Autonomous panic at the PISA report, which examines the entire Sánchez era: "We are going to fall again"
The article discusses the upcoming return to school in Spain, highlighting concerns among families, teachers, and regional governments regarding educational challenges. It notes the anxiety surrounding the PISA report, which will be published tomorrow, assessing the academic performance of students aged 15 across 91 countries. The report will evaluate skills in Reading, Math, Science, and new areas like Foreign Language and Digital Competence. The Spanish government under Pedro Sánchez and the implementation of the LOMLOE law by autonomous communities are under scrutiny. Previous poor results were attributed to pandemic closures, but this time, critics blame the LOMLOE for lowering academic standards. The law allows passing courses with fewer failures and prioritizes attitudes over concrete knowledge. Concerns are growing that this approach, combined with increased screen time, has not improved Spain’s position in PISA, which already lagged behind OECD averages in Science, EU averages in Math, and both in Reading. Regional governments are worried about the results, though they cannot disclose them until tomorrow.
Advertisement
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The Catalan government has announced the dismissal of the head of education, Teresa Sambola, following errors in the administration of the PISA exams, which caused Catalonia to be excluded from the OECD study. Education minister Esther Niubó stated that three disciplinary proceedings would be initiated against two officials and a senior figure due to management failures during the exam process. The issue arose because the exemption rate, students excluded for various reasons, was 23.2%, far exceeding the OECD’s recommended maximum of 5%. This led to Catalonia being included in the national PISA report but omitted from the OECD’s annex summarizing regions. The ministry was alerted in March, but corrective actions were not taken before some schools had already completed their tests. Niubó claimed the information provided to schools was 'correct' but 'incomplete,' and she absolved school principals of responsibility, placing it solely on the Department of Education. This incident comes amid a turbulent academic year marked by controversy over police presence in schools and teacher strikes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, citing official statements and providing specific data regarding the PISA exam errors. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, nor does it favor one side over another. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the administrative actions taken by the
Why factuality (85): The article provides highly accurate details about the PISA error in Catalonia, including the percentage of excluded students, the disciplinary actions taken, and the technical explanation for why Catalonia was excluded from the report. It aligns closely with the primary source material, though it d
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a balanced and neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts without editorializing or taking sides. It clearly explains the situation without bias, making it one of the most objective accounts among the sources.
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 7518 days ago
The Spanish Department of Education has acknowledged responsibility for errors in the new PISA exam, reversing an initial blame on school directors. Education Counselor Esther Niubó stated during a press conference that the department itself is at fault, marking a significant shift in accountability. The controversy led to the dismissal of Deputy Secretary General Teresa Sambola and the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against three officials involved in managing the tests, two civil servants and one former high-ranking official. The results of the international assessments will be published on September 8, the first day of classes in Catalonia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of administrative responsibility and disciplinary actions taken by the education department without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on institutional accountability rather than ideological framing, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (80): The article provides detailed and accurate information about the PISA error in Catalonia, including the disciplinary actions taken and the reasons behind the exclusion of students. While it doesn't mention the Basque Country or the issue of students receiving zeros in Basque, this is not due to inac
Why objectivity (75): The article remains largely objective in its reporting, focusing on the facts of the situation without overtly criticizing or praising any party involved. It presents the events in a neutral manner, though some framing may subtly reflect institutional concerns.
El MundoIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 7518 days ago
The Spanish regional government of Catalonia has concluded an internal investigation into an error that caused the region to be excluded from the next OECD PISA report. As part of this process, three employees were placed under disciplinary review, including two civil servants and one senior official within the Education Department. Additionally, Education Counselor Esther Niubó announced the dismissal of her deputy, Teresa Sambola, stating that the coordinators of the OECD tests 'did not meet their assigned responsibilities.' The dismissals include two serious misconduct cases and one minor case.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of responsibility by officials, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of administrative inefficiency. While the focus is on accountability, the tone suggests a systemic critique of management practices rather than a balanced presentation of perspectives.
Why factuality (80): The article accurately describes the PISA error in Catalonia, the disciplinary actions taken, and the involvement of officials like Esther Niubó. It provides specific details about the number of students excluded and the nature of the mistakes made. However, it omits the Basque Country and the issue
Why objectivity (75): The article remains mostly objective in its reporting, though it includes some framing that highlights the failure of the education system and the need for accountability, which could be interpreted as a slight lean toward criticism of the government.
ABC (España)IndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8017 days ago
A few days before the release of the PISA 2025 results, the evaluation platform Monk has published an analysis showing how primary school students in Spain perform in Mathematics and Reading. Based on test results from 31,541 students, the study highlights existing gaps that develop years before students reach age 15, when they are assessed by the OECD. The findings indicate that Spanish students excel in Mathematics but struggle with Reading skills at the primary level.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from an educational assessment without overtly favoring any political perspective. It focuses on academic performance metrics rather than political debates or policy implications.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on a study by the Monk platform based on data from 31,541 students in Spain, which aligns with the cross-source consensus that early learning gaps exist before PISA results. It does not claim definitive conclusions but presents findings as part of an ongoing assessment. However,
Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely neutral, presenting facts about student performance in Math and Reading without overt bias. It uses objective language and frames the findings as part of a broader evaluation rather than taking a stance on educational policy.
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 6517 days ago
The PISA tests have become a major issue in Catalonia, particularly after the poor results from the 2022 edition. The regional government initially blamed the results on an overrepresentation of immigrants in the sample, which led to the resignation of the head of the Educational Evaluation Council and the dissolution of the organization. The controversy has resurfaced again before the new test results are released, scheduled for September 8th. In late July, the Education Department admitted that another error in the sampling invalidated Catalonia’s results this time because 23% more students were excluded than allowed by the OECD, which oversees the tests.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, highlighting the controversies and errors related to the PISA tests in Catalonia without showing clear bias toward any side. It reports on the actions taken by the regional government and the issues with the testing process without overtly favoring one
Why factuality (75): The article accurately covers the PISA error in Catalonia, including the high percentage of excluded students and the disciplinary actions taken. It also mentions the seven warnings issued by the Ministry of Education, which adds depth to the story. However, it does not reference the Basque Country
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the facts in a generally neutral way but occasionally uses language that suggests blame or criticism of the Catalan government, such as referring to the 'errors' that led to the exclusion of data. This subtle framing may affect its overall neutrality.
ABC (España)IndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6018 days ago
The article discusses the deteriorating relationship between Catalonia and the PISA assessments, highlighting concerns over the exclusion rate of students exceeding OECD standards. With the start of the 2026-2027 school year approaching, tensions are rising amid teacher unions' protests and ongoing political instability in Catalonia. The Catalan government, led by Education Minister Esther Niubó, has announced initial retaliatory measures against educational staff, which the PSC interprets as part of a broader effort to hold individuals accountable for the poor performance. The situation reflects broader institutional and political challenges within Catalonia.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents the political implications of Catalonia's PISA results and the subsequent administrative actions, it does not overtly favor any specific political faction. It reports on the controversy and responses from multiple stakeholders without clear ideological leaning. The framing
Why factuality (70): The article accurately reports on the PISA controversy in Catalonia, including the exclusion of students and the consequences for the education department. However, it does not mention the Basque Country or the issue of students receiving zeros in Basque, which were central to the primary source doc
Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while reporting on the events, though it frames the situation as a 'disaster' and mentions political fallout, which could be seen as slightly biased toward criticism of the Catalan government.
El MundoIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 40Objective 5012 days ago
The article discusses the upcoming return to school in Spain, highlighting concerns among families, teachers, and regional governments regarding educational challenges. It notes the anxiety surrounding the PISA report, which will be published tomorrow, assessing the academic performance of students aged 15 across 91 countries. The report will evaluate skills in Reading, Math, Science, and new areas like Foreign Language and Digital Competence. The Spanish government under Pedro Sánchez and the implementation of the LOMLOE law by autonomous communities are under scrutiny. Previous poor results were attributed to pandemic closures, but this time, critics blame the LOMLOE for lowering academic standards. The law allows passing courses with fewer failures and prioritizes attitudes over concrete knowledge. Concerns are growing that this approach, combined with increased screen time, has not improved Spain’s position in PISA, which already lagged behind OECD averages in Science, EU averages in Math, and both in Reading. Regional governments are worried about the results, though they cannot disclose them until tomorrow.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the LOMLOE law and the current education system as a systemic failure, aligning with left-wing critiques of neoliberal reforms. It emphasizes the negative impact of the law on academic standards and highlights concerns about reduced learning outcomes, suggesting a
Why factuality (40): The article discusses the return to school and concerns over PISA results but does not mention the specific issue of students failing in Basque or the controversy around a single teacher giving many zeros. It references PISA and the LOMLOE law but lacks direct connection to the primary source docume
Why objectivity (50): The tone is alarmist and focuses on political tensions and fears surrounding education policy. It uses emotionally charged terms like 'pánico autonómico' and frames the situation as a crisis linked to government policies, showing clear bias and lack of neutrality.
ABC (España)IndependentConservativeFactual 40Objective 3018 days ago
The article reports that Catalonia and the Basque Country have allegedly manipulated PISA test results to hide their educational failures. These regions, which have education systems heavily influenced by their governments' linguistic policies, have long claimed higher-than-average scores compared to Spain and OECD averages. The PISA test, conducted every three years and involving nearly 100 countries, serves as a global benchmark for educational quality. The piece highlights concerns over the accuracy of these results and suggests potential manipulation.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a deliberate attempt by regional governments to mislead through manipulation of educational data, implying a lack of transparency and accountability. This aligns with a right-leaning perspective that often criticizes progressive policies and emphasizes national unity.
Why factuality (40): The article makes unfounded claims about Catalonia and the Basque Country manipulating PISA results to hide educational failures. These allegations are not supported by the primary source document, which focuses on the issue of students receiving zeros in Basque and the role of private tutoring. The
Why objectivity (30): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'trampear' (cheating) and 'desastre educativo' (educational disaster), which strongly implies wrongdoing without evidence. It presents a biased narrative favoring a particular political perspective rather than presenting facts neutrally.
The article discusses the results of Spain's performance in the PISA report 2025, comparing educational outcomes across different autonomous communities. Madrid, Asturias, and Castilla y León are highlighted as having the best results, while regions like Ceuta, Melilla, and the Valencian Community show the worst performances. The overall trend indicates a decline in student performance compared to 2022, with Spanish students scoring below OECD and EU averages in Mathematics, Reading, and Science. Catalonia is noted for high scores but faces issues with sample representativeness. Other regions such as Cantabria, Galicia, and Castilla-La Mancha also perform above national and EU averages.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from the OECD PISA report without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on regional differences in educational outcomes without taking sides on the causes or implications of these disparities. While it highlights certain regions' successes and
The article reports that Andalusia continues to perform poorly in the PISA assessment compared to Spain and the European Union, particularly in Science, Reading, and Mathematics. In Science, Andalusia scores 462 points versus 477 in Spain and 481 in the EU. In Reading, it scores 441, 10 points below Spain and 18 below the EU. In Math, it scores 442, 15 points behind Spain and 21 behind the EU. The regional education councilor, María del Carmen Castillo, admits the results are not good and attributes part of the problem to the effects of the pandemic and changes introduced by the LOMLOE educational reform. She calls for greater emphasis on study, memorization, and practice, drawing a parallel to the training regimen of tennis player Carlos Alcaraz. While the Junta highlights positive indicators like increased qualifications and reduced school dropout rates, the article notes that PISA measures essential skills that Andalusia struggles with.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents the poor performance of Andalusia in PISA as a critical issue, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It cites both the admission of failure by the regional government and the broader systemic issues affecting Spain. The article avoids overtly criticizing either the左
The article reports that Catalonia has achieved results above the Spanish and OECD averages in PISA tests, but notes that the sample was invalid due to excluding 23% of students, significantly higher than the OECD's 5%. Despite this, the Ministry of Education included Catalonia's results separately from other regions. The data warns against using these results for comparisons with other territories or editions of PISA because the sample is not representative. Catalonia scores high across most categories, including Reading, Science, and Problem Solving, though slightly behind Madrid in Mathematics.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data about Catalonia's performance in PISA tests without overtly favoring any political stance. It highlights both the achievements and the methodological issues with the data collection, maintaining a balanced tone by noting the exclusion of Catalonia's results from the
The article reports that Castilla-La Mancha has improved its PISA results in science by ten points, moving from 475 points in 2022 to 485 points in 2025. This improvement places the region in sixth place among autonomous communities, showing progress compared to the significant decline seen in other regions according to PISA 2025 data. The focus is on educational performance, highlighting the region’s advancement in science scores.
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes the positive outcome of improved science scores in Castilla-La Mancha, which could be interpreted as supporting regional educational policies. While the framing is neutral, the focus on progress and positioning relative to other regions may subtly align with a narrative that赞赏
Spain's educational performance has declined according to the latest PISA report, with students scoring their lowest results since the test began in 2000. The OECD, which organizes the international assessment, notes that a 20-point difference roughly equals one school year of learning. Spanish students lost 23 points in reading comprehension, 16 in mathematics, and 8 in science compared to 2022. Their scores now stand at 451 in reading, 457 in math, and 477 in science, below the average of developed countries, which is 461, 463, and 482 respectively.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data about Spain's declining educational performance based on the PISA report without overtly criticizing specific political parties or policies. It focuses on objective statistical outcomes rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue of education is a
The article reports on Spain's declining performance in reading comprehension according to the PISA 2025 report, noting that only 2% of students aged 15-16 can read complex texts. This marks the worst results in Spanish history across math, reading, and science. The decline is part of a global trend, with OECD countries experiencing an average drop of 28 points over ten years, while Spain saw a dramatic 45-point decrease. The report links this to increased reliance on digital devices and AI tools for learning, raising concerns about students' ability to engage with lengthy texts and their impact on overall academic achievement.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure within Spain's education system, emphasizing the severity of the decline and linking it to broader societal trends like technology dependence. While it presents data objectively, the tone suggests concern about educational quality and potential long
The article discusses Spain's educational crisis, highlighting poor results from the PISA report which show declining excellence and stagnation in deficiencies. It criticizes the current system for lacking rigor, discipline, and effort, attributing this to excessive focus on abstract concepts like emotional learning and sustainability, while teachers face increasing administrative burdens. The piece also blames technology, particularly mobile phones, for altering students' reading habits and comprehension abilities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the educational crisis as a systemic failure influenced by progressive educational policies emphasizing emotional and social learning, while criticizing the lack of traditional academic rigor. It implies that these modern approaches have diluted core skills and knowledge, aligning
The article reports on the declining performance of students in the Basque Country according to the PISA results released in 2025. The scores in scientific competencies dropped by 77 points compared to the initial assessment in 2003, placing the Basque education system among the lowest in Spain. The report criticizes the PNV-led regional government for prioritizing internal evaluations over international comparisons like PISA, which has led to a lack of transparency and accountability. Despite claims of improvement by the current Education Minister, Begoña Pedrosa, the PISA data reveals a significant decline in reading and mathematics skills. The article highlights the growing gap between the Basque education system and other Spanish communities, particularly Madrid, and questions the effectiveness of the region’s educational policies.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the decline in educational outcomes as a result of the PNV's decision to distance itself from PISA and prioritize internal assessments. This suggests a critique of the ruling party's approach to education, implying that their policies have negatively impacted student performance.
The PISA report highlights a significant decline in educational performance among 15-year-old students across developed countries between 2015 and 2025, with Spain experiencing an even sharper drop. Students scored 27 points lower in reading, 22 in mathematics, and 7 in science compared to the previous decade, equivalent to nearly a year’s worth of learning. In Spain, the decline was more pronounced, with a loss of 45 points in reading, 29 in math, and 16 in science over the same period. The OECD attributes this trend to deeper causes such as increased digital device usage, reduced curiosity and effort among adolescents, and weakened reading habits, which hinder their ability to understand complex texts. The study analyzed data from 760,000 students across 90 countries and suggests that the decline might reflect a 'reconfiguration' of skills rather than a straightforward deterioration, though this remains speculative due to limited data.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from the PISA report in a neutral manner, focusing on statistical data and expert analysis without overtly favoring any political stance. It discusses factors like technology use and student behavior but does not frame these issues through a political lens or advocate a
The article discusses the decline in Spain’s performance in the PISA test, noting that this trend is part of a global pattern. It highlights concerns over students’ ability to process lengthy texts, suggesting that texts longer than 400 words are difficult for 15-year-olds to comprehend. The OECD attributes this decline partly to distractions caused by technology such as smartphones and the internet, which allegedly impair attention spans. The article also mentions that regions traditionally performing well are now declining, while others remain stable. Catalonia did not participate in the assessment, and there is confusion over why Basque Country scores are particularly low. The Ministry of Education lacks clear explanations for the drop in student performance. Additionally, the article notes that the new school year has begun amid ongoing teacher strikes and labor conflicts across several regions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about educational performance trends without overtly favoring any political ideology. While it references political figures like the Secretary of State for Education and mentions policy changes such as LOMLOE, these are presented as factual points rather than biased.
Spain has experienced a significant decline in the PISA 2025 results, confirming a downward trend observed globally. The drop is most pronounced in Science, which was the main focus this year, though Spain remains closer to its European and OECD neighbors compared to other subjects. Since 2018, Spain has lost nearly 50 points in Reading, a critical skill for academic success. Autonomous communities like Euskadi saw dramatic declines across all categories, while traditionally high-performing regions such as Madrid and Asturias also worsened their scores. Meanwhile, regions with lower performance, such as Andalusia and Canary Islands, remained relatively stable. The OECD attributes part of the decline to increased screen time and social media use, which may affect students' attention spans and ability to process complex texts. PISA also highlights educational equity in Spain, where performance differences between genders show consistent patterns, with girls outperforming boys except in Mathematics.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data and analysis from the OECD without overtly favoring any political perspective. It discusses educational outcomes and potential contributing factors like screen time but does not take a stance on policy solutions or assign blame to specific political entities. It
The students from Madrid have ranked first in Spain in the PISA report for scientific and mathematical competencies, while placing second in reading comprehension. The results show Madrid leading in science and math with scores of 495 and 477 respectively, compared to other regions like Castile and León and Cantabria. However, overall performance in Madrid has declined since 2022, along with national trends. The report highlights issues such as a high percentage of repeat students (19.6%) and limited material resources, particularly in publicly owned schools. It also notes that 30.4% of students in Madrid get distracted during digital resource use in science classes. Catalonia’s data was excluded due to the exclusion of students with special needs, affecting comparisons. Nationally, Spain's average scores in science, reading, and math lag behind OECD and EU averages, indicating a general decline in educational performance across the country.
Bias read (Center): While the article reports on educational outcomes in Madrid, which is a politically sensitive issue, the framing remains balanced by presenting both positive achievements and challenges. The article does not overtly favor any political ideology but includes quotes from the regional government to add
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Spain
