Hajduk leads by a goal with a new player to the fourth place in the Cup
Hajduk has advanced to the quarterfinals of the SuperSport Croatian Cup by defeating fourth division team Vardarac with a score of 0:2. The first goal was scored by defender Denis Hadžikadunić in the 18th minute, assisted by Roko Gabrić after a corner kick. In stoppage time of the second half, Peter Ugwuodo added a second goal for Hajduk. Coach Gonzalo Garcia made several changes to rest key players from the starting lineup, including Marko Livaja, who started the match despite usually coming off the bench. Vardarac had limited chances, with their closest attempt being a shot by Marko Kirchbauer, which was blocked by Dante Stipica. Despite Vardarac improving in the second half, they were unable to equalize against Hajduk.
Hajduk has advanced to the quarterfinals of the Croatian Football Cup after defeating Vardarac 2-0 in a match played at Vardarac’s stadium on Tuesday afternoon. The victory was secured by goals from new defender Dennis Hadžikadunić in the 18th minute and substitute Peter Ugwuodo in the 90th plus third minute. The game took place at 16:30 and was broadcast live. The match saw Hajduk dominate possession early on, with the team pressing forward consistently against the fourth-tier side Vardarac. The visitors created several chances, though none were particularly threatening until the breakthrough came in the 18th minute. Hadžikadunić, who had joined Hajduk in the summer transfer window, capitalized on a cross from the left wing following a corner kick. He positioned himself well near the goal and scored with a powerful shot, giving Hajduk the lead. Despite the early advantage, Vardarac remained competitive throughout much of the first half. They managed to create a few dangerous opportunities, including a close-range shot from Marko Kirchbauer, which was saved by captain Dante Stipica. Hajduk could have extended its lead earlier, notably in the 43rd minute, when Carlos Martin found Marko Livaja in a one-on-one situation, but the striker failed to convert the chance. In the second half, Vardarac showed improved intensity and created more scoring chances. The hosts had several opportunities, including a shot from Fran Ivaci in the 82nd minute, which Stipica again denied. The goalkeeper continued to make crucial saves for Hajduk, ensuring the visitors maintained control of the match. Hajduk made tactical adjustments during the game, bringing on substitutes such as Dalisson and Bamba to strengthen their midfield presence. The substitutions paid off, leading to the decisive goal in the final moments. Ugwuodo, who had entered the field in the 72nd minute, received a pass from Dalisson just outside the penalty area and fired home a low shot into the net, sealing the win for Hajduk. The result means Hajduk will face the winner of the match between Slavonija Požege and Oriolika in the quarterfinals. Other matches in the round of 16 will take place on Wednesday, with teams such as Zagorec and Istra 1961 set to contest their fixtures. Dante Stipica, the veteran goalkeeper who returned to Hajduk after eight years away, played a key role in the defense. His performance ensured that Hajduk did not concede despite the pressure from Vardarac. Stipica, who last wore the Hajduk jersey in May 2018, has been instrumental in helping the club rebuild its defensive strength. Hadžikadunić, who signed a contract with Hajduk until June 2028, continues to impress since joining the club. This was his third appearance for Hajduk this season, and he has already contributed significantly to the team's success. His goal in the 18th minute marked his first senior goal for the club. The match ended with a score of 2-0 in favor of Hajduk, with both goals coming from players who had recently joined the squad. The result highlights the depth and quality of Hajduk’s squad, capable of overcoming challenges posed by lower-tier opponents. The team will now look ahead to the next stage of the competition.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
In the Croatian Football Cup, Hajduk Split defeated Vardarac 2-0 in the round of 16, advancing to the quarterfinals. The match took place at 16:30, with Hajduk securing victory through goals from Dennis Hadžikadunić in the 18th minute and young Nigerian player Ugwuodo in stoppage time. Despite early chances by Vardarac, including a missed opportunity by Darius Melnjak, Hajduk maintained control throughout the game. The win marks a significant step forward for Hajduk in the competition.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a football match without any political implications. It provides a factual account of the game, focusing on the performance of players and team strategies. There is no indication of ideological leaning or biased framing towards either team.
Why factuality (100): This article is nearly identical to the primary source document, accurately reproducing the match report, goal times, substitutions, and key events. All factual claims align perfectly with the original text, with no embellishments or omissions.
Why objectivity (100): The article is completely neutral and factual, presenting only the match events without any commentary, opinion, or bias. It reads like a direct transcription of the primary source, maintaining perfect objectivity.
In a match of the sixteen-finals of the SuperSport Croatian Football Cup, Hajduk Split defeated Vardarac from Slavonia 2-0. The game took place at Vardarac's home ground. Hajduk's goalkeeper, Stipica, made a crucial save in stoppage time to prevent a goal by Vardarac's Vogyicska. Later, Ugwuodo scored the winning goal for Hajduk in the final moments of the match. Several substitutions were made during the game, including Ugwuodo coming on for Šutalo and Dalisson replacing Livaja. The victory advances Hajduk to the next round of the competition.
Bias read (Center): The article covers a sports event with no political content or implications. It focuses solely on the football match between Hajduk Split and Vardarac, detailing the score, key moments, and player substitutions. There is no mention of politics, officials, or policies, making the story apolitical.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the match outcome (2:0 win for Hajduk), goal scorers (Hadžikadunić and Ugwuodo), and key moments like Melnjak hitting the crossbar. It includes player lineups and substitutions, aligning closely with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the facts neutrally, using straightforward language without evident bias or emotional framing. It focuses on describing events without taking sides or injecting opinion.
Hajduk Split je pobijedio lokalnu momčad Vardarac 2-0 u prvom kolu Hrvatskog nogometnog kupaa, što ih povezuje u osminu finala. Golove postigli su Dennis Hadžikadunić na 18. minuti i Peter Ugwuodo u sudačkoj nadoknadi na 90. minuti. Hajduk je držao prednost tokom cijelog meča, uz podršku vratařa Dantea Stipice, koji je više puta spasio od golova. Vardarac je imao više prilike, ali nije uspio postići jednakost. Hajduk će u osmini finala igrati protiv pobjednika susreta između Slavonije Požege i Oriolika.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a football match between Hajduk Split and Vardarac, which is a sports event. There is no political charge or ideological framing involved. The tone and language remain neutral, focusing solely on the game's progression, player performances, and match outcomes. No political or煽
Why factuality (95): This article closely follows the primary source, reporting the correct scoreline, goal times, and key events (Hadžikadunić’s 18th-minute goal, Ugwuodo’s late winner). It also includes relevant background information about Vardarac’s previous match against Ližnjan and mentions the substitutions made
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, simply recounting the match events without apparent bias. It avoids emotional language and presents both teams’ performances objectively, including moments when Vardarac had chances.
The article reports on a football match between Hajduk Split and Vardarac in the Croatian Football Cup, where Dennis Hadžikadunić scored the opening goal for Hajduk. The goal came after a sequence involving Carlos Martin's corner and a cross from the left side. Hadžikadunić, who joined Hajduk this summer as a free agent, has now scored his first goal in the club's colors. This is his third appearance for Hajduk, having previously played against Lokomotiva and Rudesh. He signed a contract until June 2028 and has represented Bosnia and Herzegovina in 33 official matches.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a sports event and does not involve any politically charged subject matter. It provides a factual account of a football match, player performance, and background information on the player without taking a stance or showing bias towards any political group or ideology.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the match timeline, including Hadžikadunić’s goal in the 18th minute and Ugwuodo’s winning goal in stoppage time. It provides additional context about Hadžikadunić’s career and recent moves, which are not in the primary source but are generally accurate. Minor omissi
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely objective, focusing on describing the match events and providing context about Hadžikadunić. It avoids overtly biased language, though it does highlight his achievement of scoring his first goal for Hajduk, which could be seen as slightly favorable.
Hajduk has advanced to the quarterfinals of the SuperSport Croatian Cup by defeating fourth division team Vardarac with a score of 0:2. The first goal was scored by defender Denis Hadžikadunić in the 18th minute, assisted by Roko Gabrić after a corner kick. In stoppage time of the second half, Peter Ugwuodo added a second goal for Hajduk. Coach Gonzalo Garcia made several changes to rest key players from the starting lineup, including Marko Livaja, who started the match despite usually coming off the bench. Vardarac had limited chances, with their closest attempt being a shot by Marko Kirchbauer, which was blocked by Dante Stipica. Despite Vardarac improving in the second half, they were unable to equalize against Hajduk.
Bias read (Center): The article covers a sports event with no political implications. It focuses solely on the football match between Hajduk and Vardarac, detailing the game's progression, goals, player performances, and tactical decisions by the coach. There is no mention of political figures, policies, or issues, and
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the match outcome (2-0 win for Hajduk), goalscorers (Hadžikadunić and Ugwuodo), and mentions substitutions like Ugwuodo coming on in the second half. However, it adds some details not present in the primary source, such as the coach making changes to rest first-team pl
Why objectivity (75): The article has a slightly promotional tone toward Hajduk, emphasizing their dominance and the debut of new players like Hadžikadunić. It uses phrases like 'dominant posjed' and 'expectations were met,' which lean toward favoring Hajduk rather than presenting a strictly neutral account.
Dante Stipica, 35-godišnji vratari, vratio se u prvu momčad Hajduka nakon više od sedam godina izbivanja. Posljednji put je igrao za Hajduk 23. svibnja 2018., a nakon toga igrao je za bugarski CSKA Sofija i poljski Pogon Szczecin. Njegov posljednji natjecateljski nastup bio je u svibnju 2024. godine, a nakon toga je raskinuo ugovor u Pogonu i ponovno stigao u Split. Uvrstio se u prvih 11 za utakmicu protiv Vardarca u Hrvatskom kupu, što mu pruža priliku da dokaže svoje kvalitete.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports-related event involving a football player returning to his former club. There is no political commentary, framing, or emphasis on ideological positions. The tone remains neutral, focusing solely on the athlete’s career progression and current performance. No partisan,
Why factuality (70): The article focuses primarily on Dante Stipica’s return to Hajduk and his performance, which is not the central focus of the primary source. While it mentions the match result and Hadžikadunić’s goal, it omits several key details from the primary source, such as Ugwuodo’s late winner and specific ma
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear bias in favor of Stipica, highlighting his return and legacy while downplaying the overall match narrative. It frames the match more as an opportunity for Stipica to prove himself than as a competitive encounter between two teams.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
