Los diputados se sentirían amenazados, pero Sukić dijo: "Si quisiéramos apuntar, créanme, también lo habríamos alcanzado"
Nataša Sukič, diputada de la izquierda del partido Levice, se unió al sindicato de la Oficina del Estado (DZ) para dirigir el negocio dirigido por el presidente Žana Mahniča (SDS). La decisión provocó un debate sobre la seguridad en las salas parlamentarias, dijo Katja Kokot (Resnica). En el ambiente de la sala no se sintió más segura. Kokot fue invitada a conocer la suma de los delitos de violencia y exigió la creación de una sanción.
An ethical committee will examine the actions of Left Party MP Nataša Sukič after she threw a book at the chairperson of the National Assembly during a session. The move has sparked mixed reactions among politicians and members of the public. According to reports, Sukič claims her action was symbolic and did not intend to harm anyone. Meanwhile, Resnica MP Katja Kokot has called for formal charges against Sukič for alleged threats involving weapons, stating she feels unsafe in the parliamentary building. Kokot accused Sukič of threatening to use weapons and throwing the book toward the chairperson of the session, Žan Mahnič (SDS). She emphasized that she does not feel safe anymore in the premises of the National Assembly and demanded sanctions and the restoration of order within the institution. “I personally feel threatened and do not want to sit in the same room with someone who commits such acts,” Kokot stated. Sukič defended her actions, describing them as a symbolic gesture meant to highlight the lack of respect for the parliamentary rulebook. “It was a somewhat angry act, but I certainly didn’t target him,” she said. “If I had wanted to hit him, I would have done so.” She argued that Mahnič had no authority to put a procedural motion to a vote to prevent the session from taking place. Sukič described the book as the “bible of parliament” and claimed it was not being respected. In response to accusations of making threats with weapons, Sukič cited a quote from Bertolt Brecht: “A book is a weapon, take it in hand.” She explained that as a pacifist, humanist, and anti-militarist, she considered the book as a legitimate democratic tool. “For me, the book is our legal democratic weapon,” she added. Sukič insisted that she stood behind her actions and did not threaten anyone. She challenged Kokot and President of the Resnica party and the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, to file criminal charges against her if they felt threatened. Sukič criticized their behavior, accusing them of using the parliament for their political games. She also accused Kokot of publicly defaming others and inciting hatred through a social media post reading “Babi se je ftrgalo.” The reaction to Sukič’s actions has been varied. Jelka Godec, leader of the SDS MPs, supported Kokot and argued that throwing objects at someone, whether intending to hit them or not, constitutes violent conduct. She pointed out that in previous mandates, opposition members used language as a weapon but never physically attacked anyone in the parliament. “Do not accuse us of things we ourselves have done,” she urged. Borut Sajović, leader of the Freedom party MPs, viewed Sukič’s move as symbolic. He noted that Sukič highlighted a problem in the current mandate within the assembly. He praised Mahnič for accepting the gesture with humor and dignity. Sajović doubted that Mahnič, known for his outdoor activities, was frightened by Sukič's action. However, he stressed the need to avoid such incidents and emphasized the importance of respecting the parliamentary rules. Mojca Žnidarič (Democrats) praised Mahnič for turning the situation into a joke but criticized the overall behavior in the National Assembly. Democrats condemned similar actions and expressed disappointment over the conduct observed in the assembly. The ethical committee will consider the incident, according to the requests made by Kokot and the demands raised by other parties. Sukič agreed to the examination by the ethical committee, acknowledging that her move went beyond established norms and stirred both the parliament and the public. She believes each person has their perspective on this action and that her voters see it differently.
2 informaciones
Maribor24IndependienteCentroVeracidad 95Objetividad 89hace 14 h
Nataša Sukič, diputada de la izquierda del partido Levice, se unió al sindicato de la Oficina del Estado (DZ) para dirigir el negocio dirigido por el presidente Žana Mahniča (SDS). La decisión provocó un debate sobre la seguridad en las salas parlamentarias, dijo Katja Kokot (Resnica). En el ambiente de la sala no se sintió más segura. Kokot fue invitada a conocer la suma de los delitos de violencia y exigió la creación de una sanción.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta ambas perspectivas, las afirmaciones de Kokot de sentirse insegura y pedir medidas disciplinarias, y la defensa de Sukič de su gesto simbólico, sin favorecer abiertamente a un lado. El encuadre permanece equilibrado, evitando el lenguaje cargado o la fuente unilateral.
Por qué veracidad (95): This article closely aligns with the first in terms of factual content, accurately reporting the situation involving Sukičeva's symbolic act, Kokot's allegations of threats, and Sukičeva's response. It includes direct quotes and contextual details about the parliamentary session and the ethical revi
Por qué objetividad (89): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both perspectives without overt bias. It avoids strong emotive language but does include some direct quotes that may reflect personal views. The overall balance between the two positions is maintained effectively.
DnevnikIndependiente🔒CentroVeracidad 93Objetividad 87hace 13 h
Nataša Sukič, miembro de la Resnica, se unió a los sindicatos en el Parlamento para llevar a cabo un acto político dirigido por el presidente Žana Mahniča (SDS). La declaración provocó una discusión sobre el tema, pero no fue una amenaza violenta o un gesto simbólico. La Comisión de Ética examinó su declaración, pero Sukičeva no se presentó ante la Asamblea. La diputada Katja Kokot (Resnica) pidió que Sukičeva obtuviera una declaración sobre la violencia en la policía, pero no fue una amenaza. Sukičeva no rechazó la declaración, pero dijo que el acto político era un símbolo democrático de oro en el país.
Lectura del sesgo (Centro): El artículo presenta ambas perspectivas: Sukičeva afirma que su acción fue simbólica y no amenazante, mientras que Kokot la acusa de comportamiento amenazante.
Por qué veracidad (93): The article accurately reports that the ethical committee will review Sukičeva's actions, citing Kokot's call for formal notification of potential assault and Sukičeva's claim that her action was symbolic. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides context about the parliamentary sessi
Por qué objetividad (87): The article presents both sides fairly, quoting Kokot's concerns about safety and Sukičeva's defense of her symbolic gesture. However, the phrasing 'mešani odzivi' (mixed reactions) introduces a slight subjective interpretation rather than strictly reporting facts. Overall, the tone remains neutral
Cómo lo cubrió cada lado
El mismo suceso, agrupado por la inclinación política de los medios que lo cubren.
progresista
centro
conservador
★
Cómo lo cubrió cada lado
Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.
Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.
Las principales afirmaciones fácticas y cuántas fuentes las respaldan o las rebaten.
★
Verificación de afirmaciones
Apoya noticias independientes y conscientes del sesgo y desbloquea el pulso social, el voto de la comunidad y todas las demás funciones para suscriptores.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 4 €/mes.