An earthquake of magnitude 3.1 shook Herzegovina, and tremors were felt in DubrovnikA minor earthquake measuring 3.1 on the Richter scale shook Bosnia and Herzegovina, with tremors felt in the Dubrovnik area. According to data from the EMSC, the epicenter was approximately 50 kilometers away from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers south-southeast of Mostar, and 4 kilometers south-southeast of Stoca. Residents described the sensation as a 'weak shaking lasting a few seconds' and 'brief trembling,' with some noting that Dubrovnik experienced a light shudder. The report highlights the localized impact of the seismic event but does not mention any significant damage or casualties.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on the scientific data and local reactions without emphasizing ideological positions or partisan perspectives. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the natural event rather than any political,
Why factuality (95): The article mirrors the primary source document almost verbatim, providing exact distances and magnitudes from EMSC. It also includes quotes from citizens that match those in the primary source, showing high fidelity.
Why objectivity (90): The tone is consistently neutral and objective, presenting the event without personal commentary or emotional weight. The language remains factual throughout.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8511 days agoA moderate earthquake of magnitude 3.1 on the Richter scale struck the southern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina on Monday at 2:00 PM. The epicenter was located 39 kilometers southeast of Mostar, or eight kilometers southeast of Stoc, at a depth of 6.3 kilometers. Due to the relatively shallow depth of the epicenter, ground shaking could be felt in surrounding areas, including parts of southern Croatia. Residents of Dubrovnik and Župa dubrovačka reported feeling the tremor. There are currently no reports of material damage or injured individuals.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of an earthquake event, focusing on geographical details, the depth of the epicenter, and the regions affected. It does not present any overtly biased language, nor does it emphasize political implications or take a stance on the event itself. The information,
Why factuality (90): This article presents the earthquake information accurately, matching the primary source document and EMSC data. It includes precise distances and mentions the lack of damage or injuries, which aligns with the primary source.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual reporting. There is no strong bias or emotional language, though some phrasing suggests mild concern about the potential impact.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days agoNa podne Bosni i Hercegovini dogodio se potres magnituda 3,1 po Richterovoj skali, a podrhtavanje tla osjetilo se i na dubrovačkom području. Prema podacima Europsko-mediteranskog seizmološkog centra (EMSC), epicentar potresa bio je oko četiri kilometra jugoistočno od Stoca, 35 kilometara jugoistočno od Mostara i približno 50 kilometara od Dubrovnika. Građani su na stranici EMSC-a prijavili da je podrhtavanje bilo kratko i slabo, s komentarima poput 'slabo podrhtavanje u trajanju od nekoliko sekundi', 'kratko se zatreslo' i 'Dubrovnik, lagano zadrmalo'.
Bias read (Center): Vijest o potresu nije politički nabit, ali je izvještaj osjetljiv jer se događaj dogodio u regiji koja ima povijesne i kulturne značajke. Vijest se fokusira na opisivanje događaja bez evidentnog političkog slanja ili kritike. Izvor informacija je objektivan (EMSC), a komentari građana su neutralni i
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the earthquake details from the primary source, including magnitude, location, and distance from Dubrovnik. It aligns closely with the Dubrovački vjesnik report and provides correct distances from EMSC data. Minor discrepancies may exist in phrasing but do not affect o
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, reporting facts without emotional language. However, there is slight editorializing in phrases like 'lagano zadrmalo,' which could be seen as slightly subjective.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8018 days ago The earthquake in Siska: "It shook well"An earthquake measuring magnitude 2.8 on the Richter scale was recorded early Monday at 7:04 AM, with its epicenter located 5 kilometers southwest of Siska. The European Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC) confirmed the event, noting that the intensity reached level III-IV on the EMS scale. Local users described the tremor as brief but strong, with some commenting that it felt like a 'good shake' or 'a hit,' affecting their beds and homes. The Croatian Seismological Service reported the quake, emphasizing that it was minor and did not pose significant danger.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a minor earthquake without any overt ideological framing. It includes quotes from local residents describing the experience, but these comments are presented neutrally without editorialization. The focus remains on scientific data and public reaction, a
Why factuality (85): This article accurately reports the magnitude 2.8 earthquake near Siska, aligning with the primary source’s description of a smaller tremor. It includes correct locations and distances from EMSC data and does not introduce new information beyond what is confirmed by the primary source.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the facts without adding subjective commentary. It presents the event objectively and reports public reactions without bias.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6511 days agoA magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded on the Richter scale, with its epicenter eight kilometers from Stoca and 39 kilometers from Mostar, at a depth of six kilometers. The tremor was felt in parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina and also in southern Dalmatia in Croatia, particularly around Dubrovnik, which is located in a seismically sensitive area. Residents described the shaking as brief but noticeable, with some commenting that it was significant enough to feel. As of now, there are no reports of material damage or injuries.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on the event's location, intensity, and effects without emphasizing any particular political viewpoint or agenda. The focus remains on scientific and geographical data rather than ideological,党
Why factuality (70): This article introduces conflicting information by mentioning two earthquakes, which is not supported by the primary source. It also references a different date and adds speculative comments from users, which diverges from the primary source.
Why objectivity (65): The tone becomes more sensationalist, using phrases like 'probudila Hrvate' and quoting dramatic user comments. This indicates a less objective approach compared to the primary source.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 6514 days ago A powerful earthquake awakens Austrians: It caused rock erosion and was felt as far away as ViennaA strong earthquake measuring 4.5 on the Richter scale struck the Semmering area in Austria at 1:59 AM on August 24, 2026. The tremors were felt in Vienna and parts of Lower Austria and Styria. The epicenter was located eight kilometers southwest of Glunten and 15 kilometers east of Murzzuschlau in Styria, with the hypocenter at a depth of four kilometers. Seismologists warn that minor damages could occur in the affected area, and initial effects have already been recorded. Austrian media reported that the earthquake caused a rockslide on a road between Schottwin and Breitenstein in the Neunkirchen district. Small pieces of stone fell onto the roadway, prompting firefighters to remove the debris and restore normal traffic flow. As of now, there are no reports of injuries or significant material damage. Authorities continue to monitor the situation in the affected region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural disaster without overt ideological framing. It focuses on scientific data provided by the Geosphere Austria seismic institute and reports on the immediate consequences without taking a partisan stance. While the event has political relevance (
Why factuality (60): The article reports a magnitude 4.5 earthquake in Austria, but the primary source documents an earthquake of magnitude 3.1 near Bosnia and Herzegovina. This discrepancy significantly reduces factual accuracy. The article also mentions damage and rockfalls, which are not mentioned in the primary sour
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'snažan potres' and mentioning rockfalls, which may imply more impact than actually occurred. However, it remains relatively neutral in reporting the event.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 6011 days agoA minor earthquake of magnitude 3.1 on the Richter scale struck Bosnia and Herzegovina today around noon. The tremor was felt in the Dubrovnik area as well. According to data from the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), the epicenter was nearly 50 kilometers from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers southeast of Mostar, and four kilometers southeast of Stolac. Citizens reported brief shaking lasting a few seconds, with some describing it as a light tremor.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event with minimal political context or framing. It focuses on factual information such as the earthquake's magnitude, location, and citizen reactions without any apparent ideological slant or emphasis on political implications.
Why factuality (50): This article discusses a different earthquake altogether, focusing on a 4.5 magnitude quake in Austria rather than the 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina described in the primary source. As such, it is entirely unrelated to the event covered in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a neutral tone in describing the Austrian earthquake, though it focuses on the impact and damage rather than providing a balanced view of the seismic event itself.
Croatia
