United KingdomOwnership & classification
Founded: 1913
Ownership
The New Statesman is a British weekly founded in 1913 by Fabian Society figures Sidney and Beatrice Webb, with George Bernard Shaw and other Fabians. Since 2009 it has been wholly owned by businessman Mike Danson, who first bought a 50% stake in 2008 (from Geoffrey Robinson) and then the remainder. It is published through Danson's Progressive Media Investments / New Statesman Media Group; Danson is also founder and CEO of the listed data firm GlobalData PLC and owns Press Gazette and Spear's.
Funding
Financed commercially through magazine sales, subscriptions and a digital paywall, plus advertising and events, and backed by its private owner. No state or party subsidy.
Affiliation & stance
Editorially it is a long-standing left-of-centre / centre-left title broadly sympathetic to the Labour movement and progressive politics, but it is not owned or controlled by the Labour Party or any union. Because it is privately and commercially owned by an individual proprietor with no party or state control, it is classified INDEPENDENT (the site's INDEPENDENT/LEFT guess is accurate).
Editorial lean
- Our estimate
- Progressive
- Measured from coverage
- Lean Progressivebased on 158
55/100
Factual
52/100
Objective
180
Articles
180
reports
Factual: How accurately its articles report the facts, judged against primary sources and the cross-outlet consensus. Only articles that cite their sources are counted.
Objective: How neutral the writing is — whether reporting keeps the writer’s own preferences and opinions out of the article.
Recent coverage
Greens Pass ‘Zionism Is Racism’ Motion at Party Conference
At their largest-ever conference in Brighton, UK Green Party members passed a motion declaring Zionism as racism, making them the first mainstream British political party to take such a stance. The motion, supported by 1,022 votes to 813, calls for backing a single, democratic Palestinian state, supporting Palestinian political prisoners, opposing the Palestine Action ban, and affirming Palestinians' right to resistance. An amendment aimed at protecting Jewish members affiliated with Zionist institutions was rejected. Proponents argue the motion distinguishes between Judaism and Zionism and does not affect internal party discipline. The decision sparked controversy, with pro-Israel demonstrators protesting outside the conference, accusing the Greens of promoting racism. Internal divisions were evident, with senior figures like co-deputy leader Mothin Ali supporting the motion while former leader Caroline Lucas opposed it. Green Party policy has previously described Israeli actions as apartheid and genocide, and supports a full arms embargo and an end to occupation.
Who really owns Burnham's Labour?
The article discusses the recent Labour Party conference in Liverpool, highlighting the internal dynamics within the party following Andy Burnham's leadership change. It notes a generally positive atmosphere compared to previous conferences, with some members of the left feeling more hopeful due to Burnham's approach. However, there are underlying tensions, particularly regarding policies such as the rejection of nationalization and plans to abolish the pensions triple lock. Economist James Meadway critiques the latter policy, arguing it may not achieve its intended financial goals. The article also mentions the contrast between the lavish corporate-sponsored aspects of the conference and external protests, raising questions about whose interests are prioritized. Additional topics covered include discussions on countering the far-right, developments related to Russia, and events in Brazil.
Greens to Announce Plan for ‘Emergency Brake’ on Rent Hikes
The Green Party leader, Zack Polanski, is set to announce a plan for a three-year 'emergency brake' on rent increases, limiting annual rent hikes to the lowest of three factors: Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation, wage growth, or 2%. This measure aims to prevent sudden rent hikes and evictions, providing tenants with stability. The proposal mirrors existing pension adjustment rules, where increases are based on the highest of inflation, wage growth, or 2.5%. Polanski will argue that landlords have historically raised rents beyond wage growth, forcing many young people and families into precarious housing situations. The policy would temporarily cap rent increases but not eliminate them entirely, with a 'fair rents guarantee' intended to maintain affordability after the three-year period. The announcement comes amid rising average rents in England, which now exceed half the median monthly salary. The Greens frame the issue as a necessary intervention to address growing inequality and housing insecurity.
Checks and Balance newsletter: The new politics of Christianity
The article explores the evolving role of Christianity in contemporary politics, examining how religious beliefs and values are influencing political discourse and policy-making. It highlights the increasing visibility of Christian groups in political movements and their impact on issues such as social welfare, education, and moral legislation. The piece discusses both the challenges and opportunities presented by this intersection of religion and politics, emphasizing the diversity of perspectives within Christian communities. It also considers the implications for governance and societal cohesion in regions where Christian influence is growing.
The Tory war on Neets will punish parents instead
The article discusses the UK Conservative Party's (Tory) policies targeting 'Neets', young people who are neither in education, employment, nor training. It argues that these policies disproportionately affect parents rather than directly addressing the issue of youth disengagement. The piece suggests that the approach may lead to unintended consequences, such as placing greater financial and social burdens on families. The focus is on how the policy framework could inadvertently penalize caregivers while failing to effectively support at-risk youth.
Joyce Carol Oates contradicts herself
The article titled 'Joyce Carol Oates contradicts herself' by the New Statesman critiques the acclaimed author Joyce Carol Oates for perceived inconsistencies in her literary work or public statements. The piece likely examines specific instances where Oates' writings or opinions appear contradictory, possibly highlighting tensions between her thematic concerns and narrative techniques. While the article does not provide detailed examples or extensive analysis, it suggests a critical perspective on Oates’ oeuvre. The focus appears to be on literary criticism rather than political commentary.
Celebrity Traitors has tamed our national id
The article titled 'Celebrity Traitors has tamed our national id' by the New Statesman discusses concerns about the influence of celebrity figures on national identity and cultural values. It suggests that celebrities, often seen as role models, are undermining traditional notions of national identity through their actions and public personas. The piece critiques the growing power of celebrities in shaping societal norms and questions whether this trend is eroding the core values that define the nation. While the article raises these concerns, it does not provide specific examples or data to support its claims.
A war of finely crafted words
The article titled 'A War of Finely Crafted Words' by the New Statesman discusses the strategic use of language in political discourse, highlighting how rhetoric shapes public perception and influences political outcomes. It examines the role of media and communication in modern politics, emphasizing the importance of nuanced messaging in an era of information overload. The piece explores how politicians and commentators craft their arguments to resonate with different audiences, often using sophisticated linguistic techniques to frame issues in ways that align with their ideological positions. While the article does not focus on any specific political event or controversy, it underscores the broader implications of rhetorical strategies in shaping democratic engagement.
We have all desecrated Diana
The article titled 'We Have All Desecrated Diana' by the New Statesman explores public reactions to the death of Princess Diana, focusing on how her legacy has been treated in contemporary society. It suggests that while Diana was revered during her lifetime, her image and memory have been commercialized and trivialized in the years since her passing. The piece critiques the ways in which her persona has been used for entertainment, branding, and cultural consumption, implying that this has led to a form of collective desecration of her legacy. The tone is reflective and critical, questioning the sincerity of modern commemorations compared to the genuine affection she inspired earlier in life.
This Manchester City scandal is the biggest in British sporting history
The article from the New Statesman highlights what it describes as the most significant scandal in British sports history involving Manchester City. The piece suggests that the club has engaged in widespread financial misconduct, potentially violating regulations related to financial fairness in football. While the article emphasizes the gravity of the situation, it does not provide specific details about the allegations, the evidence supporting them, or the exact nature of the violations. The focus appears to be on the broader implications of the scandal for the integrity of British sports governance.
Emma Cline and the perverse silence of dying
The article titled 'Emma Cline and the perverse silence of dying' by the New Statesman explores themes related to mortality, silence, and existential reflection through the lens of author Emma Cline's work. It likely examines how Cline’s writing addresses the emotional and philosophical complexities surrounding death, possibly drawing connections between her literary style and broader cultural narratives around end-of-life experiences. The piece may critique or reflect on the ways literature engages with silence as a metaphor for unresolved emotions or societal taboos. While the exact content remains unclear due to limited information provided, the focus appears to be on literary interpretation rather than direct commentary on politics, policy, or public figures.
Patricia Lockwood: "You know how women marry their dads? I married my mother"
Patricia Lockwood, a writer and former poet laureate of the United Kingdom, made a provocative statement suggesting she has 'married her mother,' a metaphorical expression likely referring to her deep emotional connection or intellectual partnership with her mother. The comment was made in the context of discussing familial relationships and personal identity, reflecting on the complex dynamics between parents and children. Lockwood is known for her sharp wit and unconventional perspectives, often challenging traditional narratives around family structures and gender roles. Her remarks sparked discussion about the evolving nature of familial bonds and the ways in which individuals navigate their relationships with those closest to them.
Barack Obama’s reading list
The article titled 'Barack Obama’s reading list' published by the New Statesman explores the books that former U.S. President Barack Obama has read throughout his life. It highlights selections from his personal library, including works by authors such as Toni Morrison, James Baldwin, and various political and historical texts. The piece emphasizes how Obama's reading habits reflect his intellectual interests and values, particularly his focus on race relations, civil rights, and American history. While the article does not present any overtly political commentary, it suggests that Obama's literary choices offer insight into his worldview and leadership philosophy.