The Argentine Football Association (AFA) has issued a firm denial regarding reports that U.S. authorities seized the mobile phone of its president, Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia, during his return to Buenos Aires after the FIFA World Cup final. In a direct statement, the AFA dismissed claims that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had confiscated Tapia’s device or that he and the association’s treasurer, Pablo Toviggino, were subjected to forced retention in New York following the tournament. The AFA categorically rejected these allegations, calling them false and warning that legal action will be taken against anyone spreading misleading information that harms the institution's reputation. According to reports, the FBI conducted a search at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York shortly after the conclusion of the World Cup final, which saw Argentina defeated by Spain. Agents reportedly seized Tapia’s cell phone and searched electronic devices belonging to members of the delegation. This operation delayed the departure of the team’s charter flight, causing a two-hour delay and extending the wait for fans who had gathered at Ezeiza Airport. Notably, Lionel Messi and Rodrigo De Paul did not travel with the rest of the squad, returning separately in private flights. The U.S. investigation centers on international commercial contracts managed by the AFA, particularly those involving TourProdEnter LLC, a company acting as the entity’s representative abroad. Prosecutors, including federal attorneys Patrick Gushue, Christopher Ting, and Michael Berger, are examining transactions exceeding $300 million, seeking to determine whether certain transfers could constitute financial crimes such as money laundering and fraud through the U.S. banking system. Documents obtained via a discovery process reveal transfers from TourProdEnter to entities linked to Toviggino, as well as payments directed to María Florencia Sartirana, a former AFA treasurer. Despite acknowledging a current contract with TourProdEnter, the AFA stated that this relationship was previously reviewed by both Argentine and U.S. courts without identifying any irregularities. The U.S. Justice Department has summoned Tapia to appear before the Southern District Court of Florida on July 30, alongside Toviggino, Javier Faroni, and Diego Lucero. Investigators have requested information on communications among the individuals involved. To date, neither Tapia nor the AFA leadership has made public statements regarding the FBI’s actions or the judicial summons. Meanwhile, Tapia continues to face multiple legal proceedings in Argentina, primarily related to alleged tax evasion and financial misconduct. One case, under the Economic Crimes Chamber, involves accusations of failure to meet social security contributions totaling over $19 billion. Initiated by the Revenue and Customs Agency (ARCA), the case is overseen by Judge Diego Amarante. In June, the Economic Crimes Chamber confirmed the prosecution of Tapia and Toviggino, setting the case for trial proceedings. During his defense, Tapia maintained that the AFA did not engage in criminal behavior and argued that the disputed tax obligations were already fulfilled.
2 articles
PerfilIndépendantCentreFactualité 80Objectivité 85il y a 5 hL'Association argentine de football (AFA) a publié une déclaration officielle forte niant les informations selon lesquelles son président, Claudio 'Chiqui' Tapia, et son trésorier, Pablo Toviggino, avaient leurs téléphones portables saisis par le FBI à New York. L'AFA a rejeté les allégations de rétention forcée aux États-Unis après la finale de la Coupe du monde et a nié que les responsables soient appelés à témoigner devant les autorités américaines. L'association a qualifié ces informations de fausses et a averti qu'elle prendrait des mesures juridiques contre ceux qui diffusent des informations trompeuses pour nuire à sa réputation.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente un démenti d'un organisme officiel concernant les allégations impliquant des forces de l'ordre étrangères et des poursuites judiciaires potentielles. Il ne présente pas de parti pris clair envers l'une ou l'autre des parties, mais simplement relayant la position de l'AFA sans favoriser ouvertement une perspective par rapport à l'autre.
Pourquoi factualité (80): This article directly contradicts the previous report by stating that the AFA has denied any such seizure by the FBI, calling it false information. It highlights the official stance of the AFA and suggests potential legal actions against those spreading misinformation. This aligns with the cross-sou
Pourquoi objectivité (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the AFA's position without emotional language or evident bias. It focuses on the factual denial and the institution's response, keeping the focus on the dispute rather than taking sides.
PerfilIndépendantCentreFactualité 75Objectivité 65il y a 6 h Le téléphone portable de Claudio " Chiqui " Tapia a été saisi par le FBI: pourquoi il devra témoigner aux États-UnisL'enquête, qui se déroule en Floride, implique d'autres dirigeants et hommes d'affaires liés à l'AFA, dont Pablo Toviggino, Javier Faroni et Diego Lucero. Six opérations évaluées à plus de 300 millions de dollars sont analysées, avec des soupçons de détournement d'actifs et de blanchiment de capitaux. L'AFA a reconnu un contrat avec TourEnProdter LLC, mais affirme qu'aucune irrégularité n'a été trouvée dans les révisions précédentes.
Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente des faits objectifs liés à une enquête judiciaire internationale, sans montrer clairement de parti pris politique. Il décrit les actions du FBI, les citations judiciaires et les documents bancaires sans prendre parti ni favoriser une partie spécifique.
Pourquoi factualité (75): The article reports that the FBI seized Claudio 'Chiqui' Tapia's phone after the World Cup final, citing an ongoing U.S. investigation into international contracts of the Argentine Football Association (AFA). It mentions the operation took place at JFK Airport in New York, delayed the flight, and in
Pourquoi objectivité (65): The tone leans slightly towards reporting the events as they occurred without clear bias, but there is a subtle emphasis on the significance of the FBI action, suggesting a level of importance not necessarily shared by all perspectives. The article does not overtly take sides but presents the situat
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.
Devenir soutien
AR
