Constitutional expert: President cannot prevent Croatian soldiers from going to Paris

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 65yesterday

The article features an interview with military analyst Mario Galić on the TV show 'Novi Dan,' where he discusses the conflict between the Ministry of Defense (Pantovčak) and the Presidency (Banskih dvorova) regarding the deployment of soldiers to Paris for a humanitarian mission. Galić comments on the controversy surrounding the decision, noting that if President Milanović had received an invitation from Paris, there would have been no conflict. He criticizes Prime Minister Plenković for sending the invitation, suggesting it was a personal attack on him.

Bias read (Right): Galić frames the conflict as a personal attack on Plenković by Milanović, implying that Milanović acted out of spite rather than genuine diplomatic intent. The language suggests a negative view of Milanović’s actions while portraying Plenković as a victim, which aligns with a right-leaning narrative

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): High factual accuracy with clear explanation of the military parade and political conflict. Objectivity is fair but has some bias in emphasizing the significance of the event.

Telegram.hrIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 653 days ago

The article reports on escalating tensions between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the deployment of the Croatian Armed Forces to a military parade in Paris on July 14th. Plenković informed the government that he had received a request from French President Emmanuel Macron for Croatia’s participation, which he accepted. He emphasized that the decision should be made by the Chief of Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Tihomir Kundid, without needing presidential approval. In response, Milanović accused Plenković of bypassing him as the head of state and claimed that Kundid was threatened by someone close to Plenković, possibly Zvonimir Frka-Petešić, who allegedly warned Kundid that he would be replaced if he did not appear at a meeting. Milanović called for an emergency meeting with Plenković to address concerns over the integrity of the command structure.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the conflict as a challenge to the president’s authority and highlights his accusations against the prime minister and the chief of staff. The emphasis on the president’s direct mandate and the alleged undermining of the command structure suggests a left-leaning perspective, align

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): Article clearly states the positions of both leaders and includes legal references. While objective in reporting facts, it uses emotive language such as 'hitni poziv' which adds tension.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 654 days ago

A new dispute has emerged between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over Croatia's planned participation in a military parade in Paris on July 14, commemorating the Storming of the Bastille. The government had previously announced that Plenković would attend the event alongside 21 members of the Honorary Guard. However, Milanović opposed this, stating that Croatian soldiers would not participate in the parade. The Paris military parade, held annually since 1880 along the Champs-Élysées, includes French leaders, foreign dignitaries, and is broadcast live on national television. This year’s edition will emphasize military support for Ukraine, featuring around 10,000 French armed forces personnel and fighter jets, including one painted in the colors of the Ukrainian flag. France has invited representatives from 37 countries in the 'Coalition of Willing' to participate, though Croatia participates as a strategic partner and NATO member rather than a coalition member. Milanović noted that France was invited to a similar event in Croatia last year but did not attend.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Prime Minister Plenković's support for the parade and President Milanović's opposition—without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual background on the event and quotes both officials, maintaining neutrality in framing.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): Factual and provides good context about the conflict. Objectivity is slightly reduced by the focus on the anticipated public address and the political implications.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 654 days ago

The Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković confirmed that Croatia would send 21 members of the Honorary Protection Unit to participate in France's military parade commemorating the Storming of the Bastille on July 14. However, President Zoran Milanović opposed this decision, stating that Croatian soldiers would not attend the event. The parade, held annually on the Champs-Élysées in Paris since 1880, includes participation from foreign military units and is attended by high-ranking officials from various countries. This year's parade emphasizes support for Ukraine, featuring French Mirage 2000 fighter jets, one painted in Ukrainian colors, and representatives from the 'Coalition of Willing' nations. France invited Croatia to participate due to its involvement in the Coalition, though Croatia's contribution is primarily political and civilian rather than military.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the Croatian government's position and the president's opposition without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual information about the parade and its significance while quoting both officials involved. There is no evident bias toward one perspective over another.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): High factual accuracy with detailed legal analysis. Objectivity is fair but shows some preference for Plenković’s position over Milanović’s.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 603 days ago

The article discusses a legal conflict between Croatia's Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović regarding the deployment of honor guards for a military parade in Paris. Lawyer Veljko Miljević analyzes the situation, arguing that the Constitution is the highest legal authority and that the president holds ultimate command over the armed forces. He highlights ambiguities in the Defense Act that create tensions between the roles of the president and the minister of defense concerning the deployment of troops for ceremonial events. Miljević suggests that the current legal framework leads to conflicting orders and recommends considering changes to the law to resolve these issues.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced legal analysis of the constitutional and legislative conflicts between Croatian political leaders without overtly favoring any side. It focuses on the interpretation of laws and does not exhibit clear bias toward either the president or the prime minister.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 60): Very factual with clear description of the military parade and political conflict. Objectivity is moderate with some emphasis on the conflict’s impact on national unity.

Telegram.hrIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 604 days ago

The article reports on a new conflict between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over the participation of the Honorary Protection Battalion in a military parade in Paris commemorating France’s National Day on July 14th. Plenković and Defense Minister Ivan Anušić argue that sending the battalion does not require Milanović’s approval, asserting it is a ceremonial event rather than a military operation. Milanović counters by claiming he is the supreme commander of the armed forces under the constitution and law, implying that the decision should rest with him. He criticizes France for not attending a previous military parade in Zagreb and accuses it of arms trade with Serbia, suggesting France is ignoring Croatia. The dispute highlights tensions between civilian leadership and the military, as well as broader geopolitical issues.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the conflict through Milanović’s perspective, emphasizing his constitutional authority and criticizing France’s foreign policies. While both leaders have valid positions, the narrative leans toward supporting Milanović’s stance by highlighting his legal arguments and grievances,暗示

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 60): Accurate reporting of official documents and political tensions. Objectivity is somewhat compromised by the focus on the threat to the defense system.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 89Objective 603 days ago

The article discusses a political disagreement between Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović regarding the participation of members of the Croatian Armed Forces in a military parade in Paris. Milanović called for an emergency meeting at the Presidency due to pressure from the government on the Chief of General Staff, Tihomir Kundid, and concerns over the command structure in the Croatian Defense Forces (OSRH). Plenković responded by telling Milanović to call Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, suggesting that the issue should be addressed through higher-level diplomatic channels. The article also includes comments from other officials, including Gordan Jandroković, president of the Chamber of Deputies, who stated that the legal position of Defense Minister Ivan Anušić was clear and that Kundid must comply with the law. Tomo Medved, deputy prime minister and defense minister, emphasized that the Law on Defense clearly defines the authority of the ministry and that the president’s invocation of the constitution does not override the law.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive issue involving high-ranking officials and potential constitutional conflicts, the framing remains balanced. It presents multiple perspectives—Plenković’s response, Jandroković’s legal stance, and Medved’s emphasis on legal clarity—without overtly sl抗

Why these scores (Factual 89 · Objective 60): Article accurately reflects the dispute and includes statements from multiple officials. However, it leans into political rhetoric, particularly regarding the legal stance of ministers.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 654 days ago

Croatian President Zoran Milanović has stated that Croatia's military will not participate in a military parade in Paris commemorating the fall of the Bastille, which is scheduled for July 14. This decision has sparked a disagreement between Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who suggested that the Chief of the General Staff might lose their mandate if the military does not attend. The article references a 2013 event where Croatian troops participated in a similar parade in Paris, during which Ivo Josipović was president and Milanović was prime minister.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the positions of President Milanović and Prime Minister Plenković without overtly favoring either side. It provides historical context and quotes from both leaders, offering a balanced perspective on the disagreement over military participation in the Paris parade.

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 65): Article provides detailed context and quotes from both sides, aligning with cross-source consensus. However, it frames the conflict as a 'svada' (quarrel) which may imply a more personal dimension than purely political.

Jutarnji listIndependentLeftFactual 88Objective 604 days ago

President Zoran Milanović made several comments during a ceremony commemorating the Day of the City and the feast days of Saints Peter and Paul in Supetar. He discussed the impact of his government's actions regarding Swiss francs, stating that banks had taken advantage of people but eventually returned some funds. He avoided commenting on the government's anti-inflation measures, asking reporters if they were expecting something else. Milanović also addressed the revocation of honors from Branimir Glavaš, explaining that he would take back the honors if the court ruled against him again. Regarding the upcoming World Cup matches, he said he would watch them from home like everyone else. On the issue of Croatia's participation in a military parade in Paris, Milanović criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for not addressing the situation earlier. He claimed that the decision to send troops lies with him as the Supreme Commander under the Croatian Constitution and that Croatia would not attend due to its own military parade and tensions with Serbia.

Bias read (Left): The article presents President Milanović's strong criticism of Prime Minister Plenković, using confrontational language such as 'national shame' and asserting his authority over military decisions. The framing emphasizes Milanović's control and Plenković's perceived weakness, suggesting a leftward倾斜

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): Good factual coverage of the military parade and political conflict. Objectivity is moderate with some biased commentary on both sides.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 604 days ago

In an interview with Nova TV's 'Novi Dani' program, Croatian MP Zvonimir Troskot discussed Croatia's potential participation in a military parade in Paris hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron. The event aims to bring together representatives of the informal Coalition of Willing, a group of European countries aligned with France's foreign policy. While the defense minister has the authority to approve the deployment of soldiers without the president's consent, Troskot emphasized that President Zoran Milanović has remained silent on the issue. Troskot criticized the move, arguing that Croatia should focus on regional security issues rather than aligning with France's geopolitical agenda. He also raised concerns about the involvement of Croatian troops in potential conflicts against Russia, stating that Croatia would not send its youth into such battles. Additionally, Troskot addressed environmental concerns related to illegal waste disposal in Lika, highlighting the involvement of state authorities in the issue.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of political perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Zvonimir Troskot expressing his views on national interests and geopolitical alignment while also mentioning the lack of official response from President Zoran Milan

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): Article covers the conflict with detailed quotes and context, but the language used by Milanović suggests a strong political stance, potentially influencing reader interpretation.

tportalIndependentLeftFactual 87Objective 653 days ago

The article discusses a disagreement between Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović regarding Croatia's participation in a traditional military parade commemorating the Fall of Bastille in Paris. The French government invited all members of the Coalition of Willing Nations, including Croatia, but the Croatian government confirmed that Premier Plenković and around twenty members of the Honor Guard would attend. In response, President Milanović stated that as the supreme commander, he does not allow the military to participate in such parades, citing past experiences where France was unresponsive despite previous financial contributions and commercial ties. He criticized the decision as isolationist and emphasized the need to respect laws. Plenković countered by stating that military protocol and ceremonial duties fall under the Ministry of Defense, not the president, and warned that if the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, Tihomir Kundid, does not comply with the defense minister’s instructions, he expects his resignation. Additionally, the article mentions that the government will discuss budgetary frameworks and legal issues during its upcoming pl

Bias read (Left): The article frames the conflict as stemming from President Milanović's opposition to the military parade, emphasizing his role as supreme commander and criticizing the government's decision as isolationist. It highlights his concerns over past interactions with France and portrays the government's立场

Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 65): Article reports on the meeting and political tensions, providing relevant context. However, it focuses more on the political implications rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

tportalIndependentLeftFactual 87Objective 604 days ago

Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković are engaged in a heated dispute over Croatia's participation in a military parade in Paris organized by French President Emmanuel Macron. The disagreement centers on whether Croatian troops should attend the event, which Milanović dismissively refers to as a 'marching band performance,' while Plenković insists it is a formal ceremonial visit. Milanović claims he has the constitutional authority to decide such matters and criticizes France for selling advanced fighter jets to Serbia. Plenković responds by accusing Milanović of maintaining an anti-Ukraine stance and opposing European Union integration during his time as prime minister.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the conflict between the president and prime minister through the lens of Milanović's constitutional authority and criticism of France's foreign policy, using language that aligns with left-leaning critiques of NATO/EU alignment and defense spending. The narrative emphasizes Milan

Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 60): Article presents the conflict with specific details and quotes, but includes some incomplete sentences and uses strong language ('barażna vatra') that may skew perception towards one side.

Večernji listIndependentLeftFactual 86Objective 653 days ago

The article reports on a planned speech by President Zoran Milanović regarding a disagreement between the presidency and the government over the participation of Croatian military personnel in a traditional military parade in France commemorating the Fall of the Bastille. The government had announced that military personnel would attend the event alongside Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, but Milanović instructed them not to participate. The conflict centers on jurisdiction: Plenković claims ceremonial military missions fall under the Ministry of Defense’s authority, not the president’s. He warned the Chief of the General Staff, Tihomir Kundid, that failure to comply could result in losing his trust and facing dismissal.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the dispute as a challenge to presidential authority, emphasizing the prime minister's assertion of control over military ceremonies. It highlights the potential consequences for the chief of staff if he does not comply, suggesting a power struggle within the government. While the

Why these scores (Factual 86 · Objective 65): Article provides background and quotes from various stakeholders, including Troskot. It maintains consistency with other sources but uses phrases like 'velika nacionalna sramota' which carry emotional weight.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 86Objective 6018 hr. ago

The article discusses a discussion between professor Viktor Gotovac from the University of Zagreb Law Faculty and journalist Nina Kljenak on the show 'Novi Dan.' The conversation focused on the potential retirement of General Zvonimir Kundic and the legal implications of the new political conflict between Croatia's Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović. Gotovac commented on the situation, suggesting that if Kundic had done what Plenković requested, it would have been unconstitutional.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between a legal expert and a journalist, focusing on the legal aspects of a political conflict. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side but rather provides context and analysis without overtly favoring one perspective over another.

Why these scores (Factual 86 · Objective 60): Article discusses legal aspects and quotes experts, but the language used implies a certain perspective on the situation, affecting objectivity.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicLeftFactual 85Objective 753 days ago

The article reports on a conflict between President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the participation of the Croatian military in a traditional military parade in Paris. The disagreement centers on whether the decision to send troops to the event falls under the president’s constitutional authority. Milanović argues that Croatia should not participate in an event he believes is used to promote 'coalitions of goodwill,' while Plenković claims such decisions are outside the president’s jurisdiction. The prime minister has threatened to demand the resignation of Chief of Staff Tihomir Kundic if the military does not comply with the defense ministry’s directive.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the dispute through the lens of presidential authority versus executive oversight, emphasizing Milanović’s constitutional arguments and his criticism of the event as promoting 'coalitions of goodwill.' While both leaders have valid positions, the narrative leans toward supporting,

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factual accuracy is high as it reports the planned address by Milanović and the conflict with Plenković. Objectivity is slightly compromised due to the political nature of the content and potential bias towards one party.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 753 days ago

President of Croatia Zoran Milanović is set to address the public at 11 AM from the Presidential Office in Pantovčak. He is expected to comment on the current conflict with the government regarding Croatia's military participation in a military parade in Paris commemorating Bastille Day. The tensions between the presidential office and the government have intensified after Milanović stated that without his approval, the Croatian army would not participate in the French event. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and Defense Minister Ivan Anušić argue that sending troops for ceremonial purposes falls under the ministry's jurisdiction, not the president's. Plenković further warned that General Tihomir Kundid, head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Croatia, would lose his trust if he does not follow the defense minister's instructions. Milanović is also anticipated to address the issue of the president's constitutional authority as the supreme commander of the armed forces.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, detailing both the president's stance and the government's position without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the conflict over military authority and constitutional powers without using biased language or selectively citing sources.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): This article provides a more factual overview of the political conflict between the president and the prime minister, citing official statements and positions. It maintains a neutral tone by presenting both sides' arguments without overt bias, though it leans slightly towards the president’s perspec

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday

The article discusses tensions within Croatia's ruling coalition, focusing on the conflict between Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović over Croatia's participation in a military parade in Paris. Plenković criticized Milanović for his negative stance toward the 'Coalition of Willing,' which includes countries participating in the event. The disagreement has spilled into the ruling coalition, revealing similar divisions within the main HDZ ally, the Homeland Defense Movement (Domovinski Pokret). This internal discord raises questions about the stability of the current government and its ability to maintain unity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally, highlighting both the criticism from the prime minister and the subsequent revelation of internal divisions within the ruling coalition. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear lean.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Article accurately reports the conflict between Milanović and Plenković over military participation in Paris, citing quotes from both leaders. It mentions the political implications but uses emotionally charged terms like 'izoliranim mrgudom,' which may bias the narrative.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 702 days ago

Former Chief of the General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces, Josip Lucić, stated that current Chief of the General Staff, General Tihomir Kundid, is not solely under the authority of the President of Croatia but must also comply with the Government, the Minister of Defense, and the Croatian Parliament. Lucić emphasized that Kundid was appointed based on a procedure requiring approval from both the Government and the Parliament before being proposed to the President. He warned that if Kundid were to carry out a presidential order conflicting with defense laws, he would face legal consequences. The President, Zoran Milanović, has reiterated his stance that members of the Croatian military will not participate in a military parade in Paris on July 14th and that Kundid must follow this directive. Lucić criticized the President for applying double standards by enforcing laws against others while allowing his own ministers to act outside them during his time as Prime Minister.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from former and current high-ranking military officials regarding their roles and responsibilities within the Croatian government. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. Both perspectives—Lucić’s critique of the system

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual consistency with other sources regarding legal responsibilities. Objectivity is slightly affected by the emphasis on political consequences.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago

A constitutional expert, Dr. Miloš, explained on N1 TV that the President of Croatia does not have the authority to prevent Croatian soldiers from participating in a military parade in Paris. According to the Defense Act, decisions regarding ceremonial activities abroad are made by the Minister of Defense, not the President. The Chief of the General Staff must implement such decisions. Miloš emphasized that while the President may disagree with existing legal solutions, they can only challenge them before the Constitutional Court. He noted that the potential replacement of Chief of the General Staff Tihomir Kundic would require the government to request it from the President, but he considers this scenario unlikely. Miloš attributed the conflict to poor communication between the presidential and governmental offices, suggesting that disagreements over foreign policy issues are being escalated to a formal legal level unnecessarily. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković criticized President Zoran Milanović for stating that the Croatian army would not participate in the Paris parade, emphasizing that such ceremonial duties fall under the jurisdiction of the Minister of Defense, Ivan Anušić,

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between the constitutional expert's interpretation of the law and the political reactions from both the President and the Prime Minister. It does not favor one side over the other, providing explanations from different perspectives without overtly biased ph

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurate reporting based on legal expert analysis. Objectivity is somewhat affected by the commentary on political dynamics and institutional conflicts.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 703 days ago

Urša Raukar-Gamulin, a member of the parliamentary group Možemo, discussed the open conflict between Croatian President Zoran Milanović and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković regarding the deployment of Croatian soldiers to a military parade in Paris. She criticized the situation as an escalation of a long-standing feud between two political factions, which she claims undermines Croatia's credibility internationally. Raukar-Gamulin argued that placing the Chief of the General Staff in a position where he must choose between the two leaders violates the constitution and harms national unity. She expressed concern that such internal conflicts send a message to the international community that Croatia is not a serious country.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the conflict between the president and prime minister as harmful to national unity and constitutional integrity, criticizes the ruling party's methods as autocratic, and highlights the negative impact on Croatia's international reputation. The tone is critical of the current power

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Consistent with other reports on the conflict between Milanović and Plenković. Objectivity is moderate due to the political framing of the issue.