ON
← Back to feed
Greens Pass ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion at Party Conference
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive4 hr. ago

Greens Pass ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion at Party Conference

At their largest-ever conference in Brighton, UK Green Party members passed a motion declaring Zionism as racism, making them the first mainstream British political party to take such a stance. The motion, supported by 1,022 votes to 813, calls for backing a single, democratic Palestinian state, supporting Palestinian political prisoners, opposing the Palestine Action ban, and affirming Palestinians' right to resistance. An amendment aimed at protecting Jewish members affiliated with Zionist institutions was rejected. Proponents argue the motion distinguishes between Judaism and Zionism and does not affect internal party discipline. The decision sparked controversy, with pro-Israel demonstrators protesting outside the conference, accusing the Greens of promoting racism. Internal divisions were evident, with senior figures like co-deputy leader Mothin Ali supporting the motion while former leader Caroline Lucas opposed it. Green Party policy has previously described Israeli actions as apartheid and genocide, and supports a full arms embargo and an end to occupation.

The Green Party of England and Wales has officially adopted a motion defining Zionism as a form of racism, marking a dramatic shift in its stance on Israel and Palestine. The decision, passed at the party’s conference in Brighton by 1,022 votes to 813, calls for the replacement of Israel with a single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine. The motion has sparked intense controversy both within the party and internationally, leading to accusations of antisemitism and prompting Israel to ban the party’s leader, Zack Polanski, from entering the country. The motion, which frames Zionism as an ethnonationalist ideology aimed at establishing a Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion of non-Jewish populations, has drawn sharp criticism from Jewish communities and Israeli officials. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the resolution legitimizes “the destruction of the state of Israel” and constitutes “clearly antisemitic” rhetoric under the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition. As a result, Polanski, who is Jewish, has been barred from entry into Israel. His absence during the vote was due to his campaign efforts in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election, where he is seeking to become the party’s sixth MP. The motion has also caused rifts within the Green Party itself. Four of the party’s five MPs, Adrian Ramsay, Carla Denyer, Ellie Chowns, and Sian Berry, opposed the motion, while Hannah Spencer has not publicly stated her position. Former leader Caroline Lucas urged members to vote against the motion, warning that it might alienate Jewish members. Polanski, who had proposed amendments to protect Jewish members and clarify distinctions between Judaism and Zionism, saw both proposals rejected. Despite his concerns, he did not remain at the conference to cast his vote. The Jewish Greens, led by chair Vivien Lichtenstein, have expressed deep dissatisfaction with the motion. Lichtenstein told the BBC that she considers leaving the party, citing the motion’s potential to harm relationships with Jewish communities and organizations. She argued that the motion fails to address the realities faced by Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, and risks labeling groups that support Palestinian rights as racist. Lichtenstein emphasized that the party’s policy should allow Israelis and Palestinians to decide their future, whether through a one-state or two-state solution. She noted that the motion did not adequately consult Jewish Greens, despite claims of consultation with some Jews. The motion has also raised concerns about the broader implications for the Green Party’s reputation and effectiveness. Critics argue that the party’s stance risks alienating key voter bases and undermining its role in opposing right-wing populism. The motion’s adoption has further complicated the party’s relationship with Jewish communities and international partners, particularly given the UK’s continued support for a two-state solution, which Israel rejects. Supporters of the motion, however, argue that it aligns with the party’s longstanding commitment to Palestinian rights and the rejection of Israeli actions deemed apartheid and genocidal. The motion also calls for an arms embargo against Israel and opposes the Israel Defense Forces as a terrorist organization. Proponents maintain that the party’s position reflects a principled stand against what they see as systemic injustice and racial discrimination. As the fallout from the motion continues, the Green Party faces mounting pressure to reconcile its ideological commitments with the practical consequences of its decisions. The situation underscores the complex and often contentious nature of debates around Zionism, identity, and the politics of representation in contemporary British society.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 8 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

12 reports

New Statesman logoNew StatesmanIndependentProgressive4 hr. ago
Former Green leader: I am "deeply upset" by Zionism vote

A former leader of the Green Party expressed deep disappointment over a recent vote related to Zionism. The individual criticized the decision, indicating a strong personal stance against the position taken. The statement highlights internal disagreements within the party regarding political stances on international issues. The comment reflects broader ideological tensions within progressive political movements.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the Zionism vote through the lens of a former Green Party leader, which aligns with left-leaning political values. The emotional tone ('deeply upset') suggests a negative evaluation of the political stance, typical of left-wing perspectives on Israel-Palestine and

Daily Mirror logoDaily MirrorIndependentProgressive5 hr. ago
Zack Polanski rocked by resignation and Jewish Greens chief says she may quit over Zionism motion

The Green Party in the United Kingdom is facing internal conflict following the passage of a binding motion that declares Zionism as racism. The motion received 1,022 votes in favor compared to 813 against. This decision has been criticized by the UK's chief rabbi, who labeled it 'poisonous antisemitism.' The controversy has led to tensions within the party, with reports suggesting that the Jewish Greens chief may consider resigning due to the motion. The situation highlights deep divisions within the party regarding the intersection of Zionism and antisemitism.

Bias read (Progressive): The article discusses a motion passed by the Green Party, which is typically associated with progressive and left-leaning policies. The framing emphasizes the motion's declaration of Zionism as racism, a stance often aligned with leftist perspectives on Israel-Palestine issues. The criticism from a犹

iNews logoiNewsIndependentConservative7 hr. ago
The speed of Zack Polanski’s fall is truly spectacular

The article discusses the political fallout surrounding Zack Polanski, the leader of the Green Party, following his performance in the Gorton and Denton by-election where the Greens won against Labour. The piece criticizes Polanski for his absence during a critical moment and accuses the Greens of promoting hate and division by adopting a stance that equates Zionism with racism. The author argues that this position undermines community relations and fails to recognize the concerns of British Jews regarding safety and national identity. The article contrasts the Greens' approach with a more nuanced view of Zionism that supports a Jewish homeland while opposing oppressive policies, and highlights the broader implications of such ideological stances.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Greens' stance on Zionism as harmful and divisive, using loaded language like 'promote hate and division' and 'poisoned community relations.' It emphasizes the negative consequences of the Greens' position and portrays the author's perspective as morally superior, aligning it

Novara Media logoNovara MediaIndependentProgressive10 hr. ago
Israel Bans Zack Polanski After Green Members Pass ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion

The UK Green Party passed a motion declaring Zionism as a racist ideology, leading to Israel banning its leader Zack Polanski from entering the country. The motion, supported by 1,022 members and opposed by 813, defines Zionism as an ethnonationalist ideology that seeks to establish a Jewish state in historic Palestine at the expense of non-Jewish populations. The Israeli foreign ministry condemned the motion as 'clearly antisemitic' and claimed it legitimized the destruction of Israel. The Green Party stated it remains committed to equality, justice, and human rights, opposing all forms of racism. Four of the party's five MPs opposed the motion, while former leader Caroline Lucas urged members to reject it to avoid alienating Jewish members. Polanski, who is Jewish, did not vote on the motion and left the conference early to focus on a byelection. The motion marks the Green Party as the first explicitly anti-Zionist political party in the UK, though such motions do not directly influence election manifestos.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Green Party's motion as a progressive stance against Zionism, emphasizing the party's commitment to Palestinian liberation and opposition to Israel's actions in Gaza. The language used highlights the ideological alignment with anti-Zionist views and critiques of Israeli policy

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentConservative10 hr. ago
Israel bans Zack Polanski after Green Party backs 'Zionism is racism' motion

Israel has banned Zack Polanski, the leader of the Green Party in England and Wales, from entering the country following the party's endorsement of a motion stating that 'Zionism is racism.' The Israeli government criticized the motion, claiming it legitimizes the destruction of Israel and violates the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism by denying the Jewish people's right to self-determination. As a result, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar declared Polanski ineligible to enter Israel under the country's Law of Return, which grants entry rights to individuals with Jewish ancestry. The decision highlights tensions over the characterization of Zionism and the implications of political stances on immigration policies.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Green Party's stance as antisemitic based on the IHRA definition, aligning with Israeli government rhetoric. It emphasizes the Israeli perspective without presenting counterarguments or alternative interpretations of the motion, suggesting a right-leaning framing.

BBC News (UK) logoBBC News (UK)State / PublicCenter10 hr. ago
Jewish Greens chair says she could leave party over 'Zionism is racism' motion

A member of the UK Green Party, who is also Jewish, has expressed concerns about leaving the party due to a proposed motion that states 'Zionism is racism.' The motion supports the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian state across all of historic Palestine, a stance that has caused division among senior members of the party.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally, highlighting the controversy surrounding the motion without taking a clear stance or using biased language. It reports on the internal debate within the Green Party without favoring any side.

The Guardian (UK) logoThe Guardian (UK)IndependentProgressiveyesterday
Green party votes to adopt policy that equates Zionism with racism

The UK Green Party has officially adopted a policy that equates Zionism with racism and advocates for replacing Israel with a single Palestinian state. This decision passed by a narrow margin of 1,022 to 813 votes at the party's conference in Brighton. The policy is strongly opposed by most Green MPs and is anticipated to face legal challenges. Zack Polanski, leader of the Greens in England and Wales, was absent during the vote as he campaigned in a byelection, drawing criticism for his handling of this contentious issue.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the adoption of a policy equating Zionism with racism and advocating for a single Palestinian state as a controversial and left-leaning stance within the UK Green Party. It highlights opposition from most MPs and potential legal challenges, but does not present balanced views or a

New Statesman logoNew StatesmanIndependentProgressiveyesterday
The Green Party’s Zionism reckoning

The New Statesman article discusses the Green Party's internal debate over its stance on Zionism. It highlights growing tensions within the party regarding its support for Israel and the Israeli government's policies, particularly in light of recent conflicts and humanitarian concerns. The piece explores how some members are calling for a reevaluation of the party's position, arguing that continued support for Israel contradicts the Greens' commitment to peace and human rights. Others defend the current stance, emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong ties with Israel. The article underscores the complexity of balancing ideological principles with geopolitical realities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discussion around the Green Party's stance on Zionism through a critical lens, highlighting calls for reevaluation and focusing on humanitarian and peace-oriented arguments. This aligns with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize human rights and critique of state actions.

The Economist logoThe EconomistIndependent🔒Progressiveyesterday
Britain’s Greens have voted, shamefully, to say Zionism is racism

The article discusses a statement by the UK Green Party which claimed that Zionism is a form of racism. The phrasing used in the headline and article suggests a critical stance toward Zionism, implying that it equates to racist behavior. This claim has been widely disputed, as most international organizations and governments do not classify Zionism as racism. The article appears to present this position as a controversial or incorrect viewpoint, potentially reflecting a biased perspective.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Green Party's statement as 'shameful,' suggesting a negative judgment of their position. This implies a left-leaning critique of Zionism, aligning with broader progressive narratives that often challenge traditional Israeli policies. The language used indicates a clear bias in

Novara Media logoNovara MediaIndependentProgressiveyesterday
Greens Pass ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion at Party Conference

At their largest-ever conference in Brighton, UK Green Party members passed a motion declaring Zionism as racism, making them the first mainstream British political party to take such a stance. The motion, supported by 1,022 votes to 813, calls for backing a single, democratic Palestinian state, supporting Palestinian political prisoners, opposing the Palestine Action ban, and affirming Palestinians' right to resistance. An amendment aimed at protecting Jewish members affiliated with Zionist institutions was rejected. Proponents argue the motion distinguishes between Judaism and Zionism and does not affect internal party discipline. The decision sparked controversy, with pro-Israel demonstrators protesting outside the conference, accusing the Greens of promoting racism. Internal divisions were evident, with senior figures like co-deputy leader Mothin Ali supporting the motion while former leader Caroline Lucas opposed it. Green Party policy has previously described Israeli actions as apartheid and genocide, and supports a full arms embargo and an end to occupation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the Greens' motion condemning Zionism as racism, a position aligned with progressive and leftist perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The framing emphasizes the ideological distinction between Zionism and Judaism, aligns with anti-colonial rhetoric, and reflects a '

The Guardian (UK) logoThe Guardian (UK)IndependentProgressive2 days ago
What is Zionism and why do some critics describe it as racist?

The article discusses a debate within the Green Party regarding a motion that describes 'Zionism as racism.' It highlights the controversy surrounding the definition and historical context of Zionism, noting that some critics view it as racist. Zack Polanski, the leader of the Green Party, identifies as an anti-Zionist. The piece explores the broader implications of labeling Zionism as racist and examines the contested nature of the term. The discussion reflects ongoing tensions around the interpretation of historical and political movements.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the debate around the Green Party's stance against Zionism, which aligns with progressive and leftist perspectives. It emphasizes the critique of Zionism as racist, suggesting a left-leaning perspective by highlighting the controversial claims made by certain groups. The focus on

Novara Media logoNovara MediaIndependentProgressive3 days ago
Zack Polanski Promises Rent Controls at Tense Party Conference

At the Green Party conference, Zack Polanski proposed implementing a 3-year cap on private rents as a measure to address housing affordability. Meanwhile, tensions escalated over a controversial motion seeking to equate Zionism with racism, sparking debate among attendees. In parallel, fires broke out in French schools amid student protests focused on funding and facility conditions. Additionally, Suella Braverman's claim that only white individuals can be considered English was met with strong criticism during a Question Time session. The discussion featured contributions from several commentators including Michael Walker, Clare Hymer, Molly Harris, and Cole Stangler.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Zack Polanski's proposal for rent controls as a progressive stance aimed at addressing housing inequality, aligning with left-wing economic policies. The mention of the contentious Zionism-racism motion suggests a focus on social justice issues often associated with leftist values

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories