The two former pimps are back in Poljud, overwhelmed with emotion: "This stadium is my dream... "
Two former players of Hajduk, Marko Capan and Petar Bosančić, have returned to play against their old club at the Poljud stadium. They expressed strong emotions about being back at the stadium, which they consider a dream place. The pair, now playing for another team, aim to make amends for their previous loss to Hajduk by performing well in this match. Both players emphasized the emotional significance of returning to Poljud and acknowledged the challenge of facing Hajduk again. They discussed their expectations for the game, noting that while the situation appears similar to past encounters, the atmosphere and pressure will be intense. They also reflected on their time with Hajduk and confirmed that they do not hold any grudges toward the club.
Two former Hajduk players returned to Poljud, overwhelmed with emotions: “This stadium is my dream…” Marko Capan and Petar Bosančić, both former Hajduk players who have since joined Žalgiris, made their return to Poljud ahead of their crucial second-leg match against Hajduk in the third qualifying round of the Conference League. The pair expressed deep emotional connections to the stadium, which they once called home. Their presence stirred memories of past glory, even though they now wear different colors. Capan and Bosančić emphasized that despite the 2:5 deficit from the first leg, they were determined to fight back and show their current team's strength. Capan reflected on his return to Poljud, stating, “I’m very happy to be back here again, a place that has always been my dream. Now I’m wearing green, but life moves on. The result from the first game wasn’t great, but we want to perform better this time.” Bosančić echoed similar sentiments, saying, “I share Marko’s joy. It feels special coming back after half a year. This place holds powerful emotions, and I’m really happy to be here.” When asked about expectations for the upcoming match, Bosančić acknowledged the challenge posed by playing against Hajduk. He noted, “On paper, it looks familiar, but everyone knows how tough it will be against Hajduk. They’ll have to come back into our lives. I know the situation well and am ready. But we still have more to say.” Capan added, “We need to focus on playing a solid match, maybe scoring early. We shouldn’t rush, but take things step by step. That could give us a chance.” The pair recalled some of their favorite memories at Poljud. “We grew up here, but we’d say it was our debut for senior Hajduk,” they remarked. When questioned whether Capan might one day return to Poljud, he replied, “Not right now, and I’ve had some serious injuries. But I would definitely be happy to come back here someday.” Capan denied holding any grudge toward Hajduk, explaining, “No, I don’t hold anything against them. Injuries have been tough, and I came to Žalgiris because I needed playing time. But I want to show I’m still a good player.” Regarding the atmosphere at Poljud, Capan described it as difficult to articulate, but warned opponents, “We’ve told everyone to expect a madhouse at the stadium and to play their best football.” Both players watched Hajduk’s recent match against Istria, noting that while Hajduk played better overall, they failed to secure a win. “They’ll surely want to regain their confidence against us,” Capan said. Bosančić added, “Of course I watched, I spent three years there. It ended the way it did, maybe not the best for fans, but that’s just how it is.” Andrius Skerle, another key figure, commented on the previous match against Dinamo Tbilisi, calling it a rare occurrence. “It doesn’t happen often, and Hajduk is totally different from Dinamo. Miracles can happen, but…” he concluded. Meanwhile, Hajduk continued its strong performance in European competition, securing two wins against Žalgiris to advance to the Conference League playoffs. The team’s young star, Anđelo Šutalo, who recently joined from Dinamo, drew praise from the crowd at Poljud. Despite not scoring, Šutalo’s contributions were vital, including an assist for the opening goal. His performance earned him loud applause from the fans as he left the field. Hajduk coach Gonzalo Garcia confirmed changes to the lineup for the return match, aiming to refresh the squad due to the demanding schedule. “The schedule is tight, physically and mentally exhausting. So we’re making a few changes, giving some players with less minutes a chance,” he stated. Garcia highlighted the team’s ability to perform well when at their peak, acknowledging the challenges of maintaining consistency amid numerous matches. The expected starting XI includes Toni Silić in goal, with Mathieu Acapandie, Dario Marešić, Ron Raçi, and Dario Melnjak forming the defense. Midfielders Alberto Del Moral and Adrion Pajaziti will support Anđelo Šutalo, Dalisson, and Marin Šotiček. Up front, captain Marko Livaja leads the attack, replacing Bambe in the first 11. Del Moral takes over from Rokas Puksta, while Melnjak and Raçi replace Šimun Hrgović and Alec van Hoorenbeeck. As the match approaches, anticipation builds among fans and players alike, with all eyes on Poljud for what promises to be a dramatic encounter.
Advertisement
Go to the primary sources (4)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Two former players of Hajduk, Marko Capan and Petar Bosančić, have returned to play against their old club at the Poljud stadium. They expressed strong emotions about being back at the stadium, which they consider a dream place. The pair, now playing for another team, aim to make amends for their previous loss to Hajduk by performing well in this match. Both players emphasized the emotional significance of returning to Poljud and acknowledged the challenge of facing Hajduk again. They discussed their expectations for the game, noting that while the situation appears similar to past encounters, the atmosphere and pressure will be intense. They also reflected on their time with Hajduk and confirmed that they do not hold any grudges toward the club.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses solely on a sports event involving two former footballers returning to face their former club. There is no political commentary, framing, or bias evident in the content. It is purely descriptive of the athletes' feelings and expectations regarding the match.
Why factuality (95): This article provides detailed quotes from former Hajduk players Marko Capan and Petar Bosančić, giving insight into their emotions and motivations for playing against their old club. The facts presented are consistent with other sources and include relevant background on their careers.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the personal reflections of the players without showing clear favoritism or bias. It presents their statements neutrally and allows readers to draw their own conclusions.
Hajduk je postigao plasman u play-off ovosezonske Konferencijske lige nakon dvije pobjede protiv Litavskog Žalgirisa. U drugom susretu, koji se odigravao na stadionu Poljuda, Hajduk je pobijedio 4:0. Mladog igrača Anđela Šutala, koji je stigao iz Dinama, ističe njegova zasluzna performansa, uključujući asistenciju za Melnjaka i stvaranje problema obrani Litavaca. Nakon igre, Šutalo je primio velike ovacije od publike.
Bias read (Center): Tematika priče je sportska, pa je politički nabitost blizu nula. Stoga se ne može utvrditi politička boja. Vrijednosti su neutralne, bez evidentnog slanja ili ometanja konteksta.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Hajduk's qualification for the play-offs after defeating Žalgiris twice, mentioning the scorelines and key players involved. It also highlights Anđelo Šutalo's contribution despite him not scoring, aligning with the primary source's focus on the event itself.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while highlighting Hajduk's achievements. It presents facts objectively without overtly favoring one team over another, though it does emphasize the positive aspects of the victory and player performance.
Anđelo Šutalo, 19-godišnji nogometni igrač, je prvi put ovog ljeta nastupio od početka utakmice za Hajduk u meču protiv Žalgirisa, gdje je asistirao Dariju Melnjaku za vodeći pogodak. U pobjedi 4:0, Šutalo je bio aktivan, više puta ulazio u završnicu, i napustio je teren uz pljesak s tribine. Prošle sezone trenirao je u Dinamovoj juniorskoj momčadi Jerko Leko, koji je kasnije bio gost na podcastu 'Zona Dinamo', gdje je objasnio da je Šutalo odbacio ponudu Dinama za nastup u B momčadi i odabrao Hajduk. Leko je naveo da je Šutalo imao opciju i da je svoj odabir dao sam. Šutalo je prethodno bio u Dinamovoj akademiji četiri godine, a sada je potpisao ugovor do 2029. s Hajdukom i nastupao za hrvatsku U-19 reprezentaciju.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event involving a young footballer's transfer and training insights, which is considered apolitical. The content focuses on match performance, player development, and coaching perspectives without any overt ideological leaning. The tone remains neutral, presenting the
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the match details, including Šutalo's performance against Žalgirisa, his assist to Melnjak, and the team's overall result. It also includes quotes from Jerko Leko, who trained Šutalo at Dynamo, aligning with the primary source document. The article does not add any new
Why objectivity (75): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'ljubimac Poljuda' (beloved of Hajduk) and emphasizes Šutalo's transition from Dynamo to Hajduk, which may imply a positive spin. While it presents both sides of the story (Dynamo's perspective via Leko and Hajduk's offer), the tone leans slightl
The article reports on a football match between Hajduk and Žalgiris, scheduled for August 13, 2026, at 19:51 at Poljud stadium in Split. The headline suggests that Hajduk has a significant advantage, with Livaja potentially starting the game. However, the content provided is primarily a notice about user registration requirements for commenting on the article, rather than detailed match coverage. There is no substantive information about the match itself beyond the basic setup.
Bias read (Center): The article does not cover a politically charged subject. It focuses on a sports event but provides minimal detail about the match itself. Instead, it emphasizes website rules and user registration for comments, which is apolitical in nature.
Why factuality (70): The article provides basic match information but lacks depth in reporting specifics such as player actions or tactical decisions. The scoreline is correct, but there is limited analysis or context beyond the initial setup.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the match neutrally, focusing on the score and time without apparent bias. However, it includes registration requirements for comments, which may slightly affect neutrality.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
