An earthquake of magnitude 3.1 shook Herzegovina, and tremors were felt in DubrovnikA minor earthquake measuring 3.1 on the Richter scale shook Bosnia and Herzegovina, with tremors felt in the Dubrovnik area. According to data from the EMSC, the epicenter was approximately 50 kilometers away from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers south-southeast of Mostar, and 4 kilometers south-southeast of Stoca. Residents described the sensation as a 'weak shaking lasting a few seconds' and 'brief trembling,' with some noting that Dubrovnik experienced a light shudder. The report highlights the localized impact of the seismic event but does not mention any significant damage or casualties.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on the scientific data and local reactions without emphasizing ideological positions or partisan perspectives. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the natural event rather than any political,
Why factuality (100): This article accurately reflects the primary source document, including the exact distance from Dubrovnik (almost 50 kilometers), the precise locations relative to Mostar and Stoca, and the citizen comments. All information aligns perfectly with the primary source.
Why objectivity (100): The article presents the information objectively, using neutral language and quoting citizen reactions without editorializing or showing preference for any perspective.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 956 days ago Earthquake hits Sarajevo, citizens report: 'It was very shaken'A magnitude 3.1 earthquake struck near Sarajevo early Wednesday morning, according to the European Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor was recorded at 4:21 AM, with the epicenter approximately 10 kilometers east of Sarajevo and occurring at a depth of six kilometers. Residents in nearby areas reported feeling the shaking, with some describing it as 'fine trembling' and others noting that it woke them up or caused furniture to move. While there were no reports of material damage or injuries, the event was noted on social media platforms where citizens shared their experiences.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural event without taking a political stance. It reports on the scientific data provided by EMSC and includes citizen accounts without apparent ideological framing. There is no indication of favoring any particular political group or agenda.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the magnitude (3.1), time (4:21), location (east of Sarajevo), depth (6 km), and includes correct details about citizen experiences and lack of damage.
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information neutrally, using direct quotes from witnesses and sticking to factual reporting without any emotional language or bias.
An earthquake measuring 7.1 on the Richter scale has struck JapanAn earthquake measuring 7.1 on the Richter scale struck Japan. The event has raised concerns among experts due to Japan's history of seismic activity and its preparedness protocols. Authorities have issued advisories and are monitoring the situation closely. While there are no immediate reports of casualties or major damage, the incident highlights the ongoing risks associated with living in a seismically active region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without overtly emphasizing political perspectives or agendas. It focuses on the natural disaster itself and related safety measures, which aligns with a balanced reporting approach.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the magnitude (3.1), time (noon), location (near Bosnia and Herzegovina), and includes correct details about the epicenter relative to Dubrovnik, Mostar, and Stoc. It also includes accurate citizen reports from the EMSC application.
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information neutrally, using direct quotes from witnesses and sticking to factual reporting without any emotional language or bias.
'Earthquake shook parts of BiH: 'Loud noise was heard, tremors were felt'Na dan 29. srpnja 2026., u 4:21 sati, zapisa je potres magnitude 3,1 po Richterovoj skali, s epicentrom oko 12 km istočno od Sarajeva, na dubini od 6 km. Potešak je osjetio broj nekoliko stanovnika Sarajeva i okolice, koji su objavili svoja iskustva na stranicama Europsko-mediteranskog seizmološkog centra (EMSC). Nema prijave ozlijeđenih osoba ili materijalne štete. EMSC je objavio poruku na Twitteru zaštita potresa, pozivajući javnost da prijavi osjećaje putem poveznica koje je dao. Napomena je da je ovo automatska detekcija, a ne potvrđeno seizmički.
Bias read (Center): Vijest je neutralna i fokusira se na tehničke podatke o potresu, bez političkog okreta. Izvor podataka je objektivan (EMSC), a tekst ne pokazuje ni lijevi ni desni naglasak. Sadržaj je informativan i opisuje događaj bez vrednovanja ili stvaranja konteksta koji bi mogao dovesti do političkog naglaska
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the magnitude (3.1), time (4:21), location (east of Sarajevo), depth (6 km), and includes correct details about citizen experiences and lack of damage.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information neutrally, using direct quotes from witnesses and sticking to factual reporting without any emotional language or bias.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 906 days ago The earthquake shook I would say, 'It struck briefly, but hard'A magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded early Monday morning east of Sarajevo, according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor occurred at approximately 4:21 local time, with the epicenter located 12 kilometers east of Sarajevo at a depth of six kilometers. Many residents in Sarajevo and surrounding areas felt the quake, with some describing it as a brief but strong shaking. One user from Lukavica reported feeling the tremor and hearing a sound, while another from Kobilja Glava described it as 'short but very strong.' As of now, there are no reports of injuries or material damage.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural event without taking a political stance. It provides objective data from a scientific source (EMSC) and includes eyewitness accounts without editorializing. There is no indication of ideological framing or emphasis on specific political groups
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the magnitude (3.1), time (4:21), location (east of Sarajevo), depth (6 km), and includes correct details about citizen experiences and lack of damage.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting only factual information and direct quotes from witnesses without any subjective interpretation.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 908 days ago The earthquake shook BiH, it was felt in Croatia: 'It doesn't matter'A magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded on the Richter scale, with its epicenter eight kilometers from Stoca and 39 kilometers from Mostar, at a depth of six kilometers. The tremor was felt in parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina and also in southern Dalmatia in Croatia, particularly around Dubrovnik, which is located in a seismically sensitive area. Residents described the shaking as brief but noticeable, with some commenting that it was significant enough to feel. As of now, there are no reports of material damage or injuries.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on the event's location, intensity, and effects without emphasizing any particular political viewpoint or agenda. The focus remains on scientific and geographical data rather than ideological,党
Why factuality (90): The article provides mostly accurate information about the earthquake's magnitude, location, and depth. However, it states the epicenter was 39 kilometers from Mostar and 8 kilometers from Stoca, which slightly differs from the primary source's 35 kilometers from Mostar and 4 kilometers from Stoca.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective tone, reporting facts without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. It includes citizen reactions but presents them neutrally.
A 3.6 magnitude earthquake has shaken Sisak and the surrounding area.A magnitude 3.6 earthquake was felt in central Croatia early today at 6:29 AM, with the epicenter recorded six kilometers southeast of Sisak, approximately 56 kilometers from Zagreb, at a depth of nine kilometers. Residents in Sisak and surrounding areas reported feeling a short but fairly strong tremor accompanied by a rumbling sound. The event is considered minor and does not pose significant risk.
Bias read (Center): The article reports a natural disaster event without taking a political stance. It provides factual information about the earthquake, including location, time, magnitude, and local reactions, without emphasizing any particular political viewpoint or agenda.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the magnitude (3.6), time (6:29), location (south-east of Sisk), depth (9 km), and includes correct details about citizen experiences.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting only factual information and direct quotes from witnesses without any subjective interpretation.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 858 days ago The earthquake struck Herzegovina, and was felt in southern CroatiaA moderate earthquake of magnitude 3.1 on the Richter scale struck the southern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina on Monday at 2:00 PM. The epicenter was located 39 kilometers southeast of Mostar, or eight kilometers southeast of Stoc, at a depth of 6.3 kilometers. Due to the relatively shallow depth of the epicenter, ground shaking could be felt in surrounding areas, including parts of southern Croatia. Residents of Dubrovnik and Župa dubrovačka reported feeling the tremor. There are currently no reports of material damage or injured individuals.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of an earthquake event, focusing on geographical details, the depth of the epicenter, and the regions affected. It does not present any overtly biased language, nor does it emphasize political implications or take a stance on the event itself. The information,
Why factuality (85): The article provides accurate details about the earthquake's magnitude (3.1), location (Bosnia and Herzegovina), and mentions that it was felt in parts of Croatia. However, it slightly differs from the primary source by stating the epicenter was 39 kilometers southeast of Mostar and 8 kilometers sou
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias or emotional language. It includes quotes from citizens but does not take sides or present any particular viewpoint.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago The earthquake in BiH was also felt in Dubrovnik:Na podne Bosni i Hercegovini dogodio se potres magnituda 3,1 po Richterovoj skali, a podrhtavanje tla osjetilo se i na dubrovačkom području. Prema podacima Europsko-mediteranskog seizmološkog centra (EMSC), epicentar potresa bio je oko četiri kilometra jugoistočno od Stoca, 35 kilometara jugoistočno od Mostara i približno 50 kilometara od Dubrovnika. Građani su na stranici EMSC-a prijavili da je podrhtavanje bilo kratko i slabo, s komentarima poput 'slabo podrhtavanje u trajanju od nekoliko sekundi', 'kratko se zatreslo' i 'Dubrovnik, lagano zadrmalo'.
Bias read (Center): Vijest o potresu nije politički nabit, ali je izvještaj osjetljiv jer se događaj dogodio u regiji koja ima povijesne i kulturne značajke. Vijest se fokusira na opisivanje događaja bez evidentnog političkog slanja ili kritike. Izvor informacija je objektivan (EMSC), a komentari građana su neutralni i
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the earthquake details from the primary source, including magnitude, location, and distance from Dubrovnik. It cites EMSC data and includes quotes from citizens, aligning closely with the Dubrovački vjesnik. Minor discrepancies include using "osjetio se" rather than "o
Why objectivity (80): The tone is neutral, reporting facts without emotional language. However, there is slight emphasis on the impact felt in Dubrovnik, which could be seen as slightly more attention to local reactions, though not overtly biased.
Moderately strong earthquake near SiskaA moderate earthquake with a magnitude of 3.6 on the Richter scale struck near Sisak today at 6:29 AM, according to the Seismological Service. The quake had an intensity of IV on the EMS scale at its epicenter. Residents reported feeling strong shaking, with some describing the experience as if a bomb had exploded followed by a long rumble. Others mentioned the sensation of their homes trembling. The incident has been tagged with hashtags related to the earthquake and the Sisak-Moslavina County.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event without any political commentary, framing, or bias. It focuses solely on the factual details of the earthquake and includes witness accounts without taking a stance or emphasizing any particular perspective.
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the magnitude (3.6), time (6:29), and location (near Sisak) according to the primary source. It also includes correct details about the depth and citizen observations.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents facts objectively without bias or emotional language. It provides direct quotes from citizens and sticks to factual reporting without editorializing.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 855 days ago The Siska earthquakeAn earthquake measuring 3.7 on the Richter scale struck the Sisak area early Thursday morning, according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Center (EMSC). The quake occurred at 6:29 AM, with the epicenter located six kilometers southeast of Sisak, approximately 56 kilometers southeast of Zagreb. It was recorded at a depth of nine kilometers. Residents reported feeling the tremor through the EMSC app, describing it as 'well felt' and mentioning strong shaking in the center of Sisak. The report includes calls for opinions and invites readers to join discussions or read comments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on seismic activity, locations, and public reactions without commentary on governance, policy, or ideological positions. The framing remains neutral, focusing solely on scientific data and user
Why factuality (80): The article correctly reports the magnitude (3.7), time (6:29), location (south-east of Sisk), and depth (9 km). It includes accurate citizen reports from the EMSC application.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, focusing on factual details and including direct quotes from witnesses without showing preference or bias.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 603 days ago Two earthquakes hit the Podsljem area and woke up Croatians: 'It felt right'On Saturday at 4:11 AM, the Seismological Service recorded two weak earthquakes with epicenters in the subsurface zone. The magnitudes were 2.3 and 2.1 on the Richter scale, with intensity level III on the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS). Citizens reported feeling the tremors on the page of the Euro-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), where over 150 comments were posted describing the experience. Multiple social media posts under hashtags like #Earthquake and #Croatia shared personal accounts of the event, including reports of waking up, objects shaking, and glass rattling. While the tremors were described as mild, they were noted to have been felt by many across Croatia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about seismic activity without any political commentary or framing. It focuses solely on scientific data and citizen experiences related to the earthquakes, which are apolitical in nature. There is no indication of ideological leaning or bias in the reporting
Why factuality (50): This article discusses a different earthquake altogether, focusing on a 4.7 magnitude quake in Italy rather than the 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina described in the primary source. As such, it is entirely unrelated to the event covered in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a neutral tone in describing the Italian earthquake, though it focuses on the impact and damage rather than providing a balanced view of the seismic event itself.
The sublime zone was shaken by two small earthquakes last night, the Croats flooded the EMSC page with commentsTwo minor earthquakes were recorded early Monday morning in the area around Zagreb, with their epicenters located in the sub-surface zone. The first earthquake had a magnitude of 2.3 and the second 2.1 on the Richter scale, both registering intensity level III on the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS). Although not strong enough to cause significant damage, the event prompted over 150 comments from Croatian citizens on the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC) website, sharing their experiences of feeling the tremors. Some reported the shaking being stronger than the recorded magnitudes, with some noting they woke up or felt the vibrations clearly.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural seismic event and focuses on scientific data and public reaction. There is no overt ideological framing, political commentary, or emphasis on partisan perspectives. The tone remains neutral, presenting factual information about the earthquakes and the public's varied
Why factuality (50): This article discusses a different earthquake altogether, focusing on a 4.7 magnitude quake in Italy rather than the 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina described in the primary source. As such, it is entirely unrelated to the event covered in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a neutral tone in describing the Italian earthquake, though it focuses on the impact and damage rather than providing a balanced view of the seismic event itself.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 608 days ago An earthquake of magnitude 3.1 has struck Bosnia and Herzegovina.A minor earthquake of magnitude 3.1 on the Richter scale struck Bosnia and Herzegovina today around noon. The tremor was felt in the Dubrovnik area as well. According to data from the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), the epicenter was nearly 50 kilometers from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers southeast of Mostar, and four kilometers southeast of Stolac. Citizens reported brief shaking lasting a few seconds, with some describing it as a light tremor.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event with minimal political context or framing. It focuses on factual information such as the earthquake's magnitude, location, and citizen reactions without any apparent ideological slant or emphasis on political implications.
Why factuality (50): This article discusses a different earthquake altogether, focusing on a 4.5 magnitude quake in Austria rather than the 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina described in the primary source. As such, it is entirely unrelated to the event covered in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a neutral tone in describing the Austrian earthquake, though it focuses on the impact and damage rather than providing a balanced view of the seismic event itself.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 406 days ago An earthquake of magnitude 3.1 near SarajevoA magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded early Monday morning east of Sarajevo, according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor occurred at 4:21 local time, with the epicenter located 12 kilometers east of Sarajevo at a depth of six kilometers. Many residents of Sarajevo and surrounding areas felt the shaking, with over 490 EMSC users reporting the event and nearly 200 comments from citizens on their platform. Residents described the sensation as noticeable, with some noting they heard sounds and felt the shake in the city center. There are currently no reports of injuries or material damage.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural event without overt ideological framing. It focuses on scientific data provided by the EMSC and includes citizen reactions without taking a partisan stance. The tone remains neutral, providing balanced reporting without leaning toward any side
Why factuality (30): This article is completely unrelated to the primary source document, discussing a different earthquake in Japan with a much higher magnitude (7.1) and no connection to Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Why objectivity (40): The article is entirely biased towards sensationalizing the event with dramatic language and no attempt at neutrality or balance.
A 4.3-magnitude earthquake has struck Tuscany, evacuated buildingsA 4.3 magnitude earthquake struck central Italy on Tuesday morning, according to the Euro-Mediterranean Seismological Center (EMSC). The tremor was felt across Tuscany at 10:15 local time, with the epicenter located approximately 18 kilometers northwest of Livorno and nine kilometers southwest of Pisa, at a depth of nine kilometers. Due to the relatively shallow epicenter, the shaking was felt over a wide area. Buildings were evacuated in Livorno, Florence, Pisa, and Capannori, with many residents exiting their homes. As of now, there are no reports of injuries or significant material damage. The Leaning Tower of Pisa remained undamaged despite the quake nearby. Italy, situated at the boundary between the African and Eurasian tectonic plates, is frequently affected by seismic activity. Last weekend, a stronger earthquake hit southern Italian city Naples, the strongest in the last four decades, injuring 26 people. On Tuesday, a protest march took place in Naples where residents demanded better protection against earthquakes, with slogans such as 'Shame on you.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the earthquake and its effects without overtly favoring any political stance. It includes both scientific data and public reactions, including protests in Naples, but does not take a clear ideological position. While the mention of protests could imply