UAVeteran Volodymyr Boyko accused the Public Oversight Council at NABU (National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine) of being a facade for individuals seeking personal gain rather than genuine anti-corruption efforts. He claimed that members of the council are not engaged in civil society activities but are instead focused on financial benefits. Boyko cited former head of the Public Council on De-radicalization Tetiana Kozachenko, who criticized the selection process as undemocratic and lacking transparency. According to Kozachenko, the election of the council was predetermined, with 15 candidates named by her becoming winners despite the lack of democratic procedures. Boyko further categorized members into three groups: those involved in misusing international aid funds, those serving corrupt officials, and newcomers seeking opportunities. He provided examples such as Roman Maselka, Vitaliy Shabunin, Dmitriy Sheremetyev, and Oleksiy Gritsenko, all of whom faced scrutiny over their backgrounds and declarations.
Lecture du biais (Droite): The article presents a critical view of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), accusing it of being ineffective and corrupt. The framing emphasizes the failure of NABU and its oversight body, using strong language like 'fiction' and 'predetermined,' which suggests a negative outlook.
Pourquoi ces scores (Factualité 85 · Objectivité 60): The article presents a strong critique of the RGC at NABU, citing a veteran’s opinion and quotes from a former head of a related council. While the claims align with some cross-source criticisms, they lack direct evidence and rely heavily on subjective accounts. The tone is clearly critical and lean
