NHRC flags human rights concerns over parading of three persons in south Kolkata
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has initiated suo motu proceedings regarding reports that three accused individuals were paraded in a semi-naked state in South Kolkata. The commission issued a notice to the Kolkata Police Commissioner demanding a detailed report within two weeks, citing potential violations of human rights. According to the NHRC, the incident followed a previous day where an 18-year-old and his 19-year-old friend were allegedly assaulted and humiliated by the family of a minor girl they were seen with, leading to the youths and the older man being stripped and forced to walk naked under threat of firearms. On October 27, police paraded two of the men shirtless with ropes around their waists on the same street where the initial humiliation occurred, having arrested them for the prior day's actions. Civil rights groups criticized the police conduct as an attempt to normalize extrajudicial punishment, while noting this practice has become more frequent since the Bharatiya Janata Party assumed power in West Bengal. The Calcutta High Court had previously ruled in June 2026 that while the state has the authority to arrest and prosecute, it cannot subject the
Former West Bengal minister Indranil Sen was placed in 13 days of police custody on Thursday, October 29, following his arrest the previous day. The former minister, who served during the Trinamool Congress era, was detained in connection with a Durga Puja ticket scam. Kunal Agarwal, Additional Commissioner of Police for Crime, confirmed via statement that Sen would remain in custody until November 10. Authorities produced Sen at the Bankshall Court in Kolkata on Thursday morning. Police officials stated that investigators identified multiple financial transactions linked to Sen that he could not explain. The former minister had evaded capture despite receiving multiple summonses. While the exact amount of fraud and the full money trail are still under verification, police noted that the initial complaint alleges a loss of 34 crore rupees. Both the Kolkata Police and the Enforcement Directorate are investigating allegations of financial irregularities in the sale of Durga Puja tickets through an organization called MassArt. This group, headed by Sen’s wife, conducted exclusive Durga Puja previews in exchange for high-priced tickets. An First Information Report filed at the Bow Bazar Police Station accuses Sen and other MassArt members of exploiting the festival’s UNESCO intangible cultural heritage status for personal gain. Sen was arrested at approximately 5:10 p.m. on Wednesday, October 28, immediately after stepping out of the Enforcement Directorate office at the CGO Complex in Salt Lake. He had been undergoing interrogation there for more than four hours. During this period, officers from the Kolkata Police Detective Department and Bidhannagar Police cordoned off the surrounding area. Prior to his arrest, the Calcutta High Court denied Sen anticipatory bail. On Tuesday, October 27, Supreme Court judge Dipankar Dutta recused himself from the bail hearing. Political reactions followed swiftly. Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari and minister Agnimitra Paul suggested that if Sen had stolen funds, he shared the proceeds with former Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. Sujan Chakraborty, a senior leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), questioned whether arrests in these scams would eventually reach the top levels of leadership. In contrast, Abhishek Banerjee, general secretary of the Mamata-Trinamool faction, asserted that authorities are imprisoning anyone who refuses to compromise their integrity. On Thursday, Bharatiya Janata Party workers protested outside Sen’s residence in the Singur area. Demonstrators dragged a man with a rope tied around his waist and placed a photograph of Sen on the individual’s face. Separately, the National Human Rights Commission took suo motu notice of reports regarding the public parading of three accused persons in the Behala area of south Kolkata. The commission issued a notice to the Kolkata Police Commissioner, demanding a detailed report within two weeks. According to media reports cited by the commission, three individuals were found semi-clad with ropes around their waists. The commission stated that if the reports are accurate, the actions raise serious human rights violations. The incident occurred after an 18-year-old youth and his 19-year-old friend were allegedly beaten and humiliated by the family of a minor girl on October 27. The youth’s father, who was summoned, was also assaulted. All three victims were subsequently stripped and forced to walk naked on the road at gunpoint. On October 27, police paraded two men shirtless in shorts with ropes around their waists along the same route where the victims had been forced to walk. These two men were held on Monday, October 26, for the earlier parading incident involving three naked men, including two teenagers. Civil rights groups, including the Association for Protection of Democratic Rights, criticized the police conduct, arguing that authorities were normalizing extrajudicial punishment. This is not the first instance of such practices in West Bengal since the political transition. Similar incidents involving accused persons in vests or underwear have emerged from Howrah and other parts of the state. Most arrests involve individuals facing extortion allegations. On June 5, 2026, the Calcutta High Court ruled that while the state has the authority to arrest and prosecute, it cannot subject individuals to deliberate defamation or humiliation in the name of enforcement. Since the change in government, five ministers from the Mamata Banerjee era have been arrested. Sen is the latest among them. The first was Sujit Bose, detained for a job recruitment scam. Ministers Udayan Guha, Ujjal Biswas, and Dilip Mondal were also later arrested on charges of financial irregularities.
Former West Bengal minister Indranil Sen was placed in 13 days of police custody on October 29, 2026, following his arrest on October 28 in connection with a Durga Puja ticket scam. Authorities stated that multiple unexplained financial transactions were linked to Sen, with initial complaints alleging fraud involving approximately 34 crore rupees through the organization MassArt, which is headed by his wife. Both the Kolkata Police and the Enforcement Directorate are investigating allegations that the group exploited the festival's UNESCO intangible cultural heritage status for personal gain. Political reactions were sharply divided, with current state leaders suggesting former Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee benefited from the alleged funds, while opposition figures criticized the timing of the arrests and accused authorities of targeting dissenters. This incident marks the fifth arrest of a minister from the previous administration since the recent change in government in West Bengal.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a fact-based report on a high-profile legal and political event. It includes direct quotes from multiple stakeholders across the political spectrum, including the police, the ruling BJP-aligned state leadership, the opposition CPI(M), and the defeated TMC. By balancing the accu
Why factuality (95): The article provides precise details on the legal proceedings (13-day custody, court name, dates) and the nature of the investigation (Durga Puja ticket scam, MassArt organization). It includes direct quotes from police officials regarding the status of the investigation and the amount involved, ens
Why objectivity (90): The writing is dry and factual, focusing on procedural updates. It mentions the BJP protest outside the minister's home as a factual occurrence without injecting judgment on the protest itself. The tone remains detached and informative throughout.
The HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 90
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has initiated suo motu proceedings regarding reports that three accused individuals were paraded in a semi-naked state in South Kolkata. The commission issued a notice to the Kolkata Police Commissioner demanding a detailed report within two weeks, citing potential violations of human rights. According to the NHRC, the incident followed a previous day where an 18-year-old and his 19-year-old friend were allegedly assaulted and humiliated by the family of a minor girl they were seen with, leading to the youths and the older man being stripped and forced to walk naked under threat of firearms. On October 27, police paraded two of the men shirtless with ropes around their waists on the same street where the initial humiliation occurred, having arrested them for the prior day's actions. Civil rights groups criticized the police conduct as an attempt to normalize extrajudicial punishment, while noting this practice has become more frequent since the Bharatiya Janata Party assumed power in West Bengal. The Calcutta High Court had previously ruled in June 2026 that while the state has the authority to arrest and prosecute, it cannot subject the
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the event through the lens of civil liberties and institutional accountability, highlighting criticism from civil rights organizations and referencing a high court ruling that condemns the police behavior. It explicitly contextualizes the rise in such incidents with the change in
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the specific details of the NHRC notice, including dates, locations, and the sequence of events involving both the initial mob action and the subsequent police parade. It cites the official press release and includes reactions from civil rights groups, aligning well w
Why objectivity (90): The tone is largely neutral and journalistic. While it quotes critical statements from APDR regarding the police's actions, it presents these as reported speech rather than adopting them as the author's own opinion. The framing focuses on the institutional response (NHRC) and the facts of the incide
Deccan HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 60
Former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee alleged that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government used money and intimidation to influence voters during recent local body elections. She specifically claimed that the ruling party provided legal documents such as stamp papers and notarized affidavits to supporters, while blocking access to these services for members of her party. The report notes that these accusations were made by the leader of the All India Trinamool Congress regarding the conduct of the BJP-led state administration.
Bias read (Progressive): The article relies exclusively on the statement of Mamata Banerjee, a prominent left-leaning opposition figure, to frame the narrative around allegations of electoral malpractice by the right-wing BJP. By presenting the opposition leader's specific complaints about resource asymmetry and coercion as
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (60): The headline and lead focus entirely on the opposition leader's accusations against the ruling party. While it is a fair representation of her speech, the lack of counter-perspective or context regarding the BJP's position makes the piece feel one-sided in its immediate presentation, though typical
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
India
