ON
← Back to feed
Brussels fined AliExpress €550 million for multiple breaches of the Digital Services Act
Slovenia📈 Economyyesterday

Brussels fined AliExpress €550 million for multiple breaches of the Digital Services Act

The European Commission has imposed a fine of 550 million euros on the Chinese e-commerce platform AliExpress for failing to comply with obligations under the Digital Services Act. The commission found that AliExpress did not adequately assess risks related to the spread of illegal, dangerous, or counterfeit products through its online marketplace. This included insufficient evaluation of staff capacity to review potential illegal items, lack of quantitative indicators in risk assessments, and systems that promoted the distribution of such products through recommendations and advertisements. Testing by the commission revealed that many illegal products were recommended or advertised before being removed. Additionally, AliExpress’s system for detecting illegal products was not functioning properly, allowing numerous illegal items—including counterfeits, unsafe toys, and cosmetics—to remain available online for weeks after detection. The company also failed to effectively penalize sellers offering illegal products, allowing them to continue operating on the platform despite penalties. The fine considers the nature of the violations, their impact on EU users, and their duration, which

The European Commission has imposed a fine of 550 million euros on Chinese e-commerce platform AliExpress for multiple violations of the Digital Services Act. The decision was announced on July 20, 2026, with AliExpress given until October 20, 2026, to submit a plan outlining measures to address the breaches. According to the commission, the company failed to adequately assess risks related to the spread of illegal, harmful, or counterfeit goods through its online marketplace. The Digital Services Act requires platforms to conduct thorough risk assessments and implement effective measures to prevent the proliferation of illicit products. In its findings, the commission stated that AliExpress did not properly evaluate whether it had sufficient staff to review potential illegal items. It also noted that quantitative indicators were missing during risk assessments for the appearance of such goods in the marketplace. Furthermore, the commission found that AliExpress inadequately assessed how its recommendation and advertising systems contributed to the spread of illegal goods. Testing conducted by the commission revealed that numerous illegal items were recommended or advertised to consumers before they were actually removed. This suggests that the platform’s mechanisms for identifying and removing prohibited products were insufficient. In addition, the commission concluded that AliExpress did not take adequate steps to reduce the risk of spreading illegal goods. Its system for detecting illegal products was not functioning correctly, leading to a large number of such items circulating on the platform. These included counterfeits, dangerous toys, and cosmetic products that remained available online for weeks even after being identified. AliExpress also failed to properly enforce its policies against sellers who sold illegal goods. Despite penalties, these sellers could continue operating on the platform. The commission pointed out that product verification on AliExpress was easily circumvented through incorrect categorization of items. Additionally, the platform was ineffective in preventing the spread of counterfeit goods. Based on these findings, the European Commission has imposed the 550 million euro fine. The decision took into account the nature of the violations, their impact on users in the EU, and their duration, which extended at least until June 2025. AliExpress has criticized the fine, calling it “unreasonable.” The company expressed disagreement with the decision, stating that it does not reflect the appropriate framework or proactive improvements they have implemented. AliExpress is currently reviewing the commission’s decision and considering all available options. The company has indicated that it will provide detailed feedback and explore all possible avenues for resolution. The European Commission will issue its assessment within two months and determine a reasonable timeframe for implementing the proposed action plan.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 78yesterday
Brussels fined AliExpress €550 million for multiple breaches of the Digital Services Act

The European Commission has imposed a fine of 550 million euros on the Chinese e-commerce platform AliExpress for failing to comply with obligations under the Digital Services Act. The commission found that AliExpress did not adequately assess risks related to the spread of illegal, dangerous, or counterfeit products through its online marketplace. This included insufficient evaluation of staff capacity to review potential illegal items, lack of quantitative indicators in risk assessments, and systems that promoted the distribution of such products through recommendations and advertisements. Testing by the commission revealed that many illegal products were recommended or advertised before being removed. Additionally, AliExpress’s system for detecting illegal products was not functioning properly, allowing numerous illegal items—including counterfeits, unsafe toys, and cosmetics—to remain available online for weeks after detection. The company also failed to effectively penalize sellers offering illegal products, allowing them to continue operating on the platform despite penalties. The fine considers the nature of the violations, their impact on EU users, and their duration, which

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a regulatory action taken by the European Commission against an international e-commerce platform. It presents factual information about the alleged violations and the resulting fine without overtly favoring any side. There is no indication of biased language, selective fact-p

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the European Commission imposing a €550 million fine on AliExpress for non-compliance with the Digital Services Act. It cites official statements from the European Commission and provides specific details about the violations, such as inadequate risk assessments and ineffectiv

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the facts in a neutral tone but uses somewhat formal and institutional language typical of news reporting. While it does not overtly take sides, it emphasizes the regulatory actions taken by the European Commission, which may subtly frame AliExpress as non-compliant. There is no

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories