ON
← Retour au fil
Loren Legarda, Leandro Leviste ont quitté le pays bureau de l'immigration
PH🏛️ PolitiqueCentreil y a 21 h

Loren Legarda, Leandro Leviste ont quitté le pays bureau de l'immigration

Le sénateur Loren Legarda et son fils, le représentant du 1er district de Batangas, Leandro Leviste, ont quitté le pays le 2 août 2025, à la suite de l'annonce par le Bureau de l'Ombudsman de plaintes de pillage et de corruption à leur encontre. L'Ombudsman allègue que les projets d'énergie solaire de Leviste impliquaient des pratiques frauduleuses, notamment le transfert de contrats de service à des sociétés fictives et causant plus de 10,44 milliards de livres sterling d'obligations gouvernementales impayées. Bien que les plaintes n'empêchent pas automatiquement leur départ, l'Ombudsman pourrait demander une ordonnance de départ préventif si l'affaire progresse.

Senator Loren Legarda and her son, Representative Leandro Leviste, have departed the Philippines, according to the Bureau of Immigration. They left the country on August 2 via separate flights, days after the Office of the Ombudsman announced pending plunder and graft complaints against both individuals. The immigration authority confirmed their exit on August 7, stating neither had any derogatory records at the time of departure. The Ombudsman, Jesus Crispin "Boying" Remulla, disclosed on July 31 that formal complaints involving allegations of plunder and graft are under preliminary investigation against Legarda and Leviste. These charges stem from Leviste’s involvement in solar energy projects. The Ombudsman added that the investigation uncovered evidence suggesting that certain service contracts were transferred to Leviste’s affiliated companies, entities that exist only on paper and have yet to begin operations. According to the Ombudsman, these findings indicate that Legarda and Leviste had no intent to honor the contracts they secured. As a result, the government faces over ₱10.44 billion in outstanding financial obligations due to terminated agreements. While the current status of the complaints does not prevent Legarda and Leviste from leaving the country, the Ombudsman has the authority to request a precautionary hold-departure order (PHDO). This legal measure can be initiated by investigators and approved by courts if deemed necessary. Legarda’s absence from recent political activities has been attributed to a medical leave. On August 3, the chief of staff for Senator Legarda informed the Senate leadership that she would be on medical leave until August 5. This explanation accounts for her absence during the ongoing Senate impeachment proceedings. Senator Erwin Tulfo confirmed the medical leave, though he did not specify its nature beyond noting it was related to a medical need. Legarda has not attended the impeachment hearings scheduled from August 3 to 5. Her absence raises questions about the timing of her departure and whether it coincides with developments in the Ombudsman’s investigation. However, the Bureau of Immigration stated that her exit was lawful given her clean record at the time of departure. The allegations against Legarda and Leviste involve complex legal and financial matters tied to Leviste’s solar energy initiatives. The Ombudsman’s probe includes claims that Leviste conspired with former Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi to secure exclusive government rights over the nation’s solar energy resources. This alleged collaboration reportedly involved legislative and regulatory actions aimed at securing monopolistic control over renewable energy sectors. The investigation into these matters is still in its early stages, and no formal charges have been filed. Nevertheless, the Ombudsman’s announcement has drawn attention to potential conflicts of interest and misuse of public funds linked to Leviste’s business ventures. The inclusion of Cusi in the case adds another layer of complexity, considering his previous role in the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte. Legarda, a prominent senator known for her advocacy on environmental issues, has faced scrutiny in the past regarding her involvement in various legislative and policy decisions. Her son’s electoral victory in the Batangas 1st District earlier this year further complicates the situation, as it positions Leviste as a key figure in regional politics. As the investigation progresses, the Ombudsman may seek judicial intervention to prevent Legarda and Leviste from fleeing the country. The possibility of a PHDO remains open, depending on the strength of the evidence presented by investigators. Meanwhile, the Senate continues to monitor Legarda’s health status, with no indication that her medical condition poses an immediate threat to her ability to participate in legislative duties once her leave concludes.

1 articles

Rappler logoRapplerIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 75il y a 21 h
Loren Legarda, Leandro Leviste ont quitté le pays bureau de l'immigration

Le sénateur Loren Legarda et son fils, le représentant du 1er district de Batangas, Leandro Leviste, ont quitté le pays le 2 août 2025, à la suite de l'annonce par le Bureau de l'Ombudsman de plaintes de pillage et de corruption à leur encontre. L'Ombudsman allègue que les projets d'énergie solaire de Leviste impliquaient des pratiques frauduleuses, notamment le transfert de contrats de service à des sociétés fictives et causant plus de 10,44 milliards de livres sterling d'obligations gouvernementales impayées. Bien que les plaintes n'empêchent pas automatiquement leur départ, l'Ombudsman pourrait demander une ordonnance de départ préventif si l'affaire progresse.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente des informations factuelles sur des procédures judiciaires impliquant des politiciens de haut niveau sans approuver ou critiquer ouvertement l'une ou l'autre des parties.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article reports facts based on statements from the Bureau of Immigration and the Office of the Ombudsman. It provides dates, names, and specific allegations against Loren Legarda and Leandro Leviste. While it does not include full details of the ongoing investigations, it aligns with the cross-s

Pourquoi objectivité (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting the events as reported by official bodies. However, it includes phrases like 'plunder and graft complaints' which carry strong connotations, and it frames the departure of Legarda and Leviste as a direct consequence of these allegations, po

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés