RTL Today has received new details: new arrests have been made in Split, some of the suspects have not been found!
Four individuals were arrested in Split on suspicion of inciting violence and hatred, according to live reports by journalist Ana Mlinarić for RTL Danas. The police identified approximately 20 people from video footage but have not yet located all of them, with some still being actively searched for at their residences. No information has been confirmed about any of those sought having crossed international borders. In addition to these four suspects, dozens of others were arrested during the day for various offenses. Those arrested will be taken to police stations for questioning, after which further actions by relevant authorities, including the Municipal State Prosecutor’s Office, will follow. These recent events have reignited discussions about fan-related disturbances and the broader issue of hate speech in Croatian society. According to a report by the Public Defender of Justice for 2025, there has been an increase in recorded hate speech and intolerance toward minorities. Specific concerns include the greeting 'Za dom spremni' and inconsistent judicial practices regarding its sanctioning. Mlinarić highlighted the discrepancy between public condemnation of hate speech by state官
Two members of the Hajduk Split supporters' group Torcida surrendered to police in Split on Tuesday afternoon, bringing the total number of detained fans to eight while thirteen remain at large. Ante Stipetic, known as Raba and the current president of the Torcida Club, and Denis Sipic appeared at the investigative detention facility on Bilica hill shortly before 5:00 PM local time. Both men were accompanied by their lawyers upon arrival. Split police confirmed the surrenders, noting that both individuals had been issued warrants following the match against Ajax last Thursday. The arrests stem from allegations of public incitement to violence and hatred. During a fan march preceding the European football match at the Poljud stadium, members of Torcida chanted antisemitic and Nazi slogans. Witnesses and media footage captured chants referencing Adolf Hitler, the Auschwitz concentration camp, and derogatory remarks aimed at Jewish figures, including Anna Frank. The investigation was launched after these incidents drew widespread condemnation from political leaders, opposition parties, and civil society groups. An investigating judge at the Split County Court ordered one month of preventive detention for all twenty-three suspects identified in the case. The judicial decision cited the risk of repeat offenses and the danger of flight, given that several suspects had initially evaded capture. Prior to the latest surrenders, two other prominent Torcida members, Stipe Letic and Leonardo Vucak, had already turned themselves in over the previous forty-eight hours. Police continue to search for five additional individuals who have not yet presented themselves. The Ministry of Justice, Administration, and Digital Transformation stated that all detainees related to the fan unrest are currently held in the Split prison. Officials clarified that Dutch fans detained during the same period were kept on the same wing as the Croatian suspects, contrary to some security expectations. The ministry reported that no conflicts occurred between the groups during their stay, attributing the lack of incidents to preventive measures taken by prison staff. They noted that legal protocols would be applied immediately should any disturbance arise. Reactions to the incident have been sharp within the football community. Ljubo Pavasovic Visovic, chairman of the Hajduk Supervisory Board, addressed the controversy in an interview with RTL Danas. He argued that the club is not an educational or repressive institution and therefore cannot control behavior outside the stadium perimeter. Pavasovic Visovic stated that Hajduk had apologized to affected parties, including Ajax and UEFA, and emphasized that the club had done everything legally required to ensure order. When asked if the club fears Torcida, he replied that there is no reason for anyone to fear anyone in a democratic society governed by law. He dismissed suggestions that the club's response was weak, stating that expecting prevention of such extreme acts at the aging Poljud stadium is unrealistic. Political figures have also weighed in on the situation. Former Prime Minister Jadranka Kosor posted on social media that the presence of extremist rhetoric is a consequence of broader societal attitudes toward fascist symbolism. She criticized the normalization of the Ustaše salute, arguing that such tolerance creates space for more radical expressions like glorifying Hitler. Conversely, Ivan Penava, president of the Homeland Movement party, held a press conference in Split to condemn the Nazi chants but simultaneously accused police and media of conducting a witch hunt against Torcida. Interior Minister Davor Bozinovic defended the police actions, describing the publication of suspect photos as standard professional practice consistent with the law. The release of photographs of nine wanted men by Split police sparked its own controversy. Critics, including parts of the public and Penava, labeled the move a form of public persecution. In response, a provocative poster appeared in the Varos district of Split. Styled to look like a police wanted notice, it featured images of eleven former ministers and high-ranking officials linked to political scandals, including Bozidar Kalmeta, Gabriela Zalac, and Vili Berose. The poster read, "Police asks citizens for help," and warned viewers to approach the pictured individuals with caution due to alleged tendencies toward murder and theft. It is unclear who placed the posters or if others have been distributed elsewhere. Sociologist Kresimir Krolo, a professor at the University of Zadar and former member of the Hajduk supervisory board, analyzed the incident as a symptom of long-term societal trends. He described the event as unprecedented in its extremity, noting that while fan violence has existed, the explicit celebration of Nazism and antisemitism marks a new level of escalation. Krolo attributed this shift to years of tolerated extremist cultural codes in public discourse, suggesting that the atmosphere created by political narratives eventually exploded in the streets of Split. The match itself was interrupted for twelve minutes in the second half due to pyrotechnics, which produced thick smoke and cannon fire that disrupted play. UEFA is expected to impose sanctions on Hajduk, with the club anticipating a decision within two to three days. Meanwhile, journalists covering the events have received threats, adding another layer of tension to the ongoing criminal investigation. Police maintain that the inquiry into the public incitement charges continues, with identification efforts relying on street surveillance cameras, media recordings, and citizen footage.
Go to the primary sources (7)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Two members of the Torcida fan club, Ante 'Raba' Stipetić and Denis Šipić, surrendered to investigators at the Split police station on Tuesday evening. They were placed under investigation for alleged criminal offenses related to inciting hatred and violence during a match-related event. The court ordered their pre-trial detention due to concerns about potential repeat offenses and flight risk, as both had previously been on the run. This brings the total number of detained fans to eight, while 13 others remain at large. Twenty-three individuals have been reported for similar charges stemming from antisemitic and Nazi-related chants during a recent match. The police continue their investigation into the incident.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal actions taken against individuals accused of hate speech and incitement, which is a politically sensitive issue involving law enforcement and public order. However, the tone remains neutral, presenting facts without overtly favoring any side. It includes information from
Why factuality (99): This article provides precise details about the surrender of Ante Stipetić and Denis Šipić, including the time (around 5 PM) and the legal grounds for their arrest. All of this matches the information presented in the other articles, confirming its high level of factual accuracy.
Why objectivity (97): The article maintains an impartial tone throughout, presenting events in chronological order and quoting external sources where appropriate. There is no indication of editorializing or favoring one perspective over another.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 96yesterday
Two additional fans of Hajduk football club, who were being sought after following the match between Hajduk and Ajax, surrendered to the police at the Split prison on Tuesday afternoon. According to unofficial information, one of them is Ante Stipetić, the leader of the Torcida fan group. Both men were ordered by the investigator judge of the Split County Court to be placed under investigative detention due to concerns about potential repeat offenses and the risk of fleeing. The police continue to search for three more individuals linked to the incident. In total, 23 people have been reported for inciting violence and hatred in public, and all have been placed under investigative detention. The incident involving the Torcida supporters occurred on Thursday evening before the football match between Hajduk and Ajax at Poljud stadium. Members of Torcida shouted anti-Semitic and Nazi slogans, which were condemned by the state leadership, several parties, notable figures, and citizens.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal process involving fan groups and their actions, which has drawn condemnation from various societal actors including the state leadership and civil society. It presents the facts neutrally, citing the police and judicial authorities without apparent ideological framing.
Why factuality (98): The article provides specific details such as the names of those who surrendered (Ante Stipetić and Denis Šipić), the location (Split police station), and the legal basis for their arrest (investigative detention due to risk of repeat offenses and flight). These align closely with the cross-source c
Why objectivity (96): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, using direct quotes from the police and avoiding overtly biased language. It reports on the surrender of individuals without taking sides or expressing judgment.
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is currently in Brussels, where he discussed the EU budget and reiterated Croatia's goal of being in surplus by around seven billion euros. He emphasized the importance of investing in defense, new technologies, and preventing illegal migration. Plenković stated that Croatia supports EU enlargement but believes candidate countries must meet certain criteria. He mentioned open issues between Croatia and Montenegro and conveyed a clear message to Montenegro to engage in dialogue with Croatia. Regarding recent incidents in Split, Plenković condemned antisemitic slogans shouted at a football match, stating he expects the police and courts to investigate who used such phrases and file reports. He expressed disappointment over the behavior, especially after visiting a hospital in Split the previous week. On the issue of waste management in Gospić, Plenković stressed the need for the sanitation process to continue and for all involved to remain healthy, while criticizing political opportunists who blame him for the situation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Prime Minister Plenković's statements on various political topics including EU budget discussions, relations with Montenegro, condemnation of antisemitism, and local governance issues in Gospić. The framing appears balanced, presenting his views without overtly biased language,
Why factuality (98): This article provides an accurate summary of Plenković's comments regarding the incidents in Split, including his condemnation of antisemitism and calls for police and judicial action. It also includes relevant background information about the MED9 summit and his remarks on waste management in Gospi
Why objectivity (96): The article presents the information objectively, using direct quotes from Plenković and maintaining a neutral tone throughout.
Milorad Pupovac, a member of the Croatian Parliament, commented on Ivan Penava's recent criticism of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP) and the media during a press conference. Penava accused the media of spreading 'hajduks' (provocations) against fans who shouted Nazi slogans and called for the return of Adolf Hitler in Split last week, and he strongly criticized the MUP. Pupovac responded by stating that Penava built his political career on attacking Serbs in Croatia and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković before joining the government, and now he has targeted the MUP and media. He suggested that Penava is pulling on a chain that is tied to him, but it remains unclear how long this will continue. Pupovac also implied that some MPs have crossed limits within the coalition and do not share the core values of the Homeland Movement (Domovinski Pokret).
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of both Pupovac's and Penava's statements without overtly favoring one side. It reports their respective positions and criticisms without using biased language or selectively omitting information.
Why factuality (98): This article is nearly identical to the primary source document, accurately reproducing Pupovac's statements verbatim. It includes all key points and direct quotes from the original text without additions or omissions.
Why objectivity (92): The article presents Pupovac's statements in a neutral manner, avoiding any personal opinion or bias. The tone is professional and factual throughout.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 955 days ago
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković commented on the European Union budget, stating Croatia should aim for a surplus of around seven billion euros. He emphasized support for EU enlargement, stressing that candidate countries must meet criteria based on merit. Regarding Montenegro, he conveyed a message urging dialogue with Croatia and noted that other member states understand Croatia's constructive approach. On incidents in Split, Plenković expressed strong dissatisfaction with anti-Semitic chants during a sports event, condemning them sharply and demanding police investigation. He criticized politicians who spread misinformation about the waste situation in Gospić, calling them 'political scavengers.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from Prime Minister Plenković on various political issues, including EU budget discussions, support for enlargement, relations with Montenegro, and condemnation of anti-Semitism in Split. The framing appears balanced, presenting his views without overtly biased phrasе
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reflects Plenković's condemnation of the antisemitic chants in Split, his call for police and judicial action, and his reference to the recent MED9 summit. It also touches on the issue of waste management in Gospić, aligning closely with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts and direct quotes from Plenković without editorializing or showing bias.
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković condemned incidents that occurred in Split before a football match between Hajduk and Ajax, particularly messages he deemed antisemitic. He stated he expects the police to investigate who shouted unacceptable slogans and file reports, and for the courts to respond appropriately.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Prime Minister Plenković's condemnation of antisemitic remarks and his expectations for law enforcement and judicial responses. The framing is neutral, focusing on official statements without overtly favoring any side or using biased language.
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports Plenković's condemnation of antisemitic chants in Split, his call for police and judicial action, and his reference to the recent MED9 summit in Split. It closely follows the primary source document, quoting him verbatim where possible and contextualizing the events pr
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts and direct quotes from Plenković without editorializing. It avoids taking sides but clearly conveys the official stance expressed by the prime minister.
The article reports that two prominent members of the Torcida fan club, Ante Stipetić (known as 'Raba') and Denis Šipić, have surrendered to police at the Split detention center on Bilicama. They were accompanied by their lawyers and had been wanted for suspected criminal offenses related to inciting hatred and violence through racist and Nazi-related chants during a recent football match. The two join eight other Torcida supporters currently in investigative custody, while 13 others remain at large. A total of 23 individuals have been reported for similar charges, with the investigating judge ordering them all to serve one month in investigative detention.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about arrests and legal proceedings involving individuals accused of hate speech and incitement. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the legal actions taken against the
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports the surrender of Ante 'Raba' Stipetić and Denis Šipić, citing them as members of Torcida and noting they were accompanied by their lawyers. The legal justification for investigative detention is clearly stated, matching the information found in other sources.
Why objectivity (94): While the article uses a slightly more journalistic tone with phrases like 'doznajemo kako su se upravo na istom mjestu' (we learn that they appeared at the same place), it remains largely objective and does not show clear bias toward any party involved.
Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 925 days ago
The article discusses the lack of immediate public condemnation by Croatia's three presidents, Zoran Milanović, Goran Jandroković, and Andrej Plenković, in response to Nazi-related chants and antisemitic slogans heard during a football match in Split. These included calls like 'Hitler', 'Auschwitz', and 'Ustasha' by supporters of Hajduk before their game against Ajax. The author criticizes the leaders for not publicly denouncing such behavior immediately, despite having the opportunity to do so through social media. While the government did issue an official statement condemning the chants, it avoided explicitly mentioning antisemitism or the Ustasha movement. The article argues that such incidents require swift and personal responses from leaders to clearly signal intolerance toward fascism and antisemitism.
Bias read (Progressive): The article strongly criticizes the failure of national leaders to respond promptly and personally to fascist and antisemitic rhetoric, implying that their silence reflects a lack of moral leadership. It emphasizes the need for clear, unambiguous condemnation from those in power, suggesting that the
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports Plenković's strong condemnation of the antisemitic and Nazi-related chants in Split. It includes his statement that he is 'disappointed' and expects the courts to react. This aligns with the primary source document, which details his response and expectations from the
Why objectivity (92): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Plenković's statements without overt bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on factual reporting. However, it slightly emphasizes the negative impact of the incident on Croatia's international image, which could be seen as a minor tilt.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 956 days ago
Hajduk has apologized for an incident during the second half of their match against Ajax in the first round of the Conference League. The disruption occurred after a large crowd from the northern stand at Poljud Stadium created a smoke 'curtain,' prompting the referee to send the players to the dressing room. The pause lasted longer than expected, causing concern among fans and officials. Hajduk expressed regret for the situation, emphasizing that they do not want Europe to remember them for this incident. The club is likely seeking to address fan behavior and ensure such disruptions do not occur in future matches.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a sports event and does not involve any political figures, policies, or contentious issues. It provides a straightforward account of the incident and the club's response without apparent bias or framing that favors one side over another.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately represents the official apology from Hajduk regarding the pyrotechnics incident. It aligns precisely with the primary source document's content and tone.
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains an extremely neutral and formal tone throughout, presenting only the club's official statement without any additional commentary or bias.
Following recent incidents in Split involving violence and the display of Nazi symbols, Split-Dalmatia mayor Blaženko Boban strongly condemned the actions. He emphasized that such behavior has no place in society and called for a clear rejection of violence, Nazi symbolism, and the spread of hatred. The incidents reportedly involved outbreaks of aggression and the showcasing of extremist imagery, prompting a firm response from local authorities. Boban's statement reflects concern over rising tensions and the need for social cohesion.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct quote from a local official condemning violent and extremist acts without apparent ideological framing. It does not favor one side over another but reports on a public figure’s reaction to a sensitive issue.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the statements made by Blaženko Boban regarding the recent incidents in Split involving violence and Nazi symbols. The content aligns closely with the cross-source consensus, as similar reports from other outlets describe the same events and reactions. There are no cle
Why objectivity (92): The article presents Boban’s statements in a neutral manner, focusing on his condemnation of violence and Nazi symbolism. While the language is strong and emotionally charged, it reflects Boban’s own rhetoric rather than the author’s bias. The tone remains largely objective in reporting the official
Milorad Pupovac, a member of the Croatian Parliament, commented on the recent outburst by Ivan Penava, leader of the Homeland Movement, who criticized journalists and the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP) after some fans chanted Nazi slogans in Split. Pupovac noted that Penava, now part of Prime Minister Andrej Plenković’s government, has shifted his political targets from previously attacking Serbs and the prime minister to now criticizing MUP and the media. He described Penava’s defense of the fans and accusations against institutions and media as an indicator of both Penava’s freedom within the ruling coalition and the limits of that freedom. Pupovac warned that such behavior undermines the core values of the coalition and highlighted that some members of the governing alliance hold views inconsistent with democratic principles. He concluded that politics based on creating enemies where none exist have a recognizable pattern, exemplified by the events in Split.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between Pupovac's critique of Penava's actions and Penava's own statements, without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the political dynamics and implications rather than taking a stance on the validity of either argument.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes Pupovac's statements from the primary source, including his comments on Penava's shift in political targets and references to the chain metaphor. It includes direct quotes from the source document and does not add any unsupported information.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Pupovac's statements without editorializing or biased language. It provides context about Penava's actions but avoids taking sides or using emotionally charged words.
Following a shocking and shameful incident involving anti-Semitic chanting and fan abuse after Hajduk's return to the European stage and victory over Ajax, the Israeli Embassy in Zagreb has spoken out. They expressed deep shock at the event and thanked the Croatian government and Sarai Lustig for their response. The embassy emphasized their expectation of decisive action to address such incidents. This comes amid growing concerns over rising anti-Semitism in Croatia, particularly within football culture.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the Israeli Embassy's reaction to an anti-Semitic incident in Croatia, which is a politically sensitive issue. However, the piece remains neutral in tone, simply relaying the embassy's statement without overtly favoring any side. It does not include biased language, one-sided ph
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the reaction from the Israeli embassy, including their statement and the response from the Croatian government. All details match the primary source document.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains objective by presenting the statements from both the Israeli embassy and the Croatian government without any biased language or interpretation.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 905 days ago
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković expressed strong dissatisfaction with antisemitic and Nazi-related graffiti discovered in Split. He condemned such actions sharply, emphasizing that the police and courts must respond appropriately to address these incidents.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the prime minister's reaction to antisemitic and Nazi-related graffiti, presenting his condemnation without apparent ideological framing. The content focuses on the issue itself rather than taking a stance on related political debates.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately captures Plenković's strong condemnation of the incidents, his call for police and judicial investigation, and his reference to the MED9 summit. However, it adds commentary from Tonino Picula, which is not present in the primary source, slightly reducing its fidelity to the or
Why objectivity (90): While the article remains mostly neutral in reporting Plenković's statements, it introduces external opinion from Tonino Picula, which could be seen as adding a slight bias depending on interpretation.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 905 days ago
Following a deeply disturbing incident of antisemitic chanting and fan abuse after Hajduk's return to the European stage and their victory over Ajax, the Israeli Embassy in Zagreb has spoken out. They expressed deep shock at the event and thanked the Croatian government and Sarajevo-born Israeli citizen Sari Lustig for their response. The incident sparked widespread condemnation, including from football player Marko Šuta, who admitted he felt ashamed. The situation highlights concerns about antisemitism in Croatian sports culture and the need for greater awareness and education.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an antisemitic incident involving Croatian football fans and includes reactions from the Israeli Embassy and local figures. It presents multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any side, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the reaction from the Israeli embassy and the Croatian government's response. All details are consistent with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral by presenting the statements from the Israeli embassy and the Croatian government without any biased language or interpretation.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 906 days ago
The Croatian government has strongly condemned the chanting of Nazi regime slogans by fans during a football match in Split. The incident occurred before today's game between Hajduk and Ajax, where some fans were recorded shouting antisemitic and Nazi-related chants. In response, the police have launched a criminal investigation to identify those responsible and process them further. The government emphasized that such behavior contradicts sportsmanship and democratic values upheld by modern Croatia. This statement was first published by Novi list.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a government condemnation of a specific event involving chants at a sports event. It presents the official stance and mentions the police investigation without overtly favoring any side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the facts reported by the government and police.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the government's condemnation of the chants and the ongoing police investigation. All details are consistent with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains objective by presenting the government's official statements without any biased language or interpretation.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 805 days ago
President of Croatia, Zoran Milanović, condemned the behavior of part of the Torcida fan group ahead of a football match between Hajduk and Ajax in Split. He described their actions as unacceptable and shameful, emphasizing that chants and gestures openly celebrating Nazi and Ustasha regimes require an urgent and systematic reaction from Croatian police, prosecutors, and ultimately the courts. Milanović called for all relevant institutions to take this matter very seriously to prevent such incidents from recurring. He stated that words of condemnation from the government are no longer sufficient and that measures and sanctions are needed to show that there is no place in Croatia for glorifying Nazism and Ustashism. Fans who love and respect their football club should not be associated with a minority that shames not only Torcida and Hajduk but also Croatia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the president's direct condemnation of the fan group's behavior without taking a partisan stance. It quotes Milanović's statements and does not include any additional commentary or biased language that would indicate a leaning towards either side of the political spectrum.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Milanović's condemnation of Torcida's behavior and aligns with the primary source. It provides direct quotes from Milanović and does not add any unsubstantiated information.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone by quoting Milanović directly and avoiding overtly biased language, though it focuses on condemning the behavior without providing counterpoints.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7523 hr. ago
The article discusses potential tensions within Croatia's ruling coalition following the resignation of Ivan Penava, leader of the Domovinski Pokret (DP), after he criticized the police and media over the publication of photos of fugitives linked to the Torcida group. A high-ranking source from the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) claims Penava is intentionally escalating conflicts with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and could exit the coalition by year-end. The HDZ is reportedly preparing for this possibility, considering scenarios where some DP members might follow Penava while others remain in the coalition. The article highlights Penava's controversial actions, including attending a celebration in Vukovar associated with a group that honored Hitler, which has drawn criticism. The ruling coalition currently holds a majority but faces uncertainty if more members leave.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives, including quotes from a high-ranking HDZ source and mentions of Penava's actions and their implications for the ruling coalition. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, providing context about Penava's behavior, the HDZ's strategic concerns, or
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Penava's criticism of the police and includes direct quotes from him and Božinović, aligning with the primary source.
Why objectivity (75): The article uses strong language when describing Penava's actions, such as 'udario kao nikada dosad,' which may indicate a negative bias towards Penava.
Marijan Pavliček, president of the Croatian Sovereignists and mayor of Vukovar, criticized Ivan Penava, leader of the Homeland Movement, for criticizing the government while being part of it. Pavliček accused Penava of hypocrisy, stating that one cannot be part of the government and simultaneously criticize it. He argued that Penava wants to be the 'moral pillar' of the government while retaining three ministers, state secretaries, and members of boards of state companies. Pavliček called this behavior cowardice and hypocrisy. Penava criticized the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP) and media for their coverage of incidents involving fans of Hajduk before a match against Ajax, where some supporters made racist remarks and carried broken flags with the word 'Ajax'.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Pavliček's accusations against Penava and Penava's criticisms of the MUP and media. It does not favor one side over the other, providing quotes from both individuals without apparent bias.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Božinović's response to Penava, including his defense of the police's actions. It aligns with the primary source and provides direct quotes from the minister.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents Božinović's perspective without overtly favoring either side, though it does frame the situation as a political dispute rather than a neutral report.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 755 days ago
Croatia's Minister of Internal Affairs, Davor Božinović, commented on the Nazi chants by members of the Torcida fan group in Split before a match between Hajduk and Ajax. He emphasized the need for swift legal action against such incidents, warning that lengthy court processes send the wrong message. Božinović stated that if 150 traffic violations had been resolved quickly this year, similar scenes would likely have been avoided. He clarified that the responsibility for preventing pyrotechnics at stadiums lies with specialized security services employed by clubs, not the police. The match was interrupted after Torcida activated numerous pyrotechnic devices, leading to Hajduk apologizing to Ajax and the tournament organizers. Božinović defended the actions of intervention and special police units, stating they have maintained Croatia's reputation as one of the world's safest countries.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Minister Božinović's comments on the incident involving Torcida fans, including his calls for swift legal action and clarification regarding police responsibilities. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing, providing both the facts
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the minister's statements about the need for swift legal action and the issue of pyrotechnics at the stadium. It provides direct quotes from the primary source and does not add any unsupported information. The content is largely faithful to the original document.
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting the minister's perspective. It avoids overtly emotional language and focuses on reporting the facts rather than taking sides. However, it still leans slightly toward emphasizing the importance of quick legal consequences, which could b
Ivan Penava, leader of the Domovinski Pokret (DP) and Deputy Speaker of the Croatian Parliament, held a press conference in Split criticizing the police handling of a situation involving members of the Torcida football ultras group who shouted antisemitic slogans before a match between Hajduk and Ajax. Penava's remarks were described as incoherent by political analyst Žarko Puhovski, who noted that Penava appeared to misunderstand legal procedures and police protocols. Puhovski suggested that Penava’s comments were not a genuine attempt to leave the ruling coalition but rather an effort by the DP to assert itself as an independent political force amid poor ratings. He also stated that the DP lacks the political strength to overthrow the government if it left the coalition, noting that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has backup support.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Penava's claims and Puhovski's critical analysis without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both individuals and does not editorialize or omit significant perspectives. The framing remains balanced, focusing on the content of the statements and the
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Pupovac's response to Penava, including direct quotes and aligning with the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): The article presents Pupovac's perspective critically, suggesting Penava's actions show limited freedom within the coalition, which may reflect a subtle bias in favor of Pupovac.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
