Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days agoA hacker group called INF Group, allegedly based in Serbia, has published personal data belonging to 86,000 Croatian citizens, claiming the information was directly taken from Croatia’s judicial system. The group stated they obtained the data through hacking and posted it freely online rather than selling it. They emphasized that this action is a form of retaliation against recent arrests and reports suggesting their activities have been hindered. According to the hackers, the data includes names, personal identification numbers (OIB), birth dates, and unique citizen registration numbers (JMBG). The group claims these JMBG numbers are still used internally within Croatia’s judicial systems. The Croatian authorities have not yet responded publicly to this incident.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as an act of retaliation by the hacker group against Croatian authorities, emphasizing the group's claim that their actions are justified due to perceived repression. This framing highlights the conflict between the group and the state, aligning more with a left-wing
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the facts from the primary source document, including the number of individuals (86,000), the source of data (Hrvatsko pravosudni sustav), and the claim by INF Grupa regarding their innocence. It also mentions the lack of response from Croatian authorities, aligning wi
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains relatively neutral, presenting both sides of the story, INF Grupa’s claims and the lack of official response. However, the headline and some phrasing ('tvrde da dolaze iz pravosuđa') carry a slightly sensational tone, suggesting a narrative that may lean towards emphasizing the thre
Serbian hackers claim to have broken into the Croatian justice system.A hacker group known as INF Grupa, based in Serbia, claims to have accessed the Croatian judicial system and exposed data of tens of thousands of private individuals. The claim was shared on a dark web forum and quickly spread online, including on the website 'Bezbedan Balkan,' which focuses on cybersecurity. The hackers provided screenshots and alleged proof of stolen citizen data, stating they had access to personal information such as names, identification numbers (OIB), birth dates, and unique citizen IDs (JMBG). They emphasized that this was not related to previous incidents involving the unlawful seizure of data and claimed their actions were a form of retaliation against false narratives about them. In response, the Ministry of Justice, Administration, and Digital Transformation stated that authorities are conducting detailed analyses and technical checks to verify the authenticity of the claims, while emphasizing the importance of data security and system stability.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the hackers' claims and the official response without overtly favoring either side. It reports the allegations made by the INF Grupa and the subsequent institutional reaction without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue involves national security and cybercrim
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the claims made by INF Group, including the origin of the data from Croatia's judicial system, the size of the database (86,000 records), and the group's denial of involvement in recent arrests. It also references the primary source document's details about the JMBG nu
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the information neutrally but includes some emotionally charged phrases like 'potez očajnika' (move of desperation) and 'lažni alarm' (false alarm), which could be seen as biased toward the hackers. The tone leans slightly toward portraying the hackers as victims rather than per
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 8312 days agoA hacker group known as INF Group has claimed to have obtained personal data of 86,000 Croatian citizens, including names, identification numbers, birth dates, and unique citizen registration numbers. The group stated they accessed this information directly from Croatia’s judicial system and shared it freely online rather than selling it. They attributed their actions to a form of retaliation against recent arrests of their members, which they claim targeted innocent individuals unrelated to their activities. The group emphasized that they remain active and intend to continue targeting Croatian institutions. No official response from Croatian authorities has been reported yet.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the claims made by the hacker group and does not take a clear stance or show overt bias toward either side. It reports the situation factually, citing the group's statements and noting the lack of official response from Croatian authorities.
Why factuality (94): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, providing accurate numbers (86,000 citizens), details about the data types (names, OIB, JMBG), and the claim by INF Grupa about their innocence. It also reflects the lack of official response from Croatian authorities. The only minor deviatio
Why objectivity (83): While the content is largely factual and neutral, the article uses more emotionally charged language such as 'zlosutnoj objavi' and includes phrases like 'dolazimo po sve što vamu je drago,' which could be seen as subtly provocative or biased toward portraying the hackers as a persistent threat.
Croatia
