ON
← Back to feed
The judge who peed in the bottles and kept them in his office, the shock discovery of his colleague.
Italy🏛️ Politics3 days ago

The judge who peed in the bottles and kept them in his office, the shock discovery of his colleague.

A judge in Italy, Giuseppe Artino Innaria, has been formally disciplined by the Council of Magistrates (Csm) for maintaining bottles filled with his urine in his office during the pandemic. The disciplinary action was confirmed by the Supreme Court (Cassazione), which upheld a two-month loss of seniority penalty. The misconduct was discovered by a colleague who found the bottles while organizing shared office space. The judge admitted to using the bottles 'with maximum calm,' storing them in cabinets with other staff members. The Csm ruled that this behavior violated hygiene standards and posed health risks to colleagues. The judge attempted to justify his actions by citing poor sanitation facilities, eye condition, and pandemic-related fear, but these excuses were rejected by the Csm.

1 reports

Open logoOpenIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
The judge who peed in the bottles and kept them in his office, the shock discovery of his colleague.

A judge in Italy, Giuseppe Artino Innaria, has been formally disciplined by the Council of Magistrates (Csm) for maintaining bottles filled with his urine in his office during the pandemic. The disciplinary action was confirmed by the Supreme Court (Cassazione), which upheld a two-month loss of seniority penalty. The misconduct was discovered by a colleague who found the bottles while organizing shared office space. The judge admitted to using the bottles 'with maximum calm,' storing them in cabinets with other staff members. The Csm ruled that this behavior violated hygiene standards and posed health risks to colleagues. The judge attempted to justify his actions by citing poor sanitation facilities, eye condition, and pandemic-related fear, but these excuses were rejected by the Csm.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of judicial misconduct without overt ideological slant. It reports on the legal consequences of the judge’s actions based on official rulings and does not frame the issue through a political lens. While the subject involves public officials, the framing remains

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the disciplinary action taken against Judge Artino Innaria by the CSM and the Cassazione, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It provides details from the colleague’s discovery and the subsequent investigation, though some emotional language may bias the narrativ

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories