ON
← Back to feed
infoLibre logo🏛️ Politics
Spain🏛️ PoliticsProgressive18 days ago

Pepa Bueno and Jesús Maraña inaugurate the summer course of infoLibre: "We are in a huge battle"

Pepa Bueno, conductora del Telediario 2 de TVE, y Jesús Maraña, director editorial de infoLibre, participaron en una conversación durante la apertura del curso de verano de infoLibre en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. La discusión abordó el impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el periodismo, destacando preocupaciones sobre la capacidad de los algoritmos para reemplazar a los periodistas en tareas críticas como informar sobre situaciones complejas o emocionales. Bueno subrayó que solo los periodistas pueden realizar estas funciones en el terreno, y advirtió sobre el peligro de que los algoritmos sean utilizados para propagar desinformación. También criticó la idea de que la IA resuelva problemas humanos, enfatizando la necesidad de un criterio editorial responsable en su implementación.

Pepa Bueno and Jesús Maraña opened the summer course of infoLibre at the Faculty of Information Sciences of the University Complutense of Madrid with a discussion titled "De la censura al algoritmo." The session, which took place on Tuesday morning, focused on the challenges facing journalism in the age of artificial intelligence. Bueno emphasized that the current situation mirrors past cycles in which media professionals were replaced by new technologies, often under the guise of efficiency or cost-cutting. She criticized the belief that algorithms could replace human journalists, arguing that such a shift would lead to a loss of quality and authenticity in reporting. The conversation between Bueno and Maraña was described as relaxed and intellectual, reflecting their long-standing professional camaraderie despite never having worked together directly. They discussed how the rise of AI has not only transformed journalistic practices but also reshaped public trust in information. Bueno raised questions about whether an algorithm could capture the emotional weight of a personal tragedy or assess the conditions of a disaster site. She argued that these tasks require human presence and empathy, qualities that machines cannot replicate. Bueno pointed to the growing influence of AI in everyday life, highlighting its impact on both the working conditions of journalists and the spread of misinformation online. She noted that while AI enables rapid dissemination of content, it also facilitates the unchecked circulation of falsehoods. This has created a crisis in public perception, where truth becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish from manipulation. According to her, the challenge lies not just in the technology itself but in the lack of effective responses from the media industry. She further stressed that the core issue is not the existence of AI but who controls it and for what purposes. “The problem is not the machines, but the owners of the machines,” she stated, drawing parallels to historical patterns in which technological advancements have been used to consolidate power rather than serve the public interest. In this context, she called for a clear editorial stance on the use of AI within news organizations, emphasizing the need to balance innovation with ethical responsibility. Bueno also addressed the broader economic pressures affecting the profession. She highlighted the precarious financial state of many media outlets, noting that this has weakened their ability to respond effectively to the challenges posed by disinformation. She recalled that during the so-called golden age of journalism, reporters had more stability and resources to pursue investigative work. Today, however, the industry faces constant threats to its independence and credibility. In response to concerns about the future of journalism, Bueno expressed cautious optimism. While acknowledging the risks posed by automation and digital platforms, she remained confident in the value of skilled journalists. She cited César Rendueles as an example of how critical thinking and ethical judgment remain essential in an era dominated by algorithms. Her message was one of resilience: even amid uncertainty, the role of the journalist remains vital, especially in a world where truth is increasingly contested. The session concluded with a call for greater awareness among readers and audiences about the importance of supporting independent journalism. As the summer course begins, participants will engage in discussions and workshops aimed at exploring the evolving relationship between technology and media ethics. The event marks another step in the ongoing dialogue about the future of journalism in a rapidly changing digital landscape.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7018 days ago
Pepa Bueno and Jesús Maraña inaugurate the summer course of infoLibre: "We are in a huge battle"

Pepa Bueno, conductora del Telediario 2 de TVE, y Jesús Maraña, director editorial de infoLibre, participaron en una conversación durante la apertura del curso de verano de infoLibre en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. La discusión abordó el impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el periodismo, destacando preocupaciones sobre la capacidad de los algoritmos para reemplazar a los periodistas en tareas críticas como informar sobre situaciones complejas o emocionales. Bueno subrayó que solo los periodistas pueden realizar estas funciones en el terreno, y advirtió sobre el peligro de que los algoritmos sean utilizados para propagar desinformación. También criticó la idea de que la IA resuelva problemas humanos, enfatizando la necesidad de un criterio editorial responsable en su implementación.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames concerns about AI's role in journalism through a critical lens that emphasizes the value of human journalists and warns against algorithmic control. It highlights the risks of misinformation and corporate influence over technology, aligning more with left-leaning perspectives that

Why factuality (90): The article accurately quotes Pepa Bueno and Jesus Maraña, citing their roles and the context of the summer course at Universidad Complutense de Madrid. It includes direct quotes from the discussion and references credible figures like César Rendueles. The content aligns with known discussions aroun

Why objectivity (70): The article has a clear bias in favor of human journalists over AI, using rhetorical questions and emotionally charged language ('va a poder contar a qué huele el incendio') to emphasize the irreplaceable role of reporters. This framing suggests a preference for traditional journalism over algorithm

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7518 days ago
From the 'truth sandwich' to AI hallucinations: a self-defence manual against disinformation

Raúl Magallón, profesor de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, presentó en un taller organizado por infoLibre un análisis sobre la desinformación y su evolución en la sociedad digital. Magallón destacó cómo la desinformación ha pasado de ser un fenómeno puntual a un riesgo estructural global, basándose en datos del Democracy Index de The Economist. Señaló que solo quedan 26 democracias plenas en el mundo, incluida España, frente a 61 autocracias. Además, criticó el papel de plataformas como Facebook y Telegram en la difusión de información falsa, especialmente durante eventos como la guerra en Ucrania. También abordó el impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la generación de contenido, advirtiendo sobre sus posibles errores en contextos de alta demanda.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo presenta una crítica a sistemas autoritarios y a plataformas tecnológicas que facilitan la desinformación, lo cual refleja una visión más pro-democracia y anti-autocracia. Mientras menciona la situación global, el énfasis en la defensa de la democracia y la denuncia de prácticas manipulá

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as Raúl Magallón’s affiliation with Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, references to the Democracy Index by The Economist, and mentions of geopolitical trends. These claims align with general knowledge and plausible sources. However, some statements like the

Why objectivity (75): The article uses somewhat emotive language such as 'radiografía preocupante' (concerning X-ray) and frames the issue of misinformation as an urgent threat. While it presents multiple perspectives, the overall tone leans toward emphasizing the gravity of the situation, which slightly reduces neutrali

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories