ON
← Back to feed
Putting Yourself in Another's Place
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservativeyesterday

Putting Yourself in Another's Place

The article discusses various political issues across different countries. In Spain, Feijóo argues that the Law of the Minor cannot apply to children in Ceuta because they 'participated in an invasion,' suggesting they are responsible for entering another country illegally. This stance contrasts with Teresa Rodríguez’s perspective, who highlights the institutionalized racism against 500 Moroccan girls compared to the 350,000 Ukrainian children welcomed into Spain. The article also notes the rise of far-right parties in Israel, including the potential threat to Benjamin Netanyahu’s power. Additionally, it mentions Israeli Minister Ben Gvir announcing plans for an execution facility for Palestinians under a death penalty law. Other topics include election controversies in Colombia and Argentina, where Milei blames feminists for societal issues, and regional politics in Spain involving Ayuso appointing former politicians to advisory roles with significant financial benefits.

The Save Europe Act, a far-right group known for its anti-immigration stance, held its first public gathering in Spain this Saturday in Barcelona, drawing only a handful of participants. The event, organized as part of their European Shield tour, was met with strong opposition from hundreds of antifascists who gathered in the Plaza Sant Jaume, the heart of the city. Despite efforts by organizers to attract attendees, the demonstration failed to gain traction, highlighting the growing resistance to far-right ideologies in Spain. The Save Europe Act, which advocates for mass repatriation of migrants, had planned to hold rallies in several cities across Europe, starting from Utrecht in the Netherlands, moving through Antwerp in Belgium, and continuing to Lyon and Lille in France. However, authorities in France prohibited these gatherings due to fears of violent clashes. In Spain, despite calls from left-wing groups such as the CUP and the Comuns for a ban, the event proceeded in Barcelona, set to be followed by another in Madrid on August 26. The low turnout underscored the limited support for the movement among the general public. Organizers of the Save Europe Act, including representatives from the Spanish far-right group Reconquista linked to Vox, deployed a large banner measuring 20 meters by 20 meters (400 square meters) to draw attention to their cause. The banner bore the slogan “Remigration saves Europe,” one of the key messages of the group. Among the attendees were figures such as Alberto Tarradas, a Vox representative in the Catalan Parliament, and other members of the far-right network. Their speeches included inflammatory rhetoric against immigration, calling for the expulsion of non-European migrants and accusing the media of being complicit in what they describe as a “cultural invasion.” Antifascist protesters, numbering over 300, occupied the same plaza earlier in the day, forming a counter-protest against the far-right gathering. Police intervened to prevent confrontations, setting up barriers to separate the two groups. The presence of both sides in the central square, near the Barcelona City Council and the Catalan government offices, highlighted the tension surrounding the issue of migration in the region. The Save Europe Act’s ideology is rooted in the belief that European societies face existential threats from mass immigration, particularly from non-Western countries. They advocate for policies that would allow the deportation of individuals deemed “non-integrated” or economically burdensome, even those living legally in the EU. This approach has been described as racist and xenophobic, with critics arguing that it promotes a vision of Europe as a homogeneous, white-dominated society. The group's proposals were formally submitted to the European Commission in June 2026, but were rejected as “manifestly contrary to the values of the Union.” Support for the Save Europe Act comes primarily from far-right political parties, including Vox in Spain and the Austrian Martin Sellner and Dutch Eva Vlaardingerbroek, who have long promoted exclusionary immigration policies. In Spain, the movement has found backing within Vox, though the party itself has not publicly endorsed the specific event in Barcelona. The group’s influence extends beyond politics into grassroots activism, with young activists playing a prominent role in organizing and promoting its agenda. The controversy surrounding the Save Europe Act has intensified amid the ongoing crisis in Ceuta, a Spanish territory near Morocco where tensions between residents and migrant arrivals have escalated. Local authorities have faced criticism for their handling of the situation, with some accusing them of adopting policies that align with far-right narratives. Meanwhile, progressive organizations and leftist politicians continue to push back against the spread of xenophobic discourse, emphasizing the importance of inclusive and humane immigration policies. The police presence during the event reflected the heightened security concerns associated with the far-right movement. The Barcelona City Council has stated that while freedom of assembly is protected, it will not tolerate hate speech or acts of racism. Authorities have warned that any incitement to violence or discrimination could lead to legal consequences. The upcoming rally in Madrid is expected to see similar levels of confrontation, given the polarized climate around migration issues in Spain and across Europe.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

11 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 75yesterday
Save Europe Act's ultra rally hits Barcelona with just a few dozen people gathered

An ultra-right xenophobic rally organized by the group Save Europe Act and the Spanish collective Reconquista took place in Barcelona but attracted only around fifty participants. The event was part of the European Shield tour, which had previously been banned in France due to fears of violent clashes. Antifascist protesters gathered in large numbers at Plaça Sant Jaume, opposing the demonstration. Despite calls from antifascist groups and parties like CUP and Comuns to ban the event, authorities allowed it to proceed. Organizers faced challenges in setting up their large banner, while antifascists occupied the square before the event. Police cordoned off areas to prevent confrontations. A representative from Reconquista, linked to Vox, accused media of manipulation and called for the expulsion of migrants, using inflammatory rhetoric. The event drew criticism from antifascist groups and activists who condemned it as hate speech promoting white supremacy.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the event as a 'xenophobic' and 'ultra-right' gathering, emphasizing racist rhetoric such as 'invasion Muslim' and 'remigration as solution'. It highlights the involvement of Vox-linked figures and uses terms like 'supremacism blanco' and 'delito de odio', which carry strong right

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the low turnout at the far-right demonstration in Barcelona, citing the presence of hundreds of anti-fascists opposing them. It provides context about the European Shield tour, including previous stops and restrictions in France, and mentions the involvement of Reconqu

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the event from the perspective of the far-right groups but includes counterpoints about the anti-fascist protests. However, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'xenófoba' and includes direct quotes from the organizers that reflect their ideological stance, which introdu

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 93Objective 702 days ago
Who are Reconquista and Save Europe, the racist groups that have brought the idea of "remigration" to Spain

The article discusses Reconquista, a far-right youth movement in Spain, and Save Europe, a group promoting the concept of 'remigration', the forced return of migrants to their countries of origin. The movement is organizing a demonstration in Barcelona as part of the European Shield tour, which has been banned in France due to concerns over violence. The initiative is linked to a proposed law called Save Europe Act, submitted to the European Commission in June but later rejected as contrary to EU values. The movement claims to be non-partisan but is supported by far-right politicians like Spain’s Vox leader Santiago Abascal. The article highlights the racist and xenophobic rhetoric used by these groups, including claims that native Europeans risk becoming minorities.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the movement as far-right, xenophobic, and racist, using terms such as 'xenophobic,' 'racist,' and 'forced return of migrants.' It emphasizes the ideological alignment with far-right figures and parties, while criticizing the movement’s goals as violating EU values. The tone is un

Why factuality (93): This article provides detailed background on Reconquista and Save Europe, explaining their ideology and the legal proposal for 'remigración.' It references the European Shield tour and the suppression in France, matching the factual details found in the first article. The information is consistent w

Why objectivity (70): While informative, this piece frames the groups as 'racistas' and emphasizes their extremist policies, which may influence readers’ perceptions. The language used to describe their goals ('expulsión de los migrantes irregulares') carries a negative tone, suggesting a clear ideological position rathe

El País logoEl PaísIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 857 days ago
Crime has no nationality, only circumstances

The article discusses how political exploitation of immigration often leads to discriminatory rhetoric against foreigners, accusing them of crimes such as violence against women, homicide, theft, and fraud. It highlights research by sociologist Jesús Sánchez Barricarte from Universidad Carlos III, who analyzed 5.6 million convictions between 2007 and 2023. By standardizing data, comparing Spanish and foreign offenders of the same age and gender, the study found a 48% reduction in the criminal disparity, with foreigners committing 1,294 crimes per 100,000 inhabitants compared to 675 for Spaniards. While the gap narrowed, the article notes that differences may still stem from factors like countries of origin, where some nations report lower crime rates than Spain.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue by highlighting systemic discrimination against immigrants through political rhetoric and presents research that challenges common stereotypes. The emphasis on reducing the 'criminality gap' through standardized data suggests a critique of xenophobic narratives, aligning

Why factuality (90): The article presents specific data from a study by Jesús Sánchez Barricarte analyzing 5.6 million court sentences between 2007 and 2023. It provides numerical comparisons between Spanish and foreign offenders after standardizing variables like age and gender. The numbers given are consistent with th

Why objectivity (85): The article uses neutral language overall but includes phrases such as 'frases incriminatorias' and 'identifica al extranjero con un delincuente,' which may imply bias in political discourse rather than presenting purely objective findings. While it reports the study's results fairly, the framing su

Público logoPúblicoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
"This is how fascists are treated": neighbours of a village in A Coruña stand up to Figaredo after his racist speech

Residents of a village in A Coruña responded directly to a racist speech by José María Figaredo, a regional politician known for his far-right views. The headline translates to 'This is how fascists are treated,' suggesting a strong reaction against Figaredo's rhetoric. The article highlights local community members confronting him publicly, indicating a growing resistance to nationalist and racist narratives in the region. The incident reflects broader tensions around identity and immigration in Galician society.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the residents' confrontation with Figaredo as a justified stand against racism, using language that implies moral superiority over far-right figures. It emphasizes the community's active resistance rather than neutrality, aligning more with progressive values.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on an incident where residents of a town in A Coruña responded to a racist speech by Figaredo. While no primary source is available, the reporting aligns with common narratives around public reactions to far-right rhetoric in Spain. The phrasing 'así se trata a los fascistas' sug

Why objectivity (70): The tone of the article leans towards portraying the residents as standing up against racism, which may reflect a political bias. The use of emotionally charged phrases like 'así se trata a los fascistas' indicates a subjective framing rather than a purely objective report.

El Periódico logoEl PeriódicoIndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 454 days ago
European campaign driven by white supremacists calls for protests in Barcelona and Madrid amid Ceuta crisis

The article reports on a European campaign led by white supremacists that has organized protests in Barcelona and Madrid during the ongoing crisis in Ceuta. The campaign appears to be part of a broader movement advocating for the protection of white populations and opposing immigration, which has sparked demonstrations in major Spanish cities. The timing of these protests coincides with heightened tensions over the management of Ceuta, a disputed territory between Spain and Morocco. The article highlights the growing influence of far-right groups within Europe and their increasing visibility in public spaces.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the campaign as being led by 'supremacistas blancos' (white supremacists), a term associated with far-right ideologies. This labeling suggests a clear alignment with conservative or nationalist viewpoints, particularly in the context of rising anti-immigration sentiment across the

Why factuality (65): The article reports that a European campaign led by white supremacists is organizing protests in Barcelona and Madrid during the Ceuta crisis. While there is no primary source to verify this claim directly, similar reports from other media outlets suggest that far-right groups have been active in Sp

Why objectivity (45): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'supremacistas blancos' (white supremacists) and frames the protests as occurring 'en plena crisis de Ceuta' (during the Ceuta crisis), implying a direct connection between the protests and the ongoing political situation. This suggests a potenti

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 40Objective 302 days ago
Tension and controversy in Barcelona over the rally of the ultra group Save Europe Act against immigration in the midst of the Ceuta crisis

In Barcelona, the ultra group Save Europe Act held a large demonstration against immigration during a heightened crisis in Ceuta. The event, part of their European tour, was marked by high tension and controversy, prompting significant police presence. Left-wing organizations organized counter-protests at the same location but an hour earlier. Save Europe Act, led by figures like Martin Sellner and Eva Vlaardingerbroek, advocates for 'mass repatriation' and opposes what they call 'replacement immigration,' claiming it threatens Europe’s ethnic continuity. Their ideology includes the controversial concept of 'repatriation,' which calls for mass deportations of individuals deemed non-integrated or burdensome. The movement attempted to register as an EU Citizens’ Initiative but was rejected by the European Commission for being contrary to EU values. Catalan authorities warned of potential hate crimes and increased police surveillance.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Save Europe Act as a radical, anti-immigration movement promoting ethnocentric policies such as 'mass repatriation' and 'ethnic continuity.' It emphasizes their alignment with far-right ideologies and highlights their rejection by EU institutions. The focus on their controversial,

Why factuality (40): The article contains several factual inaccuracies and speculative content. It references a group called 'Save Europe Act' which is not mentioned in the primary source document. It also includes fabricated details about the movement's origins and goals that are not supported by the provided data. The

Why objectivity (30): The article exhibits strong ideological bias, promoting the views of the 'Save Europe Act' movement while portraying opposition groups negatively. It uses loaded language such as 'ultra' and 'identitarian activist' to describe opponents, indicating a clear lack of neutrality in its presentation.

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 30Objective 408 days ago
The agenda of the international far right hijacks Spanish politics

The article discusses how the international far-right agenda, particularly the concept of 'priority national,' has increasingly influenced Spanish politics, especially through the policies of the Vox party and its alignment with other far-right movements. It highlights how leaders like Alberto Núñez Feijóo have adopted this framework in regional governance agreements, emphasizing the prioritization of native citizens over immigrants in access to public services. The piece traces the origins of the 'priority national' idea back to France, where Jean-Marie Le Pen popularized it as part of his nationalist ideology. The article argues that this ideological shift reflects a broader trend in European far-right politics, with Spain’s conservative parties adopting similar strategies to address perceived threats to national identity. It also critiques the lack of a strong democratic counter-narrative and the inability of leftist forces to effectively challenge these narratives.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the adoption of 'priority national' by Spanish conservative politicians as a continuation of a broader international far-right movement, drawing parallels between Spain, France, Hungary, and Argentina. It emphasizes the influence of far-right rhetoric and policies, portraying them

Why factuality (30): The article discusses the influence of international far-right agendas but does not mention the creation of the new Argentine ministry under Milei or Sturzenegger. It focuses on Spain and Vox, making it unrelated to the primary source document. The facts presented are not aligned with the event desc

Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'secuestra la política' and frames the discussion around far-right influence in a biased manner. It presents the situation as if the far-right is dominating political discourse without providing balanced perspectives.

ABC (España) logoABC (España)IndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 356 days ago
Paco Castañares 'fulminates' the Minister of Health after what was seen in Ceuta with the question that many ask themselves: Listen, it's alright

On August 17, 2026, Spanish health minister Mónica García visited Ceuta and denied claims of a 'health crisis' in the autonomous city, while rejecting the idea that immigration is linked to disease. Her remarks sparked controversy, particularly regarding her characterization of such concerns as 'unfair and xenophobic.' The discussion was featured on the Spanish TV show 'En boca de todos,' where former socialist leader Paco Castañares criticized García's stance, reflecting broader public skepticism about the government's handling of healthcare and migration issues.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of Minister García as a legitimate public concern, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize fairness and oppose xenophobia. Paco Castañares, a former socialist, represents a left-wing figure who challenges the minister’s position, suggesting the article

Why factuality (30): This article focuses on political commentary regarding health minister Mónica García's visit to Ceuta and her denial of a healthcare crisis. It does not address the primary source document or any related facts about child migration agreements between Spain and Morocco.

Why objectivity (35): The article presents a biased view of the minister's statements, using emotionally charged language and framing the discussion in a partisan manner. It lacks balance by only presenting one perspective.

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentProgressiveFactual 17Objective 252 days ago
Putting Yourself in Another's Place

The article discusses various political issues across different countries. In Spain, Feijóo argues that the Law of the Minor cannot apply to children in Ceuta because they 'participated in an invasion,' suggesting they are responsible for entering another country illegally. This stance contrasts with Teresa Rodríguez’s perspective, who highlights the institutionalized racism against 500 Moroccan girls compared to the 350,000 Ukrainian children welcomed into Spain. The article also notes the rise of far-right parties in Israel, including the potential threat to Benjamin Netanyahu’s power. Additionally, it mentions Israeli Minister Ben Gvir announcing plans for an execution facility for Palestinians under a death penalty law. Other topics include election controversies in Colombia and Argentina, where Milei blames feminists for societal issues, and regional politics in Spain involving Ayuso appointing former politicians to advisory roles with significant financial benefits.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation in Spain through a critical lens, emphasizing institutionalized racism and contrasting policies toward different groups of children. It criticizes the PP and Vox for their hardline stances on immigration and highlights the rise of far-left voices like Teresa Rodríguz

Why factuality (17): This article contains highly inaccurate and misleading information. It falsely claims Feijóo said children from Ceuta 'participated in an invasion,' which is not supported by any primary source. The article also invents details such as 'the age penalty for the PP president being a few months of life

Why objectivity (25): The article uses emotionally charged language ('racismo', 'gobierno de los peores seres', '💩 de gente') and takes a strongly biased stance against right-wing policies while praising left-wing actions. It presents a one-sided narrative without presenting opposing viewpoints or contextualizing events

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒Conservativeyesterday
The Save Europe Act movement pinches in its landing in Barcelona to demand the closure of borders and mass remigrations

Save Europe Act, a movement opposing mass immigration, held its first demonstration in Spain in Barcelona, gathering around 100 people. The event was marked by police presence due to anticipated counter-protests organized by leftist groups. Authorities deployed significant security forces to prevent clashes between the two opposing groups. Participants displayed a large banner advocating 'remigration saves Europe,' while speakers claimed demographic replacement is a proven fact and criticized current immigration policies. The Barcelona City Council has announced plans to report some of the slogans used during the event to authorities, citing them as potentially racist. The council, led by the PSC, supports freedom of assembly but opposes racism and xenophobia.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Save Europe Act as a controversial movement with extreme views, using terms like 'invasi�n' (invasion), 'demogr�fica' (demographic), and 'racista' (racist). It highlights the movement's alignment with far-right figures like Vox's Alberto Tarradas and emphasizes the city council's抨

El Confidencial logoEl ConfidencialIndependent🔒Conservative2 days ago
"Remigration" was almost a taboo, now it's being championed by 'ultra' groups from Europe in the centre of Barcelona

The article discusses the growing presence of ultra-nationalist groups in central Barcelona who are openly promoting the concept of 'remigration,' which refers to the return of immigrants to their countries of origin. This issue was previously considered a sensitive or taboo topic in Spain but has now gained visibility through these groups' activities. The article highlights how such movements are becoming more vocal and organized, particularly in urban areas. It suggests that this trend reflects broader political and social shifts in Europe regarding immigration policies and national identity.

Bias read (Conservative): The article focuses on the rise of ultra-nationalist groups advocating for remigration, a politically charged topic often associated with right-wing ideologies. The framing emphasizes the increasing visibility and influence of these groups, suggesting a shift toward more conservative or nationalist傾

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories