More than 900 students did not attend the UNAM control exam in León, Guanajuato; the day went smoothly

Over 900 students failed to appear for the UNAM presential control exam in León, Guanajuato, while the two-day session proceeded without incidents. The University National Autonomous of Mexico (UNAM) reported that only 1,800 applicants showed up out of the 2,777 called to take part in the exam at its León campus. Salvador Andrade Ortiz, director of the National School of Higher Education (ENES) Unit León under UNAM, confirmed that the two-day process ran smoothly with no disruptions. He noted that all entry filters operated correctly and emphasized that no candidates were disqualified during the assessment. According to preliminary reports, each of the four shifts saw approximately 450 participants on average. Andrade Ortiz stated that the absence of more than 900 individuals could be attributed to several factors. Some students might have opted for educational opportunities offered by other institutions such as the University of Guanajuato, the Autonomous University of Aguascalates, the Autonomous University of Querétaro, and the University of Guadalajara. Others may have chosen alternative paths or decided against participating after encountering issues during online exams. He further mentioned that some candidates who committed infractions during online assessments might have decided not to attend the in-person test. The director acknowledged that there could be multiple reasons behind the low turnout, including personal decisions and academic considerations. The exam was conducted over two days, August 12 and 13, with participants coming from ten states: Aguascalientes, Durango, Nayarit, Querétaro, San Luis Potosí, Michoacán, Colima, Jalisco, and Zacatecas. The presence of numerous candidates from different regions underscored the significance of the event, which serves as a crucial step in the selection process for higher education programs. Andrade Ortiz highlighted the high level of supervision and security measures implemented throughout the examination period. He noted that the process was well-managed, with strict adherence to protocols ensuring fairness and integrity. Despite the lower attendance figures, he expressed satisfaction with the conduct of the participants from the central-western region, stating they behaved responsibly and adhered to the rules. The absence of over 900 students raised questions about the motivations behind their decision not to participate. While some may have been drawn to other universities, others might have faced personal or logistical challenges. The director suggested that these factors could influence future participation rates and potentially impact the overall outcomes of the selection process. The event concluded without major complications, with all procedures carried out efficiently. As the results are processed, further analysis will likely provide deeper insights into the patterns observed in this year’s participation. For now, the focus remains on the successful execution of the exam and the continued commitment to maintaining rigorous standards in the admissions process.