After 15 years of purging, the Sheppurins are getting a second chance! Mayor Churko doesn't want a tourist village, he wants...After 15 years of abandonment, waste accumulation, and ineffective warnings, the cleanup of the former military base Šepurine near Zadar has finally begun. The legal deadline for challenging the selection of the contractor has passed, allowing work to start on removing nearly 38,000 cubic meters of waste. The contract worth €1.48 million was awarded to the company Bagerkop-Roberto from Novi Marof, with a planned ten-month timeline for the cleanup. However, removing the waste is just the first step in addressing the long-standing issues caused by the state’s neglect and lack of clear future plans for the area. Šepurine has become one of the most glaring examples of poor state management.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation at Šepurine objectively, highlighting both the failure of past governance and the beginning of a cleanup effort. It does not favor any particular political side but focuses on the administrative and environmental implications of the state's neglect. The tone is non
Why factuality (92): The article provides specific details such as the 15-year abandonment, the amount of waste (38,000 cubic meters), the cost (€1.48 million), and the assigned company (Bagerkop-Roberto). These facts align with what would be expected from a cross-source consensus on the event.
Why objectivity (78): The article uses some emotionally charged language like 'nekadašnje vojne baze' and 'država, kao neodgovorni vlasnik,' suggesting criticism of government actions. While not overly biased, it does lean slightly toward a critical perspective.
Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 406 days agoThe article criticizes the situation in Split, Croatia, where the local government has been neglecting waste management issues for decades. It highlights how the city has allowed improper disposal of trash, creating a persistent problem that has gone unaddressed. The author compares this to watching the same movie repeatedly, suggesting that both the citizens and authorities are aware of the issue but do nothing to resolve it. The piece implies that the local government is complicit in allowing this ongoing environmental and civic failure.
Bias read (Progressive): The article uses strong critical language toward the local government, implying negligence and complicity in a longstanding public issue. The tone suggests frustration with bureaucratic inaction and a call for accountability, aligning with progressive critiques of governmental inefficiency.
Why factuality (65): The article makes strong allegations about hooliganism at football matches in Split, specifically mentioning Nazi salutes and violent behavior by Torcida fans. These claims are not explicitly supported by specific events or dates, but they align with broader reports about hooliganism in Croatian foo
Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'nacističke pjesme' (Nazi songs) and 'huligani' (hooligans), which can be seen as inflammatory. It frames the situation as a moral failure of the state and authorities, showing clear bias against the hooligan groups and the government's response.
Croatia
