We don't care about the wolf's messages, we'll celebrate the storm even more

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8518 days ago

Nikola Grmoja, president of Most and parliamentary representative, rejected criticism from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the Day of Croatian Defenders (Oluja), stating that Croatian defenders' sacrifices will never be forgotten and that messages from Serbia are irrelevant. Grmoja emphasized pride in celebrating this day more strongly, highlighting the liberation of occupied territories by Croatian defenders and expressing gratitude to all who contributed to freedom, independence, and territorial integrity. He stated that the goal now is to achieve a just Croatia where every citizen has equal opportunities, and he expressed hope that this would be accomplished. Grmoja also mentioned the desire to commemorate Oluja even more grandly and welcomed the presence of Montenegrin representatives at this year's event, hoping that ambassadors from all countries would join in future celebrations. Tomislav Šuta, mayor of Split, also attended the event and spoke about remembering all Croatian defenders, both those who fought and those who are still with them today, emphasizing the need to build a united Croatia without division.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from Croatian politicians commemorating the Day of Croatian Defenders (Oluja). It includes direct quotes from Nikola Grmoja and Tomislav Šuta, who emphasize national pride, unity, and gratitude toward Croatian defenders. The framing is neutral, presenting their views,

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Orešković's critique of the government's handling of the commemoration and the presence of Ustaša symbols. It aligns with the primary source document and provides additional context about the event without contradiction.

Why objectivity (85): The article has a more critical tone towards the government and the commemoration practices, which may introduce a subtle bias. However, it still presents the facts without outright editorializing.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8518 days ago

The article reports on a commemorative event organized by the authorities of the Republic of Serbia, referred to as 'Day of Memory for the Killed and Expelled Serbs,' which brought together senior officials from Serbia and the Republic of Serbia. During this event, Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić addressed journalists, responding to comments made by Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the military operation 'Oluja.' Vučić had previously called the operation a crime that Serbs should never forget and warned against similar actions in the future. Turudić responded dismissively, saying, 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče' ('Well, that doesn't concern us. Let them cry'), indicating a lack of concern over Vučić’s remarks. The event marked the 31st anniversary of Operation Oluja, a military operation that liberated parts of Croatia and restored its territorial integrity.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive historical event and involves tensions between Serbia and Croatia, the framing remains neutral. It presents both parties’ positions without overtly favoring one side. The focus is on reporting the event and the responses rather than taking a clear立场.

Why factuality (90): This article accurately reports Minister Šušnjar’s response to Serbian media outlets calling him an 'ustaša,' including his sarcastic retort and the context of Vučić’s comments. It aligns closely with the Telegram’s primary source.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is somewhat confrontational, especially when referencing Serbian media, but remains focused on reporting the incident without overtly taking sides.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 8518 days ago

At the official celebration of the Oluja in Knin, Ivan Turudić, Croatia's chief state prosecutor, responded to Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić's remarks about the Oluja being a crime and his stance against new persecutions. Turudić dismissed Vučić's comments with the phrase 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče,' which translates to 'We don't care at all. Let them go.' This reaction was part of the broader commemoration event, highlighting the ongoing tensions and differing perspectives between Croatian and Serbian authorities regarding historical events.

Bias read (Conservative): The article quotes a strong dismissive statement from a high-ranking Croatian official toward a Serbian leader's comments on a sensitive historical issue. The framing emphasizes the Croatian perspective and uses language that reflects nationalistic sentiment, suggesting a right-leaning bias.

Why factuality (90): This article accurately reflects Ivan Turudić’s response to Vučić’s remarks, directly quoting his statement 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče' as reported in the Telegram. It provides clear context and maintains alignment with the primary source.

Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing on reporting the reaction rather than taking sides. It presents both the content of Vučić’s comments and Turudić’s response without overtly favoring either party.

tportalIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 7018 days ago

The article reports on a brief exchange between Croatia's Chief State Prosecutor, Ivan Turudić, and Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić following a ceremony in Knin. Vučić made strong remarks about the military operation 'Oluja,' calling it a crime against Serbs that should never be repeated. He accused Croatia of hiding the truth about Jasenovac and misleading the international community. In response, Turudić dismissed Vučić’s comments with the phrase 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče,' which translates to 'Well, that's none of our concern. Let them worry.' The article notes that Vučić's speech was part of a commemoration event organized by the Republic of Serbia, referred to as 'Day of Memory for the Killed and Expelled Serbs.' Patriarch Porfirije of the Serbian Orthodox Church also commented on the operation, describing it as a 'terrible persecution without mercy in the 20th century,' while urging peace with neighbors.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Vučić's statements as provocative and inflammatory, emphasizing his accusations against Croatia and his call for vigilance against perceived threats. The response from Turudić is portrayed as dismissive and indifferent, reinforcing a narrative that aligns more closely with Serbian

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on Ivan Turudić’s response to Aleksandar Vučić’s comments about Operation Oluja, quoting him directly as saying 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče.' It also provides context about Vučić’s remarks at the memorial ceremony in Mrkonjić Grad, aligning closely with the primary s

Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the exchange between Turudić and Vučić, it remains relatively neutral in tone, focusing on the facts rather than taking sides. There is some emotional weight in the context but overall the framing is more objective compared to the other articles.

Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 88Objective 8017 days ago

Tomo Medved, potpredsjednik vlade RH i ministar hrvatskih branitelja, na svečanoj sjednici Grada Slunja održanoj povodom Dana grada, poručio je da će Hrvatska 'neće ispričavati nikome za našu pobjedu'. Odbio je optužbe predsjednika Srbije Aleksandra Vučića koje su ocjenjivala vojnu akciju 'Oluja' kao zločin koji Srbi ne smiju zaboraviti. Medved je istaknuo podršku Vlade prema branimacima i domaćem ratu, te pozvao na optimizam i nastavak gospodarskog rasta. Zastupnik Damir Mandić i županica Martina Furdek Hajdin naglasili su rast broja turista i investicije u infrastrukturu. Gradonačelnica Mirjana Puškarić istaknula je rast broja noćenja i prirodne ljepote Slunja, uz ističuće da su najveći ukras grad njegovi stanovnici.

Bias read (Conservative): Artikel fokusira na Hrvatsku kao pobednicu u Domovinskom ratu i odbacuje srpske optužbe protiv vojne akcije 'Oluja', što pokazuje podršku hrvatskoj historiji i nacionalnoj identitetu. Medved koristi izraz 'neće ispričavati nikome za našu pobjedu', što sugerira odbacivanje vanjske kritike. Poziv na '

Why factuality (88): This article repeats the core points of Medved’s speech as reported in previous articles, maintaining consistency with the primary source. It includes specific quotes and context about his response to Vučić.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is similar to earlier articles, emphasizing national pride and resistance to external criticism. While not overtly biased, it carries a strong patriotic undertone.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 8018 days ago

Saborska zastupnica Dalija Orešković objavljen je na društvenim mrežama o obilježavanju Oluje u Kninu, gdje su Dražen Keleminec i njegovi pristaši ponovno izgovarali 'Za dom spremni'. Orešković kritikuje nedostatak jasnosti u državnoj politici i povezuje to s nepotpunom izgradnjom Hrvatske kao pravne države. Ona navodi kako su takvi potezi i poviki iz različitih prostora (ulica, stadion, koncerti) ostvarili utjecaj, a da se državni vrh ne može jasno odrediti. Komentari na društvenim mrežama sugeriraju da treba ignorirati takve izraze, što je dovelo do apsurdnih predodžbi mladih o Domovinskom ratu i slikama Oluje. Orešković ističe da je slika Oluje danas ona koja je poslana izvan službenog protokola, što ukazuje na nekoherentan i nekontroliran pristup temi.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the lack of clarity in state leadership and criticizes the continued influence of nationalist rhetoric ('Za dom spremni') despite legal frameworks. The author implies that such expressions are tolerated by authorities, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of右

Why factuality (88): The article accurately reports Dalija Orešković’s critique of the state’s failure to address the use of 'Za dom spremni' during commemorations, matching the Telegram’s coverage. It includes her social media comments and contextualizes them within broader societal issues.

Why objectivity (80): While informative, the article has a slightly critical tone toward the government, suggesting a lack of clarity or action, but does not take an overtly partisan position.

Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 8018 days ago

Dalija Orešković, političarka iz Hrvatske, kritizirala je državni vrh za to što se, prema njoj, 31 godinu nakon završetka Domovinskog rata, ne jasno određuje stajanje prema uzvikivanju ustaškog pozdrava 'Za dom spremni' na obilježavanjima Oluje. U svojoj objavi na društvenim mrežama, Orešković je naglasila da bi u pravnoj državi ljudi poput Dražena Keleminca, koji su na obilježavanju Oluje uzvikivali taj pozdrav, ne bi mogli tako postupati. Tvrdi da vladajuće institucije ne reaguju na elemente povezane s ustaškim režimom, čak i kad se ti elementi javljaju na javnim mjestima. Orešković smatra da dugogodišnje ignoriše te pojave dovelo do toga da su mladi imale pogrešne predodžbe o Domovinskom ratu i Olujama.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective towards the government's handling of historical symbols and national identity, emphasizing the failure to address fascist-related elements in public discourse. The framing highlights the government's inaction and implies a lack of commitment to confronting

Why factuality (88): This article accurately reports Nikola Grmoja’s response to Vučić’s comments, emphasizing national pride and the importance of remembering Operation Storm. It aligns with the Telegram’s primary source.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is strongly supportive of national memory and resistance to external criticism, leaning towards a nationalist perspective.

Telegram.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7517 days ago

Croatian Minister of Economy Ante Šušnjar responded on social media to being called 'the worst Ustasha' by Serbia's regime-controlled newspaper Informer. The article describes Šušnjar's sarcastic reaction to the derogatory label, mocking the Serbian media's portrayal of him and their alleged attempts to influence public opinion. He criticized the media's lack of professionalism during a heatwave and highlighted the contrast between their behavior in Croatia versus Serbia. Šušnjar also addressed Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić's criticism of the military operation 'Oluja,' rejecting Vučić's claim that the operation was a crime and asserting that Croats have historically defended their homes rather than invaded. He warned that if Serbia does not acknowledge historical truths, progress will remain impossible.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Šušnjar's comments as a defense against Serbian nationalist rhetoric, using strong language like 'worst Ustasha' and referencing historical conflicts. It emphasizes his critique of Serbian media and leadership, aligning with Croatian nationalist sentiments. The tone suggests a pro

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Tomo Medved’s speech at the Slunj council meeting, responding to Vučić’s comments on Operation Storm. It includes details about Medved’s emphasis on national pride and economic growth, consistent with the Telegram report.

Why objectivity (75): The tone leans towards nationalism, particularly in highlighting Hrvatska’s strength and rejection of Serbian criticism. There is some emotional language used to emphasize national identity.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7517 days ago

Tomo Medved, potpredsjednik vlade i ministar branitelja Hrvatske, na svečanoj sjednici Grada Slunja izvršio je izjavu gdje je izrazio stav da Hrvatska 'neće ispričavati nikome za našu pobjedu'. Ovo je reagiralo na optužbe predsjednika Srbije Aleksandra Vučića koji je nazvao vojnu akciju 'Oluja' zločinom. Medved je istaknuo podršku prema braniteljima i istaknuo potrebu za optimizmom i daljnjim razvojem. Također su bili prisutni zastupnici i lokalni vodeći lijesi koji su naglasili napredak Slunja u posljednjih deset godina.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the discussion around national pride and military victory, emphasizing the importance of defending past achievements and rejecting apologies for them. The tone aligns with a nationalist perspective, particularly in its response to Serbian accusations and its celebration of Croatia

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Dalija Orešković’s critique of the state’s handling of commemorative events, including the use of 'Za dom spremni.' It aligns with the Telegram’s coverage and includes her social media commentary.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is critical of the government’s approach, suggesting a lack of firmness on historical matters, though it doesn’t explicitly call for any particular policy change.

Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7518 days ago

The article discusses the commemoration of the Day of Croatian Defenders and the 31st anniversary of the liberation of Knin during the Homeland War, known as 'Oluja.' Predrag Grmoja, President of the Most Party and MP, rejected criticisms from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the significance of Oluja, emphasizing that Croatia will continue to celebrate this victory strongly. Grmoja expressed pride in the achievements of Croatian defenders and stressed the importance of building a unified Croatia where all citizens have equal opportunities. Split Mayor Tomislav Šuta also addressed the event, highlighting the need to create a Croatia without divisions, inclusivity, and where all citizens have the right to their opinions.

Bias read (Conservative): The article emphasizes national pride, the legacy of Croatian defenders, and the rejection of external criticism, particularly from Serbia. The framing highlights the triumph of Croatian military efforts and the desire to build a unified, strong Croatia, which aligns with right-leaning narratives of

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Grmoja’s speech, including his dismissal of Vučić’s comments and his commitment to honoring Operation Storm. It aligns with the Telegram’s primary source.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is emotionally charged, emphasizing national pride and defiance against external criticism, with a strong nationalist undertone.

Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 days ago

Tomo Medved, Croatia's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, stated during a ceremony commemorating Slunj City Day that Croatia will not apologize for its victory. He responded to Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić's remarks referring to the 1995 military operation 'Storm' as a crime that Serbs should never forget. Medved emphasized that the government will not allow attacks on veterans or the Homeland War. He highlighted the government's partnership with war veterans' organizations over the past decade to improve their quality of life and honor those who brought peace and freedom. Medved also spoke about continuing economic growth and development while encouraging optimism. Positive developments were noted in Slunj, including increased tourism and a higher birth rate. Awards were presented to cities and individuals, including a lifetime achievement award to veteran Nikola Štefančić.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the political statements made by Tomo Medved and mentions the reactions from both Croatian and Serbian leaders. It does not show clear bias towards either side but rather reports on the event and statements objectively.

Why factuality (85): Article reports on Tomo Medved’s response to Aleksandar Vučić’s comments on Operation Storm, aligning with the primary source document. It mentions Medved’s emphasis on national pride and economic development, which matches the Telegram report. However, it lacks direct quotes from the primary source

Why objectivity (70): The tone is strongly nationalist and defensive, emphasizing Hrvatska’s victory and rejecting Serbian criticism. The article frames the situation as a confrontation between Hrvatska and Serbia, showing bias towards Hrvatska.

Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6018 days ago

Saborska zastupnica Dalija Orešković objavila je poruku na Facebooku u kojoj kritizira vladu i komentira incident na proslavi Dana pobjede i domovinske zahvalnosti u Kninu, gdje su Dražen Keleminec i njegovi pristaši uzvikivali 'ustaški pozdrav'. Orešković naglašava kako Hrvatska još nije potpuno izgrađena kao pravna država, što omogućuje takva ponašanja. Ona navodi da su tri desetljeća prošla, a državni vrh još uvijek ne može jasno odrediti pitanja vezana uz Oluju. Kritizira se i povikivanje na javnim prostorima, te se ističe da je slika Oluje koja je poslana izvan službenog protokola, što je dopušteno jer vlast to dopušta.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of legal statehood and criticizes the ruling establishment for tolerating historical symbols associated with wartime figures. The emphasis on the lack of clarity in governance and the acceptance of controversial historical references aligns with left-lib

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on Dalija Orešković’s Facebook post criticizing the government for not clearly defining the use of the 'Za dom spremni' slogan during commemorations of Operation Oluja. It references specific statements from Orešković and aligns with the primary source document regardi

Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical and emotionally charged, focusing on the perceived lack of legal clarity and national identity. The article frames the issue as a failure of governance and implies moral judgment against those who continue to use the slogan, showing bias towards a particular interpretation of hi

Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6018 days ago

Dalija Orešković, hrvatska političarka, kritizira državni vrh za nedostatak jasnog stajališta na pitanje uzvikivanja ustaškog pozdrava 'Za dom spremni' na obilježavanjima Oluje, 31 godina nakon kraja Drugog svjetskog rata. U svojoj objavi na društvenim mrežama, napisala je da ako bi Hrvatska bila pravna država, takvi događaji ne bi bili mogući. Nije se uspela primijetiti reakcija vlasti ni na nazive povezane s ustaškim režimom, što je, prema njoj, doprinelo apsurdnim predstavama mladih o historiji. Zaključila je da je slika Oluje koja se danas prikazuje ona koja je poslana izvan službenog protokola, jer vlast dopusti takvu situaciju.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikl kritizira državnu vlast za nedostatak jasnosti i reakcije na simbole ustaškog režima, što ukazuje na levi naglasak na potrebu za demokratskom i pravnom pristupom historiji. Iako nije direktno izražen politički program, ton i tematika sugeriraju levi naglasak na pravosudnost i historijsku isto

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the previous one in content, reporting on Orešković’s criticism of the government’s stance on the 'Za dom spremni' slogan. It includes direct quotes and maintains consistency with the primary source document’s details about the commemoration event in Knin. No new information is

Why objectivity (60): The article continues the same critical and emotive tone as the first, reinforcing the idea that the government is failing to uphold legal standards and national identity. It presents the issue through a partisan lens, suggesting that ignoring such symbols leads to distorted public perception.