HDZ again calls the mayor of Zagreb for 33,000 tons of hazardous waste: You are responsible, Tomasevic, responsible!

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago

Gradonačelnik Zagreba Tomislav Tomašević kritizira zagrebačku HDZ stranku za njezino priopćenje o 'gudronskim jamama' koje, prema njemu, pokušava skrenuti pozornost s prosvjeda u vezi s opasnim otpadom u Gospiću. Tomašević tvrdi da HDZ dva dana za redom objavljuje priopćenja o tom tematskom trenutku kako bi 'spinovao' raspravu i skrenuo pažnju s aktualnog prosvjeda. On ističe da je za sanaciju opasnog otpada nadležna država, a ne lokalne županije, i navodi da su HEP i INA, državno vlasništvo, odgovorni za odlaganje otpada. Tomašević također naglašava da je država dužna financirati sanaciju jer su te firme odložile otpad tokom desetljeća.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the HDZ's actions as an attempt to divert attention from a pressing environmental issue, which aligns with left-leaning concerns about governmental responsibility and corporate accountability. The emphasis on state oversight over local authorities and the critique

Why factuality (85): This article accurately reports on Tomašević’s response to the HDZ’s allegations, including his claim that the issue is being spun to divert attention from the Gospić protest. It aligns with the primary source document and presents the facts clearly.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is defensive on Tomašević’s part, suggesting that the HDZ is attempting to shift focus. While factual, the article lacks a balanced presentation of both sides of the argument.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago

Zagreb's mayor, Tomislav Tomašević, addressed concerns during a press conference regarding hazardous waste contamination at the Savica area. He criticized the local HDZ party for issuing repeated statements about the 'Gudronska jama' incident, suggesting they were attempting to divert attention from protests against hazardous waste in Gospić. Tomašević emphasized that the state is responsible for removing and remedying hazardous waste, citing three reasons: the state's responsibility for managing such waste, the lack of legal processing or disposal options within Croatia, and the fact that the waste was already dumped before he was born. The issue involves 33,000 tons of industrial hazardous waste stored in three lakes at Savica, which supplies water to around 150,000 people in Zagreb.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a political maneuver by the HDZ to shift focus away from protests over hazardous waste in Gospić, implying criticism of the ruling party. It emphasizes the role of the state in handling hazardous waste and supports the protests, aligning with a left-leaning stance

Why factuality (85): The article continues the discussion around the HDZ’s accusations and Tomašević’s rebuttal, maintaining consistency with the primary source document. It presents the facts without major deviations.

Why objectivity (65): The tone remains critical of the HDZ’s actions, suggesting they are trying to distract from another environmental issue. The article does not provide a balanced view of the situation.

Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago

Zagreb's mayor, Tomislav Tomašević, accused the local branch of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) of attempting to divert attention from protests in Gospić related to hazardous waste by repeatedly issuing statements about the 'Gudronsko jamo' incident. He claimed that the HDZ has been using these statements to 'spin' the conversation away from the main issue: the legality and management of dangerous waste imported into Croatia from other European countries, which cannot be legally processed or disposed of within the country. Tomašević emphasized that the state, not the local municipality, is responsible for handling this waste, citing three reasons: the state manages hazardous waste, the companies involved (HEP and INA) are state-owned, and the land where the waste was deposited is primarily owned by the state. He also noted that the cleanup costs were expected to be covered by the companies that deposited the waste.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the HDZ's actions as attempts to distract from environmental issues through 'spinning' narratives, implying criticism of their approach. The emphasis on state responsibility over local governance aligns with left-leaning priorities such as holding centralized power accountable and

Why factuality (85): This article repeats the same claims made by the HDZ and Tomašević, aligning with the primary source document. It presents the facts accurately and consistently with the earlier reports.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is still critical of the HDZ, suggesting they are using the waste issue to divert attention from the Gospić protests. The article lacks a balanced perspective and focuses on one side of the argument.

Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago

The Croatian political party DOMiNO has called for an immediate ban on waste imports into Croatia and the urgent appointment of a new chief state inspector. The party criticizes the current head of the State Inspectorate, who they claim is unfit to handle the ongoing crisis, particularly the hazardous waste situation in Gospić. They emphasize the need for a strong, independent leader with clear authority and mandate to investigate cases of illegal waste disposal. DOMiNO supports the 'Domoljubne istine u otuđenom svijetu' declaration but warns against conflating it with planned protests in Zagreb. The party also criticizes politicians who have aligned with the protest movement, accusing them of using public concern over waste management as a tool for political gain. They specifically target Tomislav Tomašević, who won elections on the issue of waste, and call for his resignation due to alleged negligence in managing waste in Zagreb.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of waste management as a moral and legal failing by those in power, emphasizing accountability and transparency. It uses accusatory language toward specific politicians and institutions, suggesting a left-leaning perspective that prioritizes public welfare and anti-corru

Why factuality (85): Similar to Article 1, this article provides detailed information about the hazardous waste found in the Savica lakes, including dates and analysis results. It aligns closely with the primary source document and presents the facts without significant deviation.

Why objectivity (65): The tone remains critical of the current administration, focusing on their alleged failure to act on known issues. While factual, the article lacks balance by not addressing potential counterpoints or providing context beyond the HDZ's claims.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 656 days ago

The Zagreb branch of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has accused Mayor Tomislav Tomašević of negligence regarding the 'Gudronska jam' (Gutrot Hole), a site containing approximately 33,000 tons of hazardous industrial waste in three lakes at Savica, near the Petruševec water supply facility that provides water to around 150,000 residents of Zagreb. The HDZ released a timeline detailing the history of the issue, including the discovery of unstable hazardous waste in 2006, plans for remediation in 2007, and findings of deep soil contamination by 2018. According to the HDZ, the city failed to report the site to the Environmental Protection Fund as a 'black spot' in 2025. The HDZ claims that the current administration, which took office in 2021 under Tomašević and his party Možemo!, has not implemented concrete technical solutions or detailed groundwater monitoring programs, despite acknowledging the problem in 2023.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the HDZ's accusations against the mayor and his administration in a critical tone, emphasizing their failure to address environmental hazards and suggesting negligence. The framing highlights the HDZ's perspective while omitting direct counterpoints from the mayor’s office or aν

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the concerns raised by the HDZ regarding the hazardous waste in the Savica lakes, citing specific years and data. It aligns with the primary source document and presents the facts without major discrepancies.

Why objectivity (65): While factual, the tone is highly critical of the local government, implying negligence and political manipulation. There is little attempt to provide a balanced view or consider alternative explanations.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicConservativeFactual 85Objective 657 days ago

A political dispute over hazardous waste in Zagreb has intensified, with the local HDZ accusing Mayor Tomislav Tomašević and his party 'Možemo' of failing to address the issue despite knowing about the presence of 33,000 tons of dangerous industrial waste in lakes at Savica for years. The HDZ claims that Tomašević and 'Možemo' have ignored recommendations to continue monitoring and implement cleanup measures since the beginning of their mandate. They also accuse Tomašević of not reporting Savica to the Environmental Protection Fund as a priority site for remediation last year. Non-partisan representatives and members of other parties, including Drito, have criticized the situation, stating that the environmental crisis cannot be used to downplay other issues like the case of Gospić. The city of Zagreb has not yet responded to requests for comment.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue through the lens of the HDZ, emphasizing accusations against the current administration and highlighting the failure of the opposition to act on environmental concerns. It uses strong language such as 'eco-bomb,' 'instrumentalize,' and 'total negligence,' which suggest a

Why factuality (85): This article repeats the core facts about the hazardous waste in the Savica lakes, including the volume and historical data. It matches the primary source document and presents the information consistently.

Why objectivity (65): The tone remains critical of the local authorities, focusing on their alleged failure to address the issue. The article lacks a balanced approach and emphasizes the political implications over the factual details.

Novi listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 657 days ago

The article reports that the HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) has criticized Zagreb Mayor Tomislav Tomašević for failing to address environmental concerns related to hazardous waste located near the Petruševec water intake on the Savica River. The waste, estimated at 33,000 tons, was confirmed by chemical analyses in 2006, and remediation plans were announced in 2007. Despite having access to research data, funding, and authority, Tomašević’s administration allegedly halted monitoring efforts and failed to initiate a cleanup plan. The HDZ claims that Tomašević and his coalition, including the ruling party 'Možemo!', have ignored scientific findings and neglected their responsibility to protect the environment, despite being positioned as experts on waste management. The article suggests that while other areas like Gospić demand urgent action, Tomašević’s government has not taken similar steps in Zagreb.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a failure of the current Zagreb administration (led by Tomašević and 'Možemo!') to act on environmental concerns, implying negligence and lack of accountability. It contrasts this with the HDZ’s criticism and positions the ruling party as ineffective compared to theHD

Why factuality (85): This article accurately reports on the HDZ's allegations regarding the 33,000 tons of hazardous waste in the Savica lakes near the water intake plant. It references historical data from 2006 and 2007, aligning with the primary source document. However, it lacks direct quotes from the primary source

Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a critical tone towards the current administration, suggesting negligence, but it doesn't present alternative perspectives or counterarguments. This leans toward a partisan perspective despite reporting factual claims.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 657 days ago

The Zagreb HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union) has raised concerns about hazardous industrial waste located in three lakes along the Sava River near the water intake plant Petruševec, which supplies water to approximately 150,000 residents. The waste, totaling around 33,000 tons, was confirmed by chemical analyses as early as 2006, and remediation plans were announced in 2007. Despite ongoing research documenting soil contamination and elevated levels of PAHs and metals in groundwater, the city mayor Tomislav Tomašević and his coalition, Možemo!, have allegedly failed to act over the past five years. The HDZ criticizes the current administration for halting monitoring efforts, failing to implement a remediation plan despite legal obligations, and not informing citizens of findings. They accuse Tomašević of neglecting environmental responsibilities and suggest that the waste poses a significant threat to public health.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue as a failure of the current Zagreb administration, particularly under Mayor Tomislav Tomašević, using strong accusatory language such as 'eco-bomb,' 'not even touched,' and 'failed to act.' It positions the HDZ as a responsible opposition force highlighting negligence, a

Why factuality (85): This article continues the narrative from previous ones, detailing the timeline of the hazardous waste issue in Zagreb. It includes specific years and data points that match the primary source document, maintaining consistency with the facts presented.

Why objectivity (65): The article adopts a confrontational tone against the current administration, emphasizing their responsibility and past inaction. It lacks an objective evaluation of the situation and focuses primarily on criticism.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicConservativeFactual 85Objective 657 days ago

The Zagreb branch of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has warned about dangerous industrial waste located in three lakes near the Petruševec water reservoir, which supplies water to around 150,000 residents of Zagreb. The HDZ accused Mayor Tomislav Tomašević of inaction over the past five years regarding this issue. According to HDZ leader Ivan Matijević, chemical analyses confirmed hazardous waste in the area as early as 2006, and plans for remediation were announced in 2007. Despite these findings, the current administration has not initiated any action, including submitting the area to the Environmental Protection Fund as a priority site for cleanup. Monitoring efforts have been halted, and no remediation plan has been adopted, despite legal requirements.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a critical stance toward the current Zagreb administration led by Tomislav Tomašević, accusing them of inaction on environmental issues. It highlights the HDZ’s claims against the ruling coalition (Možemo and SDP), using strong language such as 'eco-bomb' and emphasizing the HDZ

Why factuality (85): The article continues the discussion on the hazardous waste in the Savica lakes, referencing the same data and timelines as the primary source. It maintains factual alignment with the original report.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is again critical of the local government, highlighting their perceived inaction. The article does not offer a balanced perspective or explore different angles of the issue.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 505 days ago

Gradonačelnik Zagreba Tomislav Tomašević kritizira zagrebačku HDZ stranku za činjenicu da je dva dana za redom objavila priopćenja o 'Gudronske jame' – trostrukoj akumulaciji opasnog industrijskog otpada u Savici, uz vodocrpilište koje opskrbljuje 150.000 Zagrepčana. Tomašević smatra da HDZ pokušava 'zaspinati' raspravu o ovom tematskom problemu kako bi skrenuo pozornost s prosvjeda koji se događa u Zagrebu zbog opasnog otpada u Gospiću. On ističe da je za sanaciju opasnog otpada nadležna država, a ne lokalne vlasti, jer su većine firme koje su odložile otpad u državnom vlasništvo, a zemljište je u vlasništvo države. Tomašević također navodi da je odlaganje opasnog otpada trajalo desetljeća, a finansiranje sanacije trebalo biti poduzeto od tih samih firma.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a political struggle between local authorities and the state, emphasizing the role of state-owned enterprises (HEP and INA) in the accumulation of hazardous waste. The tone suggests criticism of the HDZ for diverting attention from the environmental concerns in Gospić

Why factuality (70): This article closely mirrors the content of the primary source, including details about ongoing infrastructure work and the HDZ's concerns over illegal waste sites. It includes some direct quotes from Tomašević and mentions specific projects, aligning well with the original text. However, it omits s

Why objectivity (50): While the article remains relatively neutral in tone, it still presents Tomašević’s criticisms of the HDZ in a somewhat confrontational manner, implying a political stance rather than purely factual reporting.

Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 455 days ago

Zagreb's mayor, Tomislav Tomašević, accused the local HDZ party of attempting to divert attention from protests against hazardous waste in Gospić by repeatedly publishing statements about the 'Gudronská jama' (Gudron Hole), which involves 33,000 tons of industrial waste stored in three lakes at Savica. He claimed the HDZ is trying to 'spin' the conversation away from the main issue: why Croatia allows the import of hazardous waste from other European countries that cannot be legally processed or disposed of within Croatia. Tomašević emphasized that the state is responsible for managing and cleaning up this waste, pointing out that companies like HEP and INA, both state-owned, were responsible for depositing the waste decades ago. He noted that the land where the waste was deposited does not belong to Zagreb but to another entity.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the HDZ's actions as attempts to distract from environmental issues and criticizes them for not addressing the core problem of hazardous waste management. The tone emphasizes the role of the state over local authorities and highlights the responsibility of national entities like H

Why factuality (65): The article reports on Tomašević’s response to the HDZ’s criticism regarding illegal waste sites in Zagreb, specifically referencing the 'Gudronska jama' issue. It accurately reflects his statements about the HDZ attempting to shift focus from the Gospić waste protests. However, it lacks direct quot

Why objectivity (45): The tone is clearly critical of the HDZ, using phrases like 'spinat' and 'zaspinat,' suggesting a biased perspective. The article frames the HDZ's actions negatively while portraying Tomašević as a defender of public interest, showing a clear political slant.

Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 405 days ago

The political group DOMiNO has called for an immediate ban on waste imports into Croatia and the urgent appointment of a chief state inspector, citing concerns over accountability and safety following incidents like the dangerous waste disposal in Gospić. They argue that until the state can fully control what enters the country, who handles it, and where it ends up, there is no justification for Croatian citizens and land bearing the consequences of others' criminal activities and profits. The group emphasizes that those responsible for burying hazardous waste, as well as those who enabled it, must be held accountable, along with those who had the authority to prevent it but failed to act. DOMiNO supports the declaration 'Loyal Truths in a Foreign World' but cautions against conflating it with planned protests on September 5th in Zagreb or equating it with all political and activist names that later joined the movement. They criticize politicians on the left who have aligned with the cause of the people of Lič, urging them to first clean up their own backyard before claiming credibility. DOMiNO also criticizes Tomislav Tomašević, who won elections on the issue of garbage, noting he

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a strong critique of current governance and calls for immediate action, emphasizing accountability and holding authorities responsible for environmental harm. It frames the situation as a failure of leadership and advocates for systemic change through protests and elections, not

Why factuality (50): The article discusses DOMiNO's call for a ban on waste importation into Croatia and supports the 'Domoljubne istine' proclamation. It does not directly reference the primary source document about the waste issue in Zagreb or the infrastructure work by Tomašević. The content is more focused on politi

Why objectivity (40): The tone is strongly political and advocacy-oriented, promoting DOMiNO's stance without presenting opposing viewpoints. The language suggests support for certain actions while dismissing others, indicating a lack of neutrality.

Večernji listIndependentProgressive4 days ago

The Zagreb HDZ has accused Mayor Tomislav Tomašević of evading responsibility for industrial waste pits along the Sava River near the Petruševec water intake. The party claims that approximately 33,000 tons of hazardous industrial waste are located close to the water intake, which supplies water to around 150,000 residents. The HDZ criticizes Tomašević for allegedly hiding behind his mandate and avoiding accountability, despite having previously positioned himself as a solution to waste issues. They argue that the city’s failure to address these problems during his tenure raises questions about his commitment to solving environmental concerns. The HDZ references a sanitation program document that places the waste pits within the second sanitary protection zone of the Petruševec water source and attributes responsibility to the City of Zagreb. The party has posed several unanswered questions regarding halted groundwater monitoring, lack of results sharing, and delayed sanitation efforts.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of Mayor Tomašević in a highly confrontational manner, using strong accusatory language such as 'odgovaran' (responsible), 'skrivao' (hid), and 'pranje ruku' (washing hands). It emphasizes the mayor's alleged evasion of responsibility and portrays him as inconsistent

Jutarnji listIndependentConservative4 days ago

The Zagreb HDZ has accused Mayor Tomislav Tomašević of evading responsibility for dangerous industrial waste located near the Petruševec water intake, which supplies water to around 150,000 residents of Zagreb. The party claims that Tomašević, who previously positioned himself as a solution to waste issues, now avoids taking accountability by labeling the issue as outside his jurisdiction. The HDZ leader, Ivan Matijević, criticizes Tomašević’s lack of transparency and points out that the city itself is responsible for implementing sanitary protection measures at Petruševec. He highlights that Tomašević has failed to provide answers to critical questions regarding halted groundwater monitoring, lack of results from past pollution tests, and the absence of sanitation plans during his tenure. The HDZ warns that Tomašević’s behavior reflects a lack of seriousness toward citizens’ concerns, particularly those dependent on the affected water supply.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the criticism of Mayor Tomašević in a manner that emphasizes his avoidance of responsibility and suggests a lack of commitment to environmental protection. The language used by the HDZ leadership implies a critique of Tomašević’s governance style and prioritization of certain city

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressive4 days ago

The Zagreb HDZ has accused Mayor Tomislav Tomašević of evading responsibility for dangerous industrial waste located near the Petruševec water intake, which supplies around 150,000 residents. The party claims that Tomašević, who previously positioned himself as a solution to waste issues, now avoids taking accountability by claiming he is not competent. The report highlights that Tomašević initially avoided commenting on the issue and later sent messages that further alarmed citizens by questioning his responsibility for the problem. The HDZ criticizes the mayor for not providing answers to key questions regarding the halted groundwater monitoring, lack of results from previous pollution tests, and failure to prepare for sanitation efforts during his tenure. They also note that the city did not report the contamination sites to the Environmental Protection Fund as required. The HDZ warns that Tomašević’s avoidance reflects a lack of seriousness toward citizen concerns, particularly those affected by the polluted water supply.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of Mayor Tomašević in a manner that emphasizes his evasion of responsibility and suggests a lack of commitment to environmental protection. The language used implies that the current administration is failing in its duties, aligning more closely with left-leaning or綠

N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservative4 days ago

The Zagreb HDZ has criticized Mayor Tomislav Tomašević for evading responsibility regarding dangerous industrial waste located near the Petruševec water intake, which supplies water to around 150,000 residents. The HDZ claims that Tomašević has been avoiding accountability by claiming he is not competent, despite being the city’s responsible authority for implementing sanitary protection measures. The criticism highlights Tomašević’s alleged failure to address concerns over 'giant pits' at Savica and the lack of transparency regarding water quality monitoring results. The HDZ also points out that sanitation efforts during his tenure have not been prepared or adopted, and that the city did not report these issues to environmental authorities. The HDZ accuses Tomašević of hiding behind the issue and suggests that his administration does not take the citizens’ concerns seriously.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the criticism of Mayor Tomašević in a manner that emphasizes his avoidance of responsibility and lack of action, using strong language such as 'prozvao' (called out), 'skriva se' (hides), and 'pranja ruku' (washing hands). These phrases carry a negative tone toward the mayor, who,

Telegram.hrIndependentConservative4 days ago

The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) in Zagreb has criticized Mayor Tomislav Tomašević over the issue of 33,000 tons of hazardous industrial waste located near the Petruševac water intake. In a statement signed by the local HDZ branch leader Ivan Matijević, the party accuses the mayor of evading responsibility and failing to address concerns raised by residents. The HDZ claims that Tomašević avoided public scrutiny for two days before finally appearing, but then again withdrew from accountability, sending messages that further alarmed citizens. They argue that Tomašević has shifted blame onto other areas, such as the 'gudronske jame' (landfills) in Savica, which were already problematic before his tenure. The HDZ references a 2016 city program aimed at cleaning up zones around the Petruševac water source, stating that the landfill is within the second sanitary protection zone and that the city should be responsible for its cleanup. The party questions why monitoring of groundwater was halted, why results of previous pollution tests were not shared with citizens, and why the cleanup wasn’t prepared during Tomašević’s five years in office. The HDZ concludes that Tomašević is avoiding,

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the criticism of Mayor Tomašević in a manner that emphasizes his avoidance of responsibility and suggests he is shifting blame. The language used by the HDZ implies a lack of commitment to addressing environmental issues, labeling him as evasive and irresponsible. This aligns with

tportalIndependentConservative4 days ago

The leader of the Zagreb branch of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), Ivan Matijević, criticized Mayor Tomislav Tomašević for allegedly avoiding responsibility regarding a hazardous waste site near the Petruševec water pump station. The HDZ claims Tomašević has remained silent for two days and failed to address concerns over the 33,000-ton industrial waste dump and the lack of monitoring of groundwater contamination. They accuse him of evading accountability by focusing on issues within his current term rather than addressing problems that arose before his tenure. The HDZ also questions why the city did not report the waste sites to environmental protection authorities and suggests that Tomašević’s avoidance indicates a lack of seriousness toward Zagreb residents’ concerns, particularly those relying on the Petruševec water supply. In response, Tomašević defended himself, stating that the HDZ is attempting to divert attention from protests against dangerous waste in Gospić.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation through the lens of the HDZ, which is a conservative political party in Croatia. It uses strong language such as 'skrivao se' (hid himself) and 'odgovoran si' (you are responsible) to criticize the mayor, implying he is evading duty. The tone emphasizes the HDZ's dis