The recent controversy surrounding Croatia's military participation in a ceremonial parade in Paris has sparked significant debate among legal experts, political figures, and public officials. At the center of the discussion is President Zoran Milanović, who has firmly stated that he will not allow Croatian troops to attend the event unless he personally authorizes their deployment. This stance has been challenged by constitutional scholars, including Dr. Matija Miloš from the University of Rijeka’s Law Faculty, who argue that the president's interpretation of his role as commander-in-chief may be legally inaccurate.
According to Miloš, the president does not represent the army domestically or internationally but rather the Republic of Croatia itself. He emphasized that while the president holds the position of supreme commander, this role is distinct from representing the country in diplomatic matters. The legal framework governing defense, Miloš explained, outlines specific scenarios where collaboration between the president and the minister of defense is required, particularly in cases involving armed conflict. However, in situations such as the upcoming parade in Paris—where the military is expected to participate in a ceremonial display rather than engage in combat—the decision rests solely with the minister of defense. According to the law, once the minister issues such an order, the head of the general staff must carry it out without exception.
Miloš further noted that the president has no legal means to prevent the military from attending the event in Paris. If the president disagrees with the law, he would need to initiate a process before the Constitutional Court to assess its constitutionality. However, Miloš suggested that such a move is unlikely given the current political climate. He also addressed the possibility of Prime Minister Andrej Plenković requesting the resignation of Chief of Staff Tihomir Kundida should he comply with the president's directive. Miloš clarified that it is the government—not the prime minister—that could request the president to replace the chief of staff, though he deemed such a scenario improbable.
President Milanović himself has made clear his opposition to sending Croatian soldiers to the Paris parade. During a press conference following a city council meeting in Supetar, he remarked that he was unaware of exactly whom Plenković intended to send to Paris, jokingly suggesting it might be "majorettes." However, he reiterated that the military would not attend unless he gave explicit permission. His comments were in response to reports that the government had received an invitation from French President Emmanuel Macron earlier in May, yet had taken no action until recently.
Milanović criticized Plenković for handling the situation in a manner he described as "primitive," noting that the prime minister had delayed responding to the invitation despite having received it months prior. He argued that the decision to participate in the parade should rest with him, as the supreme commander under the Constitution, and that the government's hesitation was unbecoming of a leader. He also pointed out that other members of the so-called Coalition of Willing have been invited to the event, including Serbia, which has its own military parade planned for the same occasion.
In addition to the issue of the Paris parade, Milanović touched upon several other topics during his remarks. He discussed the recent ruling by the Supreme Court regarding credits denominated in Swiss francs, stating that the outcome was a result of his government's efforts to protect citizens from predatory banking practices. He also commented on the removal of honors from Branimir Glavaš, explaining that he would reconsider granting them back if the court's final judgment reaffirmed his innocence. Regarding inflation-fighting measures proposed by the government, Milanović humorously deflected the question, suggesting that the media had already covered the topic extensively.
As for the World Cup, Milanović confirmed that he would not travel to watch matches featuring the Croatian national team, citing the logistical challenges posed by the prime minister's entourage. He concluded his remarks by emphasizing that the decision on whether the Croatian military attends the Paris parade ultimately rests with him, and that the government should respect his authority in such matters.
3 reports
N1 HrvatskaIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 804 days ago Milanovic: I don't know who Plenkovic thinks of sending to Paris, maybe the majorettes, but the soldiers can't go!President Zoran Milanović komentirao je presudu Vrhovnog suda o kreditima u 'švicarcima', tvrditeći da je to rezultat rada svoje vlade, i osvrnuo se na oduzimanje odlikovanja Branimiru Glavašu, nakon što je Ustavni sud proglasio njega nedužnom osobom. Milanović je također izrazio svoje mišljenje o vojnom mimohodu u Parizu, tvrditeći da je on, a ne dr. Andrej Plenković, zapovjednik Hrvatske vojske, i da vojnici ne mogu ići u Pariz bez njegove dopuštanja. Napomenuo je da ne zna koga Plenković misli poslati, ali da vojnici ne mogu ići ako to ne dopusti, dodajući da će Hrvatska vojska sudjelovati prema svojem sudjenju.
Bias read (Left): Milanović je izrazio kritiku prema dr. Andreju Plenkoviću, opisujući ga kao član 'HDZ-ovog kartela' i naglašavajući da je on, a ne Plenković, zapovjednik vojske. Korištenje izraza 'mlohavom motkom' i izraz
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article includes direct quotes from Milanović with clear context and attribution. The information aligns with cross-source consensus, and the tone remains relatively neutral despite some political references.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 7515 hr. ago Selak Raspudić: "While Plenković and Milanović are fighting, the army is losing people"Marija Selak Raspudić, nezavisna saborska zastupnica, kritizirala je hrvatsku politiku i naglasila potrebu za alternativu izvan predsjednika Zorana Milanovića i premijera Andreja Plenkovića. U svojim slobodnim saborskim govornim sesijama, ističe da se ova dva lidera sukobljeno sukobljavaju oko vodećeg vojnika, dok se vojska, po njevim riječima, na najvišim časničkim mjestima sastoji od ljudi koji nisu bili boležljivi tokom Domovinskog rata. Osim toga, upozorila je na smanjenje broja vojnih djelatnih osoba u proteklom periodu. U drugoj priči, Miroslav Marković iz Kluba SDP-a objasnio je kako se Vlada sve češće financira putem novca gradova i općina, što dovodi do većih računa za građane, dok Miletić iz Kluba Mosta i nezavisnog zastupnika Josipa Jurčevića kritizirao je stranku Možemo! zbog njihovog ponašanja u raspravi o privatnoj poliklinici Medikol i optužbi za manipulaciju javnošću.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the criticism against the ruling elite (Plenković and Milanović) as being out of touch with military realities and national security concerns, while highlighting systemic issues within local governance and the role of political parties. The tone leans toward criticizing the center
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article presents specific statements from Selak Raspudić and Marković with clear attribution. The facts appear consistent with cross-source consensus, though some language may lean toward political commentary, slightly reducing objectivity.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 70yesterday N1 komentar: Čini se da sukob Plenkovića i Milanovića neće stati tako skoroThe article features a morning analysis by Katarina Plantak from N1 Hrvatska, focusing on the ongoing conflict between Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović. The piece presents an open-ended question to readers asking for their opinions on the situation, inviting comments and engagement. There is no detailed content provided beyond the call-to-action for reader interaction, suggesting the article serves more as a prompt for discussion rather than a comprehensive news report.
Bias read (Center): The article does not present a clear ideological stance or frame the issue in a biased manner. It simply reports on a political conflict and invites reader input without taking sides or emphasizing particular viewpoints. As such, the framing remains balanced and neutral.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 70): The article provides minimal factual content beyond headlines and lacks specific details about the conflict between Plenković and Milanović. It appears to be an introduction or teaser rather than a full analysis, leading to lower scores for both factuality and objectivity.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter