Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 909/3/2026 The disgraced Split doctors who issued mass false convictions to drivers and sailors without any examinationTwo doctors in Split, Croatia, along with a 40-year-old employee of their clinic, are under investigation for allegedly issuing false medical certificates to drivers, sailors, and athletes without conducting any medical examinations. The 75-year-old doctor is accused of providing over 14 false health fitness certifications between December 2025 and May 2026, while the 40-year-old woman helped forge these documents knowing the individuals had not undergone proper medical checks. A 79-year-old psychologist was also involved, assisting in the creation of false psychological evaluations. The police conducted searches at the clinic, homes, and vehicles used by the suspects and seized relevant documentation. The investigation continues, and the two men were placed under house arrest, while the woman will face formal charges through the state prosecution.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal investigation involving medical professionals who issued fraudulent health certificates. It presents factual information about the alleged misconduct, the individuals involved, and the actions taken by law enforcement. There is no evident ideological framing or biased措
Why factuality (95): This article provides a comprehensive account of the case, aligning almost entirely with the primary source document. It clearly outlines the timeline of events, the roles of each individual, and the legal implications. It also mentions the number of criminal acts and the ongoing investigation, show
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information in a balanced and objective manner, using formal and neutral language throughout. There is no indication of favoring any party or expressing subjective judgment beyond what is implied by the legal framework.
Police raided a doctor's office in Dalmatia: Doctor issued certificates without examination, two more people arrestedThe Split police concluded an investigation against a 75-year-old doctor, a 79-year-old psychologist, and a 40-year-old employee of a private specialist clinic, suspecting them of issuing medical fitness certificates without proper examinations. The doctor allegedly issued such certificates between December of last year and May 19th of this year at his private clinic in the Split-Dalmatia County. These certificates were for drivers, driver candidates, and crew members of ships, boats, and yachts. The police believe the doctor did this to earn money, and the 40-year-old employee allegedly helped by creating and verifying certificates for athletes who had not passed necessary exams. The psychologist is also suspected of participating in two cases where he issued similar certificates without required assessments. The doctor faces at least 14 criminal charges related to abuse of position and authority, with the other two suspects also being charged. During the investigation, police searched the clinics, homes, and vehicles of the accused and seized documents for further review. Two men were released under custody after interrogation, while a criminal report was filed against the 40-yr-
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal investigation into medical professionals suspected of misconduct, without overt ideological framing. It reports on the actions of the accused, the evidence collected by the police, and the legal consequences, maintaining neutrality in tone and focus.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source document, detailing the investigation, the individuals involved, and the legal proceedings. It includes the timeframe of the doctor’s misconduct, the role of the psychologist, and the charges against all three parties. It also mentions the police’s
Why objectivity (85): While the article is largely neutral, it uses phrases like 'osumnjičen' (accused) and 'sumnja' (suspicions) which can carry a subtle implication of wrongdoing. This may suggest a minor editorial tilt towards portraying the accused as unethical, though not strongly biased.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 859/3/2026 Police break into a doctor's office: Doctor gives out untested certificates to drivers, sailors, and athletesA 75-year-old doctor in Split-Dalmatia County is under investigation by police for allegedly issuing medical certificates of fitness for driving, maritime crew members, and athletes without conducting required medical examinations. The criminal investigation, conducted in collaboration with the local state prosecutor’s office, suggests the doctor was acting to gain financial benefit. The doctor reportedly asked a 40-year-old employee at his private clinic to forge and verify false medical certificates for individuals who had not passed necessary health checks. Additionally, the case involves a 79-year-old licensed psychologist, whom the doctor allegedly used in two instances to issue false certificates for maritime crew members. Both the doctor and the psychologist are accused of abusing their positions and have been placed under pre-trial detention. The investigation has examined the clinic, homes, and vehicles of the suspects, and further analysis of documents is ongoing. A separate charge against the 40-year-old woman is pending with the state prosecutor.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal investigation into medical professionals suspected of fraud, without overt ideological framing. While the subject involves professional misconduct and potential abuse of authority, which could be seen as politically sensitive, the tone remains purely
Why factuality (90): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, providing detailed information about the criminal investigation, the roles of the three individuals, and the legal basis for the allegations. It includes specifics like the periods of the doctor’s misconduct and the involvement of the psychol
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on reporting the facts without introducing personal opinion or emotional language. While it uses terms like 'sumnja' (suspicions) and 'protivno propisima' (contrary to regulations), these are standard legal terminology and do not indicate strong bias.
Discovered split "medicine octopus": Dr. Pali, psychologist and nurse, published for whatTwo men aged 75 and 79 have been placed under custodial detention for issuing medical certificates without conducting necessary examinations. They will soon be examined by an investigator, after which a decision will be made on whether they will be imprisoned or released. This action was carried out by police officers in Split-Dalmatia in coordination with the Municipal State Prosecutor’s Office. The police concluded that the 75-year-old doctor, operating a private specialist clinic in the region, issued multiple false medical certificates between December 2025 and May 2026, violating regulations regarding health checks for drivers and maritime crew members. He also instructed a 40-year-old female staff member to create and authenticate false medical certificates for athletes, knowing they had not undergone required exams. Further findings suggest the 75-year-old used his position to gain financial benefit, falsifying documents and committing at least 14 cases of abuse of office. Both the doctor and the psychologist are suspected of similar offenses.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of legal proceedings involving medical professionals accused of misconduct, without overt ideological slant. It reports on the actions of individuals within the healthcare system and their legal consequences, focusing on procedural outcomes rather than partisan
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the facts from the primary source document, including the ages of the individuals involved, the nature of the alleged misconduct, and the legal actions taken by the police. It mentions the coordination with the state prosecutor’s office and the criminal investigation p
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and factual, presenting the information without overt bias. The language used is straightforward and does not include emotionally charged words. However, there is a slight tendency to frame the situation as an 'unethical' practice, which could be seen as a mild editorial lea