INEC,ADC mum as reps candidate maintains valid primaries stand

A political crisis continues to unfold in Kebbi State as the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate for the federal constituency of Sakaba/Danko/Wasagu/Zuru/Fakai insists that the results of the primary election conducted by the African Democratic Congress (ADC) remain valid. The candidate, Sadiq Sa’adu Fakai, claims that the Nigerian Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the ADC leadership in Kebbi have failed to uphold the legality of the process, allowing what he describes as an unlawful replacement of his candidacy. Fakai alleges that his signature was forged, and a false affidavit was submitted in an attempt to replace him as the official representative of his constituency. He asserts that this action constitutes a violation of judicial orders, as the dispute is currently under review in court. According to Fakai, he had previously raised concerns with his legal team, who formally notified both INEC and the ADC leadership. However, he says there has been no response or resolution from either body, leading to a situation he calls “complicity in illegality.” The candidate emphasized that the silence of INEC and the ADC in Kebbi State signals their tacit approval of the fraudulent process. This, he argues, undermines the rule of law and threatens the integrity of the upcoming general elections. Fakai warned that such actions could further alienate APC supporters and weaken the party's position ahead of the polls. He urged his constituents to remain calm and adhere strictly to the law, stating that no unauthorized replacement would be accepted in his constituency. Fakai’s legal team has reportedly taken steps to challenge the validity of the replacement process. They argue that the initial primary election was conducted in accordance with established procedures and that any subsequent attempts to alter the outcome are invalid. The candidate also expressed frustration over the failure of the ADC leadership in Kebbi to address the issue internally before it escalated to the point of legal confrontation. The situation highlights broader tensions within the political landscape of Kebbi State, where internal party dynamics often influence electoral outcomes. Fakai’s stance reflects a growing concern among APC members about the potential for manipulation and the need for transparency in the nomination process. His insistence on upholding the legitimacy of the primary results underscores the high stakes involved as the nation approaches one of its most critical electoral cycles. Legal experts suggest that the ongoing dispute could lead to prolonged litigation, potentially affecting the scheduling of the elections. The involvement of INEC adds another layer of complexity, as the commission is responsible for overseeing all electoral processes in the country. While INEC has yet to make a public statement on the matter, its role in validating candidates' eligibility makes it a key player in resolving the conflict. As the case moves forward, the focus will likely shift toward whether the courts will support Fakai’s claim that the replacement process was unlawful. Meanwhile, the ADC leadership in Kebbi remains silent on the matter, leaving many observers to speculate about the motivations behind their inaction. For now, Fakai and his supporters continue to push for a resolution that upholds the principles of fair and transparent elections.