Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 858/30/2026A Serbian influencer based in Vienna, Marko Miladinović, has been sentenced to 15 days in prison for displaying tattoos of notorious chetnik leaders Draža Mihailović and Pop Momčilo Đujić, along with other chetnik symbols, in Split, Croatia. The police reported that he had disrupted public order by showcasing these controversial tattoos at a café in Žnjan and posting photos online, which caused public outrage. He admitted to the offense during his court hearing, explaining that he got the tattoos several years ago after associating with bad company and intended to fit in. Despite acknowledging the potential offense caused, he stated he does not hate the Croatian people and plays for a Croatian club in Vienna. The police emphasized that the tattoos included symbols associated with chetnik forces, including a controversial emblem featuring a two-headed eagle with a dead head and crossed swords, accompanied by religious and revolutionary slogans. Following numerous complaints from concerned citizens, the police initiated a criminal investigation and arrested him in Split.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the incident, focusing on the legal consequences and the individual's defense without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on the legal framework, the individual's actions, and the public reaction without taking a clear ideological position.
Why factuality (90): This article closely aligns with the primary source document, accurately identifying the influencer as Marko Miladinovic and citing his statements about tattooing due to bad company. It correctly reports the legal charges, the 15-day detention, and the potential five-year ban from entering Croatia.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both the influencer’s defense and the police’s justification for the charges. It avoids overtly emotional language and provides direct quotes from the influencer and the police statement, maintaining balance in the narrative.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 758/29/2026A Serbian influencer based in Vienna, Marko Stojković, has been detained at Split’s Bilići prison for displaying tattoos of Draža Mihailović and Pop Đujić, two notorious World War II chetnik leaders. The police cited disruption of public order and violation of the Anti-Discrimination Law, leading to a potential 30-day jail sentence and a €2,000 fine. The court ordered his detention for 15 days, with a final verdict pending. Police argued that as a public figure with a large social media presence, Stojković’s actions could have broader implications for Croatia’s image as a welcoming country. Stojković admitted to getting the tattoos five to six years ago while associating with questionable individuals and claimed he intended to fit in. He stated he does not hate the Croatian people and plays for a Croatian club in Vienna. When asked if he would remove the tattoos, he initially said it was too expensive but later promised to do so soon, calling it a mistake from the past unrelated to current times.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident within the context of national identity and respect for international law, emphasizing the need to uphold legal norms and protect Croatia’s reputation. While the subject involves historical figures associated with wartime atrocities, the framing leans toward promoting
Why factuality (90): The article accurately presents the facts from the primary source, including the identity of the accused (Marko Stojković), his tattoos, and the legal consequences. It also quotes directly from the primary source regarding the police's justification for the strict punishment.
Why objectivity (75): While the article maintains a relatively neutral tone compared to others, it still includes some subjective language, such as 'sad kao žali' (now regretting), which could imply a judgment on the individual's actions.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 758/29/2026 Serbian influencer proudly displaying the tattoo of the infamous Draze Mihailović in Split, was arrestedA Serbian influencer named Marko Stojković was arrested in Split, Croatia, for publicly displaying tattoos featuring images of Draža Mihailović, a controversial World War II-era figure associated with the Ustaše regime, and Momčilo Đujić, a former leader of the Serb-dominated Chetnik movement. The tattoos included a double-headed eagle with a skull, along with phrases like 'with faith in God' and 'freedom or death,' all written in Cyrillic script. The police stated that the influencer's social media posts sparked public concern and outrage, leading to a criminal investigation. He faces a potential 30-day prison sentence and a fine of €2,000. Additionally, he has been banned from entering Croatia for five years. Another individual present during the incident, a 56-year-old Serbian citizen, had his residency revoked for participating in activities promoting behavior contrary to Croatian law.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the arrest and legal proceedings objectively, citing police statements and legal actions taken against the influencer. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal and social implications of an
Why factuality (90): The article accurately presents the facts from the primary source, including the identity of the accused, his tattoos, and the legal consequences. It also quotes directly from the primary source regarding the police's justification for the strict punishment.
Why objectivity (75): While the article maintains a relatively neutral tone compared to others, it still includes some subjective language, such as 'ponosno u Splitu pokazivao' (proudly showed in Split), which could imply a judgment on the individual's actions.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 708/29/2026 He boasted about Chetnik features and ended up behind bars: Split police detained influencer from SerbiaA Serbian influencer, Mark Stojković, was arrested by the police in Split, Croatia, for publicly displaying tattoos featuring symbols associated with the Chetnik movement during a visit to the city. The tattoos included images of Chetnik leaders Draža Mihailović and Momčilo Đujić, as well as a symbol resembling a double-headed eagle with a skull and crossed swords, accompanied by the phrases 'with faith in God' and 'freedom or death.' The police stated that his actions disrupted public order and caused unease among the public. Stojković faces a 15-day detention and will be deported after the legal process concludes, with a five-year ban on entering Croatia. Additionally, a 56-year-old man who was present with him was also sanctioned for participating in promoting behavior contrary to Croatian laws and public order.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the arrest and legal proceedings objectively, citing police statements and the actions taken against the individual. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal and public order aspects rather
Why factuality (90): The article provides accurate information based on the primary source, including the identity of the accused, the nature of the tattoos, and the legal consequences. It does not add any unverified details beyond what is stated in the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a more neutral tone but still emphasizes the negative reaction from the public and the police's stance against the tattoos, which can subtly influence the reader's perspective.
In Split he showed tattoos of Draze Mihailovic and Chetnik symbols: he was arrested, he will be deportedA 31-year-old Serbian citizen was arrested in Split after publicly displaying tattoos featuring images of Draža Mihailović and Momčilo Đujić, along with Chetnik symbols, and posting a photo of this on his Instagram account. The police received multiple complaints from concerned citizens following the post. The man was detained for 15 days and will be deported from Croatia, with a five-year ban on re-entry. He was apprehended around 2 PM on Friday near Split. According to the police, the individual's actions were deemed to disrupt public order and cause alarm among the public. The police also took action against a 56-year-old Serbian citizen who was present with him, issuing a decision to revoke his residence permit due to his involvement in promoting behavior contrary to Croatian laws and public order.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the arrest and legal proceedings against an individual for displaying symbols associated with historical figures linked to World War II-era Chetnik movements. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing
Why factuality (90): The article provides accurate information based on the primary source, including the identity of the accused, the nature of the tattoos, and the legal consequences. It does not add any unverified details beyond what is stated in the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a more neutral tone but still emphasizes the negative reaction from the public and the police's stance against the tattoos, which can subtly influence the reader's perspective.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 758/30/2026A Serbian influencer named Miladinović was arrested in Split, Croatia, for displaying tattoos featuring historical figures Draža Mihailović and Ante Pavelić, which are associated with World War II-era regimes. According to the Dalmatinski portal, he was taken to the Split Municipal Court for disturbing public order and violating the Law on Combating Discrimination. The prosecution requested 30 days in prison for the first offense and a fine of 2,000 euros for the second. The court ordered his detention at the Split jail for 15 days, with a final ruling to follow. Police argued that as a public figure who shares content online, his actions had broader implications. Miladinović admitted to the offenses but explained that he got the tattoos five to six years ago while associating with a bad group and wanted to fit in. He emphasized that he does not hate the Croatian people and plays for a Croatian club in Vienna. He acknowledged the potential harm caused by the tattoos but claimed he did not consider their impact at the time.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the legal charges against the individual and his personal explanation for the tattoos, including his admission of wrongdoing and intent to remove them. It includes direct quotes from the defendant and police arguments without overtly favoring one side over the other. The报道中
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the influencer’s arrest, the charges against him, and the court’s decision to detain him for 15 days. It references the primary source document and includes the influencer’s explanation about the tattoos being made years ago due to bad company. However, it omits some
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents facts objectively, it occasionally leans into the police’s framing of the case, emphasizing the need for strict punishment to send a message to foreign visitors. This subtle bias may affect the perceived neutrality of the report.
Novi listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 658/29/2026A Serbian citizen was arrested by Split police after displaying tattoos depicting Chetnik figures and symbols associated with wartime nationalist groups. The man, 31 years old, was detained for 15 days and faces expulsion from Croatia for five years. The incident occurred on Thursday at Ivan Pavle II Park in Žnjan, where he publicly displayed his tattoos, which included images of Draža Mihailović, Momčilo Đujić, and symbols linked to Chetnik forces. He uploaded photos of himself with these tattoos to his Instagram account, sparking public outrage. Police identified him and conducted a criminal investigation, leading to his arrest on Friday. The court has ordered 15 days of detention and a fine of 2,000 euros. The decision includes a ban on entry into Croatia for five years and the revocation of residence permits for a 56-year-old Serbian national who was present during the event.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the display of Chetnik-related tattoos as a violation of public order and dignity, aligning with the historical narrative that associates such symbols with wartime nationalism and ethnic conflict. The emphasis on public disturbance, fear, and the legal basis for punishment under '
Why factuality (85): This article closely mirrors the first one, providing accurate information about the arrest, the tattoos, and the legal consequences. Like the first article, it includes additional details not explicitly mentioned in the primary source, such as descriptions of the tattoo symbols and the exact wordin
Why objectivity (65): Similar to the first article, this piece uses biased language and frames the incident as provocative, potentially influencing reader perception by emphasizing the negative impact of the tattoos on Croatian society.
With Chetnik tattoos provoked Split, got imprisoned and banishedA 31-year-old Serbian citizen was arrested by the Split police for displaying tattoos featuring images of Chetnik leaders Draza Mihailovic and Momcilo Djukic, along with symbols associated with the Chetnik movement, including a double-headed eagle with a skull and crossed swords. The incident occurred at a public location in Znjan, where the individual disrupted public order by prominently showing these tattoos. The person posted photos of the event on their Instagram profile, which caused public outrage in Croatia. Following multiple reports from concerned citizens, the police conducted an investigation and identified the suspect, who was arrested in Split. The individual faces a potential 30-day prison sentence and a fine of 2,000 euros. Additionally, the court has ordered his deportation from Croatia for five years and revoked the residence permit of a 56-year-old Serbian citizen who was present during the incident.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of an arrest related to public order disruption involving symbols linked to a controversial historical group. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The report focuses on the legal actions taken by Croatian law
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the arrest of Marko Miladinović for tattooing WWII-era Chetnik leaders, citing specific details from the primary source such as the location (Žnjan), the tattoos (Draža Mihailović and Momčilo Đujić), and the legal consequences (15 days in jail and a five-year ban from
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'provocirao Splićane' (provoked Split residents) and describes the tattoos as 'sporni' (controversial), which introduces bias. It also frames the incident as an act of provocation rather than presenting both sides neutrally.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 608/29/2026A Serbian citizen, identified as Marko Stojković, was detained by Split police after displaying tattoos featuring imagery associated with Chetnik leaders Draža Mihailović and Momčilo Đujić, along with symbols linked to wartime nationalist groups. The incident occurred on April 17th at Ivan Pavle II Park in Žnjan, where he publicly showed his tattoos, which included religious and nationalist motifs. The police reported that the images caused public outrage and concern, leading to an investigation. Stojković, a Serbian influencer with around 90,000 followers on Instagram, had posted photos of himself wearing the tattoos on social media, prompting complaints from citizens. Police located him the next day and initiated legal proceedings. He was sentenced to 15 days in prison and faces a five-year ban from entering Croatia. Additionally, another individual present during the event, a 56-year-old Serbian national, was ordered to be deported due to involvement in promoting illegal activities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a violation of public order and national identity, emphasizing the sensitivity of historical symbols tied to wartime nationalism. While the subject involves national identity and law enforcement action, the framing leans toward portraying the actions as harmful to
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the arrest and legal consequences but includes some speculative elements not found in the primary source, such as the description of the tattoo symbols and the exact wording of the tattoo.
Why objectivity (60): The article has a strong bias towards portraying the incident as provocative and harmful to Croatian society, using phrases like 'provoke' and 'offend,' which may sway the reader's opinion.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 608/29/2026A 31-year-old Serbian influencer, Marko Stojković, was arrested by police in Split after publicly displaying tattoos depicting war criminals during his stay in the city. The incident sparked backlash from Croatian citizens, who viewed the tattoos as provocative and offensive. Stojković had shared photos from his vacation showing these tattoos on social media, which received both support from some followers and condemnation from the local population. Splitska Police launched a criminal investigation based on multiple reports from residents and later detained him. Authorities allege that his tattoos, including those of Draža Mihailović, Momčilo Đujić, and a symbolic double-headed eagle with religious and nationalist motifs, disturbed public order and peace. He faces charges under laws against disturbing public order and discrimination. The police requested a 30-day prison sentence and a €2000 fine, but the court ordered 15 days of detention. He will be deported and banned from entering Croatia for five years.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the incident as a violation of public order and national identity, emphasizing the offensive nature of the tattoos and their connection to wartime figures associated with Serbian nationalism. The focus on the disruption of 'public order' and the legal action taken by authorities,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the arrest and legal consequences but includes some speculative elements not found in the primary source, such as the description of the tattoo symbols and the exact wording of the tattoo.
Why objectivity (60): The article has a strong bias towards portraying the incident as provocative and harmful to Croatian society, using phrases like 'provoke' and 'offend,' which may sway the reader's opinion.
Serbian influencer with Chetnik tattoos cried in court: "It's because of bad company, I play for a Croatian club"A Serbian influencer named Marko Miladinović, who resides in Vienna, was detained in Split after displaying tattoos of World War II Chetnik leaders Draža Mihailović and Momčilo Đujić in a café. The tattoos were discovered during his vacation and shared online, prompting police intervention. He appeared before the local court, facing charges of disturbing public order and violating anti-discrimination laws. Police requested strict punishment due to his public influence and the potential for further offenses. Miladinović admitted to the violations, explaining the tattoos were created years ago while under bad influences and that he now regrets the actions. He emphasized his respect for the Croatian people and stated he plays for a Croatian club in Vienna. He agreed to remove the tattoos as soon as possible.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings against Miladinović, including both the charges brought by authorities and his personal explanation. While the subject involves historical figures associated with wartime nationalism, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal,
Why factuality (80): The article accurately conveys the influencer’s arrest, the charges, and the court’s decision to detain him for 15 days. It includes direct quotes from the influencer and references the police’s rationale for requesting a strict penalty. However, it cuts off mid-sentence and lacks full context from
Why objectivity (70): The article uses somewhat emotive phrasing such as 'kukao pred sudom' ('apologized before the court'), which implies a certain level of guilt or shame on the part of the influencer. While this is based on the influencer’s own words, it can subtly shape the reader’s perception of the situation.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 658/29/2026A 31-year-old Serbian citizen, identified as Mark Stojković, was arrested by police in Split, Croatia, for publicly displaying tattoos associated with the Chetnik movement, including images of leaders Draža Mihailović and Momčilo Đujić, along with symbols linked to World War II-era Chetnik forces. The individual posted a photo of himself with these tattoos on his Instagram account, which reportedly caused public outrage in Croatia. Police stated that the tattoos included Cyrillic inscriptions such as 's vjerom u Boga' ('with faith in God') and 'sloboda ili smrt' ('freedom or death'), symbols historically used by Chetnik groups during WWII. Following the incident, police launched an investigation, identified the man, and arrested him in a vehicle in Split. He faces charges related to disturbing public order and promoting discriminatory behavior. The court has ordered 15 days of detention, and after the legal process concludes, he will be deported from Croatia and banned from re-entering for five years. Additionally, another Serbian national present at the scene will face similar measures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an arrest involving historical symbols linked to a controversial wartime group. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal actions taken by Croatian police,
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the arrest of a Serbian influencer for displaying WWII-era Chetnik symbols, including tattoos of Draza Mihailovic and Momcilo Djukic. It mentions the 15-day detention and potential expulsion from Croatia. However, it incorrectly identifies the influencer as Marko Stojk
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'uznemirenost i zgražanje u javnosti Republike Hrvatske' ('unease and outrage in the public of the Republic of Croatia') and frames the influencer’s actions as an affront to Croatian national identity. This introduces a biased perspective favorin
Croatia
