AfD party congress - 'Getting stronger and bigger'
The AfD party congress in Erfurt confirmed Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla as co-leaders for the next two years, with Weidel receiving 81.3% of the votes and Chrupalla 70%. This marks a slight increase for Weidel compared to previous results but represents a decline for Chrupalla. The decision to maintain a dual leadership structure was supported by a majority of delegates. During the event, Weidel criticized Chancellor Friedrich Merz of the CDU, accusing him of making frequent reform promises without follow-through. She emphasized the AfD's commitment to strict immigration policies, while Chrupalla asserted the party's goal of eventually governing at both the state and federal levels. The congress took place amid record-high polling numbers for the AfD, with hopes of securing a first government role in eastern German state elections in September. Weidel also addressed internal debates about relaxing membership rules for former members of extremist parties, pledging to review the party’s 'incompatibility list.'
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article discusses an intensifying power struggle within Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) party between two prominent figures, Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla. The conflict highlights internal divisions within the party, which has been a significant force in German politics due to its focus on anti-immigration policies and skepticism toward the European Union. The situation reflects broader tensions within right-wing populist movements across Europe, where leadership disputes often mirror ideological rifts. This development could influence the party's strategy and public perception ahead of upcoming elections.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the internal conflict within the AfD without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on describing the situation rather than taking a stance on who is at fault or implying judgment about their positions. The language remains neutral, emphasizing the dynamics of the power battle
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article explains the legal aspects of demonstrations against the AfD congress, referencing the German constitution and laws. It is factually accurate and maintains a balanced perspective.
CORRECTIVIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 859 days ago
CORRECTIV investigated the use of AI tools by the German far-right party AfD. The article describes how AfD employee Mario Hau demonstrated a custom-built AI platform called 'Alternita Studio' during a webinar. This tool generates propaganda content such as posts, press releases, and graphics based on pre-selected right-wing news sources like Nius, Junge Freiheit, and Apollo News. The system is designed to maximize reach and was reportedly set to launch at the AfD’s federal convention in July. However, AfD lawyers later denied that the tool was fully developed, stating it would not be officially released until 2027.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AI tool as a propaganda mechanism used by the far-right AfD, highlighting its potential for misinformation and manipulation. It emphasizes the ideological alignment of the tool with right-wing media sources and criticizes the implications of such technology being used for mass
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed information about police preparation and expectations for the AfD congress, closely matching the primary source. It remains objective by presenting facts without taking sides.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 8510 days ago
The article reports that a former department head at IW Medien has joined the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland), a far-right political party in Germany. The move highlights potential shifts in personnel within media organizations and their alignment with political parties. The piece focuses on the individual’s transition and its implications for the AfD’s influence in media circles. No specific details about the individual’s role or the reasons behind the move are provided beyond the announcement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a personnel change without overtly endorsing or criticizing the AfD or the individual’s decision. It does not include commentary on the ideological stance of the AfD or the broader implications of such moves, maintaining a neutral tone.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article reports a factual personnel move without taking sides. It remains objective by presenting the information neutrally without commentary on political implications.
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 757 days ago
The article reports on a large protest against the AfD (Alternative for Germany) national congress held in Erfurt, Germany. Tens of thousands of anti-fascist demonstrators blocked major roads and highways to prevent attendees from reaching the event. The protest included participation from prominent academics and scholars who joined a solidarity initiative called 'Wissenschaft gegen Faschismus' (Science Against Fascism). One of the participants, legal scholar Max Steinbeis, explains that civil disobedience is necessary to counter the growing influence of authoritarian populism represented by the AfD. He argues that the party’s potential to gain governmental power poses a threat to democratic institutions and human rights.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD as a dangerous force promoting authoritarianism and highlights the legitimacy of civil disobedience as a response. It emphasizes the academic and activist coalition opposing the party, using strong language like 'menschenfeindliche Gesinnung' (human-hating ideology) and 'W
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Accurate description of legal boundaries and police stance. Presents both sides of the debate regarding blocking versus democratic rights, maintaining objective balance.
Die WeltIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 704 days ago
In Erfurt, during an anti-AfD protest, journalists were attacked, and the Left Party (Linke) has condemned these incidents. The event highlights tensions surrounding the AfD party, which is known for its far-right stance. The attacks on journalists raise concerns about freedom of speech and the safety of media personnel covering politically sensitive events. The Left Party's condemnation underscores their opposition to such violence and aligns with broader efforts to protect journalistic integrity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the attack on journalists as a violation of democratic values and freedom of expression, aligning with the Left Party's ideological stance against far-right movements like AfD. The emphasis on condemning the attacks suggests a left-leaning perspective, highlighting the importance,
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): The article accurately describes the legal framework around the AfD convention and mentions the court rulings. However, it includes political commentary suggesting historical analogies, reducing objectivity.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒ProgressiveFactual 88Objective 727 days ago
The article discusses the AfD party congress and criticizes attempts to block it, arguing that such actions undermine democratic principles. It highlights concerns over the AfD’s völkish nationalism, historical revisionism by figures like Gauland and Krah, and past instances of destructive behavior by AfD members in positions of responsibility. The piece emphasizes that while opposing the AfD’s ideology is legitimate, attempting to prevent their event through direct action is illegitimate and violates the rule of law. It also criticizes Left Party leader Schwerdtner for not clearly distancing herself from calls to disrupt the congress, despite expressing a preference for non-violent protest.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD as a dangerous force promoting fascism and historical revisionism, using strong language to condemn their ideology. While it acknowledges the legitimacy of criticizing the AfD, it strongly opposes any attempt to physically block their event, positioning itself against what
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 72): Provides detailed statistics from multiple sources and quotes from organizers. Maintains neutral tone while acknowledging the significance of the protest efforts.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
The article discusses the AfD (Alternative for Germany) party congress held in Erfurt, highlighting the party’s attempt to present itself professionally while ignoring internal conflicts between leaders like Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla. The commentary suggests that the event was more of a campaign-style performance focused on upcoming elections rather than genuine party governance. It notes ongoing tensions within the leadership, particularly Weidel’s growing influence over Chrupalla, and hints at potential changes in the party’s structure. The piece also criticizes the AfD for downplaying criticism of its practices, such as employing family members or associates, and for maintaining ties with far-right figures like Martin Sellner. Despite opposition and protests against the party, the AfD continues to operate under police protection, emphasizing its commitment to exercising democratic rights.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD’s actions in a critical light, emphasizing their internal conflicts, alignment with far-right figures, and suppression of dissent. While it acknowledges the party’s efforts to maintain order during the congress, it consistently portrays them as problematic and out of step,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article discusses the AfD congress and political tensions within the party, providing context on the events. It maintains a neutral tone but includes some subjective commentary on political strategies.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
The article reports on the AfD (Alternative for Germany) party congress, highlighting nine key insights from the event. It discusses internal dynamics within the party, including leadership changes, strategic directions, and responses to recent political developments. The focus is on the party’s positioning in the current political landscape and its efforts to maintain relevance amid challenges. The piece provides an overview of discussions and decisions made during the congress but does not delve into specific policy proposals or external reactions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the AfD party congress without overtly favoring any particular ideological stance. It focuses on reporting the outcomes and discussions rather than taking a clear partisan position. While the AfD is a politically charged entity, the framing of the article—
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides a detailed police report on the demonstrations, including statistics and actions taken. It maintains a neutral tone and aligns with official statements, supporting high factuality and objectivity.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 806 days ago
The article reports that the situation around the AfD national party congress in Erfurt remains dynamic according to police reports. The headline suggests ongoing developments or tensions surrounding the event, though the article does not provide specific details about the nature of these dynamics. No further information is included beyond the police statement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral report based on police observations without taking a clear ideological stance. It does not frame the situation in a left or right-leaning manner, nor does it emphasize any particular perspective. The focus is on the factual update provided by official sources.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Factual accuracy is high as it reports police statements about the dynamic situation around the AfD congress. Objectivity is good but slightly lower due to potential bias in phrasing 'dynamic' which could imply tension.
Die ZeitIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
The article reports on the AfD party congress in Erfurt, Germany, which was marked by significant protests against the party. The event saw large numbers of demonstrators, including members of the DGB union and activists from the 'widersetzen' coalition, blocking major roads and highways such as the A 71 and B 7. These actions severely disrupted traffic and public transportation in the city. During the demonstrations, there were reports of attacks on an AfD citizen office and police officers using pyrotechnics and colored smoke bombs. The police stated that the streets were blocked by counter-protesters, and some activists had attached themselves to train tracks wearing yellow warning vests. Despite these disruptions, the AfD congress proceeded with most delegates arriving early under police protection.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD as a target of widespread opposition, highlighting organized protests and their impact on the party's ability to hold its congress. While it presents both sides (AfD delegates and protesters), the emphasis on the scale and organization of the anti-Afd demonstrations, along
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Accurate reporting on police deployment. Objectivity is maintained through neutral language describing the scale of police involvement.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
The article discusses the legal framework surrounding demonstrations against the AfD party congress taking place in Erfurt, Germany. It explains that while demonstrations do not require prior approval under the German Constitution, they must be registered 48 hours in advance to ensure public safety and traffic management. The piece highlights the constitutional protection of assembly rights under Article 8 of the Basic Law, emphasizing their importance for democratic participation. It notes that Thuringia still follows the federal assembly law rather than having its own state-specific regulations. The article also addresses spontaneous assemblies, which are exempt from registration requirements due to their unplanned nature. Finally, it outlines the conditions under which assemblies might be prohibited, focusing on immediate threats to public order.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced explanation of the legal framework around assembly rights in Germany, referencing constitutional principles and court decisions without showing overt favoritism toward any political group or ideology. It focuses on explaining laws and procedures rather than taking a立场
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): This article discusses the ongoing police measures and legal challenges around the demonstration ban, citing official statements. It accurately reflects the situation but has some subjective interpretation of the implications.
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
The article reports on preparations by German police to secure the upcoming AfD federal party congress in Erfurt, Germany, amid anticipated large-scale protests. The anti-fascist group 'Widersetzen' has announced plans to block the event, with over 15,000 participants expected at a major demonstration organized by the group. Police have deployed water cannons, horse units, barriers, and multiple vehicles to manage the situation, with officers from several states involved. The police emphasize their commitment to maintaining safety and upholding constitutional rights such as freedom of assembly and speech. Activists from 'Widersetzen' claim they have built the largest anti-fascist movement in Germany and assert that the AfD’s rhetoric incites violence already being enacted through government policies.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD as a dangerous force spreading hate and inciting violence, aligning with left-wing critiques of far-right politics. It highlights the efforts of the anti-fascist group 'Widersetzen' and portrays the AfD’s influence as a threat to democratic values. While the police are not
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): This article outlines the broader context of the AfD congress, including racist remarks and mobilization efforts. It presents various viewpoints but has some biased language towards the AfD's actions.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago
The Thuringian police have stated they are well-prepared for their deployment at the AfD federal party congress taking place this weekend in Erfurt. Thousands of officers from across Germany will be deployed around the exhibition hall and in the city center from Friday to Sunday. The police emphasized their commitment to ensuring security and order while upholding constitutional rights such as freedom of assembly, press freedom, and party privileges. They mentioned that they have been preparing for months and will provide continuous updates on social media throughout the event. Up to 600 AfD members are expected to attend the congress, where the party leadership will be re-elected, with current leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla likely to remain in power. Thuringia's AfD leader Björn Höcke is playing a significant role as host, and numerous protests are anticipated.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the situation, quoting the police's preparedness and objectives without overtly favoring any side. It mentions both the AfD's event and the expected protests but does not take a stance on either. The language remains neutral, focusing on factual reporting.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article reports on police preparedness for the AfD congress, citing official statements from the Thuringian Police. It provides specific details like number of officers and their objectives. While factually sound, it leans slightly towards portraying the police as proactive rather than neutral.
Deutsche Welle (English)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago
Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) held a two-day conference in Erfurt, during which Alice Weidel consolidated her leadership within the party and positioned herself for upcoming federal elections. Weidel emphasized unity under the German flag, stating the party would aim to form a government as the 'strongest force.' The event occurred amid internal power struggles and scandals within the AfD. Meanwhile, in Cologne, over 1.5 million people attended the annual Pride parade, celebrating LGBTQ+ rights with the slogan 'For Queer Rights — Many. Together. Strong!' The event highlighted growing concerns about rising homophobia and the need to defend democratic values.
Bias read (Center): The article provides balanced coverage of both the AfD's political maneuvering and the Cologne Pride parade, presenting quotes from multiple political figures without overtly favoring one side. It does not use loaded language or selectively omit context.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Reports on the AfD congress with specific details about timing, leadership, and internal dynamics. Maintains a neutral tone and provides context without bias.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago
The article reports that the AfD (Alternative for Germany) is continuing its federal party congress in Erfurt. The headline highlights the ongoing event, but the article text provided is brief and does not include additional details about the proceedings, participants, or outcomes of the congress.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement about the continuation of the AfD's federal party congress without overtly endorsing or criticizing the party's actions. There is no clear ideological framing or emphasis on specific policies or positions, which suggests a balanced approach.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article reports on the continuation of the AfD congress in Erfurt, but lacks specific details about the content of discussions or outcomes. It mentions protests and police involvement, which aligns with the primary source document’s focus on security measures. The tone remains neutral, though th
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 758 days ago
The article discusses the upcoming AfD party congress in Erfurt, where thousands are expected to protest against the far-right party. The debate over banning the AfD continues, with rising support for the party ahead of regional elections. A new report by the civil society NGO Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte (GFF) concludes that the AfD violates democratic principles and human dignity, suggesting a potential constitutional court ban. The article highlights growing calls for a ban from civil society and parts of the political establishment, while also examining the implications of such a move. It features a discussion between journalists and experts on the challenges of banning the AfD, the strategic weaknesses of mainstream parties, and the broader fight against right-wing extremism.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD as a threat to democracy and emphasizes the legitimacy of calls for a ban, aligning with progressive viewpoints. It presents the GFF report as a significant development supporting the case for prohibition, which reflects a left-leaning perspective on handling right-wing政党.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article reports on the expected protests against the AfD congress and mentions the new report from the GFF, but lacks specific details on the primary source document. It presents multiple perspectives but has some subjective language regarding the impact of protests.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
The article reports on protests against the AfD (Alternative for Germany) during their party congress in Erfurt, where demonstrators attempted to block access roads to the venue but arrived too late as delegates had already gathered. The article notes that while demonstrations are protected by law, attempts to prevent party congresses are legally distinct since they are mandated by statute. It criticizes the use of historical analogies comparing the AfD to Nazi-era parties, arguing such comparisons are unfounded due to the lack of evidence of a putsch attempt or large paramilitary support. The piece highlights the legal stance of the authorities, which upholds the ban on blocking access roads, and mentions incidents where journalists were assaulted, with some demonstrators claiming the use of 'Faschismus' labels was insufficient to justify such actions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD's activities in a highly critical light, using strong language like 'Faschismus' and emphasizing the dangers posed by the party. While it acknowledges the legal protections for demonstrations, it consistently portrays the AfD as a threat to democracy, aligning more with a左
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): This article covers the aftermath of journalist attacks and mentions Berlin reviewing a leftist group. It provides factual updates but has a somewhat one-sided focus on the consequences, slightly lowering objectivity.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The article discusses German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière's response to the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party congress in Erfurt. De Maizière stated that he would not provide the AfD with classified information, emphasizing that such data is reserved for authorized entities. The AfD has been under scrutiny for its controversial policies and rhetoric, which have raised concerns among German authorities. This statement comes amid ongoing debates over the role and influence of the AfD within Germany's political landscape.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement by a government official regarding the handling of classified information and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on a specific policy stance without apparent ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Reports on protests with specific details like time stamps and participant groups. Maintains neutrality in describing events, though some language implies tension between protesters and authorities.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The article analyzes the AfD (Alternative for Germany) national party congress held in Erfurt, focusing on the party’s efforts to appear more moderate and professional. The event began unexpectedly at 10 a.m., despite protests and blockades by opponents. Co-leader Tino Chrupalla emphasized punctuality as a sign of professionalism, while his co-leader Alice Weidel received strong support, though Chrupalla’s approval was lower than previous years. The party avoided major disputes but addressed an controversial proposal to revise the Unvereinbarkeitsliste, which includes both leftist and far-right organizations. The article notes the AfD’s improved standing ahead of regional elections in September and highlights the potential rise of candidate Ulrich Siegmund. Meanwhile, Thuringia’s leader Björn Höcke, known for his far-right views, saw limited success, though his ally Stefan Möller was appointed as a federal deputy.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the AfD’s internal dynamics and strategic positioning without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the party’s attempts to appear more mainstream, the leadership contest, and the implications of their actions without taking a clear ideological slant
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual claims align with primary source regarding the AfD congress in Erfurt. Objectivity is compromised by biased language describing the party’s efforts to appear 'professional' and downplaying internal conflicts.
Die WeltIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
Three journalists were chased and physically assaulted in Erfurt after they attempted to report on a protest. The incident occurred during heightened tensions between demonstrators and law enforcement. Witnesses described the attackers as individuals associated with far-right groups. The police have launched an investigation into the assault, but no arrests have been made yet. The event has sparked discussions about freedom of speech and the safety of journalists covering politically sensitive issues.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the attack as a targeted act against journalists by far-right extremists, emphasizing the threat to free speech and democratic values. It highlights the involvement of far-right groups without providing balanced coverage of alternative perspectives or counterarguments. The tone is
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article reports on attacks on journalists during protests against the AfD but lacks specific details or sources for the claims. It presents a strong narrative without sufficient evidence, affecting objectivity.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.