Ahmetović on the case of the Swiss citizen: We would protect citizens as in 2015

Novi listIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 855 days ago

In the local council elections held in Kastav, candidates from the Social Democratic Party (SDP) emerged as the clear winners, securing 330 votes or 51% of the total. The SDP candidates were elected across multiple districts, including Kastav, Brnčići, Rešetari, Spinčići, and Rubeši. Candidates from the Action of Young People (AM) came second with 121 votes or 18.70%, followed by the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) with 107 votes or 16.54%, and the Patriotic Community of Croats (PGS) with 89 votes or 13.76%. A total of 651 voters participated, representing 6.98% of the registered electorate. The newly elected members include representatives from all five districts, with the SDP maintaining a strong presence.

Bias read (Left): The article presents the results of local council elections where the SDP, a traditionally left-leaning party, secured the majority of votes. While the article does not explicitly frame the outcome as favorable or unfavorable, the emphasis on the SDP’s victory and the detailed listing of their elect

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides specific numerical data on election results and lists the elected candidates by party, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. However, it lacks broader contextual analysis and leans slightly toward presenting the SDP as the dominant force without balancing potential criti

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicLeftFactual 95Objective 8514 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, izjavila je da SDP nikada ne bi pokušao utjecati na pravosuđe, ali bi pronašao način zaštititi građane kao što je to uradio 2015. godine. Komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda u slučaju 'švicarac', prema kojoj potrošači imaju pravo na zatezne kamate, ali ne i na povrat preplaćene glavnice. Ahmetović je također napomenula da su građani koji su bili žrtve financijskog sustava razočarani presudom, jer će primati samo jednu petinu punog obeštećenja. Zastupnik Boris Lalovac zahvalio je SDP-u i Možemo na kandidaturi za viceguvernera.

Bias read (Left): The article presents statements from an SDP representative criticizing the ruling party (HDZ) for not adequately protecting citizens in financial matters. The framing emphasizes SDP's past actions as protective of citizens and implies criticism toward the current government's handling of the issue.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with direct quotes from Mirela Ahmetović and references to court decisions. However, the article has a clear political bias favoring SDP, using phrases like 'ne bi odmahivao rukom kao HDZ' which implies criticism of HDZ.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 8010 days ago

The Croatian Parliament's Committee on the Constitution, Statute, and Political System has heard the first five of 15 candidates for constitutional judges. The ruling HDZ party aims to appoint three new judges before the summer recess, but the opposition SDP refuses to negotiate, citing past controversies involving Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. Previously, three candidates failed to secure the required two-thirds majority due to disagreements between the governing party and the opposition. One candidate withdrew, while three others who had previously been discussed re-entered the race. The committee will continue hearing the remaining ten candidates at its next session. SDP plans to analyze all candidates after their hearings and propose those they deem most qualified. HDZ leader Ivan Malenica urged the opposition to engage in negotiations to finalize the appointments before the summer break, warning that the Constitutional Court would remain understaffed if no agreement is reached.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives of the HDZ and SDP parties regarding the appointment process of constitutional judges. It includes direct quotes from representatives of both parties, highlighting their differing positions and motivations without favoring either side. There is no evident bias,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Factual with specific names and events mentioned. The article presents both sides but leans slightly towards SDP by highlighting their refusal to negotiate with HDZ.

Index.hrIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 8014 days ago

Members of the HDZ parliamentary group criticized the president of the SDP, Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, for suggesting that if the SDP were in power, the Constitutional Court would not have issued a ruling on 'Švicari' (Swiss nationals). The HDZ accused the SDP of undermining the judiciary and attempting to influence institutions. Krunoslav Katičić called this narrative unacceptable and emphasized the independence of the judiciary in Croatia. Nikola Mažar mentioned that 16 candidates who met the requirements for constitutional court judges will be announced on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Bias read (Right): The article presents the HDZ's perspective with strong negative language toward the SDP, accusing them of undermining judicial independence and influencing institutions. The framing emphasizes the SDP's alleged misconduct while defending the judiciary's autonomy, which aligns with conservative/liber

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Highly factual with detailed information about the candidates and the selection process. The article remains relatively neutral despite mentioning political tensions.

Novi listIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 8014 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda u slučaju 'švicarac', tvrdeći da SDP nikada ne bi pokušao utjecati na pravosuđe, ali bi pronašao način zaštititi građane. Ahmetović je naglasila da SDP, kao i ostali politički stranke, ima pravo komentirati javno dostupne sudske presude. U vezi s tim, spomenula je da su građani koji su bili žrtve financijskog sustava razočarani presudom. Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, predsjednik SDP-a, naveo je da bi takva odluka 'ne bi dogodila da je SDP na vlasti' i da je zakonom o švicarcima SDP 'stjerao banke u kut'. Zastupnik Boris Lalovac zah

Bias read (Left): The article presents statements from SDP officials criticizing the court decision and implying that the ruling would not have occurred if SDP were in power. The framing emphasizes SDP's role in protecting citizens and criticizes the current government (HDZ), suggesting a left-leaning perspective.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Very factual with direct quotes and references to court decisions. The article maintains a moderate tone but subtly supports SDP's position through its narrative.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 7624 days ago

The Croatian HDZ party posted a video on Facebook showing an incident involving parliamentary representative Sandra Benčić (from the Možemo party), claiming she insulted Minister Ivan Malenić with the word 'stoka' (meaning 'cattle'). Benčić later confirmed saying the word but clarified it was directed at the HDZ party, not individuals. She mentioned this occurred after the HDZ submitted 17 candidate proposals for judges of the Constitutional Court.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the situation in a manner that emphasizes the alleged insult by Benčić and presents the HDZ's response as a justified reaction. The language used by HDZ ('progresivna, kulturna, moderna...') appears to be complimentary toward their own party while subtly criticizing Benčić's party

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 76): The article accurately details the debate within the Constitutional Committee and the controversy surrounding the selection of judges. It remains relatively neutral but does include some emotionally charged descriptions of the political conflict.

tportalIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 7524 days ago

Sandra Benčić, a representative of the Možemo party, confirmed she used the word 'stoko' (which can be interpreted as an insult) during a meeting of the Constitutional Committee, directed at members of the HDZ party. She explained this was a reaction to the process of selecting judges for the Constitutional Court, which she criticized as being conducted hastily and without proper transparency. Benčić expressed frustration with the government's handling of decisions and the perceived manipulation of citizens.

Bias read (Left): The article presents Benčić's statement as a direct criticism of the HDZ party and the government's actions, highlighting her frustration with the political process and the use of political power over citizens. The framing emphasizes her alignment with public dissatisfaction against the ruling party

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): High factual accuracy as it directly quotes Benčić's statements and provides context from her Facebook post. However, the tone is somewhat biased towards her perspective, lacking counterpoints.

Jutarnji listIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 7024 days ago

Sandra Benčić has clarified that her use of the word 'stoka' (which translates to 'thieves') during a parliamentary session was directed at the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). She criticized the HDZ for hastily adding a discussion on candidates for judges of the Constitutional Court to the agenda of the parliamentary committee. Benčić expressed frustration with what she viewed as an underhanded procedural move by the ruling party.

Bias read (Left): The article presents Sandra Benčić’s criticism of the HDZ using strong language such as 'drumski razbojnici' ('bandits') and frames the HDZ as acting unethically and manipulatively. The tone supports Benčić’s perspective without significant counterbalance from the HDZ or other viewpoints.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports Sandra Benčić's admission of using the word 'stoka' referring to HDZ. It includes her explanation of the context and quotes from her Facebook post. The tone is somewhat biased as it presents her perspective without counterpoints from HDZ.

Novi listIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 6524 days ago

The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) responded to Sandra Benčić of Možemo, who had referred to HDZ members as 'stoka' (cattle), by accusing her of using vulgar language and defending her statement as justified. Benčić clarified that she made the comment after HDZ submitted 17 candidates for the Constitutional Court without holding a discussion on the matter, which she criticized as an example of political behavior expecting others to remain silent.

Bias read (Right): The article frames HDZ's response as a defense of their actions and criticizes Benčić's language, suggesting a right-leaning perspective by emphasizing HDZ's position and portraying Benčić's comments as inappropriate rather than addressing the underlying issue of procedural transparency.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 65): This article repeats similar information to article 5 but with slightly different phrasing. It accurately reports Benčić's admission and the context surrounding it. The tone remains biased in favor of HDZ.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 6524 days ago

Sandra Benčić (Možemo) confirmed on Facebook that she said 'stoko' (which translates to 'shame') during a session of the Parliamentary Committee for the Constitution, Statute, and Political System, referring to the HDZ party. The HDZ had previously posted a video clip showing Benčić approaching the camera before the word 'stoko' was heard. Benčić explained that her comment came after receiving 17 candidate proposals for judges of the Constitutional Court and a postponed debate. She criticized what she described as political manipulation and the underestimation of citizens.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct statement by Sandra Benčić confirming her remark and provides her explanation for it. It includes her critique of HDZ actions without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, presenting both the claim and the context without evident bias toward one政治立场

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 65): The article accurately reports Benčić's admission of using the word 'stoka' referring to HDZ. It includes her explanation of the context and quotes from her Facebook post. The tone is somewhat biased as it presents her perspective without counterpoints from HDZ.

tportalIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 6024 days ago

Sandra Benčić, a member of the Možemo party and parliamentary representative, admitted to saying 'stoka' (which translates to 'scum') during a session of the Constitutional Committee, referring to the HDZ party. In response, HDZ accused her of insulting both their party and SDP representative Saša Đujić, who was involved in the same committee meeting. HDZ stated that if they were considered 'stoka,' then so was Đujić, and criticized Možemo for how they treat their junior partners. HDZ also claimed that Benčić did not apologize for her remarks, calling them typical of her discourse.

Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's response to Benčić's remark with strong language emphasizing insult and criticism towards Možemo, while defending their own position and indirectly criticizing an SDP member. The framing highlights HDZ's perspective without balancing it with Možemo's potential defense or a

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 60): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to Sandra Benčić's comments. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's Facebook post. The tone is clearly biased in favor of HDZ and critical of Možemo.

Net.hrIndependentRightFactual 94Objective 7824 days ago

The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) posted a video on Facebook showing Sandra Benčić saying the word 'stoka' (meaning 'donkey') as she walked away from a parliamentary committee session. HDZ claims this was directed at Ivan Malenić, former dean of the University of Split, and other members of the parliamentary majority. Benčić responded by confirming she said the word, stating it referred to HDZ and expressing frustration with what she described as political manipulation and disrespect toward citizens.

Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's claim that Benčić used the term 'stoka' to criticize HDZ members, which is framed as an attack on the party. The tone of the article supports HDZ's interpretation of the event, emphasizing their narrative without providing balanced counterpoints or alternative perspectives

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 78): The article accurately reports the incident involving Benčić calling HDZ members 'stoka' and her subsequent clarification. While it presents both sides, it still has a slight lean towards supporting Benčić’s perspective.

Telegram.hrIndependentRightFactual 94Objective 7014 days ago

The head of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, claimed that if the SDP were in power, the Constitutional Court would have ruled differently on the 'Swiss case.' In response, representatives of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) accused Hajdaš of attempting to undermine the judiciary by implying political influence over judicial decisions.

Bias read (Right): The article presents the HDZ's accusation against Hajdaš as a direct challenge to his claims, using strong language such as 'undermining the judiciary' and 'attempting to subjugate institutions,' which frames the SDP leader's comments as politically motivated and inappropriate. The framing implies a

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 70): Provides detailed information on the candidates for constitutional judges. The tone remains mostly neutral, though there is a slight lean towards the process being stalled.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 94Objective 6020 days ago

Ante Sanader, politički tajnik HDZ-a, je optuzio SDP za blokiranje izbora ustavnih sudaca, upozorivši da će to blokirati rad suda.

Bias read (Right): The article presents Sanader's criticism of SDP in a manner that aligns with HDZ's political stance, suggesting a right-leaning framing through the emphasis on opposition actions and potential consequences for judicial functioning.

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 60): Factually sound in reporting HDZ's response to Benčić. The objectivity is compromised by the use of strong language and implied criticism of Možemo.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 93Objective 7223 days ago

The article discusses escalating political tensions in Croatia following a parliamentary session where a member of the ruling HDZ party accused opposition MP Možamo Sandra Benčić of calling them 'cattle' after she criticized the addition of a point on the agenda regarding the formation of candidates for the Constitutional Court. Benčić defended her remarks, stating she had no need to apologize to HDZ. HDZ members condemned her comments, with MP Nikola Mažar accusing her of expressing radical leftist views toward Croatian citizens. The dispute also involves disagreements over whether the agenda

Bias read (Right): The article frames the controversy through the perspective of HDZ representatives, emphasizing their condemnation of Benčić's remarks and portraying her as representing 'radical leftist' views. The language used by HDZ officials is more prominently featured, suggesting an alignment with their stance

Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 72): The article accurately describes the political conflict over the agenda item and the verbal exchange between Benčić and HDZ members. However, it frames the situation as an attack on institutions by the SDP, showing some bias.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 7025 days ago

The Croatian Parliament's Committee on Constitution, Statute, and Political System has provisionally approved a list of candidates for three new Constitutional Court judges. Seventeen candidates applied, but one was deemed invalid. The committee plans to interview the candidates next week, followed by inter-party negotiations requiring a two-thirds parliamentary majority for their selection. Among the applicants are three individuals previously discussed by the parliament. A brief but intense political debate preceded the decision, with Sandra Benčić (from the Možemo! party) protesting the短时间内

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the procedural steps taken by the committee, mentions the political disagreement without taking sides, and includes quotes from opposing perspectives without editorializing.

Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the SDP's stance on judicial independence and their criticism of the HDZ. However, it uses strong language such as 'bandits on the road' which indicates a lack of complete neutrality.

Novi listIndependentRightFactual 93Objective 6820 days ago

Ante Sanader, politički tajnik HDZ-a, optužuje SDP za blokiranje izbora ustavnih sudaca, tvrdeći da će to blokirati rad Ustavnog suda i negativno utjecati na demokratiju u Hrvatskoj. Poziva SDP da ozbiljnije razmotri situaciju. Sanader navodi da SDP ranije kritizirao HDZ zbog sporog postupanja u vezi s izborom sudaca, a sada ih optužuje da su prebrzi. Odmahivao je stajalište SDP-a i njegovog koaliciskog partnera Možemo, koji podržavaju Arsenau Buka, da je važniji jedan ustavni sudac nego 100 običnih sudaca.

Bias read (Right): The article presents Ante Sanader’s criticism of SDP in a manner that frames SDP as obstructing judicial processes and undermining democracy. The language emphasizes Sanader’s concerns and positions them as justified, while SDP’s stance is portrayed as delaying justice. This framing leans toward the

Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 68): Accurately presents Sanader's concerns about the blockage of constitutional court judges. The language is more confrontational, affecting the neutrality score.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentRightFactual 93Objective 6722 hr. ago

Ante Sanader, predsjednik saborskog Kluba HDZ-a, poziva sve političke stranke, posebno SDP, da se dogovore o tri kandidata za ustavne suce kako bi Ustavni sud bio upotpunjen do 15. srpnja, prije početka ljetne stankе Sabora. Sanader smatra da su devet dana nakon saslušanja kandidata dovoljno vremena za izbor najboljih stručnjaka, a naglašava potrebu za ne-stranački izbor. On navodi primjere kršenja zakona od strane predsjednika Zorana Milanovića kao dokaz za važnost punog sastava Ustavnog suda. SDP je ranije objavio da ovog puta neće pregovarati s HDZ-om o imenima kandidata, što može značiti kasniju izboru, moguće tek na jesen. Sanader tvrdi da je prethodno postignut dogovor između HDZ-a i SDP-a bio otkazan jer je SDP odustao, što je uzrokovalo novo pozivanje za zajedničku raspravu.

Bias read (Right): Artikl koristi okvir koji podcrtava problematiku izbora ustavnih suca kao ključnu za funkcionalnost institucija, posebno u kontekstu suprotnosti prema predsjedniku Milanoviću. Naglasuje potrebu za ne-stranački izbor i kritizira SDP za blokadu procesa, što pokazuje tendenciju prema konzervativnim vrl

Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 67): Well-informed report on HDZ's efforts to fill constitutional court positions. The objectivity is affected by the emphasis on HDZ's stance over others.

tportalIndependentRightFactual 92Objective 7014 days ago

Representatives of the HDZ parliamentary group responded to an announcement by SDP leader Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, who claimed that if the SDP were in power, the Supreme Court would not have issued a decision regarding the 'Švicari' case. The HDZ criticized this statement as an attack on the judiciary and an attempt to undermine institutions. Krunoslav Katičić emphasized the independence of the judiciary and accused Dončić of hypocrisy, stating that it is unacceptable to influence Croatian institutions which must remain independent. Nikola Mažar announced that 16 candidates eligible for the role

Bias read (Right): The article frames the HDZ's response as a defense of judicial independence and criticizes the SDP leader's comments as hypocritical and an attack on institutions. The language used by HDZ representatives emphasizes the need to protect the judiciary from political influence, suggesting a right-wing傾

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 70): The article presents facts about the HDZ's response to SDP leader's comments on the judiciary. It includes direct quotes but uses emotionally charged language such as 'licentious' and 'absurdly unacceptable,' indicating a lack of neutrality.

tportalIndependentLeftFactual 92Objective 7014 days ago

Mirela Ahmetović, SDP zastupnica, komentirala je presudu Vrhovnog suda u slučaju 'švicarac', gdje su potrošači dobili pravo na zatezne kamate, ali ne i na povrat preplaćene glavnice. Ahmetović je tvrdila da bi SDP zaštitio građane kao što je to uradio 2015. godine, dok je Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, predsjednik SDP-a, naveo da bi takva presuda ne postojala ako je SDP bio na vlasti. Ahmetović je također naglasila da su građani koji su bili žrtve financijskog sustava razočarani.

Bias read (Left): The article presents statements from SDP officials criticizing the ruling and implying that the current government (HDZ) has failed to protect citizens adequately. The framing emphasizes SDP's past actions as protective of citizens and criticizes the current administration, which aligns with a left-

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 70): Factual content aligns with other reports about the Swiss case and Ahmetović's comments. The tone remains relatively neutral but shows some political bias in favor of SDP.