Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 859/7/2026A Croatian parliamentary representative from the HDZ party, Zvonimir Troskot, has called on the government to declare an extraordinary ecological emergency in the area of Lika following the release of official findings by the Institute for Water Research 'Josip Juraj Strossmayer'. The study confirmed contamination of groundwater at an illegal dumpsite in Divoselo near Gospić. Troskot argues that the situation has reached a critical point where further delay is unacceptable, and urgent action is needed to remove hazardous waste from affected areas. He criticized local authorities for previously dismissing concerns about pollution and now demands transparency and accountability, particularly from Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić, who he believes must investigate whether institutional and political actors enabled this environmental disaster.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a crisis requiring immediate governmental intervention, emphasizing the failure of local authorities and calling for accountability. It uses strong language such as 'ekološka katastrofa' (environmental catastrophe), 'neposrednim počiniteljima' (direct perpetrators), '
Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the content of item 0, including the same details about the USKOK findings, the 89.2% polymer particle detection, and Troskot’s direct quotes. It provides no new information but repeats the facts accurately.
Why objectivity (85): Similar to item 0, this article remains largely neutral in tone but uses emotionally charged terms such as “ekološke katastrofe,” which may subtly influence perception, lowering the objectivity score slightly.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 859/7/2026Following the official findings by the Institute for Waters 'Josip Juraj Strossmayer' confirming contamination of groundwater beneath an illegal waste dump in Divosel near Gospić, parliamentary representative Zvonimir Troskot of the Most party has called for urgent action. The report confirms that hazardous waste has penetrated underground water systems, posing serious risks to the environment and residents of Lika. Troskot emphasized that further delays would constitute deliberate exposure to danger and urged the government to declare an extraordinary ecological situation to expedite the removal of waste from multiple locations including Silos, Rakitovc, and Lički Osik. The findings show high concentrations of polymer particles in groundwater samples, linking surface waste to subsurface contamination. Troskot criticized the mayor of Gospić for previously dismissing concerns about groundwater pollution.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a strong critique of governmental inaction and emphasizes the need for immediate ecological intervention, aligning with environmental advocacy typically associated with leftist policies. It highlights the urgency of addressing environmental harm caused by corporate or industrial
Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys Troskot’s demand for an ecological emergency declaration following the USKOK findings. It includes precise technical details from the analysis and quotes Troskot directly. The only minor issue is the incomplete ending of the quote.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains mostly neutral in tone, presenting the facts and Troskot’s statements objectively. However, the use of emotionally charged language like “ekološke katastrofe” slightly affects the neutrality score.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 709/2/2026 Plenkovic has a glass in front of him, not a bottle of water, the government claims it's from the tap.Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and his cabinet members attended a meeting in Gospić to discuss the cleanup of nearly 37,000 tons of illegal, ecotoxic waste along Bilajská Road. During the event, each official was seen drinking water from glass cups placed on the table. The government stated this was tap water from the local water supply in Gospić, aiming to reassure the public about the safety of the local water. This choice contrasted with their usual practice of using bottled water during meetings in other locations, suggesting a deliberate effort to convey confidence in the quality of Gospić’s water.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the government's actions and statements without overtly favoring any side. It describes the symbolic gesture of drinking tap water but does not editorialize or present biased interpretations. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the event itself rather 1
Why factuality (90): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, including the detail about the glass cups filled with water and the political message intended by the government. It provides accurate information about the meeting and the context of the water safety issue.
Why objectivity (70): While the facts are presented clearly, the article has a slightly biased tone towards the government's efforts, suggesting that the initiative's refusal to attend was due to the upcoming protest rather than genuine disagreement with the government's approach.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 709/1/2026 Initiative GGospić is our home: We don't come to the meeting, it's just the repair of political damageThe initiative 'Gospić is our home' has decided not to attend a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and local authorities in Gospić, which is scheduled for tomorrow. Vjekoslav Bušić, representing the initiative, stated they received an unofficial invitation but chose to reject it, citing similar scenarios in the past aimed at repairing political damage. He recalled a previous meeting held two days before the release of research results on the Gospić landfill, which he claims was intended to mitigate political harm. The initiative emphasizes that all actions taken so far have been too slow and insufficient, expressing hope for more serious and transparent efforts moving forward. They remain committed to participating in discussions after the protest on September 5th in Zagreb, provided that concrete demands and deadlines are clearly communicated.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the stance of the 'Gospić is our home' initiative against attending a meeting with the prime minister, highlighting their concerns about political maneuvering and lack of transparency. However, it does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It includes direct
Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information about the meeting between Plenković and local authorities in Gospić, including quotes from Vjekoslav Bušić of the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom.' It accurately reflects the reported refusal to attend the meeting and references past similar events. The facts
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the views of the initiative group, it remains relatively neutral in tone, focusing on reporting the statements made by Bušić without injecting personal bias. There is some frustration expressed, but it is framed within the context of the group’s position.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 709/1/2026 Bušić on Plenković's arrival in Gospić: "We will not respond to the meeting, we do not give up on the protests"Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is set to visit Gospić tomorrow, where he will meet with local authorities and representatives of civil initiatives. However, members of the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' including Vjekoslav Bušić, have decided not to attend the meeting. They argue that similar meetings were organized before previous protests against the waste disposal site, which they view as attempts to mitigate political damage. Bušić emphasized that the citizens' voice needs to be heard first, especially ahead of the planned protest on September 5th, after which discussions about specific demands and tasks for the government can take place. He criticized past actions as too slow and expressed hope for more serious future handling of the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the refusal to engage with the Prime Minister as a principled stand by civil activists, emphasizing grassroots concerns over political maneuvering. The tone supports the protesters' perspective, portraying their actions as justified resistance to perceived political interference,
Why factuality (90): Similar to Article 1, this source confirms the refusal of the initiative to attend the meeting and refers to previous instances where such scenarios were used to manage political damage. The details match those found in other articles, and the information is corroborated by multiple sources.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral stance, primarily reporting the actions and statements of the initiative group. While there is some frustration expressed over the perceived lack of action, it is not overly emotive or biased.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 659/1/2026 Who is to blame for the environmental disaster in Gospić?The article discusses an environmental crisis in Gospić, Croatia, where hazardous waste was illegally dumped into rocky terrain, sparking widespread public outrage and protests. The local initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' highlights systemic failures in waste management and regulatory oversight, accusing both local authorities and national institutions of negligence. Protest organizers emphasize that the issue transcends local concerns, calling attention to broader ecological problems across Croatia. They criticize the government for failing to act preventively despite early warnings since 2023 and serious risks identified in 2024. The protest aims to demand accountability and action rather than being framed as politically motivated.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the environmental disaster as a result of systemic governmental failure and calls for accountability from national institutions, including the Ministry of Environmental Protection. It criticizes the system for protecting itself and emphasizes the need for urgent action, which is a
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the protest in Gospić and quotes Vjekoslav Bušić from the 'Gospić je naš dom' initiative. It provides context about the environmental issue and mentions the systemic problems related to waste management. However, it does not directly reference the primary source doc
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear bias towards the protesters' perspective, using emotionally charged language like 'ekološka katastrofa' (ecological disaster) and 'crne ekološke točke' (black ecological points). It frames the situation as a systemic failure without presenting counterarguments or official res
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 709/2/2026 The provocateurs failed, the protest to save Like united the left and the right.Citizens across all political spectrums in Croatia have united over concerns regarding toxic waste being transported and buried in Gospić for years. Despite attempts by certain right-wing figures, including Igor Peternela from DOMiNO, to frame the protest as a leftist plot against the government led by HDZ and Andrej Plenković, these efforts failed. The protest, organized by 'Gospić je naš dom,' aimed to address environmental issues rather than serve political agendas. Right-wing and left-wing groups, including the Most party, joined forces in supporting the demonstration, highlighting a rare moment of unity among otherwise divided factions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, right-wing claims of a leftist conspiracy and left-wing responses, without overtly favoring either side. It highlights the failure of right-wing attempts to frame the protest negatively and notes the unexpected unity between left and right in supporting the pro-
Why factuality (85): This article confirms the non-participation of the initiative in the meeting and discusses the political implications. It aligns with other reports and presents the situation consistently. However, it does not provide independent verification of the claims made by the initiative.
Why objectivity (70): The article has a slightly negative tone towards the government, implying that their actions are politically motivated. This introduces a bias despite the factual content.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 709/1/2026The initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' has stated that it will not attend a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and other officials scheduled for Wednesday in Gospić. The group claims they were informally invited but chose not to respond due to previous experiences of similar scenarios. They reference past instances where political efforts were organized before their protests, such as a meeting held two days prior to a protest on June 27th aimed at addressing political damage. The initiative emphasizes the need for citizens' voices to be heard first before engaging with institutions, expressing concerns over slow responses and lack of transparency. They hope for more serious action and greater openness from authorities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the initiative's frustration with institutional delays and lack of transparency as a legitimate concern, emphasizing the importance of citizen voice and accountability. It highlights perceived political maneuvering by authorities, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of power.
Why factuality (85): Article provides details from an initiative member, Vjekoslav Bušić, regarding the non-participation of 'Gospić je naš dom' in a meeting with the Prime Minister. It references past events and actions by the government, aligning with cross-source reports. The information is consistent with other arti
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical towards the government's handling of the issue, using phrases like 'scenarije' and 'političke štete,' suggesting a biased perspective. While informative, it leans toward expressing frustration rather than presenting a neutral analysis.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 659/2/2026 Bencic: Plenkovic is fleeing the protests to Italy. Let him at least take the trash bag from Gospić and ask Meloni if it's theirsSandra Benčić, a member of the parliamentary group Možemo!, criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for visiting Gospić three days before a planned protest in Zagreb against his government's handling of illegal waste disposal in Lika. She suggested he take a bag of waste from Gospić on his trip to Italy and ask Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni if it belongs to them. The issue involves nearly 37,000 tons of hazardous industrial waste illegally imported from Italy and Slovenia and dumped in Gospić since 2019. Plenković visited Gospić to meet with local representatives regarding the cleanup of tens of thousands of tons of illegally disposed waste but was met with resistance from the civic initiative 'Gospić je naš dom.' He assured locals that drinking water from the public supply system is safe and that the government has a clear political will to address the problem.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the prime minister's actions negatively, suggesting he is evading responsibility by fleeing to Italy during protests. It uses strong rhetorical language ('bježi u Italiju') and implies criticism of the government's environmental policies. The tone is critical of the ruling party,
Why factuality (85): This article reiterates the accusations against Plenković, including his absence during the protest and his travel plans. It also provides context about the waste issue and the ongoing investigation, which is consistent with other reports. However, the language used is more confrontational and less
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear political angle, using sarcastic and provocative language ('sugeriram da ponese vreću...') to highlight the perceived hypocrisy of the premier. This makes the tone more subjective and less balanced.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 609/2/2026 On the day of the protests, Plenkovic flees to Italy to get a bag of trash from Gospić and ask Meloni if it's theirs.Sandra Benčić, coordinator and parliamentary representative of the Možemo party, commented on the issue of illegal waste disposal in Gospić and noted that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is traveling to Italy on the day before a large protest in Zagreb. She criticized Plenković's government for turning Croatia into a European waste dump and suggested he bring a bag of waste from Gospić on his trip to ask Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni if it belongs to them.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the prime minister's actions negatively, using strong criticism and suggesting he should confront Italy over the waste issue, which implies a critique of his government's policies and aligns with oppositional rhetoric.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the controversy surrounding Premier Plenković’s travel plans and the criticism from Sandra Benčić regarding his alleged avoidance of public scrutiny. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that Plenković is traveling to Gospić and Italy around the time of a protest. However
Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, especially in the phrase 'bježi u Italiju' (flees to Italy), which implies a negative judgment. The article uses emotionally charged language and frames the situation as a political scandal rather than presenting it neutrally.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 459/8/2026 Troskot: "The waste in the face is bioterrorism, and the government is an internal aggressor.Saborski zastupnik Mosta Zvonimir Troskot, poznat po upozorenju na ekološku katastrofu u Gospiću, bio je gost u programu 'Prvom glasu' nakon masovnog prosvjeda u Zagrebu protiv odlaganja opasnog otpada u Lici. Troskot optužuje Plenkovićevu vladu za omogućavanje uvoza opasnog otpada i naziva je 'unutarnjim agresorom', dodajući da je vlada pokušavala politički oblikovati situaciju. Naveden je mehanizam putem kojeg je opasan otpad dolazio u Gospić pod krinkom 'sekundarne sirovine', uključujući i hrvatske tvrtke. Troskot ističe da je nemoguće da župan Darko Milinović nije bio svjestan brojčanog prolaska kamiona kroz grad, a upozorava na opasnost PFAS-a u podzemnim vodama. Na pitanje sigurnosti vode, Troskot tvrdi da je voda u Lici nesigurna, a da su institucije manipulisale uzorkovanjem. Troskot predvidi negativne posljedice za buduće koalicije Mosta.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a political conflict where the ruling government is accused of enabling dangerous waste imports and mismanaging environmental crises. The language used by Troskot, such as calling the government an 'internal aggressor,' and his criticism of Premier Plenković’s absence
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the political protest against the government over waste management issues in Gospić, citing statements from Zvonimir Troskot, a politician who has raised concerns about ecological disaster. It references the Prime Minister’s absence during the protest and accuses the governmen
Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly charged and politically biased, with strong accusations against the government and specific parties. The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'bioterrorism' and 'internal aggressor,' which reflect a clear political stance rather than presenting facts objectively. It a
We did not choose this date by chance, and the bags will be taken away as soon as possible.Prime Minister Andrej Plenković visited Gospić to discuss the cleanup of illegally dumped waste at the former PPK Velebit factory site. The meeting included representatives from local institutions and the community, but members of the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' did not attend despite being officially invited. Plenković emphasized that the date was chosen strategically due to recent decisions by the Environmental Protection Fund regarding the selection of contractors for waste remediation. The company Tabak Group has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the site for €357,500 without VAT. Another bid by CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value. Meanwhile, activists Nikola Grmoja and Marin Miletić called for a protest against environmental damage in Croatia, accusing the government of using ideological divisions to avoid responsibility for the ecological crisis in Lika.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the event, including both the government's actions and the criticisms from opposition groups. It does not exhibit strong favoritism toward either side, presenting facts and quotes from multiple perspectives without overtly biased language or selective focus
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the selection of Tabak Group for handling waste in large bags and provides details about the contract value. It also mentions the legal background of Kostak but could have included more specifics from the primary source regarding the ongoing investigation.
Why objectivity (75): The article is mostly neutral but shows a slight inclination towards highlighting the potential risks associated with selecting companies with past controversies, though it does not explicitly criticize the decision.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 659/2/2026Three days before a planned large protest in Zagreb, the prime minister visited Gospić with ministers to present a plan for cleaning up hazardous waste. The organizers of the 'Gospić is our home' protest did not attend the meeting, and critics argue this was merely an attempt to mitigate political damage. Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Fund selected two companies to clean up part of the waste in Gospić. Local resident Davor criticized the prime minister for visiting too late, arguing that the government should have focused on solving the waste issue rather than making symbolic visits.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the prime minister's visit as a political move to mitigate damage, suggesting skepticism toward government actions. It highlights local opposition to the government's approach and emphasizes grassroots concerns over symbolic gestures, which aligns with a leftward傾
Why factuality (80): The article includes quotes from a local resident, Davor, criticizing the Prime Minister's visit. It mentions the planned protest and the selection of companies for waste removal. Information is corroborated by other articles, though some details are presented as opinions rather than facts.
Why objectivity (65): The language used is emotionally charged, particularly when describing the criticism of the Prime Minister. The focus on personal opinion rather than objective reporting reduces objectivity.
tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 659/1/2026The civic initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' has declined an informal invitation to meet with Prime Minister Plenković and ministers, citing past experiences of similar scenarios. Vjekoslav Bušić, representing the initiative, stated they have already witnessed such situations before, including a meeting in June where findings about illegal waste were announced just two days later. He criticized the lack of transparency and speed in addressing the issue, emphasizing the importance of giving citizens' voices more weight. Bušić expressed hope that after a planned protest on September 5th, there would be more concrete actions and greater transparency from institutions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the civic initiative's concerns as legitimate and highlights criticism of institutional delays and opacity. The emphasis on citizen voice and demands for transparency aligns with progressive values. While the article remains neutral in tone, the focus on institutional shortcomings
Why factuality (80): The article repeats the claim that Plenković is 'escaping to Italy' during the protest, which is a strong assertion without direct proof. It also includes background on the waste issue and the ongoing investigation, which is supported by other sources. However, the phrasing suggests a political crit
Why objectivity (65): The tone is more polemic, particularly in the use of phrases like 'bježi u Italiju,' which carries an accusatory tone. The article seems to take sides with the protesters, suggesting a less objective approach compared to other sources.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 608/31/2026 Miro Bulj about the protest for Lika: All-Croatian, sovereignist and patriotic!Miro Bulj, the mayor of Sinj and member of parliament, discussed his actions as mayor regarding a protest in Zagreb related to Gospić, as well as his views on the nature of such protests, which have recently been criticized by right-wing circles. The interview took place on 'Novi Dani' with Nina Kljenak. The article highlights the political discourse around the protest and Bulj's perspective on it.
Bias read (Progressive): The article discusses a protest and its criticism from right-wing groups, with Miro Bulj defending the protest as 'all-Croatian, sovereign, and patriotic.' This framing aligns with left-leaning rhetoric emphasizing national sovereignty and patriotism, while the critique from right-wing circles is a
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the controversy around labeling the protest as 'antihrvatski' and includes comments from various users. While it reports different viewpoints, it also incorporates user-generated content that may lack reliability.
Why objectivity (60): The tone is polarized, with strong accusations and counter-accusations. The article fails to present both sides equally, leading to a biased representation of the debate.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 409/2/2026 Croats sceptical about waste remediation: 'First they made a profit from importing garbage, now we will pay'Two activists, Nikola Grmoja and Marin Miletić, held a press conference calling citizens to protest in Zagreb over environmental concerns in Gospić. They accused Prime Minister Andreja Plenković of attempting to suppress the protest and criticized the left-wing political faction for failing to raise the issue at the national level. Grmoja highlighted the efforts of their representative Zvonimir Troskot, who spent over a year visiting the area. The article notes that a local subsidiary of a Slovenian company, Kostak, has been selected to cover 33,000 tons of waste temporarily until permanent remediation is completed. This company is linked to illegal waste disposal scandals in Slovenia. Readers' comments on a related question expressed skepticism about the government’s plan, with some arguing that the temporary covering of waste is not true remediation and that those who profited from importing waste should now pay for cleanup.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a political struggle against government corruption and corporate interests, emphasizing the role of left-wing representatives and criticizing the ruling party. The focus on holding officials accountable and the portrayal of the government's actions as attempts to 'min
Why factuality (50): Article presents a political critique and calls for protest, not directly related to the primary source. It includes quotes from activists but does not align with the official statement from Kostak. The focus is more on public reaction than factual reporting.
Why objectivity (40): The tone is highly critical and emotionally charged, focusing on skepticism towards the government and environmental issues. It frames the situation as a political issue rather than a factual one.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 309/2/2026The article discusses reactions to Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's recent comments regarding the situation with illegal waste disposal in the Lika-Senj area. Ante Franić from 'Grupa građana za spas Like' stated that the issue is structural and involves security lapses by state institutions, particularly the police. He warned that while the cleanup process could take up to ten years, it might lead to long-term economic challenges for the region due to perceptions of pollution. Meanwhile, Daria Došen from the civic initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' criticized Plenković's remarks as unacceptable, emphasizing their 18 months of efforts to resolve the issue through dialogue and institutional engagement before resorting to protests. She accused the prime minister of suggesting they were not committed to peaceful solutions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Franić's concerns about systemic issues and Došen's criticism of the government's stance, without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both parties involved, providing balanced representation of their arguments and responses.
Why factuality (30): The article discusses the support given by trade unions to the protest in Lika, which is unrelated to the main event covered in the primary source document. The content is not aligned with the primary source material.
Why objectivity (30): The article is completely unrelated to the main event described in the primary source document. While it is neutral in tone, it is not relevant to the subject matter at hand.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 759/2/2026 UŽIVO / Plenković after the meeting in Gospić: "Today was not chosen by chance"...Prime Minister Andrej Plenković met with representatives of local institutions, community groups, and citizen initiatives in Gospić to discuss the cleanup of illegally buried waste. The meeting took place at the Licko-Senjska County building, attended by members of the government including Tomo Medved, Branko Bačić, Marija Vučković, Irena Hrstić, and Damir Habijan. One citizen initiative, 'Gospić je naš dom,' stated they were not invited to the meeting and decided not to attend due to planned protests in Zagreb. Plenković emphasized that the date was chosen deliberately because the Environmental Protection Fund had made decisions regarding contractors for covering buried waste and transporting it. He mentioned that the fund is analyzing bids and could potentially cancel the tender if needed, leading to negotiations with other contractors. A cleanup plan for the most significant amount of buried waste is being prepared. The government has acknowledged concerns from citizens in Like and Gospić and is working closely with relevant authorities to remove the waste as soon as possible. Discussions also covered the safety of water from the public water supply system, with analyses showing
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the meeting between Prime Minister Plenković and various stakeholders discussing environmental issues in Gospić. It includes statements from both the government and the citizen initiative, providing context about the reasons for the meeting and the actions'
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat supportive of the government's actions but does not present the opposition's perspective equally. The article frames the refusal of the initiative as an act of defiance rather than a legitimate concern, showing some bias.
Croatia
