ON
← Back to feed
A federal judge has overturned Trump's visa ban on citizens of 75 countries.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter15 hr. ago

A federal judge has overturned Trump's visa ban on citizens of 75 countries.

The U.S. Supreme Court in New York has ruled to lift a temporary ban on issuing visas to residents of 75 countries, including several Western Balkan nations, which was imposed by former President Donald Trump's administration in January. The ban aimed to prevent entry of individuals who would 'receive public benefits' and was based on the claim that these applicants posed a public burden. Justice Jeannette Vargas of the federal district court in Manhattan declared the ban unlawful, stating that Secretary of State Marco Rubio exceeded his authority by implementing the policy. The ruling allows visa applications to resume for citizens of Kosovo, Albania, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, among others. The decision highlights legal challenges to immigration policies under Trump’s administration, which had implemented multiple measures targeting undocumented immigrants.

1 reports

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenter15 hr. ago
A federal judge has overturned Trump's visa ban on citizens of 75 countries.

The U.S. Supreme Court in New York has ruled to lift a temporary ban on issuing visas to residents of 75 countries, including several Western Balkan nations, which was imposed by former President Donald Trump's administration in January. The ban aimed to prevent entry of individuals who would 'receive public benefits' and was based on the claim that these applicants posed a public burden. Justice Jeannette Vargas of the federal district court in Manhattan declared the ban unlawful, stating that Secretary of State Marco Rubio exceeded his authority by implementing the policy. The ruling allows visa applications to resume for citizens of Kosovo, Albania, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, among others. The decision highlights legal challenges to immigration policies under Trump’s administration, which had implemented multiple measures targeting undocumented immigrants.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal reasoning behind the court's decision without overtly favoring either side. It explains both the rationale for the Trump administration's policy and the judicial counterarguments, maintaining a balanced tone. While the issue of immigration policy is politically charged

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories