Fortunato Mallimaci advirtió sobre el desafío de la Iglesia católica en China: elegir obispos junto al Partido Comunista

Fortunato Mallimaci, a sociologist specializing in religious institutions, warned that the Catholic Church in China faces a profound challenge with its recent agreement to jointly select bishops alongside the Communist Party. The deal, signed under Pope Francis and Chinese President Xi Jinping, marks a historic shift in how the Church navigates political tensions, particularly in regions where state control over religious affairs is strict. Mallimaci discussed these developments during an interview with Jorge Argüello on the program Efecto Mariposa broadcast by Canal E. The agreement represents a significant departure from past practices, according to Mallimaci, who has spent years studying religious dynamics across different continents. He compared this new arrangement with historical agreements made by the Vatican in politically charged environments, such as the pact with Napoleon Bonaparte following the French Revolution. That earlier deal allowed the Church to reconcile priests who had supported the revolution with those who opposed it, establishing a framework for selecting church officials. Mallimaci argued that the current agreement with China follows a similar logic, aiming to balance ecclesiastical authority with state interests. Mallimaci emphasized that the decision for both the Communist Party and the Roman Curia to agree on the selection of bishops is unprecedented. This move presents a major challenge not only for Chinese Catholics but also for many Asian Christians who have long wrestled with issues of autonomy and state oversight. The agreement could reshape the relationship between religion and politics in one of the world's most populous nations, where the government maintains tight control over religious activities. The sociologist traced the evolution of the Catholic Church back to the Second Vatican Council, held between 1962 and 1963. During this council, thousands of bishops gathered to redefine the Church’s direction, moving away from rigid interpretations of scripture toward a more flexible approach informed by contemporary social and political realities. Before the council, the Church based its teachings strictly on established doctrines. Afterward, it began interpreting faith through “signs of the times” and the concept of “the kingdom of God towards the future.” Mallimaci described this transformation as a Copernican shift within the Church, fundamentally altering how it engages with modern society. This paradigm shift continues to influence the Church’s interactions with political systems around the globe. In China, where the government exerts considerable influence over religious organizations, the joint selection of bishops could signal a willingness to collaborate rather than resist state authority. However, the implications remain complex, especially given the history of tension between the Vatican and the Chinese government over issues such as the appointment of bishops and the status of underground churches. Mallimaci pointed out that while the agreement might offer a path forward for greater cooperation, it also raises questions about the independence of the Church in China. The Communist Party’s involvement in selecting bishops could affect the Church’s ability to operate freely, potentially leading to internal divisions among Catholic communities. These challenges are compounded by the broader geopolitical landscape, which includes shifting alliances and evolving power structures in Asia. As the Church moves forward with this new model of collaboration, the outcomes will likely depend on how effectively it can maintain its spiritual mission while navigating the complexities of political engagement. The success of this agreement will be measured not only by its immediate effects but also by its long-term impact on the Church’s role in China and beyond.