Dr. Miha Juhart, a legal expert specializing in civil and economic law from Ljubljana’s Faculty of Law, has called the maneuver by Roko Snežič and Borisa Mijič a “complete nonsense.” The situation involves a dispute over the management and ownership of the company Progros, which was recently renamed Klukec, a business focused on camel breeding. According to reports, Snežič, who previously worked under the Ministry of Labour, allegedly took over the company free of charge from parliamentarian Borisa Mijič, with plans to transfer control to another figure within days. This move has sparked controversy among legal experts and stakeholders. The incident unfolded after Snežič revealed earlier this week that he had taken over Progros without payment from Mijič, who is reportedly owed 2,489 euros for legal costs. Snežič claimed he would remain the sole owner temporarily before passing control to Luka Mesec, a representative of the Left Party, who holds authority over his assets. However, according to Juhart, such a transfer does not constitute a valid enforcement action. He explained that enforcement requires selling the debtor's assets, not merely transferring them. If Mesec were to initiate enforcement, the shares held by Snežič would need to be sold, allowing Mesec to recover his debt. In response to questions about the implications for the company, Juhart stated that the director must assess the financial condition of the firm based on available information. Given the current state of affairs, it is likely that the director will recommend initiating insolvency proceedings. The owner, Snežič, would then be required to provide additional capital, otherwise the company could face liquidation. Insolvency procedures can be initiated either by the director or by creditors, including unpaid workers, suppliers, and the state. The situation has drawn attention due to the involvement of several parties, including the former director of Progros, who is also a member of parliament. Mijič, who previously served as a parliamentarian, has been accused of misrepresenting his educational background. His son, Miladin Mijič, was replaced by Admir Kamerić, who resides in the village of Dubnica in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Kamerić, who assumed the role of permanent resident, has since become the new director of the company. Legal experts warn that if the company fails to meet its obligations, the consequences could extend beyond mere financial loss. Delinquencies include unpaid wages to employees exceeding 10,000 euros, uncollected taxes and contributions to the Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) totaling more than 30,000 euros, and outstanding debts to cooperative partners. These issues have raised concerns about potential legal actions against Mijič, including possible criminal charges. Juhart emphasized that the recent transfer of Progros to Klukec represents a provocative act, not uncommon in Slovenian history. He described the scenario as a serious conflict involving individuals who have not been paid for their work, suggesting that some are exploiting the situation for personal gain. He referred to the case as a tragedy, highlighting the broader implications for affected parties. As the situation develops, the outcome will depend largely on whether the company’s director takes appropriate steps to address the financial crisis. Without intervention, the possibility of insolvency remains high, potentially leading to the dissolution of the enterprise and further legal repercussions for all involved.
1 informaciones
DnevnikIndependiente🔒ProgresistaVeracidad 55Objetividad 30hace 10 h Dr. Miha Juhart sobre la maniobra de Snow White y el Águila: "Esto es una completa tontería!"El artículo analiza una disputa legal que involucra al empresario Rok Snežič y sus intentos de transferir la propiedad de su compañía Progros a otra parte. El experto legal Miha Juhart critica la maniobra de Snežič, calificándola de "completamente tonta". Según Juhart, el procedimiento adecuado para el cobro de deudas implica vender activos en lugar de transferir la propiedad. Snežič afirma que se ha hecho cargo de Progros del diputado Boris Mijič de forma gratuita y planea transferirlo a otro diputado, Luka Mesec, que tiene un reclamo contra él por costos legales. Sin embargo, Juhart argumenta que este enfoque no cumple con los requisitos legales para la aplicación. La situación destaca posibles errores legales y riesgos financieros para la compañía, que podrían llevar a procedimientos de bancarrota si la administración actual no aborda los problemas financieros.
Lectura del sesgo (Progresista): El artículo enmarca las maniobras legales de Rok Snežič y sus asociados de una manera que sugiere que sus acciones están motivadas políticamente o son inadecuadas.
Por qué veracidad (55): The article reports on a legal dispute involving Rok Snežič and his alleged transfer of ownership of Progros to Klukec, a company focused on camel breeding. It includes statements from lawyer Miha Juhart who criticizes the maneuver as 'complete nonsense.' The article references a debt owed by Snežič
Por qué objetividad (30): The article presents a strongly critical view of Rok Snežič's actions, using emotionally charged language such as 'popolna neumnost' ('complete nonsense'). It frames the situation as a 'tragedija te zgodbe' ('tragedy of this story') and emphasizes the legal implications without presenting alternativ
★
Mantengamos las noticias honestas.
ObjectiveNews se financia con los lectores y no tiene anuncios: te mostramos el sesgo en lugar de ocultarlo. Apoya el periodismo independiente por 5 €/mes.
Hazte suscriptor