Macarena Olona joins the law firm defending Aldama
Macarena Olona, the spokesperson for the Spanish political party Vox in the Congress of Deputies, has joined the law firm representing Víctor de Aldama, a figure involved in the Koldo case. After leaving her position at the State Bar, she will now work under José Antonio Choclán, a former judge who has previously served as legal counsel for notable individuals such as singer Julio Iglesias, footballer Cristiano Ronaldo, and Corinna Larsen during the Villarejo investigation that implicated the former king. Olona announced her new role on the social media platform X, stating that Choclán is one of Spain’s most prestigious lawyers and now her boss.
Macarena Olona, former member of Spain’s Congress and ex-district representative for the far-right party Vox, has joined the law firm of José Antonio Choclán, who represents businessman Víctor de Aldama and singer Julio Iglesias. The announcement was made public on Tuesday through Olona’s account on the social media platform 'X'. She stated she is moving into private practice “to continue fighting, on both sides of the Atlantic,” and to be “with the law and order.” The move comes after Olona left her role as a congresswoman in July 2022 due to health reasons. She had been elected as Vox’s candidate for the regional elections in Andalusia that year but stepped down before the vote. Prior to entering politics in 2019, Olona worked as a lawyer with the Spanish State Bar since 2009. Her career in public service began under the government of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, where she served as a legal advisor. Choclán, who is related to Olona, is a well-known figure in Spanish legal circles. He previously represented high-profile clients such as football star Cristiano Ronaldo and has been involved in several prominent cases. His current clientele includes Víctor de Aldama, a businessman linked to the so-called “Koldo case” involving alleged tax fraud, and Julio Iglesias, one of Spain’s most celebrated musicians. Choclán also holds the title of magistrate on leave, which adds to his reputation within the legal profession. According to reports, Olona described Choclán as one of Spain’s most prestigious lawyers. In her message, she noted that he would now be her employer. The transition marks a return to legal work for Olona, who had spent nearly three years in political office. During her time in Congress, she was known for her conservative stances on issues such as immigration and national sovereignty. Her decision to join Choclán’s firm follows a period of relative silence in the public eye after leaving politics. While she did not provide specific details about the nature of her new role, her statement emphasized continuity in her commitment to legal principles. This aligns with her previous rhetoric during her tenure in Vox, where she often spoke about upholding the rule of law and defending traditional values. Choclán’s firm has long been associated with high-profile clients and complex legal matters. His representation of Aldama, who has faced scrutiny over financial dealings, and Iglesias, whose personal life has occasionally drawn media attention, underscores the firm’s involvement in cases that attract public interest. Olona’s arrival is likely to bring additional visibility to the firm, given her political profile and prior experience in public service. The connection between Olona and Choclán appears to have existed prior to this professional arrangement. Their familial relationship suggests a longstanding personal link, though the extent of their collaboration before now is unclear. Choclán’s background in both judicial and private legal sectors positions him as a strategic choice for Olona, who seeks to combine her political experience with legal expertise. As of now, there are no immediate indications of how long Olona will remain with the firm or what specific projects she will handle. However, her presence is expected to influence the firm’s direction, particularly in areas where her political insights could intersect with legal strategies. Given her history, it is anticipated that she will focus on cases involving constitutional law, corporate governance, and public policy-related litigation. The move reflects broader trends in Spain, where former politicians frequently transition into legal or consulting roles. It also highlights the fluidity between political and legal spheres in the country, where figures can shift seamlessly between different domains of influence. With her new position, Olona continues to play a visible role in shaping legal discourse, even as she steps away from direct political engagement.
4 reports
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 859/1/2026
Macarena Olona, ex diputada del partido político Vox, ha anunciado su incorporación al bufete de abogados de José Antonio Choclón, quien representa a figuras públicas como el empresario Víctor de Aldama y el cantante Julio Iglesias. Olona comenzó su carrera en la Abogacía del Estado en 2009 antes de entrar en política, siendo diputada en el Congreso desde 2019 hasta 2022, cuando dejó su cargo debido a problemas de salud. Choclán, familiar de Olona, es un abogado reconocido por su trabajo con personalidades mediatizadas y tiene antecedentes en casos destacados como el 'caso Koldo'.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Macarena Olona's career transition from politics to private law, highlighting her professional background and connections. It does not take a clear ideological stance or frame the story in a way that favors one political perspective over another. The报道中
Why factuality (95): This article provides detailed and consistent information about Olona’s career path, including her time in public service and her political tenure. It accurately references her move to private practice and includes quotes from her social media posts. The facts align closely with other sources.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. While it mentions Choclán’s reputation and connections, it does so in a factual manner rather than promoting the firm.
Macarena Olona, exdiputada del partido Vox y abogada del Estado, ha anunciado su incorporación al bufete del abogado José Antonio Choclán, quien representa a figuras públicas como el cantante Julio Iglesias y el empresario Víctor de Aldama. En un mensaje en redes sociales, Olona explicó que su cambio a la abogacía privada busca continuar su labor 'a uno y otro lado del Atlántico' y 'con la ley y el orden'. Choclán, familiar de Olona, es un abogado reconocido por su trabajo con personajes mediáticos, incluyendo a Cristiano Ronaldo. Esta movida refleja la continuidad de Olona en el ámbito legal, aunque ahora bajo un perfil más privado.
Bias read (Center): El artículo presenta una noticia sobre el cambio profesional de una figura política (exdiputada de Vox) hacia el sector privado, sin tomar partido explícito ni mostrar un sesgo claro hacia ningún lado. Se mencionan nombres políticos y legales, pero no hay juicios valorativos o énfasis en una postura
Why factuality (90): The article confirms Olona’s move to Choclán’s firm and provides relevant background on her political career. It also mentions her role in the 'case Koldo' and Choclán’s involvement in past cases, which are corroborated by other sources. Minor details are omitted compared to more comprehensive accou
Why objectivity (80): The language is somewhat more formal and less neutral than the others, particularly when referring to Choclán as 'one of the most prestigious lawyers in Spain.' This slight emphasis may introduce a minor subjective tone.
On September 1, 2026, Macarena Olona, a former State Attorney and member of Vox, announced her move to the law firm of José Antonio Choclán, who represents businessman Víctor de Aldama and singer Julio Iglesias. In a post on social media platform X, Olona stated she is transitioning to private law practice to continue fighting 'on both sides of the Atlantic' and to be 'with the law and order.' The article highlights her shift from political representation to legal advocacy, aligning her with figures associated with wealth and celebrity.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Macarena Olona's career transition without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side of the political spectrum. While it mentions her previous affiliation with Vox and her new association with individuals linked to wealth and influence, it does not明显
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Macarena Olona has joined José Antonio Choclán’s law firm, which represents Víctor de Aldama and Julio Iglesias. It provides basic biographical information about Olona, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it lacks specific details about her transiti
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral but slightly promotional, as it mentions the prestige of Choclán and his connections with high-profile clients like Julio Iglesias and Cristiano Ronaldo. This may subtly favor the image of the law firm.
El PaísIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 659/1/2026
Macarena Olona, the spokesperson for the Spanish political party Vox in the Congress of Deputies, has joined the law firm representing Víctor de Aldama, a figure involved in the Koldo case. After leaving her position at the State Bar, she will now work under José Antonio Choclán, a former judge who has previously served as legal counsel for notable individuals such as singer Julio Iglesias, footballer Cristiano Ronaldo, and Corinna Larsen during the Villarejo investigation that implicated the former king. Olona announced her new role on the social media platform X, stating that Choclán is one of Spain’s most prestigious lawyers and now her boss.
Bias read (Conservative): The article mentions Macarena Olona, a prominent member of the right-wing party Vox, joining a law firm representing Víctor de Aldama, who is associated with the Koldo case. The framing highlights Olona's move to a high-profile legal team, which could imply alignment with figures involved in a case.
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat promotional, highlighting Olona’s new role and the prestige of her new employer. The article uses phrases like 'uno de los abogados más prestigiosos de España' which may imply an endorsement rather than a neutral statement. There is a slight bias towards portraying the legal tea
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Spain
