I told the judge that he'd turn around if he didn't at least look at the tape of that action.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9020 days ago

Tihomir Pejin, VAR sudac koji je bio napadnut u Osijeku tijekom trčanja, prevezen je u bolnicu, ali brzo je otpušten. Dvije dana nakon napada, Pejin će ponovno biti u VAR sobi na utakmici 2. kola između Slaven Belupa i Varaždina. Sudačka komisija Hrvatskog nogometnog saveza odlučila je da ga ne zamijeni, jer se Pejin osjeća psihički dobro i spreman za povratak na posao. U VAR sobi bit će i Ante Čuljak, a glavnim sudcem susreta određen je Duje Strukan.

Bias read (Center): Tematika članka je sportska i ne podrijetvuje iz političke sfere. Napad na sudca nije predstavljan kao politički incident, već kao slučajni događaj koji je zahvatio jednog sportskog sudcu. Stoga se članak smatra apolitичkim i ne ima političkog nagiba.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the attack, Pejin's recovery, and his return to duty as a VAR referee. It matches the primary source closely and avoids adding unverified information.

Why objectivity (90): The article remains objective, presenting the facts without bias or emotional language. It focuses on the timeline of events and the HNS's decision-making process.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8520 days ago

VAR sudac Tihomir Pejin, koji je bio fizički napadnut tijekom trčanja u Osijeku, vratio se na posao tek dva dana nakon incidenta. Napadnuci su bili dvojica maskiranih ljudi koji su ga izudarali teleskopskim palicama prije nego što su pobjegli. Pejin je odmah prevezen u bolnicu gdje je primljen pomoć, a kasnije otpušten na kućnu njegu. Iako je doživel traumatičan događaj, Pejin je potvrdio da se osjeća psihološki stabilno i spremno za rad, pa je sudna komisija Hrvatskog nogometnog saveza odlučila zadržati ga u delegaciji. On će suditi utakmicu između Slaven Belupo i Varaždin u Koprivnici, uz pomoć drugega VAR sudaca Ante Čuljaka, dok će glavni sudac biti Duje Strukan.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports-related event involving a referee's return to duty after an assault, which is a matter of sports administration rather than political controversy. The framing remains neutral, focusing on factual updates about the referee’s condition and schedule without overtly favor

Why factuality (95): This article closely matches the primary source, providing accurate details about the attack, Pejin’s condition, and his return to duty. It references HNS confirmation and includes relevant match details without embellishment.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an impartial tone, presenting the facts without emotional language or subjective commentary. It focuses on verified information and official decisions.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8020 days ago

VAR sudac Pejin bio je napao u petak u Osijeku, gdje su ga dvojica maskiranih ljudi udarili teleskopskim palicama. Nije imao teže ozljede i zbrinut je u KBC-u Osijeku, ali nije tražio bolovanje ni poštedu od sudačkih obveza. HNS je odlučio da ga ostavi na poslu kao VAR sudac za utakmicu 2. kola SHNL-a između Slaven Belupa i Varaždina, koja se igra nedjelju u Koprivnici. Sudačka organizacija je potvrdila da će plan ostati nepromjenjen, a nema pouzdanih informacija o motivu napada ili vezi s njegovim službenim funkcijama.

Bias read (Center): Tematika priče je sportska, pa je politička važnost minimalna. Članak donosi neutralne informacije o događaju bez evidentnog strujanja. Povratna veza s poslom VAR sudca nije predstavljena kao politička stvar, već kao profesionalna konsekvenca.

Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, confirming Pejin’s lack of serious injuries, his return to duty, and HNS confirmation. It provides accurate information about the match schedule and other officials without adding speculative content.

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on facts and official statements. While it mentions the attack briefly, it avoids emotional language and sticks to verified information.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7520 days ago

The article discusses the contrasting reactions of football coaches Federico Bessone of Osijek and Alen Peternac of Rudeš after a match where Osijek defeated Rudeš 6-1 in Velika Gorica. Bessone expressed satisfaction with his team's performance, noting they scored six goals and were dominant after scoring their first goal. He acknowledged some initial hesitation but emphasized the importance of scoring goals in football. In contrast, Peternac was disappointed with the heavy defeat, criticizing his team's poor performance, especially after conceding six goals. He admitted that the team made mistakes early on and struggled to recover, emphasizing the need to improve defensively and avoid such a large deficit.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a sports match between two football teams and the reactions of their coaches. There is no mention of politics, public policy, or any other politically charged topics. The content is purely about sports performance and does not exhibit any ideological framing or bias.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the match result (6:1 win for Osijek), lists the scorers, and includes direct quotes from both coaches. It aligns perfectly with the cross-source consensus and provides precise details about the match progression and player contributions.

Why objectivity (75): The article remains largely neutral in tone, presenting both coaches' perspectives without bias. However, it slightly emphasizes the severity of the loss for Rudeš when quoting Peternac, which introduces a minor imbalance in neutrality.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 9519 days ago

The article reports on a football match between Hajduk Split and Istra 1961, which takes place at Poljud Stadium as part of the second round of the SHNL (Split-Herceg Novi League). Both teams enter the game without points after losing their opening matches, Hajduk lost to Varazdin, while Istra fell to Lokomotive. This match serves as a preparatory game ahead of Hajduk’s upcoming third qualifying round matches in the Conference League against Lithuanian side Žalgiris. The article provides team lineups, trainer comments, and information about the referee and broadcast details.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward report on a sports event without any overt ideological or political framing. It focuses solely on match details, team preparations, and logistical information such as lineups, referees, and broadcasting channels. There is no indication of favoritism toward one队

Why factuality (90): The article provides basic factual information about the match including teams, time, and location. It does not make any claims beyond what is stated in the primary source document and accurately lists the lineups and officials involved in the match.

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a highly objective tone throughout, simply reporting facts without taking sides or using emotive language. It focuses on providing logistical information rather than commentary or analysis.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 9520 days ago

The article reports on an upcoming football match between LOKOMOTIVA and GORICA in the second round of the SHNL league. LOKOMOTIVA, coached by Nikica Jelavić, aims for their second win of the season after defeating Istra 3:2 in the first round. GORICA, having suffered a defeat against Osijek at home, hopes to improve their performance. The match is scheduled to start at 21:00 at Maksimir stadium. It will be broadcast on MAXSport 1. Both teams are fully staffed, and the referee is Antonio Škobić from Osijek, with assistant referees from Osijek and Darda, and a fourth official from Duga Resa. The VAR team includes Ivan Bebek and Kristijan Novosel.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual report on a sports event without any political charge. It focuses solely on the match details, team lineups, and officiating information, presenting the information objectively without taking a stance or showing bias.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on a different match between Lokomotiva and Gorica, providing correct information about the teams, time, and location. It includes the lineup details and officials for this particular match, matching the factual content found in the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains an objective tone throughout, presenting only factual information without any personal opinions or biased language. It serves as a clear and unbiased report on the match details.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8520 days ago

Tihomir Pejin, bivši sudac HNL-a i trenutno direktor Zračne luke Osijek, bio je napaden i pretučen dvojicom napadača u petak. Iako je napadnut, Pejin će ipak sudjelovati kao VAR sudac na utakmici 2. kola SHNL-a između Slaven Belupa i Varaždina. Utakmica je zakazana za 9. kolovoza u 18:30. Pejin je potvrdio svoju prisutnost na utakmici i objavio da se osjeća dobro nakon incidenta.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a physical attack against a sports official and his decision to participate in a match despite the incident. The framing is neutral, focusing on the event itself and the individual's response without overtly favoring any side or using biased language.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports that Pejin was attacked, suffered no serious injuries, and will continue as a VAR referee. It includes direct quotes from Pejin and confirms the HNS decision to keep him as a VAR referee. It aligns closely with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, focusing on the timeline of events and Pejin's statements. It avoids emotional language and provides a balanced account of the situation.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8522 days ago

Tihomir Pejin, bivši nogometni sudac i trenutni direktor Zračne luke Osijek, bio je napadnut u petak ujutro od strane dvojice maskiranih ljudi koji su ga pretukli palicama dok je trčao blizu stadiona Gradski vrt. Napad je ponovno fokusirao pažnju na njegovu karijeru, koja je tokom godina izazivala polemike. Pejin je poznat po nadimku 'Mr. Respect', koji je stворio kontroverzu 2017. godine kada je umjesto isključiti napadnika, dao znak 'Respect'. Ovaj incident doveo je do promjene statuta HNS-a i smijenjenja disciplinskog sudca. Pejin je bio suspendiran više puta tokom svoje karijere, a posljednji put je bio 13 mjeseci. Policija istražuje motivaciju napada.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Pejin's controversial career, including his role in football and subsequent business ventures. It discusses both his professional achievements and controversies, such as the 'Mr. Respect' incident and multiple suspensions. The narrative does not overtly sl抗

Why factuality (90): The article aligns well with the primary source, confirming Pejin’s return to duty, the nature of the attack, and the involvement of HNS. It does not include unverified speculation about motives or connections to legal matters.

Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the incident and Pejin’s return to work. It avoids emotional language and presents the information objectively.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8020 days ago

In a football match between Rudeš and Osijek at the Velika Gorica stadium, Osijek took the lead early in the game through a goal by Mexican forward Armando Leon, who capitalized on a precise pass from Vrbančić. The match began with Rudeš showing more initiative but failing to create clear chances, while Osijek managed to control possession during periods of play. The game was closely contested, with both teams having opportunities, though Rudeš struggled to maintain pressure after conceding the goal. The article highlights the tactical changes made by both coaches, particularly the inclusion of Leon in Osijek’s attack and adjustments in Rudeš’ defensive setup.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced report of the football match, focusing on game events, player performances, and tactical decisions without overtly favoring either team. It provides objective descriptions of plays, mentions both teams' strategies, and does not take a partisan stance toward any club,隊

Why factuality (90): This article offers a live match report with precise timing, player names, and goal details. It accurately describes the sequence of play and includes specific scoring moments. The information is factual and matches standard sports reporting conventions. No significant inaccuracies were found.

Why objectivity (80): The article remains objective throughout, focusing on the game action without injecting personal bias or emotional language. It reports events neutrally and avoids taking sides, maintaining a balanced perspective.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7020 days ago

In the first match of the second round of the Croatian First Football League (HNL), Osijek defeated the new league entrants Rudeš with a score of 6:1 at the stadium in Velika Gorica. The match was hosted by the Zagreb-based team. Three goals were scored by Nail Omerović, two by Armando Leon, and one by Arnel Jakupović for Osijek, while Lenny Ilečić scored the lone goal for Rudeš. Osijek's coach, Federico Bessone, acknowledged some avoidable mistakes but expressed satisfaction with the team's performance after gaining control of the game and showcasing their full potential. On the other hand, Alen Peternac, representing Rudeš, admitted the heavy defeat but praised his team's start and preparation, noting they had more possession and shots on goal. He emphasized the need for improvement and expressed disappointment with the team's collapse during the match.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a football match between two teams, discussing the game's outcome, player performances, and coaches' reactions. There is no mention of political figures, policies, or issues that could indicate a political stance. The content remains purely sports-related and does not偏向

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the match result (6:1 win for Osijek) and includes specific player names who scored. It quotes both coaches, providing direct statements from Bessone and Peternac, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. All key facts are supported and consistent with other artic

Why objectivity (70): The article presents both sides fairly, quoting both coaches with their contrasting views. While it acknowledges the heavy defeat for Rudeš, it avoids overly negative language and maintains a relatively neutral tone in reporting the events.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7020 days ago

Osijek je značajno pobedio Rudeš sa 6:1 u prvoj utakmici drugog kola SuperSport HNL-a, koju su odigrali u Velikoj Gorici. Domaci su povezali rezultat u prvom poluvremenu, postigavši četiri golova, a gosti su potvrdili svoju dominaciju u nastavku. Najveći doprinos timu dao je Nail Omerović, koji je postigao hat-trick, dok su Armando Leon i Lenny Ilečić doprineli pobjedi. Trener Osijeka, Federico Bessone, je izrazio zadovoljstvo prema rezultatu, ali je napomenuo da su timovi nisu počeli kao želeli i napravili nekoliko grešaka.

Bias read (Center): Vijest nije politička ni kontroverzna, već opisuje sportski rezultat i trenutne događaje u nogometu. Trenutak je neutralan i fokusira se na faktičke podatke o utakmici, bez evidentnog političkog okvira ili stranih perspektiva.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the match result (6:1 win for Osijek), identifies the scorers, and includes direct quotes from Bessone. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides clear details about the match outcome and coach's comments.

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the coach's perspective objectively but includes some subjective language like 'sretan sam zbog igrača' which reflects his personal satisfaction. It remains mostly neutral but has slight leanings toward the positive outcome for Osijek.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 6515 days ago

Hajduk has cleared one obstacle on their path to qualifying for the Conference League after UEFA imposed a significant penalty on Polish club Raków Czestochowa. The punishment includes a fine of €68,000 and partial closure of sections B1 to B7 at their stadium for their upcoming match against Hajduk. This comes after incidents involving pyrotechnics and fan blockades during a previous game against Hammarby. Additionally, UEFA has issued a conditional warning stating that if such behavior repeats within the next two years, all seating areas at Raków’s stadium could be closed, leaving them to play in front of empty stands. Raków’s stadium has a capacity of just 5,500 spectators, and their most ardent fans, known for causing disturbances, will not be allowed in the main section. This development is seen as favorable for Hajduk, who now face a potentially less hostile environment in their upcoming match.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a football match and related disciplinary actions by UEFA, which are standard in sports journalism. There is no political framing, commentary, or bias evident in the content. The information presented is factual and centered around the sports event and sanctions.

Why factuality (90): This article accurately reports the UEFA's disciplinary action against Raków, including the financial penalty and stadium restrictions, which aligns with the primary source. It also correctly notes the implications for Hajduk's upcoming match, providing specific details about the sanctions and their

Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear positive bias towards Hajduk, emphasizing the 'dobra vijest' and suggesting that the sanctions will benefit them. While factual, the tone is celebratory and less neutral, focusing on the advantages for Hajduk rather than presenting both sides equally.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8020 days ago

The article reports on a football match between Osijek and Rudeš, where Osijek won 6-1. The coach of Osijek, Federico Bessone, commented on the victory, expressing satisfaction with the players and the result. He acknowledged some unforced errors but emphasized the team's fortune in scoring goals and their subsequent control over the game. The article highlights Osijek's improved performance compared to last season, noting two away wins in their first two matches.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward report on a sports event without any overt ideological or political framing. It focuses on the match outcome, player performance, and coach comments, maintaining neutrality.

Why factuality (85): This article reports on the coach's reaction to the win over Rudine, citing the score and the coach's comments. It aligns with the cross-source consensus about the result and the coach's statement. The information is presented clearly and supported by the reported outcome.

Why objectivity (80): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing on the coach's professional assessment without adding personal opinion or emotional language. It presents the facts as stated by the coach without bias.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7020 days ago

The first seven matches of the Croatian First Football League (HNL) have exceeded expectations, delivering high-scoring games, dramatic twists, young players, and unpredictable outcomes. In total, 26 goals were scored across these matches, averaging 3.71 per game, with no draws recorded. Five out of seven matches featured at least three goals, showcasing an exciting and fast-paced style of play. Notably, Osijek and Lokomotiva have emerged strong early on, with Osijek scoring eight goals while conceding just one in their two matches. Young talents like Nail Omerović and Niko Škafar Žužić have made significant impacts, adding to the league’s appeal. The match between Istra 1961 and Lokomotiva highlighted the potential of younger teams, with Istra fielding an average age of 21 but playing aggressively and competitively.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on sports performance and does not engage with political issues, officials, or public policy. It provides objective data on match results, player performances, and overall league dynamics without any ideological framing or biased language.

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed statistics about the first seven matches of the season, including goal totals, match outcomes, and player performances. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding high-scoring games and lack of draws. However, it lacks specific data from official league sources

Why objectivity (70): The tone is enthusiastic and promotional, using emotionally charged language like 'najviše žele' and 'osjećaj da će bodovi ponovno biti skupi'. The article frames the season as exciting and full of potential, which may reflect a positive bias towards the league.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7020 days ago

Tihomir Pejin, bivši hrvatski sudac i trenutni VAR sudac, bio je brutalno napadnut u petak ujutro tijekom svog uobičajenog trčanja s dvema muškarcima s maskama na licima koji su koristili teleskopske palice. Nastupio je ozbiljan fizički i psihološki šok, ali je Pejin već sljedeći dan, subota, vratila se na posao kao VAR sudac na utakmici između Slaven Belupa i Varaždine u Koprivnici. HNS je potvrdio da se Pejin psihički osjeća dobro i da može nastaviti s obnašanjem svoje funkcije. U VAR sobi bit će i Ante Čuljak, a glavni sudac će biti Duje Strukan. Utakmica će se odigrati na stadionu Ivan Kušek Apaš u nedjelju u 18:30.

Bias read (Center): Vijest se temelji na sportskom incidentu bez političkog konteksta ili konflikta interesa. Povratak Pejina na posao nije predstavljen kao politička stvar, već kao profesionalna reakcija na incident. Stoga se smatra apolitikom i ne ima značajne političke boje.

Why factuality (85): Article accurately reports that Pejin was attacked but not seriously injured, confirms he will return to work as planned, and cites HNS confirmation. It includes details about his role in the upcoming match and the other officials involved. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'brutaln

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards sympathy for the victim, using emotive language such as 'brutalno' and quoting a potentially fabricated statement. The focus on personal grievances rather than objective reporting reduces objectivity.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7520 days ago

Nogometni sudac Tihomir Pejin bio je napao u petak ujutro u Osijeku tijekom trčanja od dvije maskirane osobe koje su koristile teleskopske palice. Nakon napada, Pejin je bio prevezen u bolnicu, ali je brzo otpušten i odlučio se vratiti u akciju. U nedjelju, Pejin će biti VAR sudac na utakmici između Slaven Belupa i Varaždina. Sudačka komisija Hrvatskog nogometnog saveza donijela je odluku o njegovom povratku jer se Pejin osjeća psihički dobro i spreman za dužnosti. U VAR sobi također će biti Ante Čuljak, a glavni sudac susreta će biti Duje Strukan.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports-related incident involving a referee, focusing on his physical safety and return to duty. There is no political framing, ideological emphasis, or partisan commentary. The tone is objective, providing factual information about the event, medical response, and future安排.

Why factuality (80): Matches the primary source in stating Pejin will return as VAR despite being attacked. It includes his quote about feeling fine and plans to continue working. It also mentions the other VAR official and the match schedule, aligning with the primary source.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is positive and supportive of Pejin, highlighting his resilience. While not overtly biased, it leans toward a favorable portrayal of him.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7022 days ago

Tihomir Pejin, hrvatski nogometni sudac koji trenutno radi kao VAR sudac i direktor Zračne luke Osijek, bio je napadnut i pretučen u Wilsonovoj ulici u Osijeku. Napast su mu dvojica maskiranih muškaraca, a nakon incidenta ga su prevezli u KBC Osijek. Nije imao teške ozljede. Pejin, 42-godišnjak, je posljednji put bio glavni sudac u svibnju 2025. godine, a od tada radi u VAR sobi. U proljeće 2025. godine imenovan je za direktora zračne luke Osijek, nasljeđujući Ivana Kosa. U karijeri je bio i direktor BIOS-a i član uprave Vodovod-Montaže. Bio je suspendiran na 13 mjeseci zbog suđenja na utakmici Hajduk-Gorica 19. veljače 2023. godine. Poznat je po nadimku 'Mr. Respect', dobiven 2017. godine kada je izbjegao isključivanje igrača Soudanija na utakmici Dinama i Lokomotive. Igraci su reagirali na njegovu deciziju, a Hajduk je objavio fotografiju sa natpisom 'respect'.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of an incident involving a sports official, focusing on his professional background and controversies without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political stance. The framing remains neutral, providing context without leaning towards either side of the debate

Why factuality (80): Provides detailed background on Pejin’s career and reputation, which is relevant. It includes his statement about the attack and confirms he wasn’t seriously injured. However, it goes beyond the primary source by adding historical context about his nickname 'Mr. Respect'.

Why objectivity (70): The article has a more narrative style, focusing on Pejin’s background and reputation. While informative, it introduces subjective elements about his character and past decisions.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6521 days ago

The article discusses a football match between Hajduk and Istra 1961 scheduled for Sunday at 21:00 in the first round of the Croatian First Football League (SHNL). This will be Hajduk's first home game of the season, and they aim to secure their first win after losing 2:1 to Varaždin in the opening match. The team's coach, Gonzalo Garcia, announced the match during a press conference.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a sports event with no political implications or controversy. It provides factual information about a football match and does not exhibit any ideological framing or bias.

Why factuality (80): Article discusses the match against Varaždin and criticizes coach Garcia's treatment of captain Livaja. It aligns with the primary source document by referencing the match outcome and player reactions. However, it focuses more on criticism than factual reporting.

Why objectivity (65): The article has a strong critical tone toward the coach and captain, showing clear bias. While it reports on events, it leans into opinionated commentary rather than maintaining neutrality.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6519 days ago

The article discusses a football match between Hajduk and Istra, focusing on referee Mateo Erceg's performance. The game ended in a 2-2 draw, with Erceg being praised for his consistent decisions despite some controversial moments. The article highlights specific incidents where Erceg made calls that were considered correct, such as penalizing Pajaziti for fouling Šaranić and correctly assessing that there was no penalty in a duel between Pukštas and Kolić. It also mentions other questionable decisions by assistant referees and notes that Erceg did not have many difficult situations during the match.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports event and does not involve political topics, making it apolitical. As such, it is classified as center with no meaningful lean.

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the expert opinion from Tomislav Kujundžić Lujan regarding Mateo Erceg’s performance in the match. It includes specific moments like the 4th minute incident involving Podrug and Bamba, and mentions the final score of 2:2. However, it adds an extra sentence about Ivaniš

Why objectivity (65): The tone remains largely neutral, reporting the expert's comments without overt bias. However, the inclusion of unrelated content about Ivanišević introduces a slight imbalance, suggesting a possible editorial insertion.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6519 days ago

The article discusses a football match between Hajduk Split and Istra 1961, focusing on the controversial decisions made by referee Mateo Erceg during the game. The home team, Istra 1961, expressed dissatisfaction with two penalty calls attributed to Erceg, while former national referee Tomislav Kujundžić Lujan, now a match controller, defended the referee's performance. Lujan praised Erceg's handling of the game, highlighting his professionalism and accurate decisions, including correctly dismissing penalty appeals and managing contentious moments. He acknowledged some questionable incidents but overall supported the referee’s judgment, suggesting that the players' frustration was misplaced.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced assessment of the referee's performance, acknowledging both criticisms and praise. It does not take a clear ideological stance on the issue, instead offering an objective evaluation based on the expert opinion of a former referee. There is no evident political framing

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the match between Hajduk and Istra ending in a 2:2 draw and includes quotes from Tomislav Kujundžić Lujan regarding the officiating by Mateo Erceg. However, it omits some specific details from the primary source such as the 4. minute incident involving Podruga and the

Why objectivity (65): The article presents the match outcome neutrally but frames the situation with a slight bias towards Istra's perspective by suggesting that Erceg may have missed penalties. It uses emotionally charged phrases like 'nezadovoljniji nakon susreta bili su gosti' which indicates a partial stance.