Tinubu’s Group to Atiku: Leave foreign interference, campaign on policies
Mazi Franklin Ngoforo, the Deputy National Leader (Southeast) of the Renewed Hope for Greater Nigeria (RHGN), has called on former Vice President Atiku Abubakar to focus on persuading Nigerians about his policies rather than seeking foreign intervention in Nigeria's political affairs. This statement came after RHGN launched its campaign for President Bola Tinubu's re-election in Jos, Plateau State. Ngoforo argues that seeking external influence in domestic politics could undermine a candidate's legitimacy and suggest reluctance to engage in democratic competition. He emphasizes that candidates should present credible policy alternatives to address Nigeria's economic, security, and developmental issues. Ngoforo urges Nigerians to reject strategies that risk exposing the electoral process to undue external influence and to support Tinubu based on his administration's record and development agenda. He also calls for intensified grassroots mobilization and stresses that the 2027 general election should be a sovereign choice made by Nigerians through their democratic process.
Residents of Jigawa State have expressed strong support for presidential candidate Alhaji Atiku Abubakar of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) over his pledge to reintroduce fuel subsidies, citing the policy's impact on everyday Nigerians. The issue has sparked widespread discussion in local communities, markets, and online platforms, following Atiku’s announcement during his first media engagement after the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) lifted the ban on 2027 presidential campaigns on August 19. During the session, Atiku stated, “I will restore fuel subsidy because the current removal has failed the masses. You cannot punish the poor in the name of reform. Subsidy is for the people, not for the elite.” His remarks resonated with many locals who argue that the removal of the subsidy has exacerbated economic hardship. President Bola Tinubu responded swiftly, criticizing Atiku’s proposal as a demonstration of ignorance regarding governance and economics. He claimed that the subsidy removal was a necessary step toward fiscal responsibility and warned against reverting to outdated policies. His comments have fueled frustration among ordinary citizens, who feel the government has ignored their struggles. In Jigawa, residents interviewed by The Punch correspondent emphasized that the removal of the subsidy has made basic necessities unaffordable, leading to a sharp decline in quality of life. Transport, food, and overall living costs have surged beyond the means of many families. Malam Musa, a 52-year-old commercial driver in Dutse, lamented the financial strain caused by the increase in fuel prices. He noted that before the subsidy removal, drivers could manage their expenses, but now, the cost of fuel alone has skyrocketed from N195 to over N1,300. “How can we survive?” he asked, expressing the sentiment shared by many struggling workers. Similarly, Harira Danladi, a food vendor in Dutse Central Market, reported that her business has suffered due to reduced consumer spending. Customers, unable to afford essentials, have left her with little income. “They told us subsidy removal would bring development, but we only see suffering,” she said, vowing full support for Atiku’s plan to restore the subsidy. Youth leader Usman Shehu in Takur Quarters echoed these sentiments, highlighting the critical role of fuel in the Nigerian economy. “When you touch fuel, you touch everything,” he said, emphasizing that Atiku’s promise to bring back the subsidy signals a leadership that understands the plight of the working class. Another resident, Malam Ibrahim Maibargo, a civil servant, criticized Tinubu’s administration for its perceived disconnect from the populace. He argued that the president’s insistence on maintaining the subsidy removal policy reflects an anti-people approach, leaving the majority of Nigerians to bear the brunt of economic mismanagement. The debate has extended beyond local conversations, drawing attention from national stakeholders. The ADC’s Jigawa chapter has officially endorsed Atiku’s plan, issuing a statement from its deputy chairman, Ambassador Nuraddeen Jidawa. The party attributed the current economic crisis to the federal government’s decision to remove the subsidy in 2023, linking it to rising costs of transportation, food, and other essentials. Jidawa praised Atiku as a leader committed to addressing the nation’s challenges, noting that his proposed subsidy framework would prioritize domestic fuel production and accountability. He urged voters to support ADC candidates in the upcoming 2027 elections, framing the movement as a collective effort to rescue the country from economic hardship. Meanwhile, the controversy has intensified the divide between Atiku and Tinubu. The president’s spokesperson, Bayo Onanuga, dismissed Atiku’s reversal on the subsidy as politically motivated, arguing that the policy shift undermines fiscal sustainability. However, Atiku’s media adviser, Paul Ibe, defended the former vice president’s position, asserting that leaders must be willing to reassess policies when they cause undue hardship. Ibe pointed to World Bank data showing that the subsidy removal led to a 163% increase in retail gasoline prices, exacerbating inflation and disproportionately affecting low-income households. He stressed that the real test of leadership lies in whether policies genuinely improve the lives of ordinary citizens rather than adhering rigidly to past positions.
Mazi Franklin Ngoforo, the Deputy National Leader (Southeast) of the Renewed Hope for Greater Nigeria (RHGN), has called on former Vice President Atiku Abubakar to focus on persuading Nigerians about his policies rather than seeking foreign intervention in Nigeria's political affairs. This statement came after RHGN launched its campaign for President Bola Tinubu's re-election in Jos, Plateau State. Ngoforo argues that seeking external influence in domestic politics could undermine a candidate's legitimacy and suggest reluctance to engage in democratic competition. He emphasizes that candidates should present credible policy alternatives to address Nigeria's economic, security, and developmental issues. Ngoforo urges Nigerians to reject strategies that risk exposing the electoral process to undue external influence and to support Tinubu based on his administration's record and development agenda. He also calls for intensified grassroots mobilization and stresses that the 2027 general election should be a sovereign choice made by Nigerians through their democratic process.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically charged issue involving two prominent political figures (Atiku Abubakar and Bola Tinubu), the framing remains balanced. The message is directed at both candidates, emphasizing the importance of focusing on domestic policies and rejecting foreign interference
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a statement from Mazi Franklin Ngoforo, a member of RHGN, urging Atiku Abubakar to focus on policy arguments rather than seek foreign influence. It accurately reflects the content of the speech and aligns with the cross-source consensus that the event involves political campai
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains focused on the political strategy being discussed, without overt emotional language or clear bias toward either candidate. However, there is subtle advocacy for Tinubu's campaign, which may slightly skew the neutrality of the reporting.
The PunchIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 758/23/2026
Former Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar, running as the presidential candidate for the African Democratic Congress in the 2027 election, has called on the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to release records related to current President Bola Tinubu, provided it is legally permissible. Atiku argues that Nigerians have a democratic right to access information about Tinubu's background, especially as the nation approaches a general election. He criticized the FBI's claim that releasing such records might endanger lives, stating that Nigerians are already facing significant threats due to insecurity and economic hardship. Atiku further accused Tinubu's administration of exacerbating these issues through policies that have raised the cost of living, including transportation, food, and healthcare. He emphasized that his request is based on principles of democratic accountability and transparency, not an attempt to involve the U.S. in Nigeria's internal affairs.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Atiku's demands as a democratic appeal for transparency and accountability, criticizing the current administration's policies as harmful to the populace. The tone emphasizes the need for public scrutiny of leaders and highlights the negative impact of Tinubu's governance, which is
Why factuality (85): The article reports on Atiku Abubakar's call for the FBI to release records related to President Tinubu, citing a cross-source consensus that this is an ongoing political issue. It accurately reflects statements from Atiku's spokesperson and includes quotes from the statement. The article does not p
Why objectivity (75): The article presents Atiku's perspective with some emotional language, such as 'Nigerians are already dying,' which may reflect bias. While it provides context about the economic issues, it frames the situation primarily from Atiku's viewpoint without offering balanced coverage of opposing arguments
Presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has urged the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to release potentially disclosable records related to investigations into President Bola Tinubu, arguing that Nigerians are already suffering due to Tinubu's economic policies. The FBI had requested permission to withhold certain information under the guise of protecting lives, but Atiku criticized this reasoning, linking the hardships faced by Nigerians to the removal of fuel subsidies, which he claims has caused widespread economic strain. He emphasized that his request is not an attempt to interfere in Nigeria's internal affairs but a democratic appeal for transparency regarding the leader of the nation. Atiku pledged to reverse the subsidy removal if elected and called for the release of lawful information while respecting the protection of sensitive investigative methods.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Atiku's demands for transparency as a democratic and humanitarian appeal, emphasizing the negative impact of current policies on ordinary citizens. The tone criticizes the justification for withholding information and highlights the struggles of the populace, aligning with a left-
Why factuality (85): The article reports on Atiku Abubakar's comments regarding the FBI's request to withhold records related to President Tinubu. It accurately reflects the legal context of the FBI's motion and Atiku's response, aligning with cross-source consensus on the event. However, it includes some subjective int
Why objectivity (70): The article presents Atiku's perspective with emotional language such as 'Nigerians are already dying' and frames the issue as a direct consequence of government policy. This leans towards a particular political stance, showing bias in favor of Atiku's position.
The PunchIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 608/23/2026
Former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai (retd.), has called on Nigerians to resist foreign interference in the country's affairs, specifically regarding recent moves to release documents linked to drug-trafficking investigations involving President Bola Tinubu from over three decades ago. In a position paper titled 'Nigeria First,' Buratai argues that the controversy surrounding Tinubu threatens Nigeria's international image and sovereignty. He warns that the potential release of these documents could harm the country's reputation globally, as international audiences might associate the allegations with Nigeria as a whole. Buratai emphasizes that Tinubu's current leadership and contributions to the nation should not be judged solely based on past allegations, urging Nigerians to consider his decades of service. He questions the legitimacy of a U.S. court determining the character of a Nigerian leader, highlighting concerns about national sovereignty.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a challenge to national sovereignty and portrays the U.S. court's involvement as an external threat to Nigeria's autonomy. It emphasizes the importance of protecting national dignity and highlights concerns about foreign influence, which aligns with right-leaning disc
Why factuality (75): The article reports on statements by Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai regarding foreign scrutiny of allegations against President Tinubu. It mentions a legal deadline set by a U.S. court and references a position paper. While these details align with public records and reported statements, the article does no
Why objectivity (60): The article presents Buratai's perspective as a strong defense of national sovereignty and criticizes foreign interference. However, it frames the issue primarily through Buratai's viewpoint without providing counterarguments or alternative perspectives. The language used, such as 'foreign interfere
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
NG
