ON
← Back to feed
Tomás Rebord pointed out against Marcos Galperín: Why are you every day confirming to everyone that you are half boludo on Twitter?
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Tomás Rebord pointed out against Marcos Galperín: Why are you every day confirming to everyone that you are half boludo on Twitter?

Streamer y conductor argentino Tomás Rebord criticó públicamente a Marcos Galperín, fundador de Mercado Libre, durante una reflexión sobre el rol del empresariado en la política argentina. Rebord acusó a Galperín de emitir comentarios racistas en redes sociales, específicamente una publicación en la que comparó la gestión del Congreso Nacional Africano con la anterior administración blanca en Sudáfrica. Argumentó que esta comparación reivindicaba el pasado colonial y cuestionó la participación de empresarios en debates políticos sensibles. Además, Rebord desafió a Galperín a contribuir más significativamente a Argentina, sugiriendo que su éxito empresarial no justifica su presencia en discusiones públicas. Aunque reconoció el éxito de Galperín, destacó que su influencia debería ir acompañada de acciones más impactantes.

Tomás Rebord, a popular streamer and TV host in Argentina, launched sharp criticism against Marcos Galperín, founder of MercadoLibre, during a broader reflection on the role of the business community in Argentine society and its relationship with politics. Rebord accused Galperín of publicly reinforcing stereotypes through his social media posts, particularly one related to South Africa, which he interpreted as racially charged. The remarks came amid ongoing debates over the responsibilities of Argentina’s elite, both political and economic, in addressing national challenges. Rebord's critique centered on what he described as a pattern among Argentina’s business leaders of blaming others for collective failures while avoiding accountability for their own decisions. He argued that both the political and business elites often deflect blame rather than confront their roles in shaping the country’s trajectory. During his comments, Rebord highlighted a specific tweet attributed to Galperín that compared the rule of the African National Congress in South Africa with the previous white-led administration. Rebord interpreted this as an implicit endorsement of the historical racial hierarchy in South Africa, calling the message openly racist. He questioned why someone of Galperín’s stature would engage in such discourse, suggesting it could reflect a deliberate strategy to cultivate a controversial public image. Rebord linked this behavior to a trend observed in some global tech billionaires, including Elon Musk, who have turned provocative opinions into a form of personal branding. He noted how Musk and others leverage their platforms to make bold statements that reinforce their public personas. Despite his criticisms, Rebord acknowledged Galperín’s achievements as a businessman, praising him as a top-tier entrepreneur who had built a major company. However, he challenged Galperín to think beyond commercial success and contribute more significantly to Argentina’s future. “Galperín, you’ve already created a platform for commerce. Do something for Argentina that puts us in the record books,” Rebord urged. He suggested launching ambitious technological projects, such as sending a satellite into space, to leave a lasting legacy. Rebord drew parallels between Galperín’s potential contributions and the high-profile ventures of other wealthy entrepreneurs like Musk and Jeff Bezos. He emphasized that individuals with vast resources should aim to create projects that benefit society as a whole, not just accumulate wealth. His call was part of a larger argument that Argentina cannot become a great nation without a robust and responsible private sector. The broader context of Rebord’s comments lies in a growing discussion about the role of Argentina’s business class in shaping national policy and development. He criticized the tendency of both politicians and entrepreneurs to shift blame onto each other instead of taking responsibility for their own actions. According to Rebord, true progress requires mutual accountability and a shared vision for the country’s future. Rebord’s remarks sparked immediate debate, with many questioning whether his interpretation of Galperín’s tweet was accurate or if it reflected a broader bias. Some supporters of Galperín defended the post as a legitimate analysis of historical governance models, while critics echoed Rebord’s concerns about the influence of wealthy individuals in shaping public discourse. The controversy highlights the tension between free speech and the responsibility of public figures to avoid inflammatory rhetoric, especially on issues involving race and history.

1 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveyesterday
Tomás Rebord pointed out against Marcos Galperín: Why are you every day confirming to everyone that you are half boludo on Twitter?

Streamer y conductor argentino Tomás Rebord criticó públicamente a Marcos Galperín, fundador de Mercado Libre, durante una reflexión sobre el rol del empresariado en la política argentina. Rebord acusó a Galperín de emitir comentarios racistas en redes sociales, específicamente una publicación en la que comparó la gestión del Congreso Nacional Africano con la anterior administración blanca en Sudáfrica. Argumentó que esta comparación reivindicaba el pasado colonial y cuestionó la participación de empresarios en debates políticos sensibles. Además, Rebord desafió a Galperín a contribuir más significativamente a Argentina, sugiriendo que su éxito empresarial no justifica su presencia en discusiones públicas. Aunque reconoció el éxito de Galperín, destacó que su influencia debería ir acompañada de acciones más impactantes.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo presenta una crítica directa hacia una figura empresarial con influencia política, utilizando un marco que cuestiona la legitimidad de su participación en temas públicos. La elección de palabras y la interpretación del comentario de Galperín reflejan una visión crítica hacia el poder de赀

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories