Tensions flared during a closed-door meeting at the Law Society of Singapore (LawSoc) on August 13, as over 200 legal professionals debated the release of the full findings of an internal probe into workplace bullying and poor work culture. The meeting, held at Maxwell Chambers, was marked by heated discussions and calls for greater transparency. Members argued that the full report, particularly the detailed investigation materials, should be made available to ensure accountability and uphold public trust in the organization. The meeting, which began at 5:30 p.m., concluded nearly three hours late, ending around 9:30 p.m. The controversy stems from a petition signed by over 100 members demanding the release of the complete audit committee report. This petition followed a parliamentary statement by Law Minister Edwin Tong, who revealed that an internal audit had uncovered "significant failings in leadership, workplace culture and governance" within LawSoc. These findings, according to Tong, represented some of the most serious allegations the society had ever faced. Despite this, the full report remained confidential, with only summaries distributed to attendees. Copies of the summary had to be returned before the session ended, and several key annexes, including detailed investigation reports by a law firm and an external auditing firm, were reportedly missing from the documents provided. During the meeting, members raised concerns about the lack of transparency, questioning why the full report could not be shared. They also highlighted potential conflicts of interest related to the law firm conducting the investigation and expressed worries about the public perception of LawSoc. Some lawyers suggested that a police report might be necessary due to allegations of workplace harassment. Lawyer Clarence Lun, representing Fervent Chambers, emphasized the importance of full disclosure, stating that members should be allowed to review all relevant materials, provided confidentiality and data protection measures are upheld. The discussion became increasingly contentious, with several members raising their voices. In response, a council member ordered attendees to sit down, escalating tensions. The meeting ultimately ended with the LawSoc council agreeing to reconsider whether the full report should be released. However, no definitive decision was announced, leaving many members dissatisfied. The LawSoc and the Ministry of Law have yet to provide further comments. The probe originated from an anonymous email sent to the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) and the Ministry of Manpower on September 13, 2025. The message contained allegations and complaints about certain individuals and practices within LawSoc, spanning the years 2022 to 2025. These claims included inappropriate workplace conduct, governance and oversight failures, inadequate grievance handling and whistleblowing procedures, and lapses in internal controls over administrative and financial operations. Following the receipt of the email, MinLaw referred the matter to the LawSoc council, which then established an audit committee to investigate. The committee, composed of both LawSoc members and non-members, completed its report on June 5, 2026, and forwarded it to the council on July 1, 2026. In a parliamentary response dated August 5, Tong confirmed that the audit found no evidence of deliberate financial misconduct or intentional cover-ups. Nevertheless, he reiterated that the identified failings had eroded confidence within the organization and affected the wellbeing of its employees. The report was not directly shared with members, although the council informed them via email on July 23 that it had been submitted for consideration. Additionally, the council directed the finance department to review current travel protocols following the findings. On August 14, Tong publicly endorsed the need for transparency, urging LawSoc to disclose the audit committee’s report with appropriate redactions to protect interviewees. He stressed that the findings highlight critical issues regarding workplace culture and the effective functioning of the society. Tong emphasized that the resolution of these issues requires open dialogue and that the necessary steps must be taken to reinforce governance and public trust. The Ministry of Law continues to monitor developments closely, awaiting updates from the LawSoc council on the progress of addressing the identified challenges.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
SG
