AliExpress fined €550 million for violating the Digital Services Act

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 7516 hr. ago

The European Commission has fined Chinese e-commerce platform AliExpress 550 million euros for violating the Digital Services Act by failing to adequately assess and mitigate risks associated with illegal, unsafe, or counterfeit products sold on its platform. The fine was calculated based on the nature, severity, and duration of the violations affecting users in the EU. AliExpress now has until October 20, 2026, to submit an action plan outlining measures to address these issues. The European Digital Services Board will review the plan within a month and the Commission will then have another month to make a final decision. Non-compliance could lead to periodic financial penalties. The Commission criticized AliExpress for not properly assessing whether it had enough staff to review potentially illegal products and overestimating the effectiveness of its system for identifying and removing such items. AliExpress reported that 15 million illegal products were recommended to EU consumers last year, mostly involving unsafe or counterfeit goods like cosmetics, clothing, toys, and small electronic devices. With 193 million consumers in the EU, the market is the largest for AliExpress. The

Bias read (Center): The article presents the European Commission's findings and actions against AliExpress in an objective manner, citing specific violations and the legal framework. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports the regulatory process and the implications for consumer safety. While the issue,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the European Commission's fine of 550 million euros against AliExpress for violating the Digital Services Act. It provides details on the reasons for the fine, including failure to assess and mitigate risks from illegal products. The information aligns with the cross-s

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, but there is a slight emphasis on the severity of the issue with phrases like 'nepoštovanje odluke o neusklađenosti može dovesti do periodičnih novčanih kazni,' which implies potential future consequences. There is also a brief mention of the impact on consumers, which adds

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 hr. ago

The European Commission has fined the Chinese e-commerce platform AliExpress 550 million euros for violating the Digital Services Act by failing to adequately assess and mitigate risks associated with illegal, unsafe, or counterfeit products sold on its platform. The fine was calculated based on the nature, severity, and duration of the violations affecting users in the EU. AliExpress now has until October 20, 2026, to submit an action plan outlining measures to address these breaches. The European Digital Services Board will review the plan within a month and the Commission will then take another month to finalize its decision. Non-compliance could result in periodic financial penalties. The report highlights issues such as insufficient staff for reviewing potentially illegal products, ineffective systems for detecting and removing illicit goods, and inadequate enforcement of penalty policies against sellers. The Commission emphasizes that the spread of counterfeit clothing, unsafe toys, and dangerous cosmetics is not an inevitable cost of online shopping but rather a failure by AliExpress to fulfill its obligations under the law.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the European Commission’s findings and actions against AliExpress in a factual manner, emphasizing regulatory compliance and legal obligations. While the issue involves international trade and regulation, the framing remains objective, focusing on the legal framework and the non

Why factuality (85): This article presents the same facts as the first article regarding the fine and the reasons behind it. It includes additional context about the types of illegal products sold on AliExpress, such as toxic toys and unsafe cosmetics, which supports the overall narrative. The information is consistent

Why objectivity (70): The article has a more critical tone, particularly in phrases like 'Europa je zatrpana otrovnim igračkama' which uses emotionally charged language. It also emphasizes the inadequacy of AliExpress's policies and systems, suggesting a more negative perspective than the first article.