ON
← Back to feed
UNAM publishes the results of the face-to-face control examination; see the results here
MX🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/29/2026

UNAM publishes the results of the face-to-face control examination; see the results here

The Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) published the results of the in-person control exam for the 2026 academic cycle, following issues detected during the online exam. Aspirants can access their results through the DGAE website under 'Convocatoria UNAM 2026 Licenciatura' by entering their folio number. Selected candidates will receive documents such as their university assignment letter, credential acknowledgment, and enrollment information. The UNAM announced it will enroll approximately 49,740 students, with most entering via the regulated pass system. Around 36,000 applicants attended the in-person exam across several states.

The National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) has released the results of its in-person control examination following concerns over irregularities detected during the online entrance exam for the 2026–2027 academic cycle. The university made the information available late Friday, August 28, through its official website, allowing applicants to check their status and access necessary documents. The results are accessible via the site https://www.dgae.unam.mx/, under the section titled “Convocatoria UNAM 2026 Licenciatura,” which includes a link labeled “Resultados Examen de Control 2026.” Applicants can log in using their registration number to reach a personalized page called “Tu Sitio.” Those selected will find links to download their assignment letter, university oath document, student ID confirmation, insurance enrollment details, and proof of registration among other required paperwork. According to a statement issued by the university, approximately 49,740 new students will be admitted this academic year. Of these, 28,151 will enter through the regulated pass system, while 20,923 will gain admission via the selection competition. Selected candidates were encouraged to visit their respective faculty or school websites to complete further procedures and participate in orientation activities. The in-person examination was conducted in several states including Baja California, Mexico City, Guanajuato, and Oaxaca. The university had anticipated around 58,800 participants, with slightly more than 36,000 actually attending the exams. This figure reflects the number of individuals who responded to the call for the control test after discrepancies were identified in the initial online assessment process. The decision to hold an in-person examination followed reports of irregularities in the previous online testing phase. These issues raised questions about the integrity of the admissions process and prompted the university to take corrective measures to ensure fairness and transparency. The revised approach aimed to address potential vulnerabilities in the digital format and provide a more secure environment for evaluating candidates. The release of the results marks a critical step in the admissions process, offering clarity to thousands of applicants who had been awaiting confirmation of their status. It also sets the stage for subsequent administrative steps, such as formal enrollment, orientation programs, and the distribution of essential academic materials. Applicants who wish to verify their results can access the designated portal directly through the link https://primeringreso1.dgae.unam.mx/2026/sitios/CSL/ingresar.html?ev=356a192b7913b04c54574d18c28d46e6395428ab. This platform serves as the central hub for all related documentation and procedural updates. The university’s actions reflect its commitment to maintaining high standards in the admissions process and ensuring equal opportunities for all prospective students. As the academic year approaches, the focus shifts toward preparing the newly admitted cohort for their transition into higher education, with detailed instructions and support structures being put in place.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

El Universal logoEl UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/29/2026
UNAM publishes the results of the face-to-face control examination; see the results here

The Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) published the results of the in-person control exam for the 2026 academic cycle, following issues detected during the online exam. Aspirants can access their results through the DGAE website under 'Convocatoria UNAM 2026 Licenciatura' by entering their folio number. Selected candidates will receive documents such as their university assignment letter, credential acknowledgment, and enrollment information. The UNAM announced it will enroll approximately 49,740 students, with most entering via the regulated pass system. Around 36,000 applicants attended the in-person exam across several states.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the UNAM admissions process and does not take a clear ideological stance. It reports on administrative procedures and outcomes without emphasizing political perspectives or taking sides in any controversy. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the公布和

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the UNAM releasing results from an in-person control exam following online irregularities. It includes specific dates, links to official websites, and numbers of students admitted through different pathways. The information aligns with typical institut

Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on providing practical details for applicants. There is no emotional language or overt bias, maintaining a balanced approach.

Animal Político logoAnimal PolíticoIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 858/29/2026
UNAM results: how to consult them and what to do next

The article from Animal Político discusses how to consult the results of the UNAM control exam and what comes next. It provides information on the process for checking results and outlines subsequent steps for candidates. The focus is on administrative procedures related to academic evaluations at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM).

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding administrative processes at a national university, without taking a clear ideological stance or emphasizing particular political perspectives. It focuses on procedural guidance rather than advocacy or critique.

Why factuality (70): Similar to the previous article, this piece only briefly references the release of results without providing specific details like dates, links, or student numbers. It lacks depth compared to the first article, making it harder to assess full factual accuracy.

Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, but the lack of detail suggests a more superficial treatment of the topic. It does not add new perspectives or commentary beyond what is necessary.

Animal Político logoAnimal PolíticoIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 858/29/2026
UNAM announces the results of the face-to-face control examination

The article reports that the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) has released the results of a face-to-face control exam. The headline mentions 'Grupo Animal,' which may refer to an animal-related group or initiative associated with the university. However, the provided text is brief and lacks detailed information about the exam's content, participants, or implications.

Bias read (Center): The article appears to be a straightforward announcement regarding academic results from a university institution. There is no evident ideological framing, emphasis on specific political agendas, or biased language. The focus remains on the administrative action of releasing exam results, which does

Why factuality (70): This article mentions the release of results but lacks specific details such as dates, links, or numbers of students. While it confirms the event, it does not provide enough context to fully verify the facts against the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone but appears more brief and less comprehensive than the first article. It focuses on announcing the result rather than elaborating on the process or implications.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories