Brnabić responded sharply: 'For a party, it must be admitted, you have serious personal experience'
Hrvatski ministar gospodarstva Ante Šušnjar reagirao je na izjave srpske predsjednice Skupštine Ane Brnabić, koja je kritikovala politiku Hrvatske prema Srbiji. Šušnjar je na društvenoj mreži X objavio komentare u kojima je napomenuo da Srbija sama sebi zatvara vrata prema Europskoj uniji, posebno usredotočujući se na Brnabićevo pitanje o 'derenkama'. Napomene su bile izražene ironično i s kritičnim tonom, uključujući reference na Brnabićevo druženje s Vojislavom Šešeljem i njegove izjave o državnim počastima dodeljenim osuđenim ratnim zločinicima. Šušnjar je također odbacila tvrdnje da Hrvatska prijeti Srbiji na europskom putu, naglašavajući da je Srbija samostalno donosila odluke o svojoj politici.
Minister of Economy Ante Šušnjar of Croatia has publicly responded to remarks made by Serbia’s President of the National Assembly, Ana Brnabić, following her criticism of Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. In a post on social media platform X, Šušnjar accused Brnabić of hypocrisy, citing her participation in a Christmas celebration with former war criminal Vojislav Šešelj, during which songs associated with Serbian chetnik ideology were performed by a convicted murderer, Dragan Ašanin. Brnabić had previously condemned Plenković for allegedly supporting Marko Perković Thompson, a figure she described as an “open supporter of an open Ustase.” In response, Šušnjar highlighted that Brnabić herself was present at a festive gathering where Ašanin sang traditional chetnik songs such as “Gledaj, majko, kako znaš, za četnika da me daš” and “Vrati se, vojvodo, na Dinaru ponovo,” among others. These songs, he noted, were sung to Brnabić and Šešelj, who both attended the event alongside other Serbian officials. Šušnjar’s message was laced with irony and sarcasm, suggesting that Brnabić’s criticism of Croatia over its potential stance toward Serbia’s European Union aspirations was misplaced. He pointed out that it was Serbia itself that could close its doors to Europe, using “derneks”, a term often used in Serbian political discourse to describe provocative or controversial behavior, and a vote for a ceremonial honor. Šušnjar also mocked the idea that Croatia would threaten Serbia’s path to the EU, stating that neither Croatia nor the EU would block Serbia’s access, adding that such decisions rest solely with Serbia. The incident follows a broader diplomatic tension between Serbia and Croatia, particularly regarding the treatment of wartime figures. Brnabić had criticized Plenković for his public support of Thompson, whom she labeled as an “open Ustase.” This led to a sharp exchange between the two nations, with Šušnjar seizing the opportunity to highlight perceived inconsistencies in Brnabić’s position. In his post, Šušnjar referenced a specific event, the annual Christmas party hosted by the tabloid Informer, where Brnabić and several Serbian ministers, including Ivica Dačić, Boris Bratina, Darko Glišić, and Milica Đurđević Stamenkovski, gathered with Šešelj. The event featured performances by Ašanin, who had been sentenced to 12 years in prison in 1992 for the murder of 18-year-old Jasmine Đorđević. Šušnjar emphasized that Brnabić’s attendance at such an event underscored her alignment with nationalist sentiments, despite her public condemnation of similar actions elsewhere. He concluded his message with a sarcastic remark on the song “Vrati se, vojvodo, na Dinaru ponovo,” suggesting that it might have contributed to discussions within the European Union about the surrounding context of such gatherings. Šušnjar also hinted that such scenes in Serbia could end with the phrase “Obadva, obadva, oba su pala,” a reference to the eventual downfall of both sides in historical conflicts. This exchange reflects the complex and often contentious relationship between Serbia and Croatia, particularly concerning their shared history and ongoing political tensions. It also highlights how personal conduct and cultural symbols can become points of contention in international diplomacy. As the situation develops, further statements from both sides will likely continue to shape the narrative around these issues.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Hrvatski ministar gospodarstva Ante Šušnjar reagirao je na izjave srpske predsjednice Skupštine Ane Brnabić, koja je kritikovala politiku Hrvatske prema Srbiji. Šušnjar je na društvenoj mreži X objavio komentare u kojima je napomenuo da Srbija sama sebi zatvara vrata prema Europskoj uniji, posebno usredotočujući se na Brnabićevo pitanje o 'derenkama'. Napomene su bile izražene ironično i s kritičnim tonom, uključujući reference na Brnabićevo druženje s Vojislavom Šešeljem i njegove izjave o državnim počastima dodeljenim osuđenim ratnim zločinicima. Šušnjar je također odbacila tvrdnje da Hrvatska prijeti Srbiji na europskom putu, naglašavajući da je Srbija samostalno donosila odluke o svojoj politici.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of Brnabić's comments as a defense of Croatia's stance against Serbia, using sarcastic and confrontational language. The emphasis on Serbia closing doors to Europe and the critique of Brnabić’s rhetoric align with left-leaning perspectives that prioritize European un
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports Šušnjar's comments about Brnabić attending a Christmas party where an imprisoned murderer sang četnik songs. It references the primary source document's claim that Plenković said Serbia might be closing its own doors to the EU by honoring Mladić. However, it adds detai
Why objectivity (50): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'ustaškim dernekom' and 'osuđeni ubojica,' which introduces bias. The tone is clearly critical of Brnabić and leans toward supporting Šušnjar's perspective rather than presenting both sides neutrally.
Ministar gospodarstva Hrvatske Ante Šušnjar je reagirao na kritiku predsjednice Narodne skupštine Srbije Ana Brnabić, koja je optužila hrvatskog premijera Andreja Plenkovića za podršku 'neskrivenom ustašu' Marku Perkoviću Thompsonu. Šušnjar je uspjeli da napravi povratnu vezi, navodeći da je Brnabić, zajedno s ministrima Srbije i osuđenim ratnim zločincem Vojislavom Šešeljem, slušala četničke pjesme na božičnoj proslavi u tabloidu Informer, uključujući pjesme koje je pjevao osuđeni ubojica Dragan Ašanin. Šušnjar je kritikovao Brnabićevo ponašanje kao 'dernek', a istovremeno je podsticala diskurs o pravom postupanju prema osuđenim ratnim zločinicima, posebno u vezi s osuđenim Ratkom Mladićem.
Bias read (Conservative): Šušnjar koristi agresivno i opisno jezik koji podstiče negativnu percepciju Brnabića, posebno kroz upotrebu riječi kao 'dernek' i povezanost s četnicama i ratnim zločincima. Iako se radi o političkoj kontroverzi, njegova reakcija je dominirana pravosudnom i moralnom pozicioniranjem, što je karakteri
Why factuality (70): The article correctly conveys Šušnjar's response to Brnabić regarding her attendance at a Christmas gathering with Šešelj and the singing of četnik songs by Ašanin. It also mentions Plenković's statement about Serbia potentially closing its own EU doors. However, it includes additional details about
Why objectivity (45): The article exhibits strong bias through phrases like 'ustaškim dernekom' and 'osuđeni ubojica,' which frame Brnabić negatively. The tone is clearly aligned with Šušnjar's viewpoint and lacks neutrality in presenting the situation.
Ministar gospodarstva Ante Šušnjar je na društvenoj mreži X reagirao na izjave predsjednice Narodne skupštine Srbije Ani Brnabić, koja je kritikovala predsjednika Hrvatske Andrija Plenkovića. Brnabić je smatraла da Plenković podržava Marka Perkovića Thompsona, a njegov koncert je nazvala 'ustaškim dernekom'. Šušnjar je u svojoj odgovornosti osvrnut na Božično druženje Brnabić, na kojem je goste zabavljao Dragan Ašanin, muškarac osuđen za ubojstvo 18-godišnje djevojke. Šušnjar je kritikovao Brnabić za pjevanje četničkih pjesama s Šešeljom, što je smatrao neprikladno za osuđenog ubojicu. Također je napomenuo da Srbija samu sebe zatvara vrata Europske unije, a ne Hrvatska ni Europa.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Brnabić’s criticism of Plenković and her alleged support for 'ustaški dernek,' which is portrayed as politically incorrect and aligned with nationalist sentiments. The emphasis on Brnabić’s actions during Christmas celebrations with Šešelj, and the reference
Why factuality (70): The article accurately summarizes Šušnjar's criticism of Brnabić for attending a Christmas party with Šešelj and listening to četnik songs sung by Ašanin. It correctly references Plenković's warning about Serbia possibly self-sabotaging its EU prospects. However, it adds information about Ašanin's c
Why objectivity (40): The article shows clear bias with terms like 'osuđeni ubojica' and 'ustaškim dernekom,' which are emotionally charged and favor Šušnjar's position. The overall tone is highly critical of Brnabić and lacks balance in presenting alternative perspectives.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
