Plenkovic with the ministers will be in Gospić soon.
Premijer Andrej Plenković i članovi vlade planiraju sastanak u Gospiću s predstavnicima lokalnih institucija i građanskih inicijativa u vezi s sanitacijom nelegalno odloženog otpada. Organizatorima prosvjeda, koji organiziraju prosvjed 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku', poručuje se da neće doći na sastanak, jer smatraju da cilj sastanka nije rješavanje problema, već saniranje političke štete. Plenković je ranije objasnio da neće prisustvovati prosvjedu zbog svoje konferencije u Italiji, ali istaknuo da se vlada bavi rješavanjem problema, a ne prosvjedima. Željka Rukavina iz Građanske inicijative 'Gospić je naš dom' navodi da su službeni pozivi za sastanak nisu dostavljeni, a da su informacije dobile putem medija.
Premier Andrej Plenković and members of his government will hold a meeting in Gospić tomorrow regarding the illegal disposal of hazardous waste in the area. The meeting, scheduled for 9 a.m. at the Ličko-Senjska County administration building, will involve representatives of relevant institutions, local authorities, and citizen initiatives. This comes just three days before the planned protest "Walk for Lika, Walk for Croatia," which is set to take place in Zagreb on Saturday, September 5. Daria Došen, a representative of the civic initiative "Gospić is Our Home," stated that her group has not received an official invitation to attend the meeting with Plenković. She emphasized that the initiative decided not to participate in the meeting because it occurs four days before the protest. According to Došen, the meeting does not address the core issue but instead aims to mitigate political damage. The initiative has been actively involved in addressing the issue of illegal waste disposal in Gospić, having written to the prime minister four times without receiving any response. They have proposed preventive measures and conducted research with experts, expressing willingness to engage in dialogue once the protest takes place. The situation involves nearly 37,000 tons of illegally dumped waste in Bilajska Street in Gospić. Experts from the Faculty of Geotechnics have determined that parts of the waste exhibit ecotoxic properties, heavily contaminating the soil with metals and destroying habitats irreversibly. Without proper remediation, there is a risk of further environmental contamination. The government claims to be addressing the issue seriously and structurally, stating that drinking water is safe and preparing models for waste removal and management. However, opposition groups argue that the government's actions are insufficient and politically motivated. Plenković mentioned that he would not attend the protest in Zagreb as he will be attending a conference in Italy. He noted that the government is focused on resolving the issue rather than participating in demonstrations. He also indicated that legal proceedings against those responsible for the illegal dumping have been initiated. Željka Rukavina from the "Gospić is Our Home" initiative stated that the group did not receive an official invitation to meet with the prime minister and only learned of the visit through media reports. She emphasized that the meeting should not occur before the protest, as it would undermine the message of the demonstration. The initiative expressed frustration over the lack of official communication and the perceived reluctance of authorities to address the issue directly. They stressed that the protest was necessary due to the failure of institutions to act within legal frameworks and international agreements. The meeting in Gospić is expected to focus on the steps being taken to clean up the illegally dumped waste. However, the initiative insists that meaningful discussions can only happen after the protest, when the public demands will be formally presented. They urge the government to listen to the citizens' concerns during the protest and commit to concrete actions afterward.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Daria Došen, članica građanske inicijative 'Gospić je naš dom', tvrdi da su članovi inicijative dobili službeni poziv na sastanak s premijerom Andrejem Plenkovićem u Gospiću, ali da nisu pristupili jer su bili zainteresirani za organizaciju prosvjeda protiv ilegalnih odlagališta opasnog otpada. Došen naglašava da su se takvi incidenti dogodili ranije, što pokazuje da državna vlast ne uspjeva odgovoriti na zahtjeve građana. Ona ističe da su aktivisti spremni za daljnje djelovanje, uključujući i prosvjede, ako institucije ne pristupe problemima.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a struggle between citizens and state institutions, emphasizing the lack of responsiveness from the government and highlighting grassroots efforts. The tone suggests frustration with institutional inertia and supports the activists' stance against environmental harm,傾
Why factuality (90): This article provides a comprehensive overview of the situation, including the meeting details, the citizen initiative’s refusal to participate, and the environmental impact of the illegal waste site. It cites the 37,000-ton estimate and the findings from the Geotechnical Faculty. All these facts ar
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both the government’s actions and the citizens’ concerns without overt bias. It avoids strong emotional language while still acknowledging the tension between the groups involved. The only minor deviation from full neutrality is the implica
Premijer Andrej Plenković stiže u Gospić, gdje će se sastati s ministrom, predstavnicima institucija i lokalnim vlasnicima o sanaciji ilegalno odloženog otpada. Građanska inicijativa 'Gospić je naš dom' odbijala je sudjelovanje na sastanku, smatrajući da Plenkovićov dolazak prije prosvjeda nije pokušaj rješavanja problema, već političke štete. Prosvjed, koji se zove 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku', traži hitno rješavanje problema i kritiku institucionalnog nepostupanja. U pozadini sukoba nalazi se slučaj ilegalno odloženog otpada u Bilajskoj ulici, koji je podvrgnut analizi i pokazao opasne ekološke posljedice.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel naglašava kritiku vlade i građanskog udruženja, koristi terminologiju koja podcrtava institucionalnu neodgovornost i političku štetu. Kritika vlade je direktna, dok se građanska inicijativa prikazuje kao pravična i aktivna strana. Također, akcent na prosvjed i traženje rješenja sugerira levi
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the amount of illegal waste (37,000 tons) and mentions the involvement of officials like Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and various ministers. It also references the technical assessment by the Faculty of Geotechnics regarding the environmental impact.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the situation neutrally, reporting both the government's actions and the protesters' stance. It avoids overtly biased language but does frame the event around the conflict between the government and citizens, which may subtly influence interpretation.
Premijer Andrej Plenković i članovi vlade planiraju sastanak u Gospiću s predstavnicima lokalnih institucija i građanskih inicijativa u vezi s sanitacijom nelegalno odloženog otpada. Organizatorima prosvjeda, koji organiziraju prosvjed 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku', poručuje se da neće doći na sastanak, jer smatraju da cilj sastanka nije rješavanje problema, već saniranje političke štete. Plenković je ranije objasnio da neće prisustvovati prosvjedu zbog svoje konferencije u Italiji, ali istaknuo da se vlada bavi rješavanjem problema, a ne prosvjedima. Željka Rukavina iz Građanske inicijative 'Gospić je naš dom' navodi da su službeni pozivi za sastanak nisu dostavljeni, a da su informacije dobile putem medija.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the government's actions and the perspective of civil initiatives, without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the planned meeting between the premier and local representatives, while also including the stance of the protest organizers who feel the meeting is more a
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about Premier Plenković’s planned visit to Gospić, including the participants, time, location, and context around the waste management issue. It also includes quotes from Plenković regarding his absence from a protest and mentions ongoing legal actions. Whil
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat informal and includes direct quotes from Plenković that reflect his personal stance. The article frames the situation as one where the government is actively addressing the issue rather than engaging in protests, which introduces a slight bias towards the government's position.
Premijer Andrej Plenković i članovi vlade dolaze u Gospić sutra na sastanak o sanaciji nelegalno odloženog otpada, što dolazi uoči velikog prosvjeda 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' koji će se održati u Zagrebu 5. rujna. Građanska inicijativa 'Gospić je naš dom' kritizira nedostatak transparentnosti i poštovanja građana, navodeći da su vlasti promijenile modele sanacije bez obavijesti i da su relativizirali njihove zahteve. Inicijativa zahtijeva da premijer čuje zahteve naroda i donese konkretne odluke prije prosvjeda.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government's actions as politically motivated and lacking transparency, emphasizing the citizens' demands and criticizing the lack of respect for their concerns. The tone suggests a left-leaning perspective by highlighting grassroots activism and questioning the motives behind
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and ministers will attend a meeting in Gospić regarding illegal waste disposal. It includes specific details such as the time (9:00 AM) and location (Ličko-senjska županija offices). However, some statements from the 'Gospić je naš
Why objectivity (65): The article presents information objectively at first, but later sections include emotionally charged language from the citizen initiative, such as 'Histeriziramo' and 'Narod je ustao!' These phrases suggest an activist tone rather than neutral reporting. While the factual content is largely accurat
The article reports that Daria Došen, a member of the civic initiative 'Gospić is Our Home,' claims that her group did not receive an official invitation to a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković ahead of his visit to Gospić. The visit is scheduled three days before a planned protest in Zagreb against an illegal hazardous waste landfill site in Gospić. The report includes a video interview with Došen and mentions ongoing discussions around the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights concerns raised by a civic group regarding lack of access to government officials, which aligns with left-leaning narratives emphasizing transparency and accountability. The focus on a protest against environmental policies suggests a critical stance toward current governance,
Why factuality (80): This article confirms the meeting between Plenković and officials in Gospić and accurately reports that the 'Gospić je naš dom' initiative did not receive an official invitation. It also mentions the planned protest in Zagreb and the group’s decision not to attend the meeting. The facts align with t
Why objectivity (60): The article leans toward the perspective of the citizen initiative, quoting them extensively and presenting their viewpoint as the main narrative. While it does not fabricate facts, it lacks balance by not providing counterpoints from the government or local authorities. This results in a somewhat b
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
