HZJZ has published the results of water from Gospić, Ostrok and Senja

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9510 days ago

The Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) released results from an extraordinary water sampling conducted on August 11 in the Lika-Senj County. Six samples were analyzed, three from raw water sources (Mrđenovac spring, Tonković Vrilo spring near Otočac, and Hrmotine water intake) and three from the public water supply network (Caffe Bar Like in Gospić, Elderly Home in Otočac, and Children’s Kindergarten Travica in Senj). All six samples showed concentrations of all analyzed PFAS compounds and their total below the detection limit of 0.0015 micrograms per liter. This does not necessarily mean there are no PFAS compounds present, but rather that their concentration is below the level measurable by the laboratory method. The results are consistent with previous analyses conducted regularly at these locations. Additional chemical and microbiological tests are ongoing, and their results will be published later. The sampling was carried out after reports of waste manipulation and environmental issues at an illegal landfill in Gospić, where two piezometers downstream of the site showed PFAS totals of approximately 200 ng/L and 7.1 ng/L, though these piezometers are not part of the pot

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual scientific findings regarding water quality testing without overt ideological framing. It provides balanced information about the test results, acknowledges limitations of detection methods, and mentions ongoing additional testing. While the issue of PFAS contamination (

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the findings of the extraordinary sampling conducted by HZJZ, including the locations where samples were taken and the results showing PFAS concentrations below detection limits. It aligns precisely with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article is completely neutral in tone, presenting only the facts without any subjective interpretation or emotional language.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9510 days ago

The Hrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo (HZJZ) reported that water samples taken in the Lika-Senj county during an extraordinary sampling campaign were all within legal limits, with concentrations of harmful substances below maximum allowable levels. The sampling took place on August 11th, with three raw water samples and three usage site samples collected. Analysis showed that concentrations of PFAS compounds and their sum were below detection limits, consistent with previous analyses conducted at the source and in the distribution network. Additional chemical and microbiological tests are ongoing, with results expected after laboratory processing. The HZJZ stated they will continue monitoring the situation and inform the public of new results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding water quality testing conducted by an official body, without overt ideological framing. It reports on scientific findings and regulatory compliance without apparent bias toward any political group or ideology. The tone remains objective, focusing on

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the results of the water analysis conducted by HZJZ, stating that all tested samples were compliant with regulations and PFAS concentrations were below detection limits. This matches exactly with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a perfectly neutral tone throughout, simply relaying the findings without any additional commentary or bias.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9510 days ago

The Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) released the results of water sample analyses conducted in the Lika-Senj County. All tested samples were found to comply with prescribed limits, with concentrations of analyzed substances below maximum allowable levels. Special attention was given to PFAS compounds, which were all detected at concentrations below the quantification limit of 0.0015 micrograms per liter. The results align with previous analyses conducted at the source and within the water supply network. However, additional chemical and microbiological tests are still ongoing, and their results will be published later due to the time required for completion. HZJZ has stated it will continue monitoring the situation and inform the public about the analysis results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about water quality testing conducted by an official institution, without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on scientific findings and regulatory compliance without introducing ideological or partisan perspectives. The framing remains neutral,

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the results of the water analysis conducted by HZJZ, noting that all tested samples were within legal limits and PFAS concentrations were below detection thresholds. This is consistent with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article is entirely objective, presenting only the factual results of the analysis without any interpretative or biased language.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9510 days ago

The latest water quality analysis conducted in the Lika-Senj county showed that all tested samples were within acceptable limits and considered healthy. Testing took place on August 11th, where three raw water samples and three usage site samples were collected. The results indicated that concentrations of all substances were below maximum allowable values. Particular attention was given to PFAS compounds, which were found at levels below the detection limit of 0.0015 micrograms per liter. The findings, reported by the Croatian Institute of Public Health, align with previous analyses regularly conducted at water sources and distribution networks. Additional chemical and microbiological tests are ongoing, with further results expected to be released later. The institute plans to continue monitoring the situation and informing the public about new findings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about water quality testing without overt ideological framing. It reports on scientific findings and institutional responses without taking a clear partisan stance. While the topic relates to public health and environmental regulation, which can have politic化

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the latest water analysis results from the Ličko-Senjska County area, confirming that all tested samples were within regulatory limits and PFAS concentrations were below detection levels. This aligns precisely with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article is completely neutral in tone, presenting only the factual results of the analysis without any subjective interpretation or bias.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9510 days ago

The Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) has released results from an extraordinary water quality analysis conducted in the Ličko-Senjska County. The analysis included three raw water samples and three usage site samples, all showing concentrations of PFAS compounds below detection limits and within legal permissible levels. The findings align with previous regular analyses of the water source and distribution network. Additional chemical and microbiological tests are ongoing and their results will be published later. HZJZ stated it will continue monitoring the situation and promptly inform the public of further results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about water quality testing conducted by an official institution, with no overt ideological framing. It emphasizes compliance with regulations and ongoing monitoring, without taking sides or promoting specific political agendas. The tone remains objective and

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the results of the extraordinary water analysis conducted by HZJZ, stating that all tested samples were within legal limits and PFAS concentrations were below detection thresholds. This is consistent with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a perfectly neutral tone throughout, simply relaying the findings without any additional commentary or bias.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9510 days ago

The article reports on water quality testing conducted by HZJZ (Hydrogeological Survey of Croatia) in the Ličko-Senjska county. Water samples were taken from three natural springs (Mrđenovac, Tonković Vrilo, and Hrmotine) and three usage sites (Caffè Bar Lika, Home for the Elderly Otočac, and Children’s Daycare Travica). All tested samples showed concentrations of analyzed PFAS compounds and their total sum below the detection limit of 0.0015 micrograms per liter. The results align with previous analyses conducted at the source and within the water supply network. All samples met the regulatory standards set by the Drinking Water Ordinance. Additional chemical and microbiological analyses are ongoing and will be published later. HZJZ has committed to continuing monitoring and informing the public about new analysis results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about water quality testing without overt ideological framing. It emphasizes compliance with regulations and ongoing monitoring efforts, which suggests a balanced approach. There is no clear leaning toward any political agenda, and the tone remains objective.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the results of the water analysis conducted by HZJZ, noting that all tested samples were within legal limits and PFAS concentrations were below detection thresholds. This is consistent with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (95): The article is entirely objective, presenting only the factual results of the analysis without any interpretative or biased language.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9512 days ago

RAVNATELJ Hrvatskog zavoda za javno zdravstvo Krunoslav Capak dao je objašnjenje o kvalitetu vode za piće u Ličko-senjskoj županiji, nakon što su u blizini Gospića pronađeni teški metali u otpadu. Capak je objasnio da su teški metali pronađeni u samom otpadu i u blizini, dok njihove koncentracije pada s daljinošću. Kupus uzorkovan 30 metara od otpada bio je zdravstveno ispravan. Capak je najavio pojačan monitoring vode, s objavljivanjem rezultata dva puta tjedno. Nije potvrdio opasnost za vodu za ljudsku potrošnju, a istaknuo je da su svi testovi pokazali da voda odgovara propisima. Ispitivanja su bila provedena na sedam izvorišta, s 13 uzorka i 159 malih analiza.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced explanation from an official health authority regarding water safety, without overtly promoting any political agenda. The information is based on scientific testing and regulatory standards, and the tone remains objective despite addressing a potentially sensitive and

Why factuality (95): This article closely follows the primary source document, quoting Capak directly and accurately reporting his statements about the safety of drinking water in Lika and the three levels of water control. It includes direct quotes and detailed explanations from the interview.

Why objectivity (95): The article remains highly objective, presenting Capak's statements without editorializing or injecting personal opinion. It provides a balanced view of the situation based solely on the interview content.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 9011 days ago

The Croatian Public Health Institute (HZJZ) in the Lika-Senj County has launched an urgent campaign to collect data on private wells and water storage tanks in the areas of Gospić, Otočac, Senj, Perušić, and Karlobag. This follows new findings about the presence of PFAS compounds in groundwater beneath waste disposal sites in Gospić. The institute emphasizes that analyses so far do not indicate any impact of leachate from these waste sites on the public water supply system. It clarifies that water from the public system in these areas has been tested and deemed safe for consumption, while the current initiative specifically targets users of private wells, cisterns, and local water systems outside the public network. Residents are urged to provide their names, addresses, and phone numbers via email or by calling a specified number due to high call volumes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a public health initiative without overt ideological framing. While environmental issues can be politically sensitive, the piece focuses on scientific testing and public safety rather than partisan debate. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing data-gath

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that the Ličko-Senjska County Health Institute is calling owners of wells and cisterns to contact them urgently after new findings about PFAS compounds in groundwater under a waste dump in Gospić. It also correctly states that current analyses don't indicate an impact

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without emotional language or overt bias. It clearly distinguishes between public water supply and private sources, avoiding any undue alarmism.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9011 days ago

Index.hr obtained a complete laboratory report on water sampled on April 28th at a cafe in Bilaj, near Gospić, which was tested by the Health Institute of Zagreb (HZJZ) after claims that water in the area had not been monitored for PFAS compounds for five months. The sample, taken from the drinking water supply network, received a 'compliant' rating. None of the 20 analyzed PFAS compounds, known as 'forever chemicals', were detected above the threshold of 0.0015 micrograms per liter, significantly below the legal limit of 0.10 micrograms per liter. The report also tested various chemical and microbiological indicators, including heavy metals like arsenic, lead, and uranium, all of which were within permissible limits. Pesticides and other contaminants were also found to be well below regulatory thresholds. No harmful bacteria such as E. coli or coliforms were detected.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from a laboratory report without overtly favoring any side. It reports findings objectively, citing the results of tests conducted by the Health Institute of Zagreb and emphasizing compliance with safety standards. There is no evident ideological framing or biased d

Why factuality (95): The article accurately presents the laboratory report from April 28, detailing the absence of PFAS above detection limits and confirming compliance with regulations. It provides precise figures and references the full analysis.

Why objectivity (90): The article is highly objective, presenting only factual data from the lab report without interpretation or bias. It clearly states what was tested and the results obtained.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9011 days ago

The article reports that the Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) has responded to media claims that water in Gospić has not been tested for PFAS compounds over the past five months. The HZJZ clarifies that water samples from the Mrđenovac supply zone were analyzed for PFAS compounds on April 28, 2026, as part of state monitoring. All 20 analyzed PFAS compounds showed results below the detection limit. The institute emphasizes that the claim of no testing over five months is inaccurate. They note that state monitoring includes public and local water supply systems serving more than 50 residents but excludes private wells. According to the monitoring plan for the Mrđenovac supply zone, two samples are planned, with one already collected and another scheduled for September 2026. The HZJZ also mentions that parameters monitored include metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, and other regulated substances. Additionally, the water supplier is required to conduct further tests.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from the Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) in response to media allegations, providing detailed data and clarification. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather offers factual rebuttals and procedural explanations. While the issue of water and汚

Why factuality (95): The article accurately refutes the claim that water in Gospić had not been tested for PFAS in five months, citing specific dates and referencing the national monitoring plan. It aligns closely with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (90): The article is neutral and factual, presenting the HZJZ's response to media claims without taking sides. It emphasizes the existing monitoring framework and clarifies the scope of testing.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9011 days ago

The Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) responded to media claims that water in Gospić has not been tested for PFAS compounds over the past five months. In their statement, they clarified that the head of HZJZ, Krunoslav Capak, and his team have actively engaged in informing the public through media appearances and providing responses to journalists' inquiries. They emphasized that water from the Mrđenovac supply zone was analyzed for PFAS compounds on April 28, 2026, as part of state monitoring, and all 20 analyzed PFAS compounds were below the detection limit. The HZJZ stated that the claim about lack of testing is inaccurate. They further explained that PFAS testing is included in the state monitoring plan for 2026, which covers all supply zones in Croatia. According to the Ministry of Health’s published monitoring plan, PFAS testing is part of Group B parameters across all supply zones. The HZJZ noted that the monitoring includes public and local water supply systems serving more than 50 residents but excludes private wells. They mentioned that sampling locations are typically taps at consumption points selected by county health offices. For the Mrđenovac supply zone, a

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual rebuttal to media claims regarding PFAS testing in Gospić. It provides detailed information about the state monitoring process, including dates, procedures, and regulatory requirements. While the issue of PFAS contamination is politically sensitive due to potential EPA

Why factuality (95): The article accurately repeats the HZJZ's statement about the testing schedule and monitoring parameters, aligning with the primary source document. It confirms the testing date and methodology.

Why objectivity (90): The article is neutral and factual, presenting the HZJZ's position without bias. It focuses on procedural aspects of monitoring rather than taking a stance on the issue.

tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9012 days ago

The article discusses concerns over water quality in Gospić, Croatia, following the discovery of 35,000 tons of waste in the area. Dr. Krunoslav Capak, head of the Croatian Institute for Public Health (HZJZ), states that the water is safe for consumption, based on analyses of samples taken 30 meters from the waste site. He explains that water monitoring consists of three levels: supplier-controlled checks, state-level annual monitoring by the Ministry of Health and HZJZ, and local testing. While he acknowledges high concentrations of heavy metals in the soil due to waste, he asserts there is no evidence of contamination in the drinking water. Capak advises against entering the immediate vicinity of the landfill and recommends residents with private wells contact authorities for inclusion in monitoring. The article also references ongoing protests against illegal waste dumping in Gospić.

Bias read (Center): While the issue of waste management and water safety is politically sensitive, the article presents information from an official source (HZJZ) without overtly promoting a specific political agenda. The framing remains balanced, citing both the presence of contaminants in the soil and the conclusion,

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes Capak's interview with RTL Danas, quoting his statements about the three levels of water monitoring and the safety of drinking water in Gospić. It reflects the primary source document faithfully.

Why objectivity (90): The article is neutral and factual, presenting Capak's statements without editorializing. It focuses on conveying the official perspective without introducing personal opinion.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9012 days ago

Ravnatelj Hrvatskog zavoda za javno zdravstvo (HZJZ), Krunoslav Capak, za RTL Danas potvrdio je da je pitka voda u Gospiću sigurna za konzumaciju. Navedeno je da postoji tri nivoa kontrole vode za piće: kontrola isporučitelja vode, državni monitoring i službene kontrole. Capak je objasnio da su svi dosadašnji rezultati pokazivali da je voda zdravstveno ispravna i odgovarala zakonskim i normativnim uvjetima. Odmah napomenut je da je vještačenje koje navodi prisutnost opasnih PFAS spojeva u podzemnim vodama nizvodno od ilegalnog odlagališta otpada nije relevantno za vodu koja se pije u Lici. Capak je istaknuo da su teški metali pronađeni u otpadu i u neposrednoj blizini, ali da su vrijednosti normalne. Također je najavio da će se analize pitke vode provoditi češće, s objavom rezultata dva puta tjedno.

Bias read (Center): Artikl predstavlja objektivnu analizu stanja vode u Gospiću, s referencama na državne institucije i znanstvene podatke. Iako se tematički bavi zdravstvenim pitanjima, njegova priroda je informativna i ne sadrži evidentnu političku agresiju ili preferiranje bilo koje stranke. Raspored informacija i k

Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, quoting Capak directly and repeating his statements about the safety of public water and the three-tier monitoring system. It accurately reports the confirmation that Capak would drink the water and explains the monitoring process without add

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information in a neutral and straightforward manner, focusing solely on reporting Capak’s statements without introducing bias or opinion. The tone is calm and informative, maintaining high objectivity.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 856 days ago

The water supply company Vodovod Hrvatsko Primorje d.o.o. has confirmed that drinking water on the entire service area 28, which includes the town of Rab and the municipality of Lopar, is fully safe and suitable for consumption. The company stated that the water meets all legal parameters set by the Water Act and related regulations. Regular monitoring by internal laboratories and authorized institutions ensures compliance with physical, chemical, and microbiological standards. Enhanced monitoring, recommended by the Expert Committee of the Ministry of Health, involves weekly testing of water samples from the Senj network, which serves both Pag and Rab islands. All previous test results show no deviations from safety limits, and detailed data is publicly available on the website of the Croatian Institute of Public Health.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the safety of drinking water on the island of Rab, citing official statements and regulatory compliance. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. The content remains neutral and informative, focusing solely on

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the official statement from Hrvatsko primorje d.o.o., confirming the safety of drinking water in the area. It aligns closely with the primary source document, emphasizing the health compliance and regular monitoring. The information is presented based on official data

Why objectivity (85): The tone is informative and authoritative, reflecting the position of the service provider. While it presents facts clearly, there is a slight promotional undertone in stating the water is 'potpuno sigurna i ispravna za piće,' which may imply a positive bias towards the company’s services.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 9412 days ago

The director of the Croatian Institute for Public Health, Krunoslav Capak, stated that drinking water from the Lika water supply system is completely safe and poses no health risks to citizens. He explained that since last year, the institute has been conducting intensified monitoring of drinking water quality, tracking around 150 parameters of health safety, with no deviations detected. Capak confirmed that PFAS compounds were found near a landfill, indicating contamination from leachate reaching groundwater but emphasizing that this pollution has not yet reached the sources of drinking water. New samples were collected at six locations, with results expected by Thursday. Regarding potential impacts on agriculture, soil analyses showed elevated heavy metal concentrations near the landfill, but plants did not absorb these metals or other harmful substances. Capak emphasized the need to continue monitoring soil, air, water, and groundwater, especially during future landfill remediation efforts. Earlier findings by USKOK indicated significant amounts of hazardous waste found in the industrial complex in Gospić, including toxic waste, leading to soil contamination and possible effects

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from an official source (HZJZ director) confirming the safety of drinking water and outlines ongoing monitoring efforts. It includes balanced reporting on both the confirmation of contamination near a landfill and the assurance that it does not affect drinking water.

Why factuality (92): The article accurately reports statements from Krunoslav Capak, director of the Croatian Institute of Public Health, regarding the safety of drinking water in Lika. It includes direct quotes and details about the monitoring process, including the 150 parameters tested and the detection of PFAS near

Why objectivity (94): The article presents information in a neutral manner, quoting officials directly and avoiding overtly biased language. While it emphasizes the safety of the water, it does not downplay concerns entirely, mentioning the presence of PFAS near a landfill but clarifying that it hasn't reached drinking w

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8510 days ago

The article discusses increased water quality monitoring efforts on the island of Rab in Croatia due to concerns over potential contamination from illegal waste disposal in Gospić. The Primorsko-goranska county health authority, at the request of County Governor Ivo Lukanović, is conducting additional checks on drinking water quality. These measures were prompted by an ecological crisis linked to improper waste dumping. The Croatian Health Inspection Agency (HZJZ) recently refuted claims that water in Gospić had not been tested for PFAS compounds for five months, stating that tests conducted in April showed levels below detection limits. Additional testing is planned for September, and the agency has already carried out emergency sampling. While overall results have been favorable, there is a shift toward more frequent monthly testing for metals and PFAS compounds, particularly for the water supply to Rab, which comes from the Hrmotina spring. Officials emphasize transparency and continued monitoring.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple official sources without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on administrative decisions and scientific findings without evident ideological slant. While the issue of environmental contamination and public health is politically-

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the HZJZ findings regarding water testing frequency and results, including specific dates and locations. It cites the monitoring data and clarifies the status of water safety in Gospić.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents information objectively, though it includes quotes from officials and mentions public concerns, which may introduce slight subjectivity but overall remains balanced.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 8011 days ago

The city of Pag has announced that tap water within its municipal water supply system is medically safe, following media reports about illegal waste disposal in Lika and potential contamination of groundwater. The announcement comes after tests conducted by the Waterworks Company Croatia Primorje d.o.o. Senj confirmed that PFAS compounds were not detected in the water. These tests, which began in 2025, are now mandated by law. Results from analyses carried out in 2026 show all parameters remained within legal limits. Mayor Stipe Žunić acknowledged residents' concerns but emphasized that there is no cause for alarm, while pledging continued monitoring and transparency.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding water quality testing results and includes statements from local authorities. While the issue of PFAS contamination and waste management is politically sensitive, the tone remains objective, citing official data and emphasizing the absence of any PF

Why factuality (88): The article mirrors the primary source in discussing the complexity of PFAS health impacts and the need for caution. It explains that detection alone doesn’t prove harm and that risk depends on multiple variables. It also includes relevant scientific findings about possible health effects, staying a

Why objectivity (80): While informative, the article has a slightly more concerned tone when discussing public reactions and community actions, which may lean into advocacy rather than pure reporting.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8010 days ago

The Croatian Institute of Public Health (HZJZ) reported that the concentration of PFAS chemicals at the Tonković spring near Gospić was measured at 5.2 nanograms per liter, which is below the maximum allowed level of 100 nanograms per liter. The institute emphasized that such low concentrations of PFAS are common in drinking water across Europe and worldwide, and their detection does not necessarily indicate a health risk. HZJZ clarified that while prolonged exposure to certain PFAS compounds has been linked to various health risks, including increased cholesterol levels and hormonal changes, the presence of PFAS alone does not equate to poisoning or immediate danger. The report also noted that over 97% of tested water samples in Croatia did not contain detectable levels of PFAS, with only a small percentage showing concentrations well below the legal limit. Comparative data from Slovenia, Germany, and Switzerland showed similar trends, with PFAS detected in a significant portion of samples but generally within safe limits.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about PFAS contamination in drinking water without overtly favoring any political stance. It provides balanced scientific context, references international comparisons, and emphasizes the distinction between detection and health risk. While the issue of PFAS,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the PFAS levels found at the Tonković spring in Gospić, citing specific measurements (5.2% of the maximum allowed value) and contextualizing them within European standards. It also provides technical details about PFAS chemicals and their health implications, aligning

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. However, it does include some explanatory background on PFAS chemicals, which could be seen as slightly interpretive but remains factual.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago

The Primorsko-Goranska county authorities have requested increased monitoring of water quality and additional analyses after reports of an ecological incident in Gospić. The issue has raised significant public concern, particularly because the island of Rab is supplied with water from the Like River via the Hrmotina spring, which is used by both the river Like and Gacka. County mayor Ivica Lukanović held consultations with head of the Public Health Education Center Željko Linšak to assess the current situation and request enhanced oversight. Linšak reported that previous official analyses and continuous monitoring did not show any impact from the pollution linked to the Gospić case on the safety of the public water supply system on Rab. It was agreed that monthly testing for metals and PFAS compounds will now take place instead of twice yearly, ensuring more frequent and detailed monitoring. Results of these analyses will be publicly available on the website of the center.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a local administrative action regarding environmental concerns and water quality management. While the issue involves public health and environmental regulation, the tone remains objective, focusing on factual developments and decisions made by local officials.

Why factuality (85): The article mentions increased monitoring requested by the Primorsko-Goranska County due to concerns over waste in Gospić affecting water quality for Rab Island. However, it lacks specific details from the primary source about the exact nature of the monitoring or the results of previous tests.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents information objectively but shows some concern through phrases like 'great worry' and 'urgent attention,' which slightly tilts the tone towards alarmism despite being factual.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8012 days ago

In an interview with RTL-a Danas, Krunoslav Capak, director of the Croatian Public Health Institute, addressed concerns about water quality in the Lika-Senj county. He confirmed that tap water in the area meets all health standards and complies with legal requirements. Capak explained that there are three levels of water control: local providers, state monitoring conducted by the Ministry of Health and the Croatian Institute for Public Health, and official inspections. He clarified that while some samples taken from areas downstream of waste sites showed high concentrations of heavy metals, these findings were localized and did not affect drinking water. Capak emphasized that the water used for consumption is safe and that results will now be published twice weekly to increase transparency.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information based on official data and expert statements without overtly promoting any political agenda. While the issue of water safety is politically sensitive due to public health concerns, the framing remains balanced, relying on scientific evidence and institutional sources

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the primary source document from RTL Danas, including Capak’s statements about water safety, the three levels of monitoring, and his personal opinion on drinking the water. It does not add new information or contradict the original content. However, it omits some deta

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on presenting Capak’s statements without introducing bias. However, there is a slight emphasis on reassuring the public, which could be seen as slightly more reassuring than purely objective.