Duterte impeachment trial ‘start’ of holding power to account, activists say

Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter5 hr. ago

On the second day of the Senate impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, prosecutors claimed a 'victory' as they emphasized the progress made in presenting evidence and overcoming defense objections. Representatives Zia Alonto Adiong and Terry Ridon stated that the trial has moved beyond preliminary stages and into the evidentiary phase, allowing the public to view the case materials. Adiong noted that the prosecution's goal is to ensure transparency, stating that the public would ultimately benefit from the process. The focus remains on the presentation of evidence rather than counting objections, with both sides contributing to the legal proceedings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the prosecution's perspective without overtly endorsing or criticizing their position. It reports on the procedural developments and quotes multiple representatives without taking a partisan stance. While the impeachment trial is a politically charged issue, the framing remains

Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter5 hr. ago

During the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, Senator Pia Cayetano proposed to remove from the record remarks by House private prosecutor Amando Virgil Ligutan regarding whether an alleged assassination threat by Duterte against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., his wife Liza Araneta, and former House Speaker Martine Romualdez constitutes an impeachable offense. The motion was tabled by Senate Presiding Officer Francis Escudero for further consideration. The incident highlights ongoing tensions within the impeachment proceedings and raises questions about the handling of sensitive allegations against high-profile figures.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the procedural action taken during the impeachment trial without overtly endorsing or criticizing any side. It reports on the motion to strike off remarks and the ruling by the presiding officer, maintaining neutrality in framing the event.

Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter6 hr. ago

The House prosecution panel in the Philippines has formally requested that the impeachment court issue subpoenas for the bank and tax records of Vice President Sara Duterte. These requests were submitted on July 6, 2026, and are related to the second impeachment article against Duterte, which alleges unexplained wealth. Spokesperson Regie Tongol confirmed that the impeachment court received the requests, and the defense team will have five days to respond. The financial records are expected to play a role in addressing claims of illicit enrichment.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the legal proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the procedural steps taken by the House prosecution panel and the potential implications for the impeachment case, without expressing a傾

RapplerIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Protesters gathered outside the Philippine Senate on July 6, 2026, demanding the conviction of Vice President Sara Duterte and other officials implicated in corruption during her impeachment trial. Activists argue the trial represents a crucial step toward holding powerful figures accountable, despite President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s earlier pledges to address corruption. Demonstrators chanted slogans calling for accountability against both Marcos and Duterte, while some critics accused the trial of being politically motivated. Security forces deployed around 6,000 police officers to manage the event, highlighting tensions between protesters and authorities. Supporters of Duterte criticized the opposition as 'bayaran' (paid hacks) and argued the trial was a cover for political persecution. The event underscored ongoing divisions over how to handle high-profile corruption cases within the government.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the impeachment trial as a necessary step toward accountability, emphasizing calls for justice against prominent figures like Duterte and Marcos. It highlights activist perspectives and criticizes the government’s handling of corruption, aligning more closely with progressive or左翼