ON
← Back to feed
Democracy versus the power of tech companies
Spain🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9/7/2026

Democracy versus the power of tech companies

The article discusses the growing influence of technology companies over democratic processes and regulatory frameworks in the context of global digitalization. It highlights concerns raised by European Commission President-elect Ursula von der Leyen in 2019 regarding the lack of regulation in the digital age, emphasizing Europe’s commitment to values like privacy and the rule of law. The piece contrasts the United States' dominance in technological infrastructure and platforms with its fragmented federal approach to regulation, noting California's stricter laws on data privacy and algorithmic bias. China is described as leading in the deployment of mass technologies under state coordination, though this has raised ethical concerns and conflicts with international human rights norms. Meanwhile, the European Union, once a leader in ethical AI regulation, is now seen as losing ground due to delays in implementing regulations and compromises with political groups advocating against excessive oversight. Finally, the article identifies global tech giants, such as Meta, as powerful entities driven by capitalist motives, exemplified by their data collection practices to fuel AI development.

The European Union faces growing concerns over the unchecked power of technology companies and the regulatory challenges posed by global digitalization. In November 2019, Ursula von der Leyen, then-elect President of the European Commission, emphasized the need for Europe to prioritize values, rights, trust, and the rule of law in its digital strategy. At the time, she was aware of the emerging democratic challenge stemming from the lack of regulation in the rapidly evolving digital landscape. She noted that other global powers were pursuing distinct strategies in their approach to digital transformation. Currently, the United States continues to dominate the world's major tech platforms, maintaining control over media and critical infrastructure such as data centers, graphics processing units, and integrated hardware and software solutions for various industries. However, there is a federal regulatory vacuum that contrasts with the stricter regulations in states like California, which address privacy, algorithmic bias, and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace. China leads in the societal deployment of technology through mass applications, supported by state coordination. It has become a significant global player in AI within a short timeframe, although some of its methods raise ethical concerns and conflict with basic legal principles outlined in international human rights treaties. Nevertheless, China has made notable efforts in regulation over the past two years. The EU previously held a leading position in regulating reliable and ethical AI, aiming to create an ecosystem of excellence and trust. However, it is not yet a major power in terms of investment or technological development and deployment for industry or business. Its regulatory influence is weakening, as the European Commission delays the full implementation of the AI Act, potentially undermining fundamental rights in favor of political groups and pressure organizations that argue against excessive regulation. This situation highlights a lack of technological sovereignty and regulatory stability. Global technology firms, far from being non-profit entities, are characterized by their capitalist ambitions. For instance, Meta once claimed that its AI was trained using vast amounts of user-generated images and videos to capture behavioral patterns. As this decade began, competition intensified around collecting the maximum amount of personal data, raising hopes that the EU would lead in controlling these behaviors that threaten human well-being and rights. There are signs that efforts are beginning to curb this excess. Both the United States and Europe have accused Meta of promoting addiction among children and adolescents on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, prioritizing profits over the welfare of minors. Recently, media reports indicated that Meta has agreed to pay $15.5 billion to settle lawsuits brought by U.S. state attorneys general, though final validation is pending. While this settlement is significant, it does not address deeper issues related to the regulation of technology companies. In another context, the Spanish newspaper ABC reported on the launch of the Geely Galaxy Cruiser 700, a high-performance hybrid SUV with advanced AI capabilities. The vehicle features a plug-in hybrid system with three electric motors, intelligent traction with AI, and extreme off-road capabilities. It represents one of the most technologically advanced and imposing offerings in the global market. The car will be available in Spain, marking a new chapter in the automotive industry's integration of artificial intelligence and sustainable technologies.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 759/7/2026
Democracy versus the power of tech companies

The article discusses the growing influence of technology companies over democratic processes and regulatory frameworks in the context of global digitalization. It highlights concerns raised by European Commission President-elect Ursula von der Leyen in 2019 regarding the lack of regulation in the digital age, emphasizing Europe’s commitment to values like privacy and the rule of law. The piece contrasts the United States' dominance in technological infrastructure and platforms with its fragmented federal approach to regulation, noting California's stricter laws on data privacy and algorithmic bias. China is described as leading in the deployment of mass technologies under state coordination, though this has raised ethical concerns and conflicts with international human rights norms. Meanwhile, the European Union, once a leader in ethical AI regulation, is now seen as losing ground due to delays in implementing regulations and compromises with political groups advocating against excessive oversight. Finally, the article identifies global tech giants, such as Meta, as powerful entities driven by capitalist motives, exemplified by their data collection practices to fuel AI development.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through a critical lens of corporate power and democratic erosion, aligning more closely with progressive concerns about regulation and ethics. While it presents facts neutrally, the emphasis on corporate greed, ethical issues in China, and the weakening of EU regulatory

Why factuality (85): The article presents a general overview of the current state of technological regulation by major powers, citing the EU's stance under Ursula von der Leyen and contrasting it with U.S. dominance and China's approach. While no primary source is available, the information aligns with widely reported t

Why objectivity (75): The article provides a comparative analysis but frames the EU as more ethically aligned while implying potential shortcomings in the U.S. and China. It uses terms like 'problemáticas' and 'colisión con los bienes jurídicos' which carry evaluative weight, suggesting a slight bias toward the EU's posi

infoLibre logoinfoLibreIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 609/7/2026
It's the apocalypse, I feel it already

The article expresses deep pessimism about current global and political developments, particularly regarding the unchecked power of technology companies like those led by Elon Musk and the perceived failure of democratic institutions to respond effectively. The author feels overwhelmed by the sense of impending crisis, comparing the situation to an 'apocalypse,' and criticizes the lack of decisive action by politicians and democratic parties. They reference the use of AI trained on child pornography, the influence of tech giants over economic and political systems, and the manipulation of elections through bot networks in Latin America. The tone is highly critical of modern democracy and the inability of traditional political structures to counteract these challenges.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the growing power of technology companies and their influence over politics as a major threat to democracy, using strong language that aligns with left-wing critiques of corporate dominance and authoritarian tendencies. It portrays democratic institutions as ineffective and out of

Why factuality (85): The article presents subjective concerns about AI development and political power, referencing specific claims about Elon Musk's AI using child pornography for training. While these claims may be based on reports from media outlets, they lack direct sourcing or verification. The author also expresse

Why objectivity (60): The tone is highly emotional and apocalyptic, expressing personal despair and frustration with current societal trends. The author uses strong language and frames the situation as a dire crisis, which reflects a clear ideological stance rather than a neutral analysis. This emotional framing reduces

ABC (España) logoABC (España)IndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 409/3/2026
Geely Galaxy Cruiser 700: the brutal 4×4 hybrid with 1,128 hp arrives in Spain

The Chinese automaker Geely has officially unveiled its new flagship model, the Geely Galaxy Cruiser 700, in Spain. This hybrid vehicle features three electric motors, intelligent all-wheel drive powered by AI, and advanced off-road capabilities. It is positioned as one of the most technologically advanced and powerful vehicles in the global market, with a combined power output of 1,128 horsepower. The introduction of this vehicle highlights Geely's growing presence in European markets and underscores advancements in automotive technology.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on the technological specifications and market positioning of a new vehicle, with no mention of political figures, policies, or contentious issues. There is no framing that suggests a political bias.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'brutal 4×4 híbrido' and 'más tecnológicas e imponentes del mercado global,' which suggests enthusiasm rather than neutrality. It also frames the vehicle as a flagship model without presenting alternative perspectives or critical analysis, result

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories