Naseeruddin Shah wants to weaken democracy in country: BJP
A political dispute has intensified regarding an ongoing student protest at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute (SRFTI). Veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah publicly supported the students, who are staging an indefinite sit-in following violent clashes on campus, while accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of targeting individuals who do not align with its ideology. In response, BJP leaders in West Bengal criticized Shah, with Rajya Sabha member Rahul Sinha demanding an investigation into the actor's comments and alleging potential links to international conspiracies. Other BJP figures, including MLA Ritesh Tewari, questioned Shah's motives by highlighting family connections to opposition parties and noting his previous silence during other local controversies. The underlying conflict began after a clash between a right-wing organization and students on October 4, leading to the suspension of six students for alleged vandalism and assault. The SRFTI administration maintains that disciplinary actions are based on specific instances of misconduct rather than the suppression of protest rights.
Veteran Indian actor Naseeruddin Shah has accused the Bharatiya Janatra Party of seeking revenge against individuals who oppose its policies, prompting sharp backlash from party leaders in West Bengal. The dispute centers on an indefinite sit-in staged by students at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute in Kolkata. Shah released a video message urging citizens to back the students, whom he described as aspiring filmmakers targeted for demanding administrative accountability. He alleged that the students faced show-cause notices, surveillance, threats, and orders to vacate their hostels. BJP Rajya Sabha member Rahul Sinha responded by questioning Shah’s motives, suggesting the actor aimed to weaken democracy in the country. Sinha called for a full investigation into the veteran’s comments, alleging potential links to an international conspiracy. He noted that Shah had emerged from a long period of inactivity to issue political statements against the party. State-level BJP MLA Ritesh Tewari attacked Shah’s personal connections, claiming the actor opposed the BJP and the Sangh by lineage. Tewari stated that Shah’s daughter is married in Kolkata to the son of a Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader who has contested elections. Tewari further asked why Shah remained silent when West Bengal ministers and the Kolkata mayor raised the slogan of Dawat-e-Islam. He characterized the actors as dancing to the tune of foreign money while domestic observers watch. The underlying conflict began after a clash occurred on the SRFTI campus on October 4, 2026, involving a right-wing organization and a group of students. Earlier reports cited the initial incident date as September 27, 2026. Following the violence, six students were rusticated on October 15, 2026, for allegedly vandalizing the Vice-Chancellor’s office and physically assaulting him. On October 25, 2026, a section of protesting students claimed that power supply to their sole classroom, used for internet and workstations, was cut off. They accused the administration of intensifying pressure to end the agitation. SRFTI Registrar Deepak Kumar issued a statement on October 25, clarifying that disciplinary actions were based on specific acts of misconduct, vandalism, defacement, and physical assault. He denied that the penalties were related to the students' right to protest, stating that linking the actions to legitimate protest misrepresented the facts. The institute emphasized that the proceedings were grounded in documented violations rather than political expression. Filmmaker Payal Kapadia also voiced solidarity with the students, alleging that individuals affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh entered the campus and assaulted students, including women. She questioned the punitive measures taken against those seeking accountability. Shah’s video message framed the situation as part of a broader vendetta following the BJP-led government’s victory in the Bengal elections. He argued that the current administration targets anyone who does not subscribe to its beliefs. The exchange highlights a deepening rift between cultural figures supporting the student movement and regional political leaders defending the institutional response. The students continue their sit-in, while the administration maintains that order and discipline require strict enforcement of rules regarding property damage and physical safety. No immediate resolution to the standoff has been announced.
A political dispute has intensified regarding an ongoing student protest at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute (SRFTI). Veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah publicly supported the students, who are staging an indefinite sit-in following violent clashes on campus, while accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of targeting individuals who do not align with its ideology. In response, BJP leaders in West Bengal criticized Shah, with Rajya Sabha member Rahul Sinha demanding an investigation into the actor's comments and alleging potential links to international conspiracies. Other BJP figures, including MLA Ritesh Tewari, questioned Shah's motives by highlighting family connections to opposition parties and noting his previous silence during other local controversies. The underlying conflict began after a clash between a right-wing organization and students on October 4, leading to the suspension of six students for alleged vandalism and assault. The SRFTI administration maintains that disciplinary actions are based on specific instances of misconduct rather than the suppression of protest rights.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced 'he-said-he-said' structure typical of mainstream Indian journalism covering partisan disputes. It attributes specific accusations directly to named BJP officials (such as claims of international conspiracy and personal attacks on the actor's family) and contrasts the
BJP MLA Ritesh Tiwari criticized veteran actor Naseeruddin Shah for supporting student protesters at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute (SRFTI) in Kolkata. Tiwari characterized Shah as a lifelong opponent of the BJP and the Sangh Parivar, citing family ties to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and accusing him of being influenced by foreign funds while remaining silent on other issues. In response to the MLA's comments, Shah released a video alleging that the BJP-led West Bengal government is retaliating against students who demanded accountability regarding alleged campus violence. Shah claimed that students faced show-cause notices, surveillance, threats, and eviction demands, describing the government's actions as revenge-driven. Filmmaker Payal Kapadia also voiced solidarity with the students, alleging that individuals affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) assaulted students during the initial protest.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the conflict through the lens of a BJP legislator attacking a prominent cultural figure associated with the Left opposition. By leading with the MLA's accusations that the actor is 'by lineage' an opponent of the BJP and driven by 'foreign money,' the piece emphasizes the partisan
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has explicitly ruled out forming an alliance with rebels from the Trinamool Congress who support the Nationalist Civil Party Initiative (NCPI) ahead of upcoming municipal elections in Kolkata. Samik Bhattacharya, the state president of the BJP, stated clearly that the party’s doors remain closed to these specific candidates. This decision highlights the rigid stance the BJP is taking regarding coalition partners in West Bengal’s local politics.
Bias read (Center): The provided text consists solely of a direct quote from a political figure stating a fact about their party's strategy. It does not contain adjectives, value judgments, or contextual framing that would indicate a pro-BJP or anti-BJP bias. The tone is purely informational and neutral.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
India
