ON
← Back to feed
Last year, 594 fireworks were held in Croatia, and animal lovers are calling for strict restrictions.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9 days ago

Last year, 594 fireworks were held in Croatia, and animal lovers are calling for strict restrictions.

The article discusses the issue of fireworks in Croatia, highlighting concerns raised by the animal protection organization 'Prijatelji životinja.' According to data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 594 public fireworks were held in Croatia in 2024, averaging more than one per day, with peaks in July and August. The organization advocates for stricter regulations, proposing a limit of up to three fireworks per year per local community and calls for national legislation to standardize safety measures. They argue that firework-related risks to people, animals, property, and nature should not depend solely on individual decisions by local firefighting units. The group also criticizes the term 'public fireworks' as misleading, noting many such events serve private celebrations like weddings and tourist gatherings. They further request a ban on 'fireworks days,' which allow pyrotechnics from December 27th to January 1st, arguing that festive occasions occur only around New Year’s. Their main demands include banning loud pyrotechnics as powerful as or stronger than banned firecrackers, prohibiting the sale of pyrotechnics in mixed goods stores, and limiting light pyrotechnics to a

The town of Crikvenica has canceled its planned fireworks display scheduled for tonight as a show of solidarity with Omis, which is currently grappling with a major fire. The decision was made in coordination with the Local Fire Department of Crikvenica. The cancellation comes amid growing concerns over the risks associated with pyrotechnics during the summer months, particularly in light of the ongoing crisis in Omis. According to officials from the City of Crikvenica, the decision reflects a commitment to demonstrating empathy, responsibility, and support for communities affected by such disasters. In a statement, the city expressed its solidarity with the residents of Omis and all emergency services working to mitigate the consequences of the large-scale fire affecting the area. The message extended gratitude to firefighters, members of emergency services, and residents in vulnerable areas. Despite the cancellation of the fireworks, other events and activities planned as part of the celebration will proceed according to schedule. The decision follows a series of public appeals and criticism on social media platforms regarding the potential dangers posed by fireworks during the peak of the fire season. Many users expressed concern over the unnecessary risk to human lives, animals, and the environment, emphasizing that such displays could exacerbate existing threats. These sentiments were echoed in comments left under posts announcing the event, with several individuals expressing disappointment and urging the organizers to reconsider the decision due to the current situation in Omis. The local government's response to these concerns highlights a broader trend in Croatia regarding the regulation of fireworks. According to data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 594 public fireworks were held across Croatia in 2024, averaging more than one per day. The highest number occurred in July (117) and August (113). This frequency has raised questions about the necessity and safety of such events, especially given the increasing awareness of their environmental and health impacts. Animal rights group "Friends of Animals" has been advocating for stricter regulations on fireworks, proposing legal amendments to limit the number of annual fireworks per community to a maximum of three. They argue that the current reliance on individual decisions by local fire departments is insufficient to ensure comprehensive protection for people, animals, property, and nature from the effects of pyrotechnics. The group praised the recent decision by Istrian fire brigades to suspend permits for fireworks due to fire risks, calling for similar measures nationwide. The group also highlighted the misleading term "public fireworks," noting that many such events serve private celebrations such as weddings, tourist events, and welcome parties for guests. They pointed out that complaints from residents of tourist areas have become increasingly common during the summer months, citing disturbances, fear among animals, and environmental pollution caused by frequent fireworks displays. In addition to limiting the number of fireworks, the group is pushing for a ban on so-called "fireworks days," which allow the use of pyrotechnics throughout the period from December 27 to January 1, despite the fact that the actual reason for celebration exists only on New Year’s Eve. The incident in Crikvenica underscores the tension between cultural traditions and contemporary safety concerns. While the city's decision to cancel the fireworks was framed as an act of solidarity with Omis, it also reflects a growing awareness of the risks associated with pyrotechnic displays during periods of heightened fire danger. As discussions around the regulation of fireworks continue, the balance between preserving cultural practices and ensuring public safety remains a critical issue for policymakers and communities alike.

6 reports

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago
Crikvenica is cancelling tonight's fireworks in solidarity with Omiš.

The city of Crikvenica has canceled its planned fireworks display scheduled for the evening, as part of a solidarity gesture towards the residents of Omis, who are dealing with the aftermath of a large fire in the area. The decision was made in consultation with the Public Fire Department of Crikvenica. Authorities emphasized the importance of showing empathy, responsibility, and support to affected communities during this difficult time. They expressed solidarity with firefighters, emergency services personnel, and residents in the impacted areas. Other parts of the event schedule remain unchanged.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update regarding a local administrative decision made in coordination with public authorities. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on partisan perspectives. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the practical implications of canceling the event and the表态的

Why factuality (85): This article provides clear, direct information about the cancellation of the fireworks display in Crikvenica, citing the city’s decision made in consultation with the Fire Department. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus regarding the reason (solidarity with Omiš) and the outcome (fire

Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the city’s official stance and acknowledges public reaction, it maintains a neutral tone by focusing on factual statements and avoiding emotionally charged language. However, it does include some subjective expressions such as 'važno pokazati suosjećanje,' which slightly t

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7512 days ago
Last year, 594 fireworks were held in Croatia, and animal lovers are calling for strict restrictions.

The article discusses the issue of fireworks in Croatia, highlighting concerns raised by the animal protection organization 'Prijatelji životinja.' According to data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 594 public fireworks were held in Croatia in 2024, averaging more than one per day, with peaks in July and August. The organization advocates for stricter regulations, proposing a limit of up to three fireworks per year per local community and calls for national legislation to standardize safety measures. They argue that firework-related risks to people, animals, property, and nature should not depend solely on individual decisions by local firefighting units. The group also criticizes the term 'public fireworks' as misleading, noting many such events serve private celebrations like weddings and tourist gatherings. They further request a ban on 'fireworks days,' which allow pyrotechnics from December 27th to January 1st, arguing that festive occasions occur only around New Year’s. Their main demands include banning loud pyrotechnics as powerful as or stronger than banned firecrackers, prohibiting the sale of pyrotechnics in mixed goods stores, and limiting light pyrotechnics to a

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of fireworks regulation as a matter of public safety and environmental protection, aligning with progressive values. It emphasizes the need for national legislation over localized decisions, suggesting a broader societal concern. The focus on protecting animals and the呼吁

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the number of fireworks held in Croatia in 2024 as per data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs. It also reflects the position of the Animal Friends organization and aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding their call for stricter regulations. The article doe

Why objectivity (75): The tone is supportive of the Animal Friends' stance but presents their arguments as reasonable and backed by fire departments. While it remains neutral in reporting facts, there is a slight leaning towards supporting the organization’s calls for regulation.

tportal logotportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7012 days ago
Animal lovers are calling for a limit on fireworks and a ban on noisy pyrotechnics

The article reports that according to data from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 594 public fireworks displays were held in Croatia during 2024, averaging more than one per day, with the highest numbers in July and August. Friends of Animals propose legal changes to limit fireworks to a maximum of three annually per local community and highlight support for stricter regulation from the Croatian Firefighters' Association. They argue that protection of people, animals, property, and nature from fireworks consequences should not rely solely on individual decisions by local fire departments. The group criticizes the term 'public fireworks' as misleading, noting many are used for private celebrations like weddings and tourist events. They also report frequent complaints from residents in tourist areas about weekly fireworks causing disturbance, fear for animals, and environmental pollution. Their main demands include a complete ban on loud fireworks equal to or stronger than banned firecrackers, prohibition of advertising and selling fireworks in mixed goods stores, and limiting light fireworks usage to two hours on New Year’s Eve.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a necessary regulatory action supported by the Firefighters' Association, emphasizing the need for national legislation rather than localized decisions. It highlights concerns over environmental impact, animal welfare, and public nuisance, which align with progressive

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the first in content, providing the same statistics and quoting the same statements from the Animal Friends organization. It maintains consistency with the cross-source consensus and does not add any conflicting or unsupported claims.

Why objectivity (70): The article has a more direct advocacy tone, especially when discussing the proposed legal changes and the call for banning loud pyrotechnics. While factual content is consistent, the phrasing suggests support for the organization’s demands rather than presenting both sides equally.

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 709 days ago
VIDEO In Crikvenica, the fireworks were cancelled because of Omis, performed by Tony Cetinski

A fireworks display planned as part of a concert celebrating the city of Crikvenica was canceled in solidarity with Omis, which suffered severe damage from a large fire. The event featured performances by Tony Cetinski and Ivana Kindl. Local authorities decided to cancel the fireworks after consulting with the municipal fire department. They stated the decision was made to show support for the people of Omis and those working to address the aftermath of the fire. The organizers expressed gratitude to attendees and extended their support to firefighters, emergency services, and residents affected by the disaster.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral account of the cancellation of the fireworks display due to solidarity with Omis after a fire. It includes statements from local authorities and does not exhibit biased language or one-sided sourcing. The focus is on the community's response rather than any political立场

Why factuality (80): The article confirms the cancellation of the fireworks display and attributes it to the city’s decision in collaboration with the Fire Department, similar to the previous article. It also mentions the concert by Tony Cetinski and the attendance, which adds contextual detail. The content is largely c

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, though it includes some promotional language ('Naša reporterka javlja') and focuses more on the event itself rather than the underlying reasons for the cancellation. This slight shift toward event coverage reduces overall objectivity compared to the more focused

Večernji list logoVečernji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 859 days ago
The town of Crikvenica postponed the traditional fireworks because of the horror in Omiš: 'We think it's important to show compassion in these moments'

The city of Crikvenica, in cooperation with the Public Fire Department of Crikvenica, has decided to cancel the fireworks display originally planned as part of its festival program. The decision follows concerns raised by residents and social networks regarding the tragic fire in Omis, which caused widespread fear and disruption. The cancellation was made as a gesture of solidarity with the people of Omis and emergency services dealing with the aftermath. The city expressed hope that this action would show empathy, responsibility, and support for communities facing difficult times. The rest of the event program, including concerts by Tony Cetinski and Ivana Kindl, remains scheduled for tonight at 21:15.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision to cancel the fireworks display as a community-driven response to a local tragedy, emphasizing solidarity and empathy rather than partisan politics. While the issue involves local governance and public safety, the framing focuses on collective sentiment and civic责任,

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that the city of Crikvenica canceled its fireworks display due to the fire in Omis, citing community solidarity as the reason. It includes direct quotes from the official statement and provides context about the planned events. However, it lacks specific details about

Why objectivity (85): The tone is generally neutral and respectful, focusing on the decision made by the city authorities and quoting their official statement. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though the emphasis on 'solidarity' may subtly frame the decision as a moral choice rather than a purely logistical

tportal logotportalIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 559 days ago
Crikvenica is celebrating its birthday tonight, but one thing has been cancelled because of the anger of the citizens: 'Out of all sense'

The town of Crikvenica celebrated its birthday with a planned fireworks display, but organizers canceled the event due to public backlash over recent wildfires in Omis. The local tourism association initially announced a festive evening featuring music and fireworks on social media, but comments from residents criticized the risk of fire during the summer season. Concerns were heightened by the ongoing situation in Omis, where a body was found on a burn site. In response to widespread criticism, the organizers withdrew the fireworks plan and confirmed they would proceed with the rest of the program as scheduled.

Bias read (Center): While the issue involves public safety and local governance, the article presents a balanced account of community concerns versus the organizers’ decision-making process. There is no clear ideological slant toward either side, and the framing remains neutral, focusing on factual developments rather

Why factuality (65): The article reports on the cancellation of a fireworks display in Crikvenica due to public backlash and concerns over fire risks, particularly referencing the situation in Omiš. It includes quotes from social media comments expressing concern about fire safety and the impact of wildfires. While the

Why objectivity (55): The tone leans towards presenting public sentiment as justification for the cancellation, using emotionally charged phrases like 'van svake pameti' and quoting inflammatory comments. The article frames the decision as a response to community outrage, which introduces bias by emphasizing public opini

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories