Manila, Philippines, The Philippine government has refuted claims by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. blocked his proposal for a P10,000 cash assistance program for every Filipino family. According to palace officials, the failure of the initiative lies with Cayetano's own actions rather than any obstruction from the president. During a press briefing held on July 20, 2026, Undersecretary Claire Castro stated that there was no basis for Marcos to have rejected the proposal since Cayetano had already submitted the measure prior to the president taking office. This assertion comes in response to Cayetano's recent allegations that Marcos had refused to support his plan for universal financial aid. Castro emphasized that the responsibility for the stalled proposal rests squarely on Cayetano. She pointed out that the senator had previously made similar promises while serving in Congress, yet none of these initiatives had progressed beyond the initial stages. “Senator Alan Cayetano’s shortcomings, his slow pace and inability to fulfill his promises, should not be blamed on others,” Castro remarked. To back her claims, Castro presented several newspaper articles from 2021 and 2022, which detailed Cayetano's early advocacy for the cash aid program. These documents highlighted that the proposal had been introduced well before Marcos assumed the presidency. “If a proposal is beneficial and feasible, there’s no reason it can’t be passed. And when the 2022 national budget was approved, President Marcos Jr. wasn't even President yet,” she noted. Furthermore, Castro criticized Cayetano for not fully believing in his own proposal. She suggested that even former President Rodrigo Duterte, who is considered a political ally of Cayetano, seemed skeptical about the feasibility of the P10,000 aid package. “It seems he doesn’t even believe in his own proposed bill, and it appears he hasn’t studied it thoroughly, because he’s asking for around P200 billion,” Castro said. In a separate communication via Viber, Castro accused Cayetano of spreading unfounded narratives. She argued that instead of accepting accountability for his lack of progress, the senator was deflecting blame onto others to avoid embarrassment. “Why can’t Sen. Alan Cayetano stop himself from stirring up intrigue and peddling baseless stories? Instead of acknowledging his own negligence in his duties, he points fingers at others just to save himself from embarrassment. He passes the work he fails to accomplish onto other people,” she wrote. Cayetano has faced criticism from various quarters for his handling of legislative proposals. Earlier this year, Senator Bongbong Marcos, the president's son, had called for greater accountability among lawmakers regarding their commitments. Meanwhile, some members of the opposition have expressed concern over the potential impact of unfulfilled campaign promises on public trust in the political process. The controversy surrounding the P10,000 aid proposal underscores broader issues within the legislative branch concerning the implementation of populist policies. While such programs often gain traction during election seasons, they frequently face challenges related to funding, bureaucratic hurdles, and political will once implemented. As the debate continues, attention will remain focused on whether Cayetano can provide evidence supporting his claims against the administration. The situation highlights the need for transparency and follow-through in political commitments, especially as the country navigates economic uncertainties and social challenges.
2 articles
Philippine Daily InquirerIndépendantConservateurFactualité 75Objectivité 65il y a 11 h Cayetano, et non Marcos, est à blâmer pour l'échec de l'aide de 10 000 P. PalaceLe palais présidentiel philippin a démenti l'affirmation du sénateur Alan Peter Cayetano selon laquelle le président Ferdinand Marcos Jr. avait bloqué son programme d'aide en espèces proposé de 10 000 P pour chaque famille philippine. Selon la sous-secrétaire Claire Castro, l'échec de la proposition réside dans Cayetano lui-même, qui a introduit la mesure avant que Marcos ne prenne ses fonctions et ne l'a pas avancée alors qu'il était au Congrès. Le palais a souligné que si la proposition était viable, elle aurait été incluse dans le budget national de 2022, qui a été approuvé avant que Marcos ne devienne président. Castro a également noté que même l'ancien président Rodrigo Duterte, un allié politique de Cayetano, ne semblait pas convaincu par le plan.
Lecture du biais (Conservateur): L'article attribue au sénateur Alan Peter Cayetano la responsabilité de l'échec de son programme d'aide proposé, en attribuant le problème à ses "défaillances", à son "allure lente" et à son "incapacité à tenir ses promesses".
Pourquoi factualité (75): The article reports that Malacañang attributed the failure of the P10,000 aid proposal to Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano rather than President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., citing that the proposal was filed before Marcos took office. This aligns with the cross-source consensus that Cayetano's lack of progress an
Pourquoi objectivité (65): The tone is somewhat confrontational, with the Palace spokesperson directly criticizing Cayetano's performance and using emotionally charged language like 'slow pace' and 'jetski campaign promise.' The article frames the issue as a political dispute between Cayetano and the administration, showing b
GMA News OnlineIndépendantProgressisteFactualité 60Objectivité 55avant-hier Alan Peter Cayetano, signataire de l'accord de Marcos avec P10K aidé après l'annulation des élections de 2022L'article rapporte qu'Alan Peter Cayetano a accusé Ferdinand Marcos Jr. de s'opposer au programme d'aide en espèces de P10,000 après avoir remporté les élections de 2022.
Lecture du biais (Progressiste): L'article présente l'accusation contre Marcos comme une critique politique, laissant entendre que son opposition au programme d'aide reflète une position qui s'aligne sur des positions plus conservatrices ou économiquement prudentes.
Pourquoi factualité (60): This article states that President Marcos allegedly criticized the P10K aid proposal after winning the 2022 election, but it does not provide specific evidence or quotes to support this claim. It also mentions that the proposal was previously publicized in 2021 and 2022, which is consistent with oth
Pourquoi objectivité (55): The phrasing is highly biased, suggesting that Marcos 'allegedly' criticized the proposal, implying a lack of substantiation. The article appears to take a partisan stance in favor of Cayetano, presenting the narrative without balance or neutrality.
★
Gardons l’information honnête.
ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.
Devenir soutien