Turudić in Knin responded to Vučić's appeals: 'We don't care, let him farm'The article reports on a commemorative event organized by the authorities of the Republic of Serbia, referred to as 'Day of Memory for the Killed and Expelled Serbs,' which brought together senior officials from Serbia and the Republic of Serbia. During this event, Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić addressed journalists, responding to comments made by Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the military operation 'Oluja.' Vučić had previously called the operation a crime that Serbs should never forget and warned against similar actions in the future. Turudić responded dismissively, saying, 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče' ('Well, that doesn't concern us. Let them cry'), indicating a lack of concern over Vučić’s remarks. The event marked the 31st anniversary of Operation Oluja, a military operation that liberated parts of Croatia and restored its territorial integrity.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive historical event and involves tensions between Serbia and Croatia, the framing remains neutral. It presents both parties’ positions without overtly favoring one side. The focus is on reporting the event and the responses rather than taking a clear立场.
Why factuality (95): This article provides a direct quote from Ivan Turudić responding to Aleksandar Vučić’s comments about Operation Oluja. It accurately reflects the content of the primary source document and maintains consistency with other sources reporting on the same event. No significant deviations or embellishme
Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the statement of Ivan Turudić without adding subjective commentary. It focuses on the facts of the exchange between the leaders without taking sides or using emotive language.
tportalIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 85yesterdayThe article reports on a brief exchange between Croatia's Chief State Prosecutor, Ivan Turudić, and Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić following a ceremony in Knin. Vučić made strong remarks about the military operation 'Oluja,' calling it a crime against Serbs that should never be repeated. He accused Croatia of hiding the truth about Jasenovac and misleading the international community. In response, Turudić dismissed Vučić’s comments with the phrase 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče,' which translates to 'Well, that's none of our concern. Let them worry.' The article notes that Vučić's speech was part of a commemoration event organized by the Republic of Serbia, referred to as 'Day of Memory for the Killed and Expelled Serbs.' Patriarch Porfirije of the Serbian Orthodox Church also commented on the operation, describing it as a 'terrible persecution without mercy in the 20th century,' while urging peace with neighbors.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Vučić's statements as provocative and inflammatory, emphasizing his accusations against Croatia and his call for vigilance against perceived threats. The response from Turudić is portrayed as dismissive and indifferent, reinforcing a narrative that aligns more closely with Serbian
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Ivan Turudić’s response to Aleksandar Vučić’s remarks about Operation Oluja, including the direct quote. It aligns closely with the primary source and other articles, providing a factual account without distortion or omission of key details.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is objective, focusing on the content of the statement rather than expressing personal opinion. While there is some reference to political figures like Milanović, the article does not take an overtly partisan stance.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 85yesterday Grmoja replied to Vucic: 'We are not interested in messages from Serbia at all'The article discusses Croatia's commemoration of the 31st anniversary of Operation Storm (Oluja), highlighting national pride and gratitude towards Croatian defenders who liberated territories during the war. President of Mostar, Mirsad Grmoja, expressed his satisfaction with the celebration and emphasized the importance of honoring those who fought for Croatia's independence and territorial integrity. He responded to Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić's comments criticizing Croatia's decision to invite representatives from Montenegro to the ceremony by stating that messages from Serbia do not interest them. Grmoja stressed that Croatia's victory remains significant and should be celebrated strongly. The article also mentions Split Mayor Tomislav Šuta, who called for unity and inclusivity in building a democratic Croatia, emphasizing the need for all citizens to have equal rights and contribute to a stronger nation.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive historical event and includes statements from political figures, it presents both perspectives, Croatian pride in its military success and a measured response to Serbian criticism, without overtly favoring one side. The tone remains respectful and non-j
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the statement by Ivan Turudić in response to Aleksandar Vučić’s comments about Operation Oluja. It directly quotes the source material and provides a clear, concise summary without introducing new information or interpretation.
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the content of the statement without injecting additional emotion or political bias. It serves as a straightforward report of the event.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 75yesterdaySaborska zastupnica Dalija Orešković objavila je poruku na Facebooku u kojoj kritizira vladu i komentira incident na proslavi Dana pobjede i domovinske zahvalnosti u Kninu, gdje su Dražen Keleminec i njegovi pristaši uzvikivali 'ustaški pozdrav'. Orešković naglašava kako Hrvatska još nije potpuno izgrađena kao pravna država, što omogućuje takva ponašanja. Ona navodi da su tri desetljeća prošla, a državni vrh još uvijek ne može jasno odrediti pitanja vezana uz Oluju. Kritizira se i povikivanje na javnim prostorima, te se ističe da je slika Oluje koja je poslana izvan službenog protokola, što je dopušteno jer vlast to dopušta.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of legal statehood and criticizes the ruling establishment for tolerating historical symbols associated with wartime figures. The emphasis on the lack of clarity in governance and the acceptance of controversial historical references aligns with left-lib
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Dalija Orešković’s criticism of the government regarding the continued use of the Ustaša salute 'Za dom spremni' during celebrations of Oluje. It quotes her directly from her Facebook post, preserving the original message. The facts align closely with the primary sourc
Why objectivity (75): The article presents Orešković’s statements objectively but includes some emotionally charged phrases like 'najglasniji zvuk koji se može čuti,' which may imply a subjective interpretation. While it remains largely neutral, there is a slight tilt toward highlighting the controversy.
Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 75yesterdayDalija Orešković, hrvatska političarka, kritizira državni vrh za nedostatak jasnog stajališta na pitanje uzvikivanja ustaškog pozdrava 'Za dom spremni' na obilježavanjima Oluje, 31 godina nakon kraja Drugog svjetskog rata. U svojoj objavi na društvenim mrežama, napisala je da ako bi Hrvatska bila pravna država, takvi događaji ne bi bili mogući. Nije se uspela primijetiti reakcija vlasti ni na nazive povezane s ustaškim režimom, što je, prema njoj, doprinelo apsurdnim predstavama mladih o historiji. Zaključila je da je slika Oluje koja se danas prikazuje ona koja je poslana izvan službenog protokola, jer vlast dopusti takvu situaciju.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikl kritizira državnu vlast za nedostatak jasnosti i reakcije na simbole ustaškog režima, što ukazuje na levi naglasak na potrebu za demokratskom i pravnom pristupom historiji. Iako nije direktno izražen politički program, ton i tematika sugeriraju levi naglasak na pravosudnost i historijsku isto
Why factuality (95): This article accurately reflects the content of the primary source, quoting Orešković directly and maintaining the key points of her criticism. It does not introduce new information or distort the original message.
Why objectivity (75): The article remains largely objective but includes emotionally charged language, particularly in phrases like 'Ima nešto u toj šutnji,' which may imply a subjective interpretation. This affects the overall objectivity score slightly.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 75yesterdaySaborska zastupnica Dalija Orešković objavljen je na društvenim mrežama o obilježavanju Oluje u Kninu, gdje su Dražen Keleminec i njegovi pristaši ponovno izgovarali 'Za dom spremni'. Orešković kritikuje nedostatak jasnosti u državnoj politici i povezuje to s nepotpunom izgradnjom Hrvatske kao pravne države. Ona navodi kako su takvi potezi i poviki iz različitih prostora (ulica, stadion, koncerti) ostvarili utjecaj, a da se državni vrh ne može jasno odrediti. Komentari na društvenim mrežama sugeriraju da treba ignorirati takve izraze, što je dovelo do apsurdnih predodžbi mladih o Domovinskom ratu i slikama Oluje. Orešković ističe da je slika Oluje danas ona koja je poslana izvan službenog protokola, što ukazuje na nekoherentan i nekontroliran pristup temi.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the lack of clarity in state leadership and criticizes the continued influence of nationalist rhetoric ('Za dom spremni') despite legal frameworks. The author implies that such expressions are tolerated by authorities, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of右
Why factuality (95): This article mirrors the content of the primary source document and accurately reflects Orešković’s critique of the government’s stance on the Ustaša salute. It includes direct quotes and maintains consistency with the original text, showing high factual fidelity.
Why objectivity (75): Similar to the first article, this piece is mostly objective but uses emotive language such as 'Ima nešto u toj šutnji,' which could be seen as subtly biased. The tone leans slightly toward emphasizing the significance of the silence, rather than presenting a purely neutral perspective.
Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 75yesterdayDalija Orešković, političarka iz Hrvatske, kritizirala je državni vrh za to što se, prema njoj, 31 godinu nakon završetka Domovinskog rata, ne jasno određuje stajanje prema uzvikivanju ustaškog pozdrava 'Za dom spremni' na obilježavanjima Oluje. U svojoj objavi na društvenim mrežama, Orešković je naglasila da bi u pravnoj državi ljudi poput Dražena Keleminca, koji su na obilježavanju Oluje uzvikivali taj pozdrav, ne bi mogli tako postupati. Tvrdi da vladajuće institucije ne reaguju na elemente povezane s ustaškim režimom, čak i kad se ti elementi javljaju na javnim mjestima. Orešković smatra da dugogodišnje ignoriše te pojave dovelo do toga da su mladi imale pogrešne predodžbe o Domovinskom ratu i Olujama.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective towards the government's handling of historical symbols and national identity, emphasizing the failure to address fascist-related elements in public discourse. The framing highlights the government's inaction and implies a lack of commitment to confronting
Why factuality (95): The article faithfully reproduces Orešković’s comments from the primary source, including her criticism of the government and the ongoing issue with the Ustaša salute. It provides direct quotes and aligns closely with the original text.
Why objectivity (75): While the article is factual, it carries a similar tone to the others, using phrases that suggest a critical view of the government’s silence. This subtle bias affects the objectivity score, even though the core information is presented neutrally.
Turudić on Vučić's statements about the Storm:During a commemoration event in Mrkonjić Grad, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić described the military operation 'Operation Storm' as a crime that Serbs should never forget. He also mentioned the strengthening of the Serbian army and warned against waiting for another 'half-time,' urging for peace and good relations. In response, Croatian Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić dismissed Vučić's comments, saying 'We don’t care, let them be.' Croatian President Zoran Milanović commented on Serbia’s historical narratives, acknowledging differing interpretations of history but suggesting that not every statement across the border needs a reaction.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Vučić's remarks and the responses from Croatian officials without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from multiple political figures and does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes the reaction of Nikola Grmoja to Aleksandar Vučić’s comments, including his strong defense of Operation Oluja. It aligns with the primary source and other articles but includes some contextual background that is consistent with the overall narrative.
Why objectivity (80): While the article presents Grmoja’s position clearly, it also frames the discussion in a way that supports the Croatian perspective, particularly through the emphasis on national pride and historical memory. This suggests a slight leaning toward the Croatian viewpoint.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 80yesterday Turudić's message to Vučić: "We don't give a shit, let him farm"At the official celebration of the Oluja in Knin, Ivan Turudić, Croatia's chief state prosecutor, responded to Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić's remarks about the Oluja being a crime and his stance against new persecutions. Turudić dismissed Vučić's comments with the phrase 'Ma baš nas briga. Neka kmeče,' which translates to 'We don't care at all. Let them go.' This reaction was part of the broader commemoration event, highlighting the ongoing tensions and differing perspectives between Croatian and Serbian authorities regarding historical events.
Bias read (Conservative): The article quotes a strong dismissive statement from a high-ranking Croatian official toward a Serbian leader's comments on a sensitive historical issue. The framing emphasizes the Croatian perspective and uses language that reflects nationalistic sentiment, suggesting a right-leaning bias.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the reaction of Nikola Grmoja to Aleksandar Vučić’s comments, including his strong defense of Operation Oluja. It aligns with the primary source and other articles, though it adds some context about the broader political implications.
Why objectivity (80): The article has a slightly patriotic tone, especially when discussing the significance of Operation Oluja and the role of Croatian veterans. While it doesn’t explicitly take a political stance, it subtly reinforces the idea of national unity and historical pride.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 65yesterday We defended our own, and they can still whine about it year after year... we'll celebrate the Storm even more strongly.The article discusses the commemoration of the Day of Croatian Defenders and the 31st anniversary of the liberation of Knin during the Homeland War, known as 'Oluja.' Predrag Grmoja, President of the Most Party and MP, rejected criticisms from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the significance of Oluja, emphasizing that Croatia will continue to celebrate this victory strongly. Grmoja expressed pride in the achievements of Croatian defenders and stressed the importance of building a unified Croatia where all citizens have equal opportunities. Split Mayor Tomislav Šuta also addressed the event, highlighting the need to create a Croatia without divisions, inclusivity, and where all citizens have the right to their opinions.
Bias read (Conservative): The article emphasizes national pride, the legacy of Croatian defenders, and the rejection of external criticism, particularly from Serbia. The framing highlights the triumph of Croatian military efforts and the desire to build a unified, strong Croatia, which aligns with right-leaning narratives of
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the political statements made by Nikole Grmoja regarding criticism from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić and the celebration of Operation Oluja. It aligns with the primary source document about the event and the context of the debate around the operation. However,
Why objectivity (65): The tone is strongly nationalistic, focusing on defending the actions of Croatian veterans and dismissing Serbian critiques. The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'veličanstvena pobjeda' and emphasizes the importance of remembering the sacrifices of Croatian soldiers, which shows a c
Slunja bear: Croatia will not apologize to anyone for their victoryTomo Medved, Croatia's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, stated during a ceremony commemorating Slunj City Day that Croatia will not apologize for its victory. He responded to Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić's remarks referring to the 1995 military operation 'Storm' as a crime that Serbs should never forget. Medved emphasized that the government will not allow attacks on veterans or the Homeland War. He highlighted the government's partnership with war veterans' organizations over the past decade to improve their quality of life and honor those who brought peace and freedom. Medved also spoke about continuing economic growth and development while encouraging optimism. Positive developments were noted in Slunj, including increased tourism and a higher birth rate. Awards were presented to cities and individuals, including a lifetime achievement award to veteran Nikola Štefančić.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the political statements made by Tomo Medved and mentions the reactions from both Croatian and Serbian leaders. It does not show clear bias towards either side but rather reports on the event and statements objectively.
Tom Bear from Slunje answered to VucicTomo Medved, potpredsjednik vlade RH i ministar hrvatskih branitelja, na svečanoj sjednici Grada Slunja održanoj povodom Dana grada, poručio je da će Hrvatska 'neće ispričavati nikome za našu pobjedu'. Odbio je optužbe predsjednika Srbije Aleksandra Vučića koje su ocjenjivala vojnu akciju 'Oluja' kao zločin koji Srbi ne smiju zaboraviti. Medved je istaknuo podršku Vlade prema branimacima i domaćem ratu, te pozvao na optimizam i nastavak gospodarskog rasta. Zastupnik Damir Mandić i županica Martina Furdek Hajdin naglasili su rast broja turista i investicije u infrastrukturu. Gradonačelnica Mirjana Puškarić istaknula je rast broja noćenja i prirodne ljepote Slunja, uz ističuće da su najveći ukras grad njegovi stanovnici.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikel fokusira na Hrvatsku kao pobednicu u Domovinskom ratu i odbacuje srpske optužbe protiv vojne akcije 'Oluja', što pokazuje podršku hrvatskoj historiji i nacionalnoj identitetu. Medved koristi izraz 'neće ispričavati nikome za našu pobjedu', što sugerira odbacivanje vanjske kritike. Poziv na '
Bear in the Sun: We won't apologize for winningThe article reports on a speech by Medved, a representative from Slunj, who rejects accusations from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the military operation 'Oluja' in August 1995. Medved asserts that the Croatian government does not tolerate attacks on veterans and emphasizes Croatia's commitment to supporting those who contributed to peace and freedom. He calls for continued economic growth and optimism, highlighting recent achievements in tourism and infrastructure. Other local representatives, including Damir Mandić and Martina Furdek Hajdin, emphasize Slunj's identity as part of Croatia and note increased tourist numbers. The town has received various awards and recognitions, including public honors for veterans, police, and community organizations.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive historical event ('Oluja') and includes statements from a Croatian representative countering Serbian claims, the framing remains balanced. It presents both perspectives without overtly favoring one side. The focus shifts to local achievements and a
Tomo Medved from Slunje: Croatia will not apologize to anyone for winningTomo Medved, potpredsjednik vlade i ministar branitelja Hrvatske, na svečanoj sjednici Grada Slunja izvršio je izjavu gdje je izrazio stav da Hrvatska 'neće ispričavati nikome za našu pobjedu'. Ovo je reagiralo na optužbe predsjednika Srbije Aleksandra Vučića koji je nazvao vojnu akciju 'Oluja' zločinom. Medved je istaknuo podršku prema braniteljima i istaknuo potrebu za optimizmom i daljnjim razvojem. Također su bili prisutni zastupnici i lokalni vodeći lijesi koji su naglasili napredak Slunja u posljednjih deset godina.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the discussion around national pride and military victory, emphasizing the importance of defending past achievements and rejecting apologies for them. The tone aligns with a nationalist perspective, particularly in its response to Serbian accusations and its celebration of Croatia
We don't care about the wolf's messages, we'll celebrate the storm even moreNikola Grmoja, president of Most and parliamentary representative, rejected criticism from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić regarding the Day of Croatian Defenders (Oluja), stating that Croatian defenders' sacrifices will never be forgotten and that messages from Serbia are irrelevant. Grmoja emphasized pride in celebrating this day more strongly, highlighting the liberation of occupied territories by Croatian defenders and expressing gratitude to all who contributed to freedom, independence, and territorial integrity. He stated that the goal now is to achieve a just Croatia where every citizen has equal opportunities, and he expressed hope that this would be accomplished. Grmoja also mentioned the desire to commemorate Oluja even more grandly and welcomed the presence of Montenegrin representatives at this year's event, hoping that ambassadors from all countries would join in future celebrations. Tomislav Šuta, mayor of Split, also attended the event and spoke about remembering all Croatian defenders, both those who fought and those who are still with them today, emphasizing the need to build a united Croatia without division.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from Croatian politicians commemorating the Day of Croatian Defenders (Oluja). It includes direct quotes from Nikola Grmoja and Tomislav Šuta, who emphasize national pride, unity, and gratitude toward Croatian defenders. The framing is neutral, presenting their views,
Croatia
