ON
← Back to feed
AliExpress fined record €550m by EU for failing to stop sale of illegal and fake goods
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

AliExpress fined record €550m by EU for failing to stop sale of illegal and fake goods

The European Union has fined AliExpress a record €550 million under the Digital Services Act (DSA) for failing to prevent the sale of illegal and harmful goods on its platform. The fine, the largest ever imposed by the EU under the DSA, comes after the European Commission found that AliExpress lacked sufficient staff to assess product legality and allowed illegal items to remain online for extended periods. The ruling highlights concerns over consumer safety and compliance with digital regulations. While AliExpress criticized the fine as 'disproportionate,' the EU emphasized the severity of the platform's failures in protecting users. Similar fines have been levied against competitors like Temu and X, underscoring ongoing regulatory scrutiny of major e-commerce platforms.

AliExpress, the Chinese online retail platform, has been fined a record €550 million by the European Union for failing to prevent the sale of illegal and harmful goods on its marketplace. The penalty, announced by the European Commission, marks the largest fine ever issued under the Digital Services Act (DSA), which took effect in 2024 to safeguard consumers against deceptive practices and unsafe products. The fine stems from the EU's findings that AliExpress did not adequately monitor or remove illegal items from its platform. These included counterfeit clothing, unsafe toys, and potentially hazardous cosmetics and kitchenware. According to the commission, the platform lacked sufficient personnel to evaluate the legality of products, often allowing only tens of seconds for assessment before approval. Many illegal goods were also promoted through AliExpress’s recommendation algorithms, and internal risk assessments proved ineffective. As a result, numerous harmful products remained accessible to buyers for extended periods. The European Commission emphasized that the scale of the platform does not absolve it from responsibility. Henna Virkkunen, the commission’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security, and democracy, stated that the presence of counterfeit and dangerous goods online is not an inevitable consequence of e-commerce but rather a failure to meet legal obligations. She called on AliExpress to take immediate corrective actions. This fine surpasses previous penalties under the DSA, which included €200 million levied against Temu and €120 million against X. However, it represents less than 1% of the €122 billion in annual revenue generated by AliExpress’s parent company, Alibaba. The maximum possible fine under the DSA would have been 6% of global revenue, though the exact calculation remains unclear. The EU’s investigation revealed widespread non-compliance among products listed on major retail platforms. A prior study found that 65% of cosmetics, 63% of food supplements, and 60% of personal protective equipment sold on these platforms were non-compliant with EU regulations. This context underscores the broader challenge faced by regulators in ensuring consumer safety in the digital marketplace. AliExpress responded swiftly, calling the fine “disproportionate.” The company argued that its existing frameworks and recent improvements were not adequately recognized by the commission. It expressed disagreement with the ruling and indicated it would review the decision and consider all available options. The European Commission clarified that the fine was not based solely on the presence of illegal products but rather on the platform’s failure to establish effective safeguards. Despite being given over two years to improve its compliance and risk management processes, AliExpress did not meet the required standards. The commission noted that while the platform’s terms of service appeared to align with EU law, they allowed sellers to list non-compliant goods with ease. Internal testing conducted by the commission uncovered extensive violations, even as AliExpress claimed to operate within the EU’s “safety gate” mechanism designed to quickly identify and block illegal content. This discrepancy highlights ongoing challenges in enforcing digital regulations across global platforms.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 88yesterday
AliExpress fined record €550m by EU for failing to stop sale of illegal and fake goods

The European Union has fined AliExpress a record €550 million under the Digital Services Act (DSA) for failing to prevent the sale of illegal and harmful goods on its platform. The fine, the largest ever imposed by the EU under the DSA, comes after the European Commission found that AliExpress lacked sufficient staff to assess product legality and allowed illegal items to remain online for extended periods. The ruling highlights concerns over consumer safety and compliance with digital regulations. While AliExpress criticized the fine as 'disproportionate,' the EU emphasized the severity of the platform's failures in protecting users. Similar fines have been levied against competitors like Temu and X, underscoring ongoing regulatory scrutiny of major e-commerce platforms.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the EU's enforcement of the Digital Services Act as a regulatory action, focusing on legal compliance and consumer protection. While the issue of digital regulation is politically charged, the reporting remains balanced, citing both the EU's stance and AliExpress's rebuttal. No黨

Why factuality (95): The article reports a significant fine against AliExpress by the EU under the Digital Services Act, citing failure to prevent illegal goods. The figures (€550m, comparison to previous fines) align with the cross-source consensus. The mention of specific product categories and the role of the Digital

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the EU's stance and quotes officials neutrally, but uses emotionally charged language like 'harmful clothing' and 'dangerous cosmetics,' which may influence reader perception. The focus on AliExpress compared to Temu and X could imply a broader regulatory trend, though it remain

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories